“Gatorade—scientifically formulated with nutrients that taste best when you need

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question “Gatorade—scientifically formulated with nutrients that taste best when you need them most.”(Name the fallacy)

Hi there, this assignment is to write one single page responding to

Hi there, this assignment is to write one single page responding to a student paper. I will attach my paper and the student paper so you won’t have different ideas than mine. I will also attach the instructions.

all the requirment written on the paper that i have upload please

all the requirment written on the paper that i have upload please read it carefully its my final project

Directions: Each participant will develop a major curriculum project built around a

Directions: Each participant will develop a major curriculum project built around a selectedemployment position or subject area. The task is to provide written documentationconcerning the purpose and curriculum of the teacher’s specific program.Theportfolio should be in the format below.Format:1.Title Pagea.Course Titleb.Instructor’s Namec.Schoold.Programe.Date of Completion2.Table of Contents3.Board Resolution (If applicable)There should be on file at your school a board resolution authorizing yourcourse/program4.School Philosophy5.Program Philosophy/Vision/Mission Statement6.Program GoalsWhat is the program attempting to do?7.Program Descriptiona.Locationb.School District (high school, vocational center)c.Demographics of Location (ethnicity, gender, socio-economic, industry, education)can be found on US Census Bureau website8.Curriculuma.Coursesb.Course Descriptionc.Course Objectivesd.Unitse.Lessons/Competenciesf.Lesson Objectivesg.Aligned with Idaho CTE Standards9.Evaluationa.Student Assessmentb.Program Evaluation (How will you evaluate the program)c.Advisory Committee: List of Members, Mission Statement and sample meeting minutes.

Discussion regarding CTE completely 1.What is the most important knowledge, skill, or

Discussion regarding CTE completely 1.What is the most important knowledge, skill, or ability which you have learned during this course?2.What is the most important unanswered question?3. What is a professional goal that you will have for the second semester of this school year?.

case where reasoning severely malfunction

How are we failing to reason? Imagine that you are a journalist and your task is to uncover a case where reasoning severely malfunctions. For this essay, you are to research some thing that actually happened (e.g., in history, in current society, in the digital sphere, wherever); and then you are to take us through the story of howreasoning malfunctioned. Get as detailed as possible with the story and, most importantly, show me your original analysis. I want to see how you uncover bad reasoning. Your essay should be structured as follows:1) Have an introduction where you tell me: a) what case study you’ll be discussing; b) what your thesis is (the thesis should tell us exactly WHAT is malfunctioning in the reasoning); c) the outline of your discussion (e.g., what you will be discussing first, second, and third and so one). 2) Body paragraphs where your point is analysis. Each paragraph should provide a puzzle piece to the story that you are telling. Make it original. Apply the concepts that you are learning. Get really detailed in telling us how the reasoning malfunctions. 3) A conclusion. Tell us what you have done in your discussion and also why this case study is important. 4) Citations. Any time you are using someones quotes and also ideas, you must cite. Did you know that even if you use part of an old paper for another class and you don’t cite yourself, that’s plagiarism? I know! That’s wild. Now that you know, cite EVERYTHING that is not your own original idea because turn it in will flag it. I do not care if it’s APA, MLA, or Chicago, just cite consistently. For a reference on MLA and APA citations go to: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/ (Links to an external site.) 5) Do NOT use someone’s analysis. I repeat, this must be your original analysis. One concern is that if you are using someone else’s analysis it will be flagged by the turnitin software and that’s plagiarism. So, don’t use some journalist’s article. Do not look for someone to organize the information for you. Rather, start searching around for an interesting topic and then find a rich source of information that you can analyze yourself. Now, here’s the thing, I’m a realist: you may have to rely on other journalist’s stories in order to get to the direct source. For example, suppose that you google, failures in reasoning and you get a Vox article about McArthur Wheeler and the Dunning-Kruger Effect. Good. Now use that article to get to the direct source of the information; and rely on your own analysis of that information. Here’s an example of a small blog post that I wrote a couple of years ago. I use events that others have written about. However, I have my own original analysis of those evehttp://www.danceofreason.com/2015/03/check-yourself-before-you-wreck-yourself.html (Links to an external site.) 2,000 words, MLA format C level paperDue August 2, 2019 11:59 pm

Hi there, I have this assignment about writing a reflection paper based

Hi there, I have this assignment about writing a reflection paper based on an online class. It should be about 2 to 3 pages single spaced. I will attach the instructions. I will also send you an example of how it should be

on Program evaluation in CTE

Part 1 is to focus on one or two points of particular interest (i.e., something that caught your attention, caused you to reconsider something, or clarified something you did not understand previously). Here, “reflective” is referring to a habit of mind that questions why, what, and how one goes about doing what one does, with an eye toward making “what is,” better. It is a reflective critique of what has been learned and/or observed. As teachers, we all need to reflect on what we do and why we do it. Reflection is a vital part of improving instruction and learning.Part 2 is to focus on application; that is, on how the session materials can be put to use in “your” classroom or situation. Again, this is a reflective process looking for ways of applying what has been learned. The commentary is due within the week following the given session. Students are expected to engage in online discussions of the commentaries.https://www.energy.gov/eere/analysis/program-evaluation-why-what-and-when-evaluate

