Questions Uploads

Assignment-5-Persuasive-Paper-Part-3-Possible-Disadvantages-Answers-with-Visual

Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals

Due Week 10 and worth 250 points

Using feedback from your professor and classmates, revise Parts 1 and 2, and add Part 3. Plan to include visuals to illustrate the advantages of your proposed solution.

Write an eight to ten (8-10) page paper in which you:

Provide Part I: Revision of A Problem Exists (3-4 pages)

1. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Provide Part 2: Revision of Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages (3-4 pages)

2. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Develop Part 3: Possible Disadvantages, Answers, with Visuals (1-2 pages, for 7-9 total pages)

3. Included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

4. State, explain, and support the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one (1) paragraph.

5. State, explain, and support the second (and third if desired) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

6. Include one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

8. Provide a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Repeat or paraphrase your thesis statement.

9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

11. Support disadvantages and answers with at least two (2) additional quality relevant references. Use at least eight (8) total for Parts 1, 2, and 3. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Points: 250

Assignment 5: Persuasive Paper Part 3: Possible Disadvantages and Answers

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Insufficiently revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Partially revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Satisfactorily revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Thoroughly revised your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

2. Revise your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.
Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Insufficiently revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Partially revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Satisfactorily revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

Thoroughly revised your Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages, using feedback from the professor and classmates.

3. Included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Insufficiently included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Partially included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Satisfactorily included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

Thoroughly included a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph.

4. State, explain, and support the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one (1) paragraph.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and did not submit or incompleted provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and insufficiently provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

Partially stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and partially provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and satisfactorily provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the first disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and thoroughly provided a logical answer in one (1) paragraph.

5. State, explain, and support the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and provide a logical answer. This should be one or two (1 or 2) paragraphs.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and did not submit or incompletely provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and insufficiently provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Partially stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and partially provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and satisfactorily provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the second (and third if appropriate) disadvantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution and thoroughly provided a logical answer in one or two (1-2) paragraphs.

6. Include one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Insufficiently included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Partially included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Satisfactorily included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

Thoroughly included one or two (1-2) relevant visuals that help illustrate an advantage.

7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Insufficiently used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Partially used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Satisfactorily used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

Thoroughly used effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.

8. Provide a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Repeat or paraphrase your thesis statement.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Did not submit or incompletely repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

Insufficiently provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Insufficiently repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

Partially provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Partially repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

Satisfactorily provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Satisfactorily repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

Thoroughly provided a concluding paragraph to summarize the proposed solution, its advantages, possible disadvantages, and answers to the disadvantages. Thoroughly repeated or paraphrased your thesis statement.

9. Develop a coherently structured paper with Use effective transitional words, phrases, sentences, and an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Insufficiently developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Partially developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Satisfactorily developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

Thoroughly developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.

10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Insufficiently used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Partially used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Satisfactorily used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

Thoroughly used one (1) or more rhetorical strategy (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain claims.

11. Support disadvantages and answers with at least two (2) additional quality relevant references. Use at least eight (8) total for Parts 1, 2, and 3.

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices.

Meetsnumber of required references; all references high quality choices.

12. Clarity, writing mechanics, and APA formatting requirements (including in-text citations and reference page)

Weight: 25%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Response-student-s-discussion-British-literature

Please response a student’s discussion, 100 words.

Student’s discussion: Question 3

Personal Connection Exercise—Connecting with the ideas and characters for the play.

Unfortunately, I can relate to many of the personal connection questions. Some of the questions relate to my grade school years. My so called friends at times were not very nice to me. I was the kind of person that talked to everyone, but hung out mostly with the mid-popular crowd. Some of my friends were in the popular click, so I would hang out with them too. Then, my mid-popular friends would get mad at me. They would pass me mean notes and not want to talk to me. It was so stupid, but I played along and tried to win them back. This answers the questions “wondered if you were going crazy” and “wondered who you could trust”. I never did anything wrong, I just had other friends. I was a people pleaser. I had major drama in my late teen and early twenties with a boyfriend. He was a bad guy and he had done a lot of bad things. However, I thought he cared for me. I was terribly wrong. I don’t want to go into details, I have tried to put all that pain and craziness behind me. Throughout my situation, I “loved someone my family didn’t approve of” (for good reason, I just didn’t want to believe it). I “disobeyed what my parents wanted me to do” (many times). The one question that I am still trying to forgive myself is “hurt someone you loved because you were wrapped up in your own drama”. I hurt my Mom and Dad. I was hurtful to them in my words and actions. I feel still feel horrible at times.

My reaction to Iago up to this point in the play in regards to his strengths, motivations, and like/not like. Iago is not my favorite character. If I knew this play, I would have not picked him as my focus. I feel that his motivations consist of a few topics. The first motivation is resentment. Right from the beginning, Iago is passed over by Othello for a promotion. Per Iago, his promotion was given to Cassio (Act one, Scene one, 18-21). The next situation that gave Iago motivation was that there is a rumor spreading that Othello slept with his wife, which created jealously (Act one Scene three 378-379). Lastly, Iago has suspicion that Cassio has also slept with his wife (Act two Scene three 300 -301). I do not like Iago; I feel he is a manipulative and a conniving person. Even though he might have some reasons, he exploits people. He pretends to be Othello’s right hand man, but Iago hates Othello and tries to destroy Othello’s marriage and reputation. He pretends to be a friend to Roderigo, but is just using him to get money out of him and to breakup Othello’s marriage. In addition, Iago does not treat his wife kindly. I did like that Iago talked Roderigo out of killing himself, even if it was only out for his own interests, Iago did save his life. A strength he has, whether positive or negative, is the fact that Iago is committed to his demolition of Othello’s marriage, he is very sure of himself, and confident.

