Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

I want someone expert in writing to write for me a Memo

/in /by

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays I want someone expert in writing to write for me a Memo for my final portfolio , the reflection letter is posted below also some other files

Create a an APA Annotated Bibliography It must have 5 scholarly sources

Create a an APA Annotated Bibliography It must have 5 scholarly sources Please view the sample to complete it correctlyTHERE AN BE NO PLAGIARISM AT ALLTOPIC: Effecrs of Social Media on Rel

You are to type a 1500 word persuasive essay in MLA format.

You are to type a 1500 word persuasive essay in MLA format. Also provide a detailed outline of the essay that includes a thesis statement and a 75 word summary of the essay. Cite at least 5 sources and be sure to paraphrase and make proper citations. The topic to write about is “Should college athletes be paid for playing”. The topic is a social issue, so take a position (against it). Explain why college athletes should not be paid. Argumentation: Convince your reader of your opinion. Follow the guidelines and the instructions correctly. I have attached a powerpoint and a few other attachments to help you write the essay.With the essay, i need you to type up a point-by-point outline, and in the outline you must have 3 bases for persuasion and 3 bases for debate. I attached images of an example outline. Be sure to look at them for further help.

I would Inform them that I’m an International Student and I was

I would Inform them that I’m an International Student and I was attending English school at that time

Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a

Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis essays) for this assignment. First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis essay written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique. If the author of your critique is not specified, focus on the publication of the critique. Choose from among these sources: Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:Evaluate the critic/author:Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have? (If you are using a valid source, you should be able to find these easily)Find the thesis of the article:What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?Evaluate the thesis:Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.Evaluate the support:disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly? Next, locate a second critique about the novel that includes ideas somewhat similar (genre classification, for instance) to any of the discussions you have in your essay. The second critique can either support or refute any of the claims in your paper. The objective of this portion of the essay is to further support your opinion of the primary critic’s thesis or support. Therefore, for example, if you choose a secondary article that refutes any of your claims, you will need to counteract those ideas to bring the focus of your essay back in alignment with your essay’s thesis (your personal opinion of how the primary critic is either correct or incorrect in his or her thesis claim and/or how the first critic is either effective or ineffective in his or her support). Every discussion in this essay should ultimately support the claim you make in your thesis. For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, and if you agree, does the second critic also support this thesis? How so? If the second critic does not support your assessment of the first critic’s thesis, what evidence can you use from the text to argue that the second critic is incorrect? Consider another example: if the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, and if you disagree, does the second critic help you argue your own view of the first critic’s thesis? If so, how? Perhaps the second critic disagrees with your view and feels the novel is autobiographical– if that’s the case, be prepared to use evidence from the text to refute the second critic’s thesis and support your own argument. Using two critiques in this way will allow you to create a polished, comprehensive Evaluation Essay that allows you to connect your own ideas to those of seasoned critics. In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop your essay so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement in both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims is supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen; the novel, Frankenstein; and/or the study guides. Using proper MLA style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.Helpful Hints: For a thesis statement, try answering a question like: How and how well does this piece of criticism state and support its argument regarding Frankenstein? You might use these as possible guidelines in crafting your thesis statement: (Critic, aka author of the critique) uses (add critic title) to (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) by (explain why and/or include your support). OR (Critic)’s (add critique title) (add an adjective to describe the effectiveness of the argument such as “adequately” or “inadequately”) argue that (add critic’s thesis) because (explain why and/or include your support). More specific thesis examples: John Smith uses “Frankenstein Critique Essay” to adequately argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster by coddling Victor as a boy. OR John Smith’s “Frankenstein Critique Essay” does not effectively argue that Victor’s mother created the first monster because the novel Frankenstein too strongly supports inherent good or bad, which means nurturing roles cannot be held responsible.The guidelines for this assignment are:Length: This assignment should be a minimum of 3 typed pages or at least 750 words.Header: Include a header in the upper left-hand corner of your writing assignment with the following information:Format:Underline your thesis statement in the introductory paragraph. Reminder: You need at least two critiques in addition to the novel in Works Cited in order to receive the highest score. In other words, you need three sources total in cited in the essay and on the Works Cited page in order to earn the maximum points in the corresponding column on the grading rubric. Failure to meet the source minimum will result in a severe decrease in your grade.

discussion and answer further questions

In this discussion, answer these two questions (using, of course, expert perspectives aka research) about your project (250 words minimum). 1) Why is answering/addressing this policy failure urgent? To whom? Says who? (You’ll first need to define what the policy failure is.)2) Why is this problem not yet solved? What is preventing it from being addressed or responded to? CITE and explain the positions of your experts. (Include at least five citations with annotations.) In your annotations, you should identify and discuss opposition positions! So please elaborate on ALLIES and OPPONENTS. Who is likely, predictably AGAINST? Why? More helpfully, who is strategically against, or offering a compromise or alternative position?We might accurately describe some opposition as “predictable” and therefore not spend a whole lot of time engaging it. On the other hand, people who generally agree but differ on tactics, strategy, and details demand some real attention. What about their position makes it more reasonable, viable, cost effective than a different one?Respond to one or two of your peers’ discussion posts. (In order to receive credit for this assignment, you must respond to a peer’s post AND ask them a specific–not vague–question in your response.) We can help each other clarify our advocacy positions by offering feedback and asking targeted, constructive questions.

