5) Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerptExecutive Mansion,
Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question 5) Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerptExecutive Mansion, Washington,April 4, 1864. A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.My Dear Sir: You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows: I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power. I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution? By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether. When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident…Yours truly,A. LincolnBased on the letter, what was Lincoln’s position on the Constitution?1) It was more important than his own beliefs.2) It was secondary to states’ rights.3) It could only work as long as there was unity.4) It would only have power if the president was neutral.6) Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerptExecutive Mansion, Washington, April 4, 1864. A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.My Dear Sir: You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows: I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power. I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution? By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether. When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident…Yours truly,A. LincolnIn the lines in bold, President Lincoln describes pursuing compensated emancipation. How did the Border States respond?1) They rejected it.2) They accepted it.3) They did not respond.4) They armed themselves.
Philadelphia was in the national spotlight last summer because of
Question Philadelphia was in the national spotlight last summer because of juvenile crime and the mayor’s response to it. Specifically, groups of teens were participating in “flash mobs” organized through social media and text messages. These mobs of teenagers, sometimes meeting without a goal in mind, ended up being involved in various illegal activities, such as assaulting people at random or stealing from stores in Philadelphia’s tourist and shopping districts. The mayor, Michael A. Nutter, spoke out sharply against these youth and their behaviors. He also took aim at the teenagers’ parents, saying that being a “human ATM” or “sperm donor” will not suffice for being a parent, and that parents “need to get a hold of [their] kids before we have to” (Simon, Philadelphia Inquirer, Aug. 7). Nutter emphasized that he believes that problems like these flash mobs are stemming from the homes and parents need to take more responsibility for their children (CNN.com, Aug. 9). Nutter certainly has the law on his side. Philadelphia, like many other cities, can impose penalties on the parents when their children are out past the city curfew. In Philadelphia, the parents receive a warning for the first violation, up to a $150 fine for a second violation, and $300 to $500 fines for subsequent violations. After two or more violations, each repeat offense can result in up to a $300 fine and/or up to 90 days in jail for the parents. A number of other cities have similar laws that penalize parents for their children’s actions.
8) Read this sentence from Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address:.
Question 8) Read this sentence from Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address:. . . let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation’s wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan – to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.What does the word cherish mean as used in this sentence?1) Adore2) Harbor3) Idolize4) Nurture9) Read this sentence from Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address:It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces; but let us judge not that we be not judged.To what does the phrase sweat of other men’s faces refer?1) The moisture of exertion2) The owners of plantations3) The suggestion of work4) The toil of slaves10) Read this sentence from Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address:He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, . . .Which of the following best describes the effect of the word woe in this sentence?1) It suggests helping and hope.2) It suggests relief and respite.3) It suggests suffering and grief.4) It suggests working and labor.
Please give me ideas for composing a memo to future
Question Please give me ideas for composing a memo to future 100WB online students. The purpose is to inform your audience on what to prepare for (particularly in an online-only setting), and what you have learned in the course. Include any additional insight.
