HELLO , IM LOOKING FOR WEEK4 DISCUSSION BOARD PHI341(fallacy of

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question HELLO , IM LOOKING FOR WEEK4 DISCUSSION BOARD PHI341(fallacy of relevance /weak induction/ambiguity ) also if there is sample Q. for midterm .thanks

Consider the following statements: (a) Lester is 19 years old

Question Consider the following statements:        (a)  Lester is 19 years old and Kathryn has a PhD.        (b) Lester is 19 years old and Kathryn has a PhD and Darren is 6 feet tall.Circle the letter of the statement which is most informative

P1 Sam is not tallP2 Sam is either tall or

Question P1   Sam is not tallP2   Sam is either tall or short or likes coca-cola. />C    Sam is shortThis argument is     (i)  valid      (ii) invalid     (iii) neither valid nor invalid   (iv) indeterminate

If two pieces of information in an argument together (but

Question If two pieces of information in an argument together (but not separately) do not defeat a loophole to the argument’s conclusion, then those pieces of information are joint premises for that conclusion.(i)  True      (ii) False    (iii) neither true nor false     (iv) indeterminate

In an argument diagram, premises which together support a conclusion

Question In an argument diagram, premises which together support a conclusion are linked together by the following symbol:(i)  

Arguments can also function as explanations, but explanations can never

Question Arguments can also function as explanations, but explanations can never function as arguments. />(i)   True      (ii) False        (iii) neither true nor false     (iv) indeterminate

Prompt: Describe the theory of Compatibilism. Do you think it

Question Prompt: Describe the theory of Compatibilism. Do you think it works?

1. On pp. 114-122, Plato (via his spokesperson Socrates) provides

Question 1. On pp. 114-122, Plato (via his spokesperson Socrates) provides more detail about his views regarding things such as the Equal itself, the Beautiful itself, the Good itself, etc. (on p. 139 Phaedo refers to such things as “the Forms”). What are the distinctive characteristics of the Forms? How do the Forms differ from particular things that we experience with our senses?

arguments in support of cultural relativism

Question arguments in support of cultural relativism

As far as philosophy goes, what is a definition of

Question As far as philosophy goes, what is a definition of science, and compare this to what non-science is, and give an example.

What is the empiricism and instrumentalism in philosophy of science?

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question What is the empiricism and instrumentalism in philosophy of science? How does it pertain to science and non science. Which theoris in philosophy of science best fall under science and non science?

I am just beginning a course in Philosophy of science.

Question I am just beginning a course in Philosophy of science. I am trying to figure it out. What happens in a scientific revolution? Can you also give me an example so I can research into it? Thanks

a 1-2 page dialogue (Single spaced)

The dialogue has to be based on Fyoder Dostoevskys text “The problem of evil”. Document attached.

Describe the theory of Compatibilism. Do you think it works?

Question Describe the theory of Compatibilism. Do you think it works?

Pay attention and take notes on how they approach this case

Pay attention and take notes on how they approach this case using the three major ethical theories you have already learned in this class.

