HI6027 Business and Corporate Law

                                                              Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines                  
Trimester T1 2020
Unit Code HI6027
Unit Title Business and Corporate Law
Assessment Type Group Assignment
Assessment Title Case Studies of Business Law and Business Structures
Purpose of the assessment (with ULO
Mapping)
The purpose of the Group Assignment is to provide students with an opportunity to work in a collaborative environment in solving two case problems by citing the relevant legal rules and cases and applying these to the facts of the case.
In this Group Assignments, students are required to:
–                      Critically analyse the ethical implications of legal decisions and how they impact on the business environment. (ULO 2)
–                      Assess the obligations, rights and remedies available to parties in particular commercial relationships. (ULO 3)
–                      Critically examine the foundations of Australian company law. (ULO 4)
–                      Critically discuss and apply contract and tort law in business circumstances. (ULO 5) – Critically discuss and apply the legal framework that regulates a company’s dealings with outsiders. (ULO 7)
Weight 30% of the total assessments
Total Marks 30%
Word limit Group Written Report of maximum 2,000 words
Due Date Week 11
Submission Guidelines •     All work must be submitted on Blackboard by the due date along with a completed Assignment Cover Page.
•     The assignment must be in MS Word format, no spacing, 12-pt Arial font and 2 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings and page numbers.
•     Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using the AGLC style.

 

Assignment Specifications

 
Purpose:
The Group Assignment aims to provide students with an opportunity to work in a collaborative environment in solving two case problems by citing the relevant legal rules and cases and applying these to the facts of the case.
 
Students are to form groups, with a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 4 students per group. The assignment consists of a 2,000-word written report.
 
Instructions: Please read and re-read carefully to avoid mistakes.
 

Group Report

  1. This group assignment consists of 2 parts. Part A is a question on Contract Law, and Part B is a question involving Business Structures. Both questions must be answered.

 

  1. The total word limit for the group report is 2,000 words (+/- 10% allowed) with each part having a maximum word count of 1,000 words. Word count limits are strictly enforced. A deduction of two (2) marks will be imposed for every 50 words over the word count for either part of the report. Anything over the word count will not be read by your lecturer.

 

  1. The total word count for the report as well as each part must be clearly written on the cover sheet of the assignment. A paper will not be marked if the word counts are not written on the cover sheet.

 

  1. The group report is worth 30% of total marks in this unit.

             
Important Reminders:

  • You must form your groups by self-enrolment in Blackboard. Please refer to the document “Group Assessment Self Enrolment Tutorial”, that has been posted in Blackboard (under announcements and also in “Assessments” folder). This document will assist you with the process of self-enrolling in a group to undertake an assessment task in Blackboard Ultra.

 

  • All group report submissions must be de done online and run through SafeAssign. No hard copies are to be submitted. Only one group member needs to submit for the whole group.

 

  • Please fill in the “Rubric Group Report” sheet (available in Blackboard under “Assignments and Due dates) and attach as a cover sheet to your group report and upload on Blackboard.

 

  • Each team member also must also submit to their lecturer/tutor a “Peer Evaluation of Individual Participation in Group Assignment” sheet (available in Blackboard under “Assignments and Due dates) with their assignment.

 

  • Group report must be submitted via SafeAfssign on Blackboard and show a similarity percentage figure. Any group report that does not show a SafeAssign similarity percentage will not be marked and be required to re-submit.

 

  • Late submissions will be subject to Holmes Institute policy on student assessment submission and late penalties (please refer to subject outline and Student handbook).

 

  • All reports are expected to observe proper referencing in accordance with the Australian Guide to Legal Citation (AGLC). A copy of the AGLC has been posted in the Week 2 tutorial folder.

You may also download a copy for free via this link:  https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/2877782/AGLC3.pdf
 

  • In general, for written reports, a SafeAssign similarity percentage of 25% or below is acceptable. Regardless of the similarity figure, all group reports must use in-text citation and observe proper referencing rules.

