Construction of Clinic Assignment | Online Assignment
The purpose of this assignment is to state your clinical/practice question and explore the literature pertaining to your clinical/practice problem (A case for Nurse Practitioners/APRN autonomous practice and Prescriptive authority) as you described in your Module 3 Discussion Board . According to Moran et al. (2020) when conducting a literature review, the goal is to obtain a representative sample of the literature which describes the concepts related to the phenomenon of interest and the research results applicable to the clinical/practice question and identify what gaps need to be further researched. Your work for this paper may be used to build upon your scholarly project and publishable manuscript—thus it is important that you align your literature review with the topic you have selected (or are considering) for your PICOT question and DNP project. This assignment is due Sunday, Week 6, by 11:59 PM EST. This assignment is worth 25% of Course Grade. Instructions: Please follow the rubric below. Your work for this paper may be used to build upon your scholarly project and publishable manuscript—thus it is important that you align your literature review with the topic you have selected (or are considering) for your PICOT question and DNP project. Paper length is no more than 8 pages excluding references and title page. RUBRIC: CP Question and Review of Literature Rubric (1) CP Question and Review of Literature Rubric (1) Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION AND QUESTION a. Describe the clinical or practice problem you would like to address for your DNP project. State why this problem is an issue. Support your reasoning/rationale as to why this is an issue with current data or literature. 3 points b. State the practice question you wish to address in PICOT format (this should be the response to the problem defined above). 3 points 6.0 to >3.0 pts Parts A and B are both addressed. For 6 points both parts a and b are addressed. The clinical or practice problem is described and supported with evidence AND the PICOT is stated. 3.0 to >0.0 pts A or B addressed but not both. Clinical problem stated OR PICOT written. One of the two components addressed. 0.0 pts No Marks 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome State the population and setting being addressed 2.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction to the Literature Review on the topic 2.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 2.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome SECTION II REVIEW OF LITERATURE Includes most of the major studies conducted on the topic, including but not limited to, recent literature (last 5-7 years)—-a minimum of 10 articles is required. 10.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Includes primarily research studies, systematic reviews and guidelines addressing the practice question you wish to address. 10.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Similar and discrepant research findings discussed. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome SECTION III APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS Critically appraises the contributions of key studies and provides the strengths of evidence. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Describes the weaknesses in existing studies and identifies important gaps in the literature. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conceptually organized based on type of articles and findings. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Succinctly summarizes and synthesizes findings. 15.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome SECTION IV FURTHER RESEARCH Identifies what ideas need to be further researched. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Preparation—The DNP Program Evaluation Rubric for Papers will be followed to assess Preparation of this Review of Literature. See the Rubric for Papers below. This is a total of 30 points. EACH SECTION OF THE WRITING RUBRIC IS BELOW. 0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 0.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Thesis/Topic 6.0 to >4.0 pts Exceptionally clear Exceptionally clear; easily identifiable, insightful; introduces the topic for the paper; summary in one or two well-written sentences. 4.0 to >2.0 pts Generally clear Generally clear; is promising; could be a little more inclusive of the content of the paper. 2.0 to >1.0 pts Central Idea is adequate but not fully developed. Central idea is adequate but not fully developed; may be somewhat unclear (contains vague terms); only gives a vague idea of the content of the paper. 1.0 to >0.0 pts Difficult to identify with inadequate illustration of key ideas Difficult to identify with inadequate illustration of key ideas; does not let the reader know what the paper is going to include. 0.0 pts No thesis statement or introduction is identifiable. 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content/Development 6.0 to >4.0 pts Thesis coherently developed and maintained throughout Thesis coherently developed and maintained throughout; thorough explanation of key idea(s) at an appropriate level for the target audience; critical thinking with excellent understanding of the topic; original in scope (this paper made sense, was easy to understand, and did not leave reader with questions due to incomplete development). 4.0 to >2.0 pts Explanation or illustration of key ideas consistent throughout essay Explanation or illustration of key ideas consistent throughout essay; original but may be somewhat lacking in insight; minor topics of the paper could be developed more thoroughly. 2.0 to >1.0 pts Explanation or illustration of some of the key ideas; Explanation or illustration of some of the key ideas; reader is left with some questions due to inadequate development; content may be a little confusing or unclear as to what the author means. 1.0 to >0.0 pts Little or no relevant detail Little or no relevant detail; many areas that could be expanded. 0.0 pts Paper does not make sense Paper does not make sense; unclear what the author is trying to say; very little real information presented. 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization 6.0 to >4.0 pts ood organization with clear focus and excellent transition between paragraphs Good organization with clear focus and excellent transition between paragraphs; logical order to presentation of information; paragraphs are well-organized; easy to understand and makes sense. 4.0 to >2.0 pts Adequate organizational style with logical transition between paragraphs; Adequate organizational style with logical transition between paragraphs; overall or paragraph organization could be slightly improved. 2.0 to >1.0 pts Adequate organizational style Adequate organizational style, although flow is somewhat choppy and may wander occasionally; somewhat confusing due to organization of paper or paragraphs. 1.0 to >0.0 pts Incoherent structure Incoherent structure; logic is unclear; paragraph transition is weak; difficult to understand; must re-read parts to figure out what is being said. 0.0 pts No order to content No order to content; very confusing and difficult to read; makes no sense. 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics 6.0 to >4.0 pts Skillful use of language; varied, accurate vocabulary Skillful use of language; varied, accurate vocabulary; well-developed sentence structure with minimal errors in punctuation, spelling or grammar; appropriate margins, font; correct application of research style format; use of professional active voice; very well-written paper. 4.0 to >2.0 pts Appropriate use of language with a few errors Appropriate use of language with a few errors in grammar, sentence structure, punctuation; fairly accurate interpretation of assignment guidelines, with a few minor errors; readability of paper only slightly affected by mistakes. 2.0 to >1.0 pts Some problems Some problems with sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and/or spelling; may have several run-on sentences or comma splices; some errors in citation style; format does not fully comply with assignment guidelines; somewhat difficult to read due to mistakes. 1.0 to >0.0 pts Many difficulties Many difficulties in sentence structure, grammar, citation style, punctuation, spelling and/or misused words; proper format not used consistently; many errors in citation style very difficult to understand. 0.0 pts Not written at a graduate level Not written at a graduate level; many mistakes; proper format not used consistently; many errors in citation style; difficult to read and understand. 6.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome References 6.0 to >4.0 pts Uses sources effectively and documents sources accurately with minimal errors Uses sources effectively and documents sources accurately with minimal errors; limited use of direct quotes (No more than 2 or 3); meets reference requirements for assignment; reference list is in correct format. 4.0 to >2.0 pts Appropriate sources and documentation; may have minimal errors with too few or too many in-text citations; Appropriate sources and documentation; may have minimal errors with too few or too many in-text citations; missing no more than one reference as required for the assignment. 2.0 to >1.0 pts Some quotes not integrated smoothly into text; Some quotes not integrated smoothly into text; several errors with in-text citations or reference list; omitted in-text citations infrequently; missing 2 required references; overuse of direct quotes 1.0 to >0.0 pts Quotes are not well integrated into narrative or are significantly overused; Quotes are not well integrated into narrative or are significantly overused; paraphrasing is too close to original work. (Minimal errors only; more significant errors will be considered plagiarism – See Plagiarism statement to right.) 0.0 pts Plagiarism Plagiarism – source material not adequately paraphrased; direct quotes not identified; source material not referenced. *Plagiarized papers will be given a grade of zero and could result in failure of the course 6.0 pts Total Points: 100.0DNP 800 ROL Exemplar 2019-
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"
