HST201 Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 2 Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence Content, Research, and Analysis 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Requirements Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Content Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of labor scarcity in colonial America; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge of labor scarcity in colonial America. Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge of labor scarcity in colonial America. Fails to demonstrate knowledge of labor scarcity in colonial America. 17-20 Points 13-16 Points 9-12 Points 5-8 Points Critical Analysis Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of using slaves or indentured servants for labor in colonial America. Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation of using slaves or indentured servants for labor in colonial America. Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation of using slaves or indentured servants for labor in colonial America. Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of using slaves or indentured servants for labor in colonial America. 9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Sources / Examples Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the scarcity of labor. Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the scarcity of labor. Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the scarcity of labor. Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. Mechanics and Writing 9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor HST201 Critical Thinking Rubric – Module 2 style. assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling. assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling. inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling. quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling. 9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points Demonstrates proper use of APA style Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error. Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors. Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors. Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors. Total points possible = 90

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"