Is “What’s moral for you is not necessarily moral for

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question Is “What’s moral for you is not necessarily moral for me” true?

I just need to give comments about what Krystine Munoz said below:KRYSTINE

I just need to give comments about what Krystine Munoz said below:KRYSTINE MUNOZ Peter Singer believes that animals deserve the same respect as human beings do. He believes that it is immoral to use animals in any way that may promote cruelty or pain. His views on Ethics stems from a utilitarian point of view—maximize happiness while diminishing pain.Ethics has taught me that as individuals we must respect others decisions, despite not agreeing with them— however, one must never forget their morals and values, and fight for what is deemed right. Morality is a public phenomenon and it is ever changing. We must always remember that people are in entirely different situations than ourselves, thus the actions they take may be completely different than the ones we do because of where they currently are in life. There are different morals for everyone and those different morals produce different rules and results.Ethics has taught me that there are inconsistent statuses amongst animal ethics. Many, like Singer, believe animals should not be harmed or tortured in anyway, whereas others see themselves as superior because animals are unable to understand what morality truly means. When I think of animals and ethics, it has opened my eyes to how many animals are killed inhumanely so people can eat meat. At my household, we eat meat however we have gradually begun to substitute it for vegan products, because we feel guilty for eating the meat of an animal that was tortured and killed inhumanely. Just like the stance of animal ethics, there is an inconsistent status among environmental ethics. People are quick to knock down forests and tear down farm land to build sky rises despite the fact that they are contributing to global warming, destroying ecosystems, and so forth. It’s unfortunate that many don’t see that these environmental changes will be detrimental for our future here on Earth.

YANET SAIDAccording to Kantian ethics, the medical practitioners in charge of taking

YANET SAIDAccording to Kantian ethics, the medical practitioners in charge of taking care of the children should apply the principles of health care , which emphasize the moral duty of saving lives. The nurses and doctors are required to treat any baby born prematurely, especially when they have a chance of survival. They should therefore not treat the baby only as a means, but also as an end to themselves. The interests of the parents of the infant are also very essential in this case and should be considered. According to Kant, nothing mattered except having a good will. Morality is a matter of intention, and as long as our intentions are good, the consequences of our actions are not important. The parents want their baby to survive no matter the odds. Their morality and will is jot in question here. The mother even claims that as long as her baby survives, she will not mind if he grows up as a handicapped kid with mental illness conditions. Life is more important to her than the consequences that may accompany her decision to save her baby’s life. This is what Kantian ethics prioritizes, and as long as the parents give consent, the medical practitioners should treat the baby and do everything possible to save his life. Regardless of whether the parents or the medical practitioners like it, Kant insists that moral worth only comes when you do something because you know it fulfills your moral duty.Kantian ethics maintain that if it is in line with their moral duty, they should save the baby’s life by all means necessary .

In a five paragraph essay, apply ONE ethical theory to decide the

In a five paragraph essay, apply ONE ethical theory to decide the moral course of action in the medical case of the premature twins studied in class. Apply the ethical theory to support your arguments. Not using the ethical theory results in an automatic zero. Using more than one ethical theory results in an automatic zero.

Hello, Can I get help for an outline for my

Question Hello, Can I get help for an outline for my Philosophy paper? According to Socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters? Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted? Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?

I need to get the answer for these questions ATTACHMENT

Question I need to get the answer for these questions ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment 0E2BA246-BD3F-4734-BE09-5D295C37E153.jpeg WK 2 Transition Paper (2-3 Pages in Length) I would like you to copy and paste the following questions or statements into your paper and I would like you to answer each one individually: (2-3 Pages in Length) 1. The following are the main tenants (beliefs) of Deism. Type in your answer 2. The following are the three key factors in the development of Deism. Type in your answer 3. The following are my two examples of how Deism undermines key tenants of Christian Theism. Type inyour answer 4. The following is how there was a transition from Christian Theism to Deism in the 17th Century (1600’s). Type in your answer

We can identify an argument as categorical deductive ifa. The

Question We can identify an argument as categorical deductive ifa.    The conclusion is of the argument probably trueb.    There are at least four claims in the argumentc.    The claims relate to all, none, or some members of a categoryd.    The claims use operators such as “or” “if/then”

knowledge about oneself and the world around them, goes beyond

Question knowledge about oneself and the world around them, goes beyond five sense. What is this called? />Bhagaved Gita humanities 1301 course philosophy

Fideism is inferior to rationalism. Evaluate this view of the

Question Fideism is inferior to rationalism. Evaluate this view of the nature of religious belief.answer of word limit 3000

If a philosopher or a scientist is a “naturalist” what

Question If a philosopher or a scientist is a “naturalist” what does that mean? 