RESPOND TO A PEERLEO SAIDThe categorical imperative is the idea that a

RESPOND TO A PEERLEO SAIDThe categorical imperative is the idea that a philosopher in the 18th Century named Immanuel Kant, had and one which was built around the idea that for a law standing on high moral grounds and one which is also unconditional at the same time, the validity it has will never depend on any ulterior motive in the very end. This paper will aim to shed light on this and while at it, elaborate on all the related optics.What does categorical imperative consist of?As it has been explained by many scholars after its inception, and even in the introductory part of this paper, the categorical imperative is supposed to help us to find a comfortable nut right moral space. In other words, through a categorical imperative, we are able to derive a suitable way to evaluate our own moral actions and obligations for that matter and with this, making good judgments is no a long shot at all.It is also very important to highlight the fact that categorical imperative doesn’t stand for the idea that human beings are to be commanded. It justifies how they cannot follow commands in each and every moral direction they take, but rather take these so-called commands, and redefine them into what philosophers and other learned fellows would call a mere and rather simple formal procedure or process.Through this same procedure, it then becomes easier and flexible to evaluate and even go all the way to rationalize any step or action about which might end up becoming relevant in a moral scope and grounds, to say the least. This is, therefore, the true definition and perception of the categorical imperative.The downside of Kant’s Categorical Imperative. In as much as the Kant’s Categorical Imperative has been used over the years and in the process earned a number of plaudits, it still has its upsides and so does it have its downsides. The following are some of the downsides of the Kant’s Categorical Imperative and some of which are revealing on the weakness of the entire Kant’s Categorical Imperative. The weaknesses are as follows;One of the major weaknesses exhibited by the Kant’s Categorical Imperative is the fact that it goes all the way to build up on simple analogy that as individuals, we know how to categorize the difference between evil and good. In as much as this remains to be true in a given extent, it is important to highlight the fact that it is also delusional to some people. This is, therefore, one of the downsides of the Kant’s Categorical Imperative.The second downside of the Kant’s Categorical Imperative is the fact that as an ideology, seems counter-intuitive. With this particular trait, it finds itself in the middle f ends its both advocates for and hence losing its credibility when it is needed. Being counter-intuitive is just among the many other downsides associated with the Kant’s Categorical Imperative. The following are, therefore, some of the weaknesses and hence, some of the main downsides of the Kant’s Categorical Imperative that are worthy of being mentioned in this case. It is however very important to highlight the fact that these are not the only weaknesses and hence the downsides of the Kant’s Categorical Imperative as there are more that are relative and hence open to multiple ways of interpretation.

response to Peter Singer’s view on Ethics

Provide a response to Peter Singer’s view on Ethics. How has this class changed or begun to change the way you see your relationship to other human beings, animals, and the environment?

since 1972, when the Supreme Court declared that the capital punishment (death penalty) statutes across the states were unconstitutional as applied, the debate around the use of Capital Punishment and due process has continued. Controversy regard

At least since 1972, when the Supreme Court declared that the capital punishment (death penalty) statutes across the states were unconstitutional as applied, the debate around the use of Capital Punishment and due process has continued. Controversy regarding the utilization of capital punishment usually raises its voice when an execution is about to happen. Thus far, the Supreme Court has never declared the use capital punishment to be unconstitutional. Challenges by defense attorneys will undoubtedly continue.Take a position regarding whether or not the capital punishment should be declared prohibited by way of a Constitutional Amendment.In your discussion consider:Please make your initial post by midweek, and respond to at least one other student’s post by the end of the week. Please check the for specific due dates.

This week, we are studying a number of argument fallacies:

Question This week, we are studying a number of argument fallacies: common mistakes that we make when reasoning with other people. Two of the fallacies are called “appeal to the person” and “straw man.” Of the two items below about Socrates, which one commits the appeal to the person fallacy? And which one commits the straw man fallacy? How can we tell which one is which?1. The philosopher Socrates argues that each person should care more about the soul than about the body, since the soul lasts forever while the body is temporary. I hope people do not listen to this, though, because telling people not to care at all about their own bodily health like this is dangerous and misguided. Good health is important, and I am surprised that someone as supposedly wise as Socrates would tell people to be unhealthy. We must reject Socrates’ argument.  2. Socrates made the argument that the soul is more important than the body, because the soul lasts forever while the body is only temporary. But remember that Socrates was obviously a lousy husband and father, and he was also a convicted criminal. Can we really believe the arguments of someone like this? 

Hasty generalization and the composition fallacy are sometimes confused with

Question Hasty generalization and the composition fallacy are sometimes confused with each other. What is similar between them that might cause this confusion? What is different between them that would ultimately allows us to tell one from another? Hasty generalization is also sometimes confused with faulty analogy. What is similar between them that might cause this confusion? What is different between them that would ultimately allows us to tell one from another?Are there any other fallacies that seem to be easy to be confused with each other?  

Animal research is a necessary practice in the world of

Question Animal research is a necessary practice in the world of medical research, allowing scientists to develop life-saving interventions and to spot catastrophic problems before new techniques or products make their way to actual patients. However, this does not mean that we should deny that there are serious ethical issues involved.Animal testing is not a pretty or pleasant process. It causes pain and suffering to animal subjects, and legitimate cases of abuse have been uncovered by animal rights groups. Consequently, the practice should be tightly regulated, and alternative methods should be employed whenever possible.Questions:

The post HELLO , IM LOOKING FOR WEEK4 DISCUSSION BOARD PHI341(fallacy of appeared first on Smashing Essays.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"