 

  • All assignments are expected to strictly follow Holmes Institute’s Academic Conduct and Integrity Policy and Procedures. A copy of the Policy is available on the Holmes Institute home page. (About Holmes > Policies) This policy is also explained in your Student Handbook.

 

  • Plagiarism and contract cheating in any form will not be tolerated and will have severe consequences for the groups found committing the same, including receiving zero (0) for the entire assignment and possible failure in the unit.

 

  • Any group assignment that is found to contain fake or bogus references or references that are clearly irrelevant to the subject matter of the assignment will receive an automatic zero (0) mark.

 

  • IMPORTANT: Identification of individual work. To ensure that all students participate equitably in the group assignment and that students are responsible for the academic integrity of all components of the assignment, each group must complete the following table which identifies which student/students are responsible for the various sections of the assignment:

 

Assignment section Student/Students
   
   
   
   
   

 
This table needs to be completed and submitted with the assignment as it is a compulsory component required before any grading is undertaken.
 

Marking criteria Weighting (%)
Group Report  
–     Identification of material facts involved in problem question 6%
–      Identification of legal issues / legal question and relevant law 8%
–     Thorough yet succinct application of law to material facts 8%
–     Citation and referencing 4%
–     Professional quality 4%
TOTAL Weight 30%

 
 
             

Assignment Questions

 

Part A: Contracts Law Question

  • Read the Contracts Law question below.

 

  • In 1,000 words (+/- 10% is allowed), answer your chosen question using the IRAC method.

 

  • Your answer must be supported by relevant law and cases decided by Australian courts (preferably the High Court) and/or scholarly articles. A minimum of 3 genuine and relevant references are required for this part of the report.

 

  • Your references must be listed in a Reference list at the end of the Part A question.

 
 
 
Joey Joystick is a computer programmer. While he was in his final year of university studies, he worked as an intern with a local electronic games producer, Great Games Pty Ltd. Joey impressed his supervisors with his insightful comments and other input on design work. They were so impressed with his work on one design, Crypt Force, that they gave him part credit for it and paid him a general bonus for it. Crypt Force ultimately won an industry award and proved to be a big seller for the company.
 
After Joey’s university graduation ceremony, he was ushered aside by a Great Games executive who showed him a document and said:
 
“We’re very impressed by your work, Joey. We’d like you to join us permanently— we’re sure you’ll be happy with the deal we can offer you.”
 
The document was a contract of employment which contained the following clauses:
 

  1. The duration of the contract is three (3) years.

 

  1. The employee (Joey) agrees that he will not for the duration of the employment contract or for a period of one year after the conclusion of the employment undertake design activities in Australia for the purposes of the production of electronic games or any other form of entertainment.

 
The starting salary under the contract was that normally paid to a senior designer, which was a position a new designer would not usually attain until he or she had worked with Great Games for three years. Joey happily signed the agreement.
 
After two years with Great Games, Joey was approached by a film production company, Computer Animated Films Inc (CAN). Joey agreed with CAN that, for a salary five times what he was getting paid by Great Games, he would immediately start work as part of a team producing Cosmic Armada, a feature-length computer animated film. As part of the deal, Joey would also work on a spin-off Cosmic Armada electronic game.
 
Advise Great Games whether it can prevent Joey from working for CAN.
 
In answering this question, you are expected to draw on legal rules, principles and cases discussed in the lectures from Weeks 1 to 4 and the corresponding chapters from the prescribed textbook.
 
             

Part B: Business Structures question

  • Read the questions below on Business Structures.

 

  • In 1,000 words (+/- 10% is allowed), answer the chosen given question.

 

  • A minimum of 3 genuine and relevant references are required for this part of the report. Examples of relevant references for this question include the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); the Australian and Securities and Investment Commission’s (ASIC) website (asic.gov.au), the website of the Australian Business Register’s (ABR) website (www.abr.gov.au).

 

  • Your references must be listed in a Reference list at the end of the Part B question.

 
 
You have graduated from Holmes Institute with a Master’s Degree in Professional Accounting, and you’re employed as an accountant/financial advisor, for an accounting firm called Big Business Accountants. 
 