Using citations from the assigned reading, explain briefly how Schechtman

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question Using citations from the assigned reading, explain briefly how Schechtman modifies Locke’s theory of personal identity to conform to a person’s intelligibility of those memories. Give examples about how this idea of personhood allows us to reasonably form plans for future action. Finally, give reasons why we should or should not accept Schechtman’s modified account of personal identity.Required Reading: Marya Schechtman, “Personal Identity and the Past” (PDF)Recommended Reading: SEP, “Personal Identity” – Introduction and Section 1

According to Lawler, what is “the problem of technology”? What

Question According to Lawler, what is “the problem of technology”? What are the moral principles that he appeals to in deploying his argument? And, to what extent do you agree or disagree with his argument?

Do you think that Apple has more of an obligation

Question  Do you think that Apple has more of an obligation to its users or to the FBI? Should law enforcement have access to personal accounts and devices in any possible circumstance? Explain.

After watching both Ted talks “How Algorithms Shape Our World”

Question After watching both Ted talks “How Algorithms Shape Our World” and “We Are Creating an Dystopia Just to Make People Click on Ads,” and directly referencing relevant course reading materials of your choice, please answer the following: what is your position regarding the role that learning technologies play in our lives today? What are your projections for their impact in the future? How does your projection reflect overall human “progress” vis a vis individual freedoms and the success (or failure) of democratic practices?

Please locate your state ethics code. For state use Texas or Alabama.

Please locate your state ethics code. For state use Texas or Alabama. Joe Murphy and Wen Swenson list a series of questions that one should ask when one is to abide by that code. You can find them at http://www.singerpubs.com/ethikos/html/20questions.html .The questions range from whether there should be one or more codes to whether it is outdated given new technology (think social media) to does it lead to other sources to better explain the concepts. Please apply at least 7 of the questions to your code. You may simply list the question then give the explanation using your code. You should meet the word minimums but you will only need to reference your code, no other sources.

What do you think about Descartes’s Meditations on First Philosophy?

Question What do you think about Descartes’s Meditations on First Philosophy?

who asks ‘whether virtue can be taught.’ Socrates replies that

Question who asks ‘whether virtue can be taught.’ Socrates replies that he does not as yet know what virtue is, and has never known anyone who did. what do you think about Socrates’ answer

Why do we diagram arguments? For many, seeing helps connect

Question Why do we diagram arguments? For many, seeing helps connect ideas and concepts that can be complex and difficult to grasp. By understanding the elements and components visually we are better able to critically build and understand an argument. For this week’s forum, you will find one (1) Venn Diagram and do the following:- Find an interesting Venn Diagram on the internet. A good place to find Venn Diagram is on Pinterest. You can find a serious one or a humorous one; your choice.- Discuss what the Venn Diagram is trying to communicate.- Explain why the Venn Diagram is effective or not effective. – While completing the forum consider the Week 6 trigger questions.

Choose a topic and describe the topic, concept, idea, or

Question Choose a topic and describe the topic, concept, idea, or approach that is going to be the central idea of a Infographic. Find a minimum of three (3) sources which 2 are academic and 1 article topic.

1. According to Plato (in the voice of Socrates), what is

Question

1. According to Plato (in the voice of Socrates), what is the danger of believing bad arguments? Is he right or wrong? Defend your answer.

How does Hume challenge our understanding of cause and effect?

Question How does Hume challenge our understanding of cause and effect? How might someone who was interested in defending our knowledge of cause and effect respond?

The post Is “What’s moral for you is not necessarily moral for appeared first on Smashing Essays.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"