Please help review itPro Immigration Essay /> A common argument
Question Please help review itPro Immigration Essay /> A common argument among those opposing further immigration is that foreigners take U.S. jobs and cause unemployment among the displaced American workers. In the July 13, 1992 edition of Business Week , a poll states that sixty-two percent of non-blacks and sixty-three percent of blacks agree that “new immigrants take jobs away from American workers.” This is a widely held, if erroneous belief, among Americans. However, Julian L. Simon, author of The Economic Consequences of Immigration, states: immigration does not exacerbate unemployment…Immigrants not only take jobs, but also create them. Their purchases increase the demand for labor, leading to new hires roughly equal in number to the immigrant workers. In the same Business Week poll, eighty-three percent of non-blacks and eighty-seven percent of blacks agree that “many new immigrants are very hard-working.” The results of the poll may seem somewhat contradictory, but not necessarily negative. Those polled seem to be at least a little open-minded in their view of the quality of new immigrants. However, in order to overcome their distrust of foreigners, Americans must abandon their suspicions and recognize, as Simon has, that our lives are enhanced by immigrants creating, not taking, U.S. jobs. A widely held belief among Americans against immigration is that foreigners “strain social service budgets.” According to the same poll, sixty-two percent of non-blacks and fifty-nine percent of blacks agree “immigrants use more than their fair share of government services, such as welfare, medical care, and food stamps.” This belief has its roots in the nineteenth- century, when “one of the first immigration laws was designed to exclude the entry of people likely to become a ‘public Charge’,” according to the CQ Researcher These beliefs are misguided and more than likely attributable to illegal immigration, which is not an issue on this topic. In actuality, immigrants are young and healthy when they arrive, and therefore, “do not receive expensive Social Security and other aid to the aged,” according to Simon. In fact, Americans should be thankful for immigrants as they “contribute more to the public coffers in taxes than they draw out in welfare services” and put “about $2,500 into the pockets of natives” from excess taxes. They are, in fact, raising the quality of life of those dependant of the social services. In his nationally syndicated column, Pat Buchanan, a past Presidential candidate, wrote “immigration should be suspended to preserve the nation.” This appears to be a case of “the pot calling the kettle black.” Buchanan’s ancestors had to have immigrated from somewhere, so should they have been kept from immigrating “to preserve the nation”? According to Buchanan’s statistics, the U.S. is currently seventy-five percent white, twelve percent black, nine percent Hispanic, and the rest mostly Asian-American. By mid-twenty-first century, “whites may be near a minority in an America of eighty-one million Hispanics, sixty-two million blacks, and forty-one million Asians.” Again, should their immigration be suspended to preserve a white majority? Buchanan seems to equate “white” with “American,” and “Hispanic, black, and Asian” with “foreigner.” Unfortunately, Mr. Buchanan is not alone in his opinions. The fear of encroachment by foreign-born Americans is a common one. However, they also bring with them valuable technical knowledge and skills, as well as being “fifty percent more likely…to have post-graduate educations” than Americans, according to Simon. The traditionalists opposing immigration must recognize our lives are enhanced by their knowledge and education, and that in order to “preserve our nation”, they must realize we are a “nation of immigrants” and let others prove their worth. The issue of immigration must be dealt with rationally, not emotionally. Facts, figures, and statistics must be studied by both sides in order to reach a decision most beneficial to our nation. Our lives are enhanced by the new jobs created by immigrants, the social service funds bolstered by their tax payments, and the valuable technical skills and knowledge brought with them. These benefits far outweigh any negative effects and prove the value of immigrants as they pursue the American Dream in our “nation of immigrants.BibliographyChandler-Crisp, S. (1992, July) “Workers Displaced”: how immigration is affecting unemployment. Business Week, pp. 19-21Simon, Julian. The Economic Consequences of Immigration Into the United States. New York: Penguin, 1976.Eckerd, Thomas, G. (1996, Feb) “Academic politics” CQ Researcher, pp. 145-168.Buchanan, Patrick, “Getting Tough at Last.” Newsday 15 Mar 1992: 22.