is : Semiotics/Culture this is the final paper

Final Paper (Instructions) Content Organize your paper into sections with headings. For a term paper the sections might be: you have to chose between the US vs other country semitics/ culture. I have attached the file. Topic Introduction: Goal Thesis statement Body part: Main point #1 Main point #2 Main point #3 Supporting evidences (Credible References) Conclusion: Restate your goal, main points and thesis statement. End on a strong note. Bibliography/References FormatStyleGrammar and spellingReferences Apply Semiotics (class terms):The Saussurean model- Signifier- Signified concept- The relational systemThe Peircean model- symbolic mode- iconic mode- indexical mode- denotation and connotation -intertextuality – intratextuality(The book “The Basic Semiotics” is uploaded on Moodle).Apply “Dialogism”: Time and Space Self and Other Relativity Theory Outsideness Answerability How To Write A Good Research PaperResearch paper presents and argues a thesis, the writer’s proposition or opinion. It is an analytical or persuasive essay that evaluates a position. As such, a research paper tries to convince readers that the writer’s argument is valid or at least deserves serious consideration. As a result, a research paper requires the writer to be creative in using facts, details, examples, and opinions to support a point. The writer has to be original and inventive in deciding which facts best support the thesis and which ones are superfluous.When you write a research paper, you have to read what authorities have written about the topic and then write an essay in which you draw your own conclusions about the topic. Since your thesis is fresh and original, you can’t merely summarize what someone else has written. Instead, you have to synthesize information from many different sources to create something that is your own. A term paper, in contrast, is a collection of facts. It does not argue a point; it does not try to persuade readers to think or act a certain way. Since a term paper is a summary of information from one or more sources, you are merely reporting what others have said. This is not to say that a term paper doesn’t have many valid uses. For example, it is very helpful for people who need a great deal of data in a condensed, easy to read form. Government workers are often asked to prepare term papers with information on weather, transportation, economics, and so forth. What Are the Qualities of a Good Research Paper? No matter what its topic or length, an effective research paper meets the following ten criteria: 1. The paper has a clear thesis.2. The writer shows a strong understanding of the topic and source material used.3. There is evidence that the writer has read widely on the topic, including the recognized authorities in the field.4. The paper acknowledges the opposition but shows why the point being argued is more valid.5. The points are organized in a clear and logical way. 6. Each point is supported by solid, persuasive facts and examples.7. Every outside source is carefully documented.8. All supporting material can be verified.9. The paper follows the standard conventions of the genre, including the use of correct documentation and a Works Cited page.10. The paper uses standard written English. This is the level of diction and usage expected of educated people in high schools, colleges, universities, and work setting. APA (American Psychological Assoc.) Rozakis, L. (1999). Schaum’s Quick Guide to Writing Great Research Papers. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. MLA (Modern Language Assoc.) Rozakis, Laurie. Schaum’s Quick Guide to Writing Great Research Papers. McGraw-Hill Professional, 1999. Schaum’s Quick Guide Series. EBSCOhost.

this video, explain what the Categorical Imperative consists in. Also, explain the downside of the Kant’s Categorical Imperative.

Based on this video, explain what the Categorical Imperative consists in. Also, explain the downside of the Kant’s Categorical Imperative.

Write a 500-750-word essay and include the following: PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Write a 500-750-word essay and include the following: PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU ARE ONLY WRITING ABOUT MEDIA ADVOCACY THEORY AND AGENDA SETTING THEORIES (Just these 2 theories)Include three or more scholarly resources.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. This benchmark assignment assesses the following competency:5.2: Describe media influence through the lens of different mass communication theories.*This assignment uses a specific template, attached

