Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

Superior Essay Writers | Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics

/in /by

  1. In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.
  2. In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
  3. In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview: (a) What is ultimate reality? (b) What is the nature of the universe? (c) What is a human being? (d) What is knowledge? (e) What is your basis of ethics? (f) What is the purpose of your existence?
    Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials.
    While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
    Reference material link:
  • Read “The Role of Spirituality in Health Care,” by Puchalski, from Proceedings (Baylor University Medical Center) (2001).
    URL:
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1305900/
  • Read Chapters 1-3 in Called to Care: A Christian Worldview for Nursing.
    URL:
    http://gcumedia.com/digital-resources/intervarsity-press/2006/called-to-care_a-christian-worldview-for-nursing_ebook_2e.php
  • Read “What Is Scientism?” by Burnett, on the American Association for the Advancement of Science website (2018).
    URL:
    https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism
  • Read “10 Things You Should Know About Scientism,” by Moreland, on the Crossway website (2018).
    URL:
    https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/
    RUBRIC:
  1. Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.
  2. Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.
  3. Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.
  4. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
  5. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
  6. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
  7. Please use the reading material links and the attached link in the additional material as reference and citations. And include them as reference.
    Note: Assignment 2 Submission
  8. On a word doc include your name, student number, marking criteria sheet and the two tasks of the assignment and submit it to the assignment 2 submission link on the NUR1201 Study desk
  9. Please note checking your assignment through Turnitin is required before final submission.
    The Turnitin process may take up to 24 hours to produce a report.
    Therefore, allow adequate time to do this and address any issues of plagiarism detected by Turnitin before final submission.
    *Any percentage that relates to plagiarism detected by Turnitin is a concern and requires you to address this.
    The following link provides information on Turnitin (sourced from USQ learning centre). There is a drop down box that you can click. From this, you will be able to view a variety of questions and answers that will help most queries.
    https://www.usq.edu.au/learningcentre/usqstudydesk-skills/turnitin

NUR1201 The Patient Experience and Partnering in Care
Criteria-referenced Assessment (CRA): Assessment 2 Written Assignment (Weighted at 50%)

Student Name : Student Number:
Task 1: Online discussion forum Activities weeks 9 & 10 (15%)

15-12.5 12.4-11 10.9-9.5    9.4 -7.5    < 7.4

Demonstrates engagement with online discussion forums by providing four screenshots
• Week 9 response to a peer’s post
• Your Week 10 response to a peer’s post

• Your Week 9 self-post
• Your Week 10 self-post

• Posts submitted by due date
Week 9 :due 15th September
Week 10: due 22nd September
• Name included on screen shots

In your assignment you have:

• Provided all four posts

• Your two responses to a peer’s posts provides highly constructive and specific and positive feedback. Supported by in text referencing.

• The two self-posts draw from relevant literature and are supported by in text referencing

• Overall your weekly posts demonstrates your insightful understanding of the specific theories discussed in activity.

• Your name is included on screen shots of posts.

• Your posts were submitted by the due date. In your assignment you have:
• Provided four posts required

• Your two responses to a peer’s posts provides constructive appropriate feedback. Supported by in text referencing.
• The two self-posts draw from relevant literature and are mostly supported by in text referencing

• Overall your weekly self-posts demonstrates your understanding of the specific theories discussed in activity selected.
• Your name is included on all screen shots of posts

• Your posts were submitted by the due date In your assignment you have:
• Provided the four posts required

• Your two responses to a peer’s post provides useful feedback but it was general. Not always supported by in text referencing.
• The two self-posts most times have drawn from relevant literature and are not always supported by in text referencing
• Overall your weekly posts demonstrated an above average understanding of the specific theories discussed in activity selected
• Your name is included on the screen shots of posts
• Your posts were submitted by the due date In your assignment you have:
• Provided the four posts required

• Your responses to a peer’s posts provided only general, routine feedback. Not supported by in text referencing.

• Your two self-posts were superficial and/or perfunctory and mechanical.

