Superior Essay Writers | The Patient Experience and Partnering in Care
Assessment Item 2: Written Assignment
There are two tasks in this assignment:
(1) Your online discussion forum posts
From the forum titled: Forum – linked to Assessment 1 and 2 (seeded online forum Activities)’.
(2) A 1300 word case scenario reflection task (using an essay style).
Please feel free to use this document to paste your online forum posts into and to write your reflection task into (see p.7 to start this). The reason for this request is that many students have difficulty adding the marking rubric to their assignment.
Otherwise, please add the criteria sheet (marking rubric – located on pp. 9-14) to your written assignment. Click and highlight the marking criteria, right click, copy and right click paste to your word document.
Task 1: Online discussion forum activity posts (15%)
(see marking rubric).
From the forum titled: Forum – linked to Assessment 1 and 2 (seeded online forum Activities)’.
You need to take a screen shot of each of the following posts to your group forum and copy them onto your assignment document.
Weeks 9: Reply post to a peer and a self-post: due 15th September = 4 posts
Week 10: Reply post to a peer and a self-post: due 22nd September
Be sure to include in your capture your name and the date of posting.
Instructions: how to take a screen shot:
Using snipping tool: Go to your search icon located bottom left hand side of your computer screen. Type in the search bar ‘Snipping tool’.
Click the desktop app – snipping tool. Find the word New click the down arrow, click Rectangular snip.
Drag the cursor around the area you want to snip. Click file, save as pictures. Create a folder NUR1201 Week 9. Save your capture in this folder.
Using control/alt/print screen (PrtScn)
Place the curser on the screen you want to copy.
Hold down the control and Alt tabs and click on print screen (PrtScn)
Place curser on the assignment doc and click on control V
Task 2: Case Scenario Reflection task using an essay style (35%)
1300 words (+/- 10%)
Case Scenario Recording: ‘The Age 75 Recording’
Topic Focus: ‘Preventing falls and harm from falls’ and ‘My health record’(e-health record).
Background Information
Reflection is a way of thinking and working for Registered Nurses and is useful in raising our conscious awareness of aspects of care that may or may not be hidden from our view. This raised awareness about these aspects of care improves our understanding as nurses and assist us in directing action strategies that can improve both the patient and their family’s experience and the ‘partnering in care’ strategies that we utilise. Improving the ‘patient care experience and partnering in care’ and using Gibbs Reflective cycle (1988) as a framework in combination with drawing upon relevant theory provides a foundation for nurses to operate from and as such is required for task 2.
Instructions:
• View the Case Scenario – Recording ‘The Age 75 Recording’
This Recording is located at the top of this study desk page within the white ribbon, under useful links: course recordings
• After viewing the ‘patient experience and partnering in care’ case scenario recording – ‘The Age 75 Patient Experience and Partnering in Care’, write a 1300 word reflection using Gibbs Reflective Cycle (1988) as the framework, in an essay style.
• Within your reflection aim to draw upon relevant literature/theory to help you analyse this patient experience with the goal to improve the care experience of patients and their families.
Drawing upon relevant literature (theory) will support and strengthen your reflection.
Examples of relevant literature you could draw from would include:
Theory taught this semester. For example the weekly NUR1201 topics such as nursing governances and nursing philosophies that guide the application of nursing care practice, and other related theory such as the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards and partnering in care ‘action’ strategies. Aim to also include relevant theory linking to this patient experience topic – Preventing falls and harm from falls and My health record(e-health record).
Other relevant literature (peer reviewed journal articles) you have researched, using the USQ library data bases.
Reflection – using Gibbs (1988) reflection cycle in an essay style
When to use third person and when to use first person.
• Write in third person for this reflection /essay style – in most instances, for example the introduction and conclusion.
• Write in third person for Gibbs reflective cycle (1988) – stages 1, 4, 5 and 6.
• Write in first person for stage 2 (feelings and thoughts)
• Write in first person and third person for stage 3 (Values/Beliefs), as applicable.
Please structure in the following way:
Suggestions to help you write your reflection in an essay style.
Introduction –Purpose and to orientate your reader (100 words)
Write in third person here.
Write one paragraph here (no dot points)
• This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the thesis statement (this is your position statement – your argument).
• The second sentence should state the chosen case scenario, the framework and the main theories that you will use in your essay.
• The remaining sentences should include the overview of main points or brief plan for what will be included in your essay.
Body of Essay – Gibbs reflection – six stages (1100 words)
- Description: (guide only 120 words) Describe the patient’s experience. Aim to focus on a particular relevant aspect, identify key themes and justify these themes of care focus.
Write in third person here.
Write one paragraph here (no dot points)
This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the main point.
The remaining sentences – describe the patient experience, identify the key themes and include a justification for these themes of care focus.
- Feelings and Thoughts: (guide only 120 words) Describe and examine your feelings and thoughts in response to your description. Identify the values and beliefs that connect you to your feelings and thoughts and evaluate your response to the patient’s experience in terms of those feelings and thoughts. For example, why did you feel that way? (Link your response back to stage 1)
Write in first person here.