Create an outline for Endgame (by Samuel Beckett) by organizing
Question Create an outline for Endgame (by Samuel Beckett) by organizing its major events into a traditional five-act narrative structure. As part of your outline, explain your reasoning for dividing the play as you did. Finally, write a paragraph explaining how the structure of Endgame affects the ultimate meaning of the play. http://www.ricorso.net/rx/library/authors/classic/Beckett_S/Endgame.htm
Please give me some ideas to compose an email to
Question Please give me some ideas to compose an email to Jane in response to her message (Jan’s message as below). The purpose is to provide feedback for Jane as a fellow SJSU student. Consider the sensitive topic and what you might add to the conversation, and/or suggest to Jane. ====From: Jane LetterTo: San José State, Office of President <sjsupres@ sjsu.eduDate: August 5, 2019Subject: Gilroy Garlic Festival incidentDear Office of President:In response to Dr. Papazian's recent message regarding Gilroy (http://blogs.sjsu.edu/newsroom/2019/message-regarding-gilroy-garlic-festival-shooting/). I would like to express my opinions as an SJSU student going on my 5th year here.Because we are still in summer, I don't feel this incident was met with an adequate Campus response. I grew up in the town of Morgan Hill, not far from Gilroy, and have known peers from Gilroy at SJSU. In my opinion, this is a local tragedy that our school should respond to as a community. Although the president's message provides links to counseling services, there hasn't been any Campus-wide effort to spotlight potential concerns and anxiety. For example, I'm sure there is a statistic out there regarding how infrequently individuals seek crisis counseling on their own.In light of this, SJSU should engage in campus-wide efforts to support students and faculty in times of crises. The reality is that we live in a country where mass shootings can and do occur. Instead of only acknowledging the incident and reminding us of available resources, there needs to be more collective action. Wouldn't President Papazian agree?Sincerely,Jane Letter
I need to write two 4-5 pages essay for Ger’man’y Econ and
I need to write two 4-5 pages essay for Ger’man’y Econ and British Econ(Target contry). Actually this is a 20 pages paper. For this order, I hope you finish the fourth part(4-5 pages), I gonna looking for long-term corporation if you did well:There are two books are required to read and one is recommended to read. I will post part of A Concise Economic History of the World here. So it may help you to do your work (Also, I will post the first part of this long paper, and you can see my professor’s commens)”Explicit use of economic theories, models, and data” is the most importantI will post the requirement and rubric here. Notice: Body of paper supports central thesis; brings to bear appropriate and persuasive evidence. Conceptual sophistication and engagement with topic; recognition of limitations and counterarguments; thoughtfulness; originality of ideas; appropriate number of pages. Explicit use of economic theories, models, and data.
1) “When in the Course of human events, it becomes
Question 1) “When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”Which phrase in this passage from the Declaration of Independence directly states the purpose of the document? 1) to dissolve the political bands2) to assume among the powers of the earth3) impel them to the separation4) declare the causes2) “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”The theme of this passage from the Declaration of Independence is best described as:1) the people must remove any government that destroys rights2) certain truths are easily understood3) life, liberty, and happiness are the most important rights4) new government brings safety and happiness3) “In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.”These lines from the Declaration of Independence are an example of the use of _______________. 1) thesis2) ethos3) purpose4) pathos4) “as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.”These lines from the Declaration of Independence are an example of the use of _______________.1) pathos2) theme3) thesis4) ethos5) “He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.”These lines from the Declaration of Independence are an example of the use of _______________. 1) pathos2) theme3) logos4) thesis
Explain why reading and writing integration is vital across all
Question Explain why reading and writing integration is vital across all content areas. Describe what this integration may look like in an early childhood, elementary school, and at the high school setting.*Please provide citations and references!
2) “AT this second appearing to take the oath of
Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question 2) “AT this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.” What is the purpose of this passage from President Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address? 1) to explain that the people are already acquainted with him2) to explain his reasons for making a shorter inaugural speech3) to explain that his attention and energy is still focused on the war4) to explain that he has hope for the future3) “AT this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.” Which rhetorical element is included in this passage from President Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address?1) ethos2) theme3) thesis4) logos5) “With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.” Which statement below is true of the conclusion of Lincoln’s speech?1) Lincoln promises retribution for war2) Lincoln explains why the war has ended3) Lincoln promises to restore peace4) Lincoln expresses the reasons for peace
I need help with an essay about this weeks chapter
Question I need help with an essay about this weeks chapter “Govinda” in the book Siddhartha, by Herman Hesse. This is what was asked,”Govinda suspects that Siddhartha has found his own way to Nirvana without following a formal doctrine. Is this true, or has Siddhartha followed a prescribed path towards his goal? I have read the chapter I just need some help with ideas. Thanks!