Goal: The goal of this assignment is to help you

Question Goal: The goal of this assignment is to help you achieve CO3.Course Objectives: CO3.framework for developing one’s own ethical and moral philosophy.This assignment and our final paper (Wk 7) are designed to help you to framework for developing your own ethical and moral philosophy. What would such a framework do for you? It would help you make decisions in your life in a way that is logical, and in a way that aligns with your personal values (these may come from your personal religious commitments, your family, your ethnic or cultural background — or some combination of all of these). Why do you need a framework if you have values. Holding values and being able to “think through” challenging problems in order to arrive at a conclusion about them in light of those values can be challenging. How will you begin to develop your own ethical and moral framework? By selecting a moral issue that challenges you or that you want to explore or learn more about, and then using one of the ethical theories from our course as a kind of lens by which to examine that moral dilemma, you’ll paper that fully explores the issue and you’ll draw some conclusions about where you stand on the issue in light of research.How should I proceed if I want to do well on this assignment? You should look ahead to the Week #7 paper as well as read the details provided here carefully, so that you fully understand both assignments before you begin your work. ASSIGNMENT DESCRIPTION This assignment is a proposal for the Week 7 Final Paper. This proposal should include an ethical topic that you will critique with one of the main ethical theories from our course.  One short paragraph for this part of the proposal is sufficient.  Your Proposal must also include a list of at least three academic resources that you will use to begin your research on the topic.         One of them can be an encyclopedia article.  One should be a primary reading. Example: Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals.  The third one should be an academically, peer-reviewed journal article from the APUS online library.  These three resources will form the beginning of your beginning bibliography. Sources you include in your proposal’s working bibliography should be annotated, which means that you should explain in two or three sentences the main argument of each resourcewhy each resource is helpful and how you anticipate using the resource for your own argument.  Lastly, your proposal should include a brief description of at least one thing in the Philosophy Program Guide that you saw that might be helpful for your final paper. Check out the Philosophy Program Guide in the APUS Library: Philosophy Program GuideASSIGNMENT DETAILSFor this assignment, match one of the following ethical theories from Western Civilization with a contemporary topic of your choice. What sort contemporary topic or moral/ethical dilemma should I explore and unpack using my selected ethical theory?  When considering a contemporary topic, think about current events, some ethical issue you are passionate about, or an ethical issue you know a lot about, or perhaps even encounter in your professional or personal life – or maybe there’s an issue you’ve heard about but don’t fully understand and want to learn more. If you need help coming up with an idea of an ethical issue to critique with your ethical theory, you can begin by taking a look at the following website, but don’t feel constrained by this list. This is an opportunity for you to be creative in your thinking and to do something that you are interested in learning more about!ETHICAL ISSUES IN CONTEMPORARY CULTURE Adam Blatner, M.D. Revised … The list below is meant to be evocative rather than comprehensive. There are many other issues you may want to explore — choose one.https://www.blatner.com/adam/psyntbk/ethicissues.htmWhich “ethical theories” should I choose from?  When considering what ethical theory to apply to the moral dilemma topic you select, consider this list of theories from our course. If you have a particular theory you want to use that is not listed, seek your Instructor’s approval. Aristotelian Virtue EthicsImmanuel Kant’s Deontological EthicsJeremy Bentham/John Stuart Mill’s UtilitarianismSocial Contract TheoryJohn Rawls’ Theory of JusticeEgoismEvolutionary MoralityExistentialismFeminism Cultural RelativismHINTS/TIPS/RESOURCES If you have questions regarding selecting an issue, or researching and writing, please ask your Instructor for guidance, but you do not need specific approval for this assignment if you choose one of the ethical theories below. The Instructor’s feedback from this assignment may help you focus your topic to improve your final paper due in Week #7, so be sure to read it carefully once it has been returned to you. 

What is the definition of fallacy of relevance? Fallacy of

Question What is the definition of fallacy of relevance? Fallacy of weak induction? and fallacy of ambiguity?

Kafka – The TrialDescribe the portrayals of “law” in the

Question Kafka – The TrialDescribe the portrayals of “law” in the novel. Any of the characters (guards, court officials, lawyers, judges, the women, the painter, defendants, K., etc) have knowledge of the law? Give specific examples from the reading that describe what kind of relationship the characters have to the law.

Kafka – The Trial Describe the interactions between K. and

Question Kafka – The Trial Describe the interactions between K. and other characters in the novel. What is the nature of their interaction? Give specific examples.

My 91-year-old father died recently in a hospice setting. When

Question My 91-year-old father died recently in a hospice setting. When it was evident that he was going to die, my sisters and I made arrangements to move our mother, who has Alzheimer’s, to a care facility. She and my father were able to live together until then because of the wonderful work of a paid caregiver and my sister’s attention. The director of the facility advised us against telling Mom that Dad had died, as she wouldn’t remember and would grieve anew each time she was told. We were advised to say something like, “He’s at the store and will be right back.” We understood the rationale, but it still seemed wrong to deceive Mom. The day after Dad died, we told her and stressed that he had died peacefully and that we were there. When she asked me the next day where he was, I said that he was “resting with Jesus,” an expression familiar to her. Oddly, she has not asked about him since. Had she done so, would it have been respectful of her remaining dignity and of their 68-year marriage to repeatedly lie to her? Donna, Ithaca, N.Y. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/magazine/is-it-ok-to-give-cigarettes-to-a-homeless-person.html?rref=collection/column/the-ethicist

What is the difference between science and non science in

Question What is the difference between science and non science in Philosophy. What are 2 examples of non science and philosophers associated to it? I am curious if non science is correlated to deontology…..

“On Free Will” page 374-376

Question “On Free Will” page 374-376

can you help me summarizing ” What is philosophy ?”

Question can you help me summarizing ” What is philosophy ?” by Alistair Sinclair page one through seventeen (1-17)

Is A. J. Ayer a cognitivist or noncognitivist about moral

Question Is A. J. Ayer a cognitivist or noncognitivist about moral style=”color:rgb(33,33,33);”>    statements?    Explain your answer.

After viewing the video of 24, explain why it can

Question After viewing the video of 24, explain why it can be considered a Utilitarian episode. How does this movie reflect Utilitarianism? Was the act that this episode culminated in a morally correct act? Would you have performed this act if you were in Jack Bauer’s position?

The post “Gatorade—scientifically formulated with nutrients that taste best when you need appeared first on Smashing Essays.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"