Write one paragraph here (no dot points)
This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the main point.
The remaining sentences – describe and examine your feelings and thoughts in response to your description. Identify the values and beliefs that connect you to your feelings and thoughts and evaluate your response to the patient’s experience in terms of those feelings and thoughts.
- Values and Beliefs: (guide only 120 words) Describe some values and beliefs of yours that may have impacted on your feelings and thoughts about what went on. After reflecting about the ‘values and beliefs’ that connect to your feelings and thoughts, identify where these values and beliefs originate from? Why are these values and beliefs important? Who are they important to and why? Are they important to you, the patient and the patient’s family? (Link your response back to stage 1 & 2).
Write in first person and in third person as applicable
Write one paragraph here (no dot points)
This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the main point.
The remaining sentences – describe some values and beliefs of yours that may have impacted on your feelings and thoughts about what went on. Identify the ‘values and beliefs’ that connect to your feelings and thoughts. Identify where these values and beliefs originate from and justify why they are important to you as a person and nurse as one, the patient and the patient’s family. - Analysis (300 words) Analyse the patient experience and partnering in care case scenario, identify and explain the care displayed in the case scenario (inadequate and adequate care). Draw upon some literature to support your analysis of the case scenario and relate it to the scenario by providing examples. Aim to make sense of this patient experience in terms of how you reacted to it. (Link this analysis to your responses to stages 1-3).
Write two paragraphs here (no dot points)
This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the main point – relating to a reason why aspects of the care in the scenario were inadequate.
The remaining sentences will explain and support the main point by referring to the evidence and relating it to the scenario using examples.
This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the main point – relating to a reason why aspects of the care in the scenario were adequate.
The remaining sentences will explain and support the main point by referring to the evidence and relating it to the scenario using examples.
- Conclusions Drawn: (300 words) Identify the conclusions/new meanings that can be drawn here. (Link these conclusions to your responses to stages 1-4).
Write two paragraphs here (no dot points)
Write one paragraph here (no dot points)
This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the main point.
The remaining sentences will link back to your responses in stages 1 to 4. Identify at least 2 negative indicators and discuss how these indicators will direct future change in patient/family care.
Write one paragraph here (no dot points)
This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the main point.
The remaining sentences will link back to your responses in stages 1 to 4. Identify at least 2 positive indicators and discuss how these indicators will direct future change in patient/family care.
- Action Plan: (140 words) Describe an action plan that you would initiate based on your conclusions and say how this action plan you describe will improve patient care?
Write one paragraph here (no dot points)
This first sentence of your paragraph should provide the main point.
The remaining sentences will select at least two ways to partner with patients/families – linking to the case scenario and justify the choice of these strategies selected.
Conclusion – Link back to your introduction thesis statement and summarise main points (100 words)
Suggestions to help you write your essay
Use one paragraph for this conclusion, restating your thesis statement, providing an overview of main points and providing a concluding sentence or two, that rounds out your learning from the assignment.
Essay style requirements
• Make sure to include your name and student number on both the assignment and the assignment file name
• Adherence to the stated word limit is required
• Do not use headings or subheadings
• All parts of the essay should be attempted
• Margins: 2cm on 4 sides; & line spacing: at least 1.5; Font size: 12 Times New Roman
• Referencing:
o Use APA 6th Edition referencing style
o A full reference list is required at the end of the assignment. For further information on referencing at USQ, refer to https://www.usq.edu.au/library/referencing
o Each paragraph’s first sentence is indented according to APA style
o Refer to current (no later than 7 years; older seminal literature is accepted) academic peer-reviewed journal articles to justify your ideas.
Paste your 4 Screen shots here.
(Please note, this space will naturally expand as you insert your forum posts).
