Explain as fully as possible Kant’s Good Will. What are

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question Explain as fully as possible Kant’s Good Will.  What are those categories of things that according to Kant are good but are not good without qualification?  Why is that so for Kant? When is the will a good will? And was is the difference between the hypothetical imperative and the categorical imperative?

What exactly is the scientific revolution, and what are some

Question What exactly is the scientific revolution, and what are some examples of it? Did Keppler replace Aristotles work behind this theory?

How do you explain falsifiability and the contingency of scientific

Question How do you explain falsifiability and the contingency of scientific conclusions, and to what extent do you think they should be understood as reliable explanations of how the world works, is it possible to equate this to personal experience?

Give an example of begging the question and the either/or

Question  Give an example of begging the question and the either/or fallacy. 

1.The cultural relativist claims that “What is right and wrong

Question 1.The cultural relativist claims that “What is right and wrong varies from culture to culture”. In the lecture videos, Dr. Wilson claimed that this can be understood as either a descriptive claim or a normative claim. Explain both of these senses.2.) Many people think that if cultural relativism is true, then everyone should tolerate other cultures and their moral beliefs and practices. In the lectures, Dr. Wilson explained why this is not true, and that if you truly support tolerance, then you should not accept cultural relativism. Explain the reasons Dr. Wilson gave for that conclusion. 

. Your answer should form an essay and at least

Question . Your answer should form an essay and at least four paragraphs. In order to get full credit, you must go into detail, and be clear and complete. Make sure your answer is complete, and clear, as if the person reading your answer has no knowledge of what you are talking about, and needs to hear full explanations of the ideas you raise and discuss.  Socrates claims that he went around discussing such things as justice, beauty, and truth with the powerful people in Athens because he was given a mission from the gods. Explain the story that Socrates relates in the “Apology” for how this mission got started. In pursuing this mission, Socrates concludes that although he does not know anything about the most important things in life, he is in fact the wisest of all Athenians. Explain why he thinks this, and how he came to that conclusion. Explain the “spectrum of knowledge” that Dr. Wilson mentioned in the lecture videos, and how it relates to this issue. Explain how this relates to the topic of critical thinking.

Give an example of the validity effect and the mere

Question Give an example of the validity effect and the mere exposure effect from your life. 

its about introduction to logic Questions please see the word file that

its about introduction to logic Questions please see the word file that i attached i attached the reading summary in PDF file u might need it for the q’s .please make sure u are able to answer the Q’s right please watch Inconvenient Truth on line and do the five questions 26-30 on the test.

This is the textEdward Said states that cultural and ethnic

Question This is the textEdward Said states that cultural and ethnic identity is made by humans, the differences in culture can be seen in national habitats, long traditions, etc. Despite the cultural differences, Edward Said states that the only reason people from different culture lived separately from one another, is because of fear and prejudice as individuals believed that’s the way humans should live. Edward State believed that trying to understand someone’s culture was difficult task that often was advantageous, through sympathy, logical thinking, and looking at others perspectives other than our own. This is a difficult task, as it’s easier for people to assume certain things on a person based on stereotypes out of fear and prejudice, in a way for their culture to be considered superior. By taking the time to understand culture, requires sympathy, logical thinking, and looking at other cultures;s perspective this is a difficult task, as it requires for people to think of their own stances on certain cultures rather than believing preconceived notions that were taught. By forming a decision based on these factors, it allows for individuals to view different cultures without bias. In addition, help individuals understand that just because culture is different, that it’s not any worse than other cultures.This is an interpretation of the text done by Edward Said done by me, with an example of how Said’s principle can be applied in real life scenarios. . Edward Said states that cultural and ethnic identity is made by humans, the differences in culture can be seen in national habitats, long traditions, etc. Despite the cultural differences, Edward Said states that the only reason people from different culture lived separately from one another, is because of fear and prejudice. Edward State believed that trying to understand someone’s culture is a difficult task, and culture can be understood through sympathy, logical thinking, and looking at others perspectives other than our own. This is a difficult task, as it’s easier for people to assume certain things on a person based on stereotypes out of fear and prejudice which often leads to negative implications which can be seen through in the way others treat people of other cultures. This can be seen in the way some police officers treat minorities such African American, Hispanics, etc. A causian cop is more likely to target minorities such as African Americans to procedures such as frisk and stop because they believe in negative stereotypes associated with specific minorities. This shows that not all cultures are not treated equally, because their less likely to target a member of their own race. This can be seen on the website New York Civil Liberties and Union, where New York police department stop and frisk annual data is published where race is detailed as well as innocence(New York Civil Liberties Union, 2019). This can be seen in the annual report data of stop and frisk from the first quarter of 2019 where it states: ” 2,142 were innocent (68 percent),1,900 were black (60 percent),914 were Latino (29 percent), and 290 were white (9 percent) (New York Civil Liberties Union, 2019)”.This shows that police could have potentially believed in negative stereotypes surrounding these individuals as a reason to engage in stop and frisk.The data shown from the year 2003-to the first quarter of 2019, shows an overwhelming majority of black and latinos are targeted compared to whites. By viewing culture through the factors mentioned by Said, individuals and police are able to see other cultures as without bias whether it’s negative or positive. By understanding culture it allows for people to be seen as humans, and be treated equally. This can lead to less racial profiling, as the preconcieved notion of certain minorities are less likely to be taken seriously. 

the assignment in the word file and the article in the screenshot

the assignment in the word file and the article in the screenshot files. flow the stricture in the word file and use simple English. do not use source from the internet.