as a Key Tool in Health and Human Services
Evidence-based practice utilizes a variety of research methods to gather evidence as to the efficacy of a program’s effectiveness, or cost effectiveness. According to your text, “Sound research and its applications, although not guarantees of perfect policies and programs, are extremely useful tools in developing sound social policies and programs” (p. 281). Additionally, we read that evaluation research is different from “basic” research in that evaluation research is based on reality factors in the field and can answer the question: Is this program achieving its goals within the cost estimates? In this first assignment, you will create a fictional “how to” guide in which you will analyze the steps pertinent to effective program assessment. Specifically, you will:Your fictional “how to” guide is intended to provide a step-by-step explanation of the components related to evaluating programs; you will not be conducting an assessment as part of the assignment. An example of a program evaluation and the research format is given in the Evaluation Strategies for Human Service Programs (Links to an external site.). Your example can be any of the typical health and services areas including: hospitals, nursing homes, clinic for substance abuse, counseling clinics, Salvation Army, Red Cross, homes for the homeless, special school programs, crisis centers and social support. Program evaluation can include a variety of different research approaches and may also include acquiring a great deal of data. As you read the article Introduction to Program Evaluation for Public Health Programs: A Self-Study Guide (Links to an external site.), keep in mind the information requirements to carry out a program evaluation. Certainly the connections among program outcomes, the activities of the program, and consequential outcomes constitute the key model of any program evaluation.
7) Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerptExecutive Mansion,
Question 7) Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerptExecutive Mansion, Washington, April 4, 1864. A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.My Dear Sir: You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows: I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power. I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution? By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether. When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident…Yours truly,A. LincolnWhat does President Lincoln describe in the lines in bold?1) The readers who will likely disagree with his values2) The people who rejected his offer of emancipation3) The times he did not allow military emancipation4) The lines in the Constitution that give him power
8) Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerptExecutive Mansion,
Question 8) Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerptExecutive Mansion, Washington, April 4, 1864. A. G. Hodges, Esq., Frankfort, Ky.My Dear Sir: You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally stated the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows: I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel; and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially in this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it in my view that I might take the oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power. I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times and in many ways; and I aver that, to this day I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation, and yet preserve the Constitution? By general law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life, but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution altogether. When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March and May and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition; and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss; but of this I was not entirely confident…Yours truly,A. LincolnIn a paragraph of three to five sentences, summarize President Lincoln’s meaning in the paragraph in bold. Use proper spelling and grammar.9) The Emancipation Proclamation, excerptBY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. A PROCLAMATION.I, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, President of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy thereof, do hereby proclaim and declare that hereafter, as heretofore, the war will be prosecuted for the object of practically restoring the constitutional relation between the United States, and each of the States, and the people thereof, in which States that relation is, or may be, suspended or disturbed.That it is my purpose, upon the next meeting of Congress to again recommend the adoption of a practical measure tendering pecuniary aid to the free acceptance or rejection of all slave States, so called, the people whereof may not then be in rebellion against the United States and which States may then have voluntarily adopted, or thereafter may voluntarily adopt, immediate or gradual abolishment of slavery within their respective limits; and that the effort to colonizepersons of African descent, with their consent, upon this continent, or elsewhere, with the previously obtained consent of the Governments existing there, will be continued.Use context to determine the meaning of the word in bold.1) Build2) Establish3) Infiltrate4) Populate5) Settle10) The Emancipation Proclamation, excerptBY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. A PROCLAMATION.I, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, President of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy thereof, do hereby proclaim and declare that hereafter, as heretofore, the war will be prosecuted for the object of practically restoring the constitutional relation between the United States, and each of the States, and the people thereof, in which States that relation is, or may be, suspended or disturbed.That it is my purpose, upon the next meeting of Congress to again recommend the adoption of a practical measure tendering pecuniary aid to the free acceptance or rejection of all slave States, so called, the people whereof may not then be in rebellion against the United States and which States may then have voluntarily adopted, or thereafter may voluntarily adopt, immediate or gradual abolishment of slavery within their respective limits; and that the effort to