Start writing your Case Scenario Reflection task using an essay style here…
Sample Solution
In the United States, there are unassigned “principles” and measures of which individuals are relied upon to adjust to, sexual orientation being one of them. From the beginning of time individuals have just known two sorts of sex, female and male, however shouldn’t something be said about other sexual orientation characters? Individuals will in general create dispositions about the individuals who distinguish themselves as the contrary sex. These frames of mind are affected by an assortment of elements: religion, ethics, political belief system, just to give some examples. I needed to perceive what truly impacts the frames of mind the country holds towards transgender individuals. The articles I talk about location U.S. demeanors towards those people and give knowledge of why they feel have those frames of mind. The article, “Heteros’ Attitudes Towards Transgender People: Finding from a National Probability Sample of U.S Adults,” by Aaron T. Norton and Gregory M. Herek, presents an investigation that portrays the relationships of people’s frames of mind towards transgender individuals. They reviewed 2,281 members, and the study concentrated on five theories, every speculation concentrating on various perspectives that contribute towards hetero people frames of mind towards transgender individuals. The principal, “heteros’ mentalities toward transgender individuals are decidedly related with their dispositions toward sexual minorities” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.5). The member’s mentalities were estimated with a progression of inclination thermometers, and the members were told, “utilizing a scale from zero to 100, if you don’t mind disclose to us your own sentiments toward every one of the accompanying gatherings… The hotter or progressively good you feel toward the gathering, the higher the number you should give it,” vis-versa. (Norton and Herek, 2010, p. 6). On the off chance that the member felt neither warm or cold toward the gathering, they would rate it 50 (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 6). The members were likewise advised to utilize a 5-point scale, extending from firmly consent to unequivocally dissent, for Attitudes Towards Lesbians (ATL) and Attitudes Towards Gay Men (ATG) (Norton and Herek, 20102, p.6). The higher the scores demonstrated more elevated amounts of sexual bias. The outcomes for this theory demonstrate that transgender individuals are exceptionally related with the four sexual minority gatherings: gay men, lesbian ladies, swinger men, and indiscriminate ladies, and they are likewise adversely connected with the scores of the ATG and ATL. (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.7). Like the principal theories, the four-different spotlight on comparable perspectives that associates towards the pessimistic dispositions individuals have towards transgender individuals. The subsequent theory states, “they [attitudes] are more negative among men than ladies,” was demonstrated to be valid (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.4). As indicated by the investigation hetero man have increasingly negative evaluations to all “men” targets (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.8). Men likewise scored higher than ladies, which means more prominent bias on both the ATG and ATL scale. Speculation three expressed that “to the degree hetero respondents embrace a double, origination of sexual orientation, their frames of mind toward transgender individuals are increasingly negative” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.4). 46.5% concurred that “there isn’t sufficient regard for their characteristic divisions between the genders,” while 19.5% deviated, and 34.0% detailed they were “in the center.” In every one of the outcomes inferred that mentalities towards transgender individuals were associated with support of sexual orientation parallel convictions (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.8). “Transgender dispositions are connected with a similar social mental factors that have reliably been seen to associate with heteros” frames of mind toward sexual minorities, is the thing that the fourth speculation expressed” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.4). This theory takes a gander at four distinct connections: tyranny, political belief system, religion, and individual contact with sexual minorities of dispositions toward transgender individuals. I concentrated on three of the four, political philosophy, religion, and individual contact with sexual minorities. 48.2% depicted their political belief system was moderate, while 26.5% were liberal and 30.7% were traditionalist (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 9). The traditionalist respondents gave lower thermometer rating (25.39%), trailed by moderate (32.18%), at that point dissidents (39.23%), in this way implying preservationist people had increasingly pessimistic, preference dispositions toward transgender individuals (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.9). The second of the four relationships I concentrated on was religion. It was discovered that ladies who have “a lot” of religious direction in their everyday living, had transgender appraisals that were altogether increasingly negative (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 9). The outcomes additionally presumed that earlier contact with gay or lesbian individuals implied that thermometer scores were higher, less partiality, than respondents who had needed such contact (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.9). The fifth and last speculation that the review tried was, “men’s frames of mind toward the two gatherings are connected I comparative approaches to the factors determined in theories 3 and 4… If sexual preference is controlled, between those factors and men’s transgender demeanors ought to be decreased to no hugeness predictable with past discoveries.” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 4). While theory five had little help, it inferred that hetero men’s frames of mind toward transgender individuals and their political and sexual orientation convictions decreased when their dispositions toward gay men were factually controlled (Norton and Herek, 2012, p. 110). It likewise reasoned that with ATG scores controlled, ladies’ demeanors were anticipated by “dictatorship and against libertarianism,” as were men’s; indicating sexual orientation contrasts in the mental underlying foundations of transgender frames of mind were not watched (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.11). Aaron Norton and Gregory Herek’s article about the frames of mind heteros have about transgender individuals was intriguing, I found that the examination concentrated on a portion of the fundamental perspectives that impact heteros’ dispositions towards transgender individuals in the U.S. I likewise picked up learning concerning why individuals may have such frames of mind. I feel that the substance included all through this article is applicable with a portion of the points we have talked about in class, for example, ‘ethic, religions, and sexuality’, and sex way of life all in all. The article included many finding that I concur with. One being that, “demeanors towards transgender individuals were more negative among hetero men than hetero ladies” (Norton and Herek, 2012, p.1). I accept that to be valid, insights demonstrate it, yet additionally however out the network I live in. I have watched the frames of mind and criticisms transgender individuals face in my locale, and I have observer progressively negative mentalities originating from the hetero men that I have contact with. I likewise concur that being presented to progressively sexual minorities, prompts individuals having less sexual partiality toward transgender individuals. I have discovered that by having contact with the individuals who recognize as lesbian or gay, makes me all the more tolerating of transgender individuals. I accept that the study overall enables perusers to acquire learning about the bias frames of mind individuals, particularly heteros, have towards transgender people inside the Unites States. The article, “Young men Don’t Cry’ or Do They? Demeanors Toward and Beliefs About Transgender