So what happens ? Describe as best you can the

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question So what happens ? Describe as best you can the outcome of the discussion and briefly how they arrive at this point . Where does this leave the discussion of whether it was appropriate for Euthyphro to charge his father with impiety ? With Socrates assuming that Euthyphro would be for him a useful teacher ?

What is moral relativism ? Based on your reading of

Question What is moral relativism ? Based on your reading of this dialogue would Euthyphro and Socrates be appropriately labeled as moral relativists ? Explain.

explain the controversy surrounding the Intelligent Design and/or related arguments

Question explain the controversy surrounding the Intelligent Design and/or related arguments for the existence of God.a)     You may focus on Paley’s version of the Argument from Design. Or you may use arguments discussed by Blackburn. Alternatively, explain how this controversy functions in the recent Supreme Court case concerning the Intelligent Design [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/program.html ]. Or you may use both. b)     State, explain, and discuss at least two different objections to the argument from design. E.g., you may argue against the inductive step in the argument and show that we have good reasons to doubt that any natural object (the world or something in the world) is in fact designed. You may also argue that, even if the argument gives us a reason to think that there is a Designer, we still have reasons to doubt that this designer is God. In particular, does the argument from design support a view that the designer is omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent, purely spiritual, creator ex-nihilo, constantly active in the world, necessary and eternal being, one being, and so on? Please explain.

This is my inerpretation of Marget Mead’s Sex and temperment

Question This is my inerpretation of Marget Mead’s Sex and temperment work is it right? style=”background-color:transparent;color:rgb(26,26,26);”>Margaret Mead believed that culture conditioned the way gender roles developed, which varied from culture to culture, not depending on sex, this is noted in Margaret Mead’s work: Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies (Mead,1963). This was observed in three different tribes and their culture:Arapresh, Mundugumor, and Tchambuli (Mead,1963). It was found that the Arapesh culture, that both men and women displayed were kind and mild mannered, this can be seen as both genders acted unaggressive, co-operative, etc (Mead,1963). The culture displayed qualities similar to what people considered femine qualities such as kindness, nurturing, etc. In the Mundugumor culture, the qualities contrasted to Arapresh culture, where common traits for both men and women are aggressiveness, maternal aspects to the minimum, and undisciplined (Mead,1963). The ideal characteristics for men and women in Mundugumor culture is aggressive male and agressive female married (Mead,1963). The third tribe the Tchambuli, it showed reversal in what most people consider traditional gender roles, where women were dominant and men were emotionally dependent on the woman (Mead,1963). By looking at these three cultures, common factors can be found where sex did not play significant role in shaping gender roles and each culture had varied gender roles. As a result, it can be concluded in the work, that human nature is malleable which is shaped by cultural upbringing (Mead,1963). It can be said by Mead’s work, a newborn child can be shaped to display personality traits such as aggression, or kindness through culture upbringing. 

What, for Holbach, is wrong with the idea of immanent

Question What, for Holbach, is wrong with the idea of immanent causation?

While Holbach does not use the term “immanent causation” he

Question While Holbach does not use the term “immanent causation” he gives a description of it and says it’s the primary mistake that advocates of free will make. What, for Holbach, is wrong with the idea of immanent causation?

help to answer these questions with short answer about philosophy

Hello I need help to answer these questions about philosophy with short answer please find attached

to write 2 pages Informations about the Depaul basketball stare Bernard Randolph

Hello I need to write 2 pages Informations about the Depaul basketball stare Bernard Randolph please find attached the informations

this is logic philosophy. the question is self explanatory. ATTACHMENT

Question this is logic philosophy. the question is self explanatory. ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment Screen Shot 2019-07-31 at 7.16.17 PM.png Fill out the truth table to determine whether the following symbolized statement is tautologous, self-contradictory, or contingent: Click on a square once for T. Click again for F. When the table is the way you want, click on Submit.

How did Hume explain the origin of ideas and how

Question How did Hume explain the origin of ideas and how does the distinction Hume makes about impressions and ideas? How does Hume regard the nature of our mind and how does Hume explain what is called the process of “thinking”? From what impression is that idea supposed to be derived?

What does Locke mean by “substance and why does Locke

Question What does Locke mean by “substance and why does Locke believe that there must be substances underlying everything that we experience? How does Berkeley disagree with Locke on primary and secondary qualities? How does Berkeley arrive at the existence of God?

The post Explain as fully as possible Kant’s Good Will. What are appeared first on Smashing Essays.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"