• Overall your weekly posts demonstrated some understanding of the specific theories discussed in activity selected

• Your name is included on the screen shots of posts

• Your posts were submitted by the due date In your assignment you have:
• 0 – 3 posts were provided

• Any posts provided were very brief, superficial, and or vague/ absent.

• Posts were missing key information and did not provide evidence or in text referencing

• Your name was not included on screen shots of posts

• Posts were not submitted by the due date

Task 2: Scenario task (35%)

Application of Relevant Literature (Frameworks and Theories) to Chosen Case Scenario (25%)

Marks 2 – 1.9 1.8 – 1.6 1.5 – 1.3 1.2 – 1 < 0.9
REFLECTIVE CYCLE
Description
Highly relevant, well-structured, clear and concise description of event. Identifies two (2) or more highly relevant themes of nursing care.
Linked to both topic focus.
Highly relevant, specific and clear justification for focusing on each area of care. Relevant well-structured, clear and concise description of event. Identifies two (2) or more relevant themes of nursing care.

Linked to both topic focus.

Relevant, specific and clear justification for focusing on each area of care. Above average concise description of event. Identifies two (2) relevant themes of nursing care.

Linked to both topic focus.

Above average clear justification for focusing on each area of care. Sound description of event. Soundly identifies two (2) themes of nursing care.

Linked to one topic focus (but not the topic specified.

Sound justification for focusing on each area of care. Limited relevance. Absent, vague or limited description of themes of nursing care. Themes not relevant. Did not identify two (2) themes.

Not linked to topic focus.

Justification absent, vague or inappropriate.

Marks 2 – 1.9 1.8 – 1.6 1.5 – 1.3 1.2 – 1 < 0.9
Feelings and Thoughts Highly relevant and concise description and examination of their own feelings and thoughts as a person/nurse in relation to the patient care experience.

Linked to both topic focus. Relevant and concise description and examination of their own feelings and thoughts as a nurse in relation to the patient care experience.
Linked to topic focus. Above average description and examination of their own feelings and thoughts as a nurse in relation to the patient care experience.
Linked to both/ and or one topic focus.
Sound description and examination of their own feelings and / or thoughts as a nurse in relation to the patient care experience.

Linked to one topic focus.
Absent, limited, unclear description and examination of their own feelings and thoughts as a nurse.

Not linked to topic focus.

Marks 4.0 – 3.6 3.5 – 3.1 3.0 – 2.6 2.5- 2 < 1.9
Values/Beliefs Highly relevant, logical clear and concise explanation on the values/beliefs that underpin their own feelings and thoughts as a person/nurse – includes at least one (1) value/belief linked to personal feelings
and
one (1) value/belief accurately linked to relevant nursing governances.

Linked to both topic focus.

Outstanding integration of 3 highly relevant resources to support discussion on values/beliefs.
Relevant, logical and clear explanation on the values/beliefs that underpin their own feelings and thoughts as a person/nurse – includes at least
one (1) value/belief linked to personal feelings
and
one (1) value/belief accurately linked to relevant nursing governances.

Linked to both topic focus.

Quality integration of 3 relevant resources to support discussion on values/beliefs.
Clear, above average explanation of the values/beliefs that underpin their own feelings and thoughts as a person/nurse – includes
one (1) value/belief linked to personal feelings
and
one (1) value/belief linked to nursing governances.

Linked to both topic focus.

Above average integration of 2 relevant resources to support discussion on values/beliefs. 

Sound explanation of the values/beliefs that underpin their own feelings and thoughts as a person/nurse – includes

one (1) value/belief linked to personal feelings
and
one (1) value/belief linked to nursing governances.

Linked to one topic focus.

Sound integration of 2 relevant resources to support discussion on values/beliefs. Limited or no explanation on their values/beliefs that underpin their own feelings and thoughts as a person/nurse
Does not include:
one (1) value/belief linked to personal feelings
and does not include
one (1) value/belief linked to nursing governances.

Not linked to topic focus.
Inappropriate resources that do not support the discussion on values/beliefs used.