Revise the draft that is attached, utilizing the feedback from the instructor.Both

Revise the draft that is attached, utilizing the feedback from the instructor.Both the draft and the feedback are attached.

30 ptsFull Marks28.5 ptsExcellent27 ptsVery Good24 ptsGood21 ptsUnsatisfactory18 ptsFail0 ptsMissing28.5 / 30

30 ptsFull Marks28.5 ptsExcellent27 ptsVery Good24 ptsGood21 ptsUnsatisfactory18 ptsFail0 ptsMissing28.5 / 30 ptsTask Related Skills – Response 1) Relates materials to ideas discussed in the course 2) Connects the material to problems in the present-day world 3) States your opinion 4) Relates material to your life, experiences or feelings 5) Discusses whether material changed your perspective in any way?30 ptsFull Marks28.5 ptsExcellent27 ptsVery Good24 ptsGood21 ptsUnsatisfactory18 ptsFail0 ptsMissingComments4) Relates material to your life, experiences or feelings 5) Discusses whether material changed your perspective in any way?21 / 30 ptsContent – Content Completeness 1) Student gives a response to all aspects of the prompt 2) Student demonstrates content knowledge.10 ptsFull Marks9.5 ptsExcellent9 ptsVery Good8 ptsAverage7 ptsUnsatisfactory6 ptsFail0 ptsMissing8 / 10 ptsContent – Content Accuracy (10%) – The student includes course source information accurately.10 ptsFull Marks9.5 ptsExcellent9 ptsVery Good8 ptsGood7 ptsUnsatisfactory6 ptsFail0 ptsMissingComments9 / 10 ptsLanguage – General Writing Skills I (The student demonstrates writing skills at the sentence, paragraph, and whole-paper level.) 1) The whole paper has coherence 2) Ideas can be understood but some reader effort may be necessary 3) Sentences and paragraphs show cohesion 4) Sentences and paragraphs show consistent and strategic movement of ideas 5) Simple transitions show connections between ideas, sentences.5 ptsFull Marks4.75 ptsExcellent4.5 ptsVery Good4 ptsGood3.5 ptsUnsatisfactory3 ptsFail0 ptsMissing4.75 / 5 ptsWriting Process and Editing 1) Takes notes on listenings and readings 2) Writes a Summary on Anders 3) Visits tutor for brainstorming 4) Writes a first draft 5) Fixes grammar, spelling, and punctuation mistakes.5 ptsFull Marks4.75 ptsExcellent4.5 ptsVery Good4 ptsGood3.5 ptsUnsatisfactory3 ptsFail0 ptsMissing4.5 / 5 ptsLanguage – Language Use and Grammar 1) Paper layout is adequate for academic writing (format, margins, fonts, etc.) 2) Grammar and syntax meet academic standards 3) Spelling and Punctuation meet academic standards 4) Citation and other notation meet academic (APA) standards 5) Language meets academic standards for definition and usage.10 ptsFull Marks9.5 ptsExcellent9 ptsVery Good8 ptsGood7 ptsUnsatisfactory6 ptsFail0 ptsMissing9.5 / 10 ptsIf you looked at the Outline I put in Collaborations, you would have seen that there was another step in the process of writing this paper. You needed to include a synthetic discussion after the conclusion, and that synthesis was an important part of the paper overall. So while you had some outstanding parts to this paper, it lacked completion of the primary goal of the paper.

INSTRUCTIONSWatch episode 3 of National Geographic’s first season of The Story of

INSTRUCTIONSWatch episode 3 of National Geographic’s first season of The Story of God. The episode is entitled “Who is God?” You will find the video in Modules in Canvas.WITHOUT summarizing, compose one to three paragraphs reflecting upon whatever struck you as most interesting in the video. Look for evidence of “religious” vs “theological” material. FORMATTING Calibri 11 pt font, double-spacing. Files should be .doc or .docx. No .pages files;No bibliography or footnotes are required. Should you choose to include a critical apparatus, it should be CMS. Use parentheses for in-text biblical citations of sacred text/s;Use universal language (e.g. “humankind” not “mankind”).EVALUATION A maximum of 5 points will be awarded. I will be looking for evidence of connecting what was viewed with what you have learned in class.