colonize persons of African descent, with their consent, upon this continent, or elsewhere, with the previously obtained consent of the Governments existing there, will be continued.That on the first day of January in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.That the executive will, on the first day of January aforesaid, by proclamation, designate the States, and part of States, if any, in which the people thereof respectively, shall then be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any State, or the people thereof shall, on that day be, in good faith represented in the Congress of the United States, by members chosen thereto, at elections wherein a majority of the qualified voters of such State shall have participated, shall, in the absence of strong countervailing testimony, be deemed conclusive evidence that such State and the people thereof, are not then in rebellion against the United States.That attention is hereby called to an Act of Congress entitled “An Act to make an additional Article of War” approved March 13, 1862, and which act is in the words and figure following:”Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That hereafter the following shall be promulgated as an additional article of war for the government of the army of the United States, and shall be obeyed and observed as such:Article —. All officers or persons in the military or naval service of the United States are prohibited from employing any of the forces under their respective commands for the purpose of returning fugitives from service or labor, who may have escaped from any persons to whom such service or labor is claimed to be due, and any officer who shall be found guilty by a court-martial of violating this article shall be dismissed from the service.SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That this act shall take effect from and after its passage.”Which word most clearly and correctly describes the tone of this text?1) Informal2) Firm3) Militaristic4) Political
11) The Emancipation Proclamation, excerptBY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED
Question 11) The Emancipation Proclamation, excerptBY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. A PROCLAMATION.I, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, President of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy thereof, do hereby proclaim and declare that hereafter, as heretofore, the war will be prosecuted for the object of practically restoring the constitutional relation between the United States, and each of the States, and the people thereof, in which States that relation is, or may be, suspended or disturbed.That it is my purpose, upon the next meeting of Congress to again recommend the adoption of a practical measure tendering pecuniary aid to the free acceptance or rejection of all slave States, so called, the people whereof may not then be in rebellion against the United States and which States may then have voluntarily adopted, or thereafter may voluntarily adopt, immediate or gradual abolishment of slavery within their respective limits; and that the effort to colonize persons of African descent, with their consent, upon this continent, or elsewhere, with the previously obtained consent of the Governments existing there, will be continued.That on the first day of January in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.That the executive will, on the first day of January aforesaid, by proclamation, designate the States, and part of States, if any, in which the people thereof respectively, shall then be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any State, or the people thereof shall, on that day be, in good faith represented in the Congress of the United States, by members chosen thereto, at elections wherein a majority of the qualified voters of such State shall have participated, shall, in the absence of strong countervailing testimony, be deemed conclusive evidence that such State and the people thereof, are not then in rebellion against the United States.That attention is hereby called to an Act of Congress entitled “An Act to make an additional Article of War” approved March 13, 1862, and which act is in the words and figure following:”Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That hereafter the following shall be promulgated as an additional article of war for the government of the army of the United States, and shall be obeyed and observed as such:Article —. All officers or persons in the military or naval service of the United States are prohibited from employing any of the forces under their respective commands for the purpose of returning fugitives from service or labor, who may have escaped from any persons to whom such service or labor is claimed to be due, and any officer who shall be found guilty by a court-martial of violating this article shall be dismissed from the service.SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That this act shall take effect from and after its passage.”Read the text below:[Those] who may have escaped from any persons to whom such service or labor is claimed to be dueWhich of the following is true of this excerpt?1) The phrase claimed to be due implies a lack of credibility.2) The word escaped suggests the mode of departure was immoral.3) The phrase such service or labor suggests the labor is unjust.4) The inclusion of the phrase to be due implies the escapees must return.12) The Emancipation Proclamation, excerptBY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. A PROCLAMATION.I, ABRAHAM LINCOLN, President of the United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the Army and Navy thereof, do hereby proclaim and declare that hereafter, as heretofore, the war will be prosecuted for the object of practically restoring the constitutional relation between the United States, and each of the States, and the people thereof, in which States that relation is, or may be, suspended or disturbed.That it is my purpose, upon the next meeting of Congress to again recommend the adoption of a practical measure tendering pecuniary aid to the free acceptance or rejection of all slave States, so called, the people whereof may not then be in rebellion against the United States and which States may then have voluntarily adopted, or thereafter may voluntarily adopt, immediate or gradual abolishment of slavery within their respective limits; and that the effort to colonize persons