Does not include at least 2 resources.

Marks 6 5 4 3 < 2.9
Analysis Highly relevant, clear and comprehensive analysis of the event for this patient care experience and topic focus.

Consistently linked to literature.
Linked to both topic focus.

Highly relevant, strong justification linked to literature Relevant, clear and comprehensive analysis of the event for this patient care experience and topic focus. Nearly always linked to literature.

Linked to both topic focus.

Relevant, strong justification linked to literature

Above average analysis of the event for this patient care experience and topic focus. Most times linked to literature.

Linked to both topic focus.

Above average justification linked to literature
Sound analysis of the event for this patient care experience and topic focus. Linked to literature once or twice.

Linked to one topic focus.

Sound justification, with an attempt to link to literature.

Vague or unclear analysis for this patient care experience and topic focus. Not linked to literature.

Not linked to topic focus.

Absent and or poor justification. Not linked to literature.

Marks 6 5 4 3 < 2.9
Conclusions drawn A balance – 2 highly relevant positive and 2 highly relevant negative indicators

Discussed positive and negative indicators for directing – implementation of strategies: ‘the patient experience and partnering in care’ – at the individual and their family level; health organisation level – at an outstanding level.

Linked to both topic focus. A balance – 2 highly relevant positive and 2 highly relevant negative indicators

Discussed positive and negative indicators for directing – implementation of strategies: ‘the patient experience and partnering in care’ – at the individual and their family level; health organisation level – at a quality level.

Linked to both topic focus. A mix of 3 highly relevant positive/negative indicators

Discussed positive and negative indicators for directing – implementation of strategies: ‘the patient experience and partnering in care’ – at the individual and their family level; health organisation level – at an above average level.

Linked to both topic focus. 1 positive indicator and 1 negative indicator /Or all positive and or all negative indicators.

Discussed positive and negative indicators for directing – implementation one of these strategies: ‘the patient experience and partnering in care’ – at the individual and their family level; health organisation level – at a sound level

Linked to one topic focus.

1 or Absent or vague positive/negative indicator/s

Does not discuss positive/negative indicator for implementing the strategies: ‘the patient experience and partnering in care’ for the individual and their family and health organisations.

Not linked to topic focus.
Marks 5 4 3 2.9 -2.5 < 2.4
Action Plan Select two ways to partner with older patients like Mr. Taylor and his family (other than one on one interview) and justify the choice of these two strategies selected: at an outstanding level.
Linked to both topic focus. Select two ways to partner with older patients like Mr. Taylor and his family (other than one on one interview) and justify the choice of these two strategies selected: at a quality level.
Linked to both topic focus. Select two ways to partner with older patients like Mr. Taylor and his family (other than one on one interview) and justify the choice of these two strategies selected: at an above average level.
Linked to both topic focus. Selects two ways to partner with older patients like Mr. Taylor and his family (other than one on one interview) and justifies the choice of these two strategies selected: at a sound level.
Linked to one topic focus. Does not select two ways to partner with older patients like Mr. Taylor and his family (other than one on one interview) and does not justify the choice of these two strategies selected.
Not linked to topic focus.
Academic structure writing and referencing skills (10%)