INSTRUCTIONSWatch episode 3 of National Geographic’s first season of The Story of

INSTRUCTIONSWatch episode 3 of National Geographic’s first season of The Story of God. The episode is entitled “Who is God?” You will find the video in Modules in Canvas.WITHOUT summarizing, compose one to three paragraphs reflecting upon whatever struck you as most interesting in the video. Look for evidence of “religious” vs “theological” material. FORMATTING Calibri 11 pt font, double-spacing. Files should be .doc or .docx. No .pages files;No bibliography or footnotes are required. Should you choose to include a critical apparatus, it should be CMS. Use parentheses for in-text biblical citations of sacred text/s;Use universal language (e.g. “humankind” not “mankind”).EVALUATION A maximum of 5 points will be awarded. I will be looking for evidence of connecting what was viewed with what you have learned in class.

For this assignment, you will be writing a response to the essay

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays For this assignment, you will be writing a response to the essay you selected for your Week 2 Outline. The purpose of a draft is to give your instructor a good sense of your organizational writing skills so they can examine your use of the strategies of basic argumentation and critical response and provide you with feedback you can incorporate in your Final Essay.In your paper,The Critical Response Essay – Rough Draft

ER Diagram of Prototype Database

Design a prototype database using an illustrative ER diagram, which meets the following criteria:· The design should include at least 4 tables· The tables should have primary keys and must be linked. The link will be through the mechanism of foreign keys, i.e, placing the key from one table as a field in a second table. · Data split into more than one table based on 1:1 or 1:M relationships · Use Microsoft Excel show the tables, fields, records, and data for the Prototype Database.Note. Submit the design of your database as an ER diagram. You may use Word, PowerPoint, Creately, LucidCharts, or any other software of your choice to design this diagram. You are not required to design your prototype database in Microsoft Access.

ATTACHED IS WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT THAT YOU WILL NEED FOR THIS assignment.

ATTACHED IS WEEK 3 ASSIGNMENT THAT YOU WILL NEED FOR THIS assignment. USE SAME TOPIC AS ATTACHED.Assignment 1.2: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part IISynthesizing and WritingDue Week 5 and worth 100 pointsWhen looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.For Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes, reviewed the Procon.org Website in order to gather information, and engaged in prewriting to examine your thoughts.* Remember that in the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext.In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write a paper to synthesize your ideas.Part II – WritingWrite at three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

a video about a book called This Changes Everything and respond to it

Please write your original post responding to the documentary. In your original post, you must use TWO quotes from the film and reflect on your overall thoughts about Klein’s argument that grassroots movements are the key to fighting the fossil fuel industry and climate change. About 350 words. Video is available on iTunes.

I need someone who is very expert in writing and have knowledge

I need someone who is very expert in writing and have knowledge to write for me a memo for my final portfolio

i want someone expert in writing research to edit or rearrange for

i want someone expert in writing research to edit or rearrange for me some parts of my research , the research uploaded below

treatment of aids in Africa this is how the essay format should be -information on statistics and data -how treatment is done -side effects -problem with African nation in regards to the drugs -what to do -conclusion

Topic :The treatment of aids in Africa this is how the essay format should be -information on statistics and data -how treatment is done -side effects-problem with African nation in regards to the drugs-what to do-conclusion

I want someone expert in writing to write for me a Memo

I want someone expert in writing to write for me a Memo for my final portfolio , the reflection letter is posted below also some other files

Utilizing the National Standards for Professional Learning and other similar resources as

Utilizing the National Standards for Professional Learning and other similar resources as a guide, analyze and apply what you have learned to your own organization or choose an organization of interest. As a minimum include the following resources: learning designs, outcomes, leadership, data implementation and learning communities. Develop an action plan for improvement relating to your current organization or another organization. The written paper should be at least seven – ten (7-10) pages in length not including cover page or reference page. A minimum of five-seven (5-7) scholarly current references are required for this assignment. Write in the third person and submit in a word document.

I want someone expert in edit some paragraph in my research like

I want someone expert in edit some paragraph in my research like conclusion and the methodology , i will post the file below

Resources and Examples of TopicsA narrative essay is a journey through time.

Resources and Examples of TopicsA narrative essay is a journey through time. Every narrative essay has three parts: a beginning, a middle, and an end. Writing a narrative essay is different from a persuasive essay. Narrative essays do not have such arguments. They have settings, characters, and dialogue. They have conflicts and resolutions. Great narrative essays also have turning points. Writing a narrative essay is about telling a story using your original voice. Good narrative essays have a touch of poetics. Characters and settings should be described with flare.

The post I want someone expert in writing to write for me a Memo appeared first on Smashing Essays.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"