Resource

Shakespeare, W., & Crowther, J. (2003). No fear Shakespeare: Othello. New York: Spark.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

You-are-deciding-among-three-investments-as-you-do-for-Case-4-computer-science-question-help

cenario:

You are deciding among three investments, as you do for Case 4. You

have heard of an expert who has a highly reliable “track record” in the

correct identification of favorable vs. unfavorable market conditions.

You are now considering whether to consult this “expert.” Therefore, you

need to determine whether it would be worth paying the expert’s fee to

get his prediction. You recognize that you need to do further analysis

to determine the value of the information that the expert might provide.

In order to simplify the analysis, you have decided to look at two possible outcomes for each alternative (instead of three). You are interested in whether the market will be Favorable or Unfavorable, so you have collapsed the Medium and Low outcomes. Here are the three alternatives with their respective payoffs and probabilities.

Option A: Real estate development. This is a risky opportunity with the possibility of a high payoff, but also with no payoff at all. You have reviewed all of the possible data for the outcomes in the next 10 years and these are your estimates of the Net Present Value (NPV) of the payoffs and probabilities:

High/Favorable NPV: $7.5 million, Pr = 0.5

Unfavorable NPV: $2.0 million, Pr = 0.5

Option B: Retail franchise for Just Hats, a boutique-type store selling fashion hats for men and women. This also is a risky opportunity but less so than Option A. It has the potential for less risk of failure, but also a lower payoff. You have reviewed all of the possible data for the outcomes in the next 10 years and these are your estimates of the NPV of the payoffs and probabilities.

High/Favorable NPV: $4.5 million, Pr = 0.75

Unfavorable NPV: $2.5 million, Pr = 0.25

Option C: High Yield Municipal Bonds. This option has low risk and is assumed to be a Certainty. So there is only one outcome with probability of 1.0:

NPV: $2.25 million, Pr = 1.0

You have contacted the expert and received a letter stating his track record which you have checked out using several resources. Here is his stated track record:

True State of the Market

Expert Prediction

Favorable

Unfavorable

Predicts “Favorable”

.9

.3

Predicts “Unfavorable”

.1

.7

You realize that this situation is a bit complicated since it requires the expert to analyze and predict the state of two different markets: the real estate market and the retail hat market. You think through the issues of probabilities and how to calculate the joint probabilities of both markets going up, both going down, or one up and the other down. Based on your original estimates of success, here are your calculations of the single probabilities and joint probabilities of the markets.

Probabilities

Favorable

Unfavorable

A: Real Estate

0.50

0.50

B: Just Hats

0.75

0.25

Joint Probabilities

A Fav, B Fav (A+, B+)

0.375

A Unf, B Unf (A-, B-)

0.125

A Fav, B Unf (A+, B-)

0.125

A Unf, B Fav (A-, B+)

0.375

Finally, after a great deal of analysis and calculation, you have determined the Posterior probabilities of Favorable and Unfavorable Markets for the Real Estate business and the boutique hat business.

Real Estate

Just Hats

F

U

F

U

0.45

says “F/F”

0.75

0.25

0.90

0.10

0.15

says “F/U”

0.75

0.25

0.30

0.70

0.30

says “U/F”

0.125

0.875

0.90

0.10

0.10

says “U/U”

0.125

0.875

0.30

0.70

For example, this table says that there is 45% chance that the expert will predict Favorable for both markets (F/F), and when he makes this prediction, there is a 75% chance that the Real Estate market will be favorable and 25% chance that it won’t, and also a 90% chance that the Hat market will be Favorable and 10% chance it won’t.

You have developed a Decision Tree showing the original collapsed solution and also showing an expanded Decision Tree for evaluating the value of the expert’s information. You need to enter the probabilities into this tree to see if the expert’s information will increase the overall expected value of your decision. Download the Excel file with the incomplete Decision Tree: Decision Tree for BUS520 SLP 4

Assignment

Complete the information in the Decision Tree in the Excel file. Determine the Expected NPV of the decision if you were to consult the Expert. Does use of the Expert increase the value of your analysis? If so, by how much?

Develop a PowerPoint presentation to your private investment company and explain your analysis and your recommendation. Provide clear rationale/ justification for your decision. Use audio/video feature in PowerPoint to present each slide. Be sure to check the Oral Communication Rubric (under Assessments>Rubrics) to understand the requirements for the PowerPoint presentation.

Upload both your PowerPoint presentation and Excel file with the Decision Tree analysis to the SLP 4 Dropbox.

SLP Assignment Expectations

Analysis

Conduct accurate and complete analysis in Excel. Check the following link on PowerPoint presentation:

https://support.office.com/en-US/article/PowerPoin…

Required:

  • Meet Length requirements: 10-15 slides (not including Cover and Reference pages).
  • Provide a brief introduction to/background of the problem.
  • Show analysis that supports Excel analysis and provides thorough discussion of assumptions, rationale, and logic used.
  • Offer meaningful and accurate recommendation(s).
  • Oral presentation of each slide should use video/audio feature in PowerPoint
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

HCS-325-Discussion-What-are-the-Advantages-of-Teamwork-in-Today-s-Health-Care-Organizations

What are the Advantages of Teamwork in Today’s Health Care Organizations. 100-150 words

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"