Harry is a client, and he has made an appointment to see you. Harry is keen in starting a business. This business he is proposing to start is a bakery. Harry has qualifications in bakery which includes making cakes, bread, pastries. 
 
Harry, has saved up his money and he has about $50,000.00 in cash. He hasn’t bought any equipment but he has found a shop which he is considering leasing where his bakery business will be operating from.
 
Harry has always been an employee and now he would like to know what type of business structure he should have for his bakery. 
 
Your task is to write a report to Harry about the types of business structures that you consider would be suitable for Harry to consider.
             
Marking Rubric
Group Report

Total marks available: 15 marks  Excellent
 
Good
 
Satisfactory
 
Unsatisfactory
 
Identification of material facts involved in problem question
 
(6 marks)
5.5 to 6 marks
 
Completely
identifies all relevant facts of case
4.5 to 5.5 marks
 
Identifies most of the relevant facts of case
3 to 4 marks
 
Identifies the basic relevant facts of the case but misses other relevant facts
Below 3 marks
 
Does not identify relevant facts of case
Identification of legal issues / legal question and
relevant law
 
(8 marks)
7.5 to 8 marks
 
Correctly identifies all relevant legal issues and are stated in the form of questions.
 
Correctly identifies relevant and appropriate legal rules and case law, and states them in the form of statements
6 to 7 marks
 
Issues correctly identified, but may contain extraneous information and are not stated in the form of questions.
 
Legal rules and case law correctly identified, but may contain extraneous info and are not in the form of statements.
4 to 5.5 marks
 
Issues are not completely identified.
 
Legal rules and case law not correctly identified.
Below 4 marks
 
Identifies incorrect or irrelevant issues.
 
Identifies incorrect or irrelevant legal rules and case law.
Thorough yet succinct application of law to material
facts
 
(8 marks)
7.5 to 8 marks
 
Correctly identifies facts; wellreasoned discussion relating facts to the rules and case law.
6 to 7 marks
 
Correctly identifies facts. Not well reasoned.
4 to 5.5 marks
 
Facts not correctly identified. Analysis incoherent.
Below 4 marks
 
Scant to no analysis.
Citation and referencing
(including minimum number of
references)
 
(4 marks)
3.75 to 4 marks
 
Correctly cites minimum of 6 references, in-text and in reference list.
3 to 3.5 marks 
 
Has minimum of 6 references; or has occasional errors in formatting of in-text citations and reference list
2.5 to 2.75 marks
 
Does not have minimum of 6 references or contains errors in formatting of intext citations and reference list
Below 2 marks
 
No referencing either in-text or in reference
list; or cites
inappropriate references; or all references not cited in the correct format.

 

Professional quality including language use and writing
style
 
(4 marks)
 
3.75 to 4 marks
 
Professional language. No grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors.
3 to 3.5 marks 
 
Some mistakes. Does not detract from understanding.
2.5 to 2.75 marks
 
Many mistakes. Detracts from understanding.
Sloppy.
Below 2 marks
 
Reflects no real effort.
Deductions
 
Excess word count (1 mark for every 25 words over)
 
Under the word limit (1 mark for every 25 word under)
 
Lacks minimum of 6 references (1 mark for every missing reference)
       