of African descent, with their consent, upon this continent, or elsewhere, with the previously obtained consent of the Governments existing there, will be continued.That on the first day of January in the year of our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State, or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.That the executive will, on the first day of January aforesaid, by proclamation, designate the States, and part of States, if any, in which the people thereof respectively, shall then be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any State, or the people thereof shall, on that day be, in good faith represented in the Congress of the United States, by members chosen thereto, at elections wherein a majority of the qualified voters of such State shall have participated, shall, in the absence of strong countervailing testimony, be deemed conclusive evidence that such State and the people thereof, are not then in rebellion against the United States.That attention is hereby called to an Act of Congress entitled “An Act to make an additional Article of War” approved March 13, 1862, and which act is in the words and figure following:”Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That hereafter the following shall be promulgated as an additional article of war for the government of the army of the United States, and shall be obeyed and observed as such:Article —. All officers or persons in the military or naval service of the United States are prohibited from employing any of the forces under their respective commands for the purpose of returning fugitives from service or labor, who may have escaped from any persons to whom such service or labor is claimed to be due, and any officer who shall be found guilty by a court-martial of violating this article shall be dismissed from the service.SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That this act shall take effect from and after its passage.”Why did Lincoln feel it was important to identify himself not only as president but also as commander-in-chief of the armed forces at the time of the Emancipation Proclamation?Be sure to use evidence from the text to support your answer.13) Read this sentence from Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address:. . . let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the nation’s wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle, and for his widow, and his orphan – to do all which may achieve and cherish a just, and a lasting peace, among ourselves, and with all nations.What does the phrase bind up the nation’s wounds mean? 1) Confine2) Limit3) Secure4) Wrap14) Read this sentence from Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address:Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said “the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.Which of the following best explains the effect of the phrase until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword? 1) It creates a sense of honored fairness.2) It creates a sense of sorrow and grief.3) It suggests a feeling of suffering and pain.4) It suggests a much-deserved justice.
can someone please provide examples of how incorrect use of
Question can someone please provide examples of how incorrect use of punctuation could cause significant problems in your professional field or program of study.
Based on your knowledge of acting styles and techniques, which
Question Based on your knowledge of acting styles and techniques, which of the following is a challenge of the realistic acting style?
For the Advocacy Project, you will be writing a paper that you
For the Advocacy Project, you will be writing a paper that you might give at an undergraduate conference. In preparation, you must analyze several aspects of your rhetorical situation so that you have a better grasp of your audience and the kind of appeals you want to make to them.Basic outline1. Read the full AP Prompt, paying particular attention to the section on your audience. List at least 10 beliefs or values that you think they may have in common. As college students, what do they care about? As young adults? Why will your ideas appeal to them?2. Choose 3 potential solutions for the problem that you outlined in your CP. Write 2-3 sentences about each solution, explaining its benefits and considerations.3. Based on what you know about your genre, audience, and purpose, which solution do you think will be most effective? Write a paragraph (4-6 sentences) that goes more into depth about this particular solution. What do you know about the costs (relating to money, time, people, etc.)? What problems do you foresee with helping your audience buy in to your solution? Because your audience is diverse, how will you appeal to one group without alienating another? What more do you need to know about your topic, about your audience, or about argumentation so that you can write a paper that this audience will find both interesting and convincing?AP project requirementThis draft should be approximately 1000 words, and include your introduction paragraph and some of your first body paragraphs (probably the ones where you outline your problem). We will not be doing peer review for this draft. Instead, I will be giving you comments and tips to consider as you complete your paper. Knowing that this is the only draft I will read in its entirety, please give your best effort to these 1000 words so that you can get the most useful feedback from me. You will do peer review for AP draft 2.I will upload my last CP project and this AP project prompt as a reference for you. Basicly this AP project is required you to read my CP project first and then write a paper by following the prompt.
Can someone provide how the digital faculty development relates to
Question Can someone provide how the digital faculty development relates to your professional or academic field.
Govinda suspects that Siddhartha has found his own way to
Question Govinda suspects that Siddhartha has found his own way to Nirvana without following a formal doctrine. Is this true, or has Siddhartha followed a prescribed path towards his goal?The discussions are like mini essays. Directly answer the question, provide logical reasons, support those reasons with explanation and evidence from the text.
The post 5) Letter to a Citizen of Kentucky, an excerptExecutive Mansion, appeared first on Smashing Essays.
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"