5 - 4.6 4.5 - 4 3.9 - 3 2.9 -2.6    <2.5

Structure
Introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion

Sample Solution

In the United States, there are unassigned “principles” and measures of which individuals are relied upon to adjust to, sexual orientation being one of them. From the beginning of time individuals have just known two sorts of sex, female and male, however shouldn’t something be said about other sexual orientation characters? Individuals will in general create dispositions about the individuals who distinguish themselves as the contrary sex. These frames of mind are affected by an assortment of elements: religion, ethics, political belief system, just to give some examples. I needed to perceive what truly impacts the frames of mind the country holds towards transgender individuals. The articles I talk about location U.S. demeanors towards those people and give knowledge of why they feel have those frames of mind. The article, “Heteros’ Attitudes Towards Transgender People: Finding from a National Probability Sample of U.S Adults,” by Aaron T. Norton and Gregory M. Herek, presents an investigation that portrays the relationships of people’s frames of mind towards transgender individuals. They reviewed 2,281 members, and the study concentrated on five theories, every speculation concentrating on various perspectives that contribute towards hetero people frames of mind towards transgender individuals. The principal, “heteros’ mentalities toward transgender individuals are decidedly related with their dispositions toward sexual minorities” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.5). The member’s mentalities were estimated with a progression of inclination thermometers, and the members were told, “utilizing a scale from zero to 100, if you don’t mind disclose to us your own sentiments toward every one of the accompanying gatherings… The hotter or progressively good you feel toward the gathering, the higher the number you should give it,” vis-versa. (Norton and Herek, 2010, p. 6). On the off chance that the member felt neither warm or cold toward the gathering, they would rate it 50 (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 6). The members were likewise advised to utilize a 5-point scale, extending from firmly consent to unequivocally dissent, for Attitudes Towards Lesbians (ATL) and Attitudes Towards Gay Men (ATG) (Norton and Herek, 20102, p.6). The higher the scores demonstrated more elevated amounts of sexual bias. The outcomes for this theory demonstrate that transgender individuals are exceptionally related with the four sexual minority gatherings: gay men, lesbian ladies, swinger men, and indiscriminate ladies, and they are likewise adversely connected with the scores of the ATG and ATL. (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.7). Like the principal theories, the four-different spotlight on comparable perspectives that associates towards the pessimistic dispositions individuals have towards transgender individuals. The subsequent theory states, “they [attitudes] are more negative among men than ladies,” was demonstrated to be valid (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.4). As indicated by the investigation hetero man have increasingly negative evaluations to all “men” targets (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.8). Men likewise scored higher than ladies, which means more prominent bias on both the ATG and ATL scale. Speculation three expressed that “to the degree hetero respondents embrace a double, origination of sexual orientation, their frames of mind toward transgender individuals are increasingly negative” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.4). 46.5% concurred that “there isn’t sufficient regard for their characteristic divisions between the genders,” while 19.5% deviated, and 34.0% detailed they were “in the center.” In every one of the outcomes inferred that mentalities towards transgender individuals were associated with support of sexual orientation parallel convictions (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.8). “Transgender dispositions are connected with a similar social mental factors that have reliably been seen to associate with heteros” frames of mind toward sexual minorities, is the thing that the fourth speculation expressed” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.4). This theory takes a gander at four distinct connections: tyranny, political belief system, religion, and individual contact with sexual minorities of dispositions toward transgender individuals. I concentrated on three of the four, political philosophy, religion, and individual contact with sexual minorities. 48.2% depicted their political belief system was moderate, while 26.5% were liberal and 30.7% were traditionalist (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 9). The traditionalist respondents gave lower thermometer rating (25.39%), trailed by moderate (32.18%), at that point dissidents (39.23%), in this way implying preservationist people had increasingly pessimistic, preference dispositions toward transgender individuals (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.9). The second of the four relationships I concentrated on was religion. It was discovered that ladies who have “a lot” of religious direction in their everyday living, had transgender appraisals that were altogether increasingly negative (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 9). The outcomes additionally presumed that earlier contact with gay or lesbian individuals implied that thermometer scores were higher, less partiality, than respondents who had needed such contact (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.9). The fifth and last speculation that the review tried was, “men’s frames of mind toward the two gatherings are connected I comparative approaches to the factors determined in theories 3 and 4… If sexual preference is controlled, between those factors and men’s transgender demeanors ought to be decreased to no hugeness predictable with past discoveries.” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 4). While theory five had little help, it inferred that hetero men’s frames of mind toward transgender individuals and their political and sexual orientation convictions decreased when their dispositions toward gay men were factually controlled (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 110). It likewise reasoned that with ATG scores controlled, ladies’ demeanors were anticipated by “dictatorship and against libertarianism,” as were men’s; indicating sexual orientation contrasts in the mental underlying foundations of transgender frames of mind were not watched (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.11). Aaron Norton and Gregory Herek’s article about the frames of mind heteros have about transgender individuals was intriguing, I found that the examination concentrated on a portion of the fundamental perspectives that impact heteros’ dispositions towards transgender individuals in the U.S. I likewise picked up learning concerning why individuals may have such frames of mind. I feel that the substance included all through this article is applicable with a portion of the points we have talked about in class, for example, ‘ethic, religions, and sexuality’, and sex way of life all in all. The article included many finding that I concur with. One being that, “demeanors towards transgender individuals were more negative among hetero men than hetero ladies” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.1). I accept that to be valid, insights demonstrate it, yet additionally however out the network I live in. I have watched the frames of mind and criticisms transgender individuals face in my locale, and I have observer progressively negative mentalities originating from the hetero men that I have contact with. I likewise concur that being presented to progressively sexual minorities, prompts individuals having less sexual partiality toward transgender individuals. I have discovered that by having contact with the individuals who recognize as lesbian or gay, makes me all the more tolerating of transgender individuals. I accept that the study overall enables perusers to acquire learning about the bias frames of mind individuals, particularly heteros, have towards transgender people inside the Unites States. The article, “Young men Don’t Cry’ or Do They? Demeanors Toward and Beliefs About Transgender Youth,” by Hogler Elischberger, Jessica Glazier, Eric Hill, and Lynn Baker-Verduzco present an overview study that looks at the frames of mind U.S. grown-ups have toward transgender youngsters and youths. There were 281 people (128 male, 152 females, and 1 missing data) that took an interest in the review and detailed that had “for the most part positive frames of mind toward transgender minors” (Elischberger, Glazier, Hill, Verduzco, 2016, p. 199). The overview initially surveys the disposition grown-ups had toward transgender individuals by posing a progression of inquiries. It at that point surveys their conduct expectations with two theoretical circumstances. The examination finished up with the ‘assumed reasons for sex atypicality, where the members were approached to show how emphatically organic (nature) and ecological (support) cause influence atypical conduct (Elischberger et. al., 2016, p.203). The article, “Young men Don’t Cry’ or Do They? Mentalities Toward and Beliefs About Transgender Youth,” by Hogler Elischberger, Jessica Glazier, Eric Hill, and Lynn Baker-Verduzco presents a review study that inspects the frames of mind U.S. grown-ups have toward transgender youngsters and teenagers. There were 281 people (128 male, 152 females, and 1 missing data) that took an interest in the overview and detailed that had “by and large great frames of mind toward transgender minors” (Elischberger, Glazier, Hill, Verduzco, 2016, p. 199). The study initially surveys the frame of mind grown-ups had toward transgender individuals by posing a progression of inquiries. It at that point surveys their conduct goals with two theoretical circumstances. The investigation closed with the ‘assumed reasons for sex atypicality, where the members were approached to demonstrate how emphatically organic (nature) and ecological (sustain) cause influence atypical conduct (Elischberger et. al., 2016, p.203). The study initially surveys the members frames of mind, with a progression of disposition explanations. The members utilized a 10-point Likert type scale extending from 1, totally deviate, and 10, totally consent to see rate their frames of mind toward the rundown of proclamations gave. The announcements given included “By and by, I see this sexual orientation atypical conduct as an issue in light of the fact that … Six of these announcements were given that varied as far as the reason refered to for the objection: … it is against my ethics, … it repudiates my religious perspectives, B… it will hurt the tyke’s [teenager’s] current associations with their companions, B… it will be a terrible impact on other kids [teenagers],… it might affect the kid’s [teenage>

GET ANSWER

find the cost of your paper

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

Superior Essay Writers | Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics was first posted on August 24, 2019 at 2:35 pm.
©2019 "Graduate Paper Help". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@graduatepaperhelp.com

Superior Essay Writers | Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics was first posted on August 24, 2019 at 2:36 pm.
©2019 "Essay Lords | Bringing Excellence to students world wide". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@Academicheroes.com.us

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"