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

United Methodist University Business Ethics Questions Discussion

Question Description

Business Ethics
Consider the following questions from your studies in business ethics. Use your own words and go into some detail when responding to each question; a 3-4 sentence response should be sufficient for most questions. You may refer to your notes from lectures, discussions, our text, and outside resources, but I am looking for your individual analysis in every response. Make sure to focus your responses on the ethical aspects of the issue in question and respond to all parts of the question directly. Back up your claims with good reasoning. Each question is worth one point; a total of 14 points can be earned.
1) What ethical dilemmas may be raised for businesses specifically due to expanding technological
abilities?
2) Read the piece from the Center for Ethical Business Cultures in the Supplement section called “Expectations”. Do you agree that there is a “Trust Gap” between business and the general public that needs addressing?
3) How could the public combat the type of corporate misdeeds featured in “The Corporation”?
4) There is a longstanding history of gender inequality in the U.S. workplace, including wage discrepancy.
Explain why this is not an acceptable situation.
5) What do you make of Rawl’s assertion that”… social and economic inequalities, for example
inequalities of wealth and authority, are just only if they result in compensating benefits for
everyone, and in particular for the least advantaged members of society”?
6) Would Marx agree that issuing a stimulus check to laid-off workers would increase their human dignity?
7) What would be some important ethical considerations in protecting workers from COVID-19 in meat
processing plants?
8) What kind of moral obligations should employees be expected to hold towards their
employer/organization in today’s workplace?
9) Review the Minnesota Principles on Global Business Ethics in Supplemental Readings. Choose one
of the Stakeholder Principles (customers, employees, investors….), and discuss how businesses
might be convinced to follow the specific guidelines mentioned.
10) The goal of advertising may be seen as creating the compulsive desire to purchase a product. Is
this a problem that should somehow be controlled/regulated?
11) Describe the type of character most suited for organizational leadership, according to the Virtue Ethics
of Aristotle.
12) After reviewing “There’s No Such Thing as Business Ethics” in Supplemental Readings, discuss how a
business organization might best succeed with a “Golden Rule” philosophy in its leadership.
13) Beyond concerns over COVID-19, what do you believe to be the most significant ethical issues facing
business today, and what would you suggest as a general approach to dealing with those issues?
14) Which ethical principle, concept, or theory you learned about will be the most useful to your future
ethical decision-making as a business professional?
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

HI6007 Unit Name: Statistics for Business Decisions

Assignment: Tutorial Questions 1
 
Due: 11:30pm 15th May 2020
 
Weighting:  25%
 

Total Marks: 50 marks

 
Purpose: This assignment is designed to assess your level of knowledge of the key topics covered in this unit
 
Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed:
 

  1. Students are able to apply appropriate business research methodologies to support decision-making process.
  2. Students are able to identify and apply valid statistical techniques in a given scenario to solve business problems.
  3. Students are able to justify and interpret the results of a statistical analysis in the context of critical reasoning for a business problem solving.
  4. Students are able to apply statistical knowledge to summarize data graphically and statistically, either manually or via a computer package.
  5. Students are able to justify and interpret statistical/analytical scenarios that best fit business solution.
  6. Students are able to justify value and limitations of the statistical techniques to business decision making.

 
Description: Each week students were provided with three tutorial questions of varying degrees of difficulty.  These tutorial questions are available in the Tutorial Folder for each week on Blackboard. The Interactive Tutorials are designed to assist students with the process, skills and knowledge to answer the provided tutorial questions.  Your task is to answer a selection of tutorial questions for weeks 2 to 6 inclusive and submit these answers in a single document.
 
The questions to be answered are;
 
Week 2
Question 1 (10 marks)
 
In your own words, differentiate the following statistical terminologies with some examples.

  1. Population Parameter and Sample Statistic                                                                 (2.5 marks)
  2. Descriptive Statistics and Inferential Statistics                                                                 (2.5 marks)
  3. Nominal Scale and Ordinal Scale                                                                                 (2.5 marks)
  4. Primary Data Source and Secondary Data Source                                                 (2.5 marks)

Week 3
Question 2 (10 marks)
 
Data showing the population by state in millions of people follow (The World Almanac, 2012).  The dataset in Excel file 2012Population.xlsx.

  1. Develop a frequency distribution, a percent frequency distribution, and a histogram.
         Use a class width of 2.5 million. (4 marks)
b. Does there appear to be any skewness in the distribution? Explain. (3 marks)
c. What observations can you make about the population of the 50 states? (3 marks)

 
Week 4
Question 2 (10 marks)
 
Forty-three percent of Americans use social media and other websites to voice their opinions about television programs (the Huffington Post, November 23, 2011). Below are the results of a survey of 1364 individuals who were asked if they use social media and other websites to voice their opinions about Television programs
 

  Uses Social Media and Other Websites to Voice Opinions About Television Programs Doesn’t Use Social Media and Other Websites to Voice Opinions About Television
Programs
Female 395 291
Male 323 355

 

  1. Show a joint probability table.                                                                                   (2 marks)
  2. What is the probability a respondent is female?                                                              (2 marks)
  3. What is the conditional probability a respondent uses social media and other websites to voice opinions about television programs given the respondent is female? (3 marks)
  4. Let F denote the event that the respondent is female and A denote the event that the respondent uses social media and other websites to voice opinions about television programs.

Are events F and A independent?                                                                                             (3 marks)
 
Week 5
Question 3 (10 marks)
 
The average starting salary for this year’s graduates at a large university (LU) is $20,000 with a standard deviation of $8,000. Furthermore, it is known that the starting salaries are normally distributed.
 

  1. What is the probability that a randomly selected LU graduate will have a starting salary of at least $30,400? (3 marks)
  2. What is the probability that a randomly selected LU graduate will have a salary of exactly $30,400? (2 marks)
  3. Individuals with starting salaries of less than $15600 receive a low income tax break.

What percentage of the graduates will receive the tax break?                       (2 marks)

  1. If 189 of the recent graduates have salaries of at least $32240, how many students graduated this year from this university? (3 marks)

 
Week 6
Question 3 (10 marks)
 
The College Board reported the following mean scores for the three parts of the SAT (The World Almanac, 2009):
Critical reading                  502
Mathematics                      515
Writing                                 494
Assume that the population standard deviation on each part of the test is 100.
 

  1. What is the probability that a random sample of 90 test takers will provide a sample mean test score within 10 points of the population mean of 502 on the Critical reading part of the

test?                                                                                                                                                 (4 marks)
 

  1. What is the probability that a random sample of 90 test takers will provide a sample mean test score within 10 points of the population mean of 515 on the Mathematics part of the test? Compare this probability to the value computed in part (a). (6 marks)

 
Submission Directions:
 
The assignment has to be submitted via Blackboard.  Each student will be permitted one submission to Blackboard only.  Each student needs to ensure that the document submitted is the correct one.
 
 
             
 
Academic Integrity
Academic honesty is highly valued at Holmes Institute. Students must always submit work that represents their original words or ideas. If any words or ideas used in a class posting or assignment submission do not represent the student’s original words or ideas, the student must cite all relevant sources and make clear the extent to which such sources were used. Written assignments that include material similar to course reading materials or other sources should include a citation including source, author, and page number.
In addition, written assignments that are similar or identical to those of another student in the class is also a violation of the Holmes Institute’s Academic Conduct and Integrity Policy. The consequence for a violation of this policy can incur a range of penalties varying from a 50% penalty through to suspension of enrolment.  The penalty would be dependent on the extent of academic misconduct and the student’s history of academic misconduct issues.   All assessments will be automatically submitted to SelfAssign to assess their originality.
 
Further Information: 
For further information and additional learning resources, students should refer to their Discussion Board for the unit.
 

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

MGT321 Saudi Electronic University International Business Questions

Critical Thinking
Read the Management Focus on, “NAFTA’s Tomato Wars,” available in attachment, and answer the following questions:
 
Assignment Question(s):                                                    

  1. Was the establishment of a minimum floor price for tomatoes consistent with the free trade principles enshrined in the NAFTA agreement?

 

  1. Who benefits from the importation of tomatoes grown in Mexico? Who suffers? Give arguments in support of your answer.

 

  1. Do you think that Mexican producers were dumping tomatoes in the United States? Give reasons.

 

  1. What do you think will be the impact of the new higher floor price? Who benefits from the higher floor price? Who suffers? Give logics.

 

  1. What do you think is the optimal government policy response here? Explain your answer.

Place an order with us to get a customized paper similar to this or any related topic. NB: The assignment will be done from scratch and it
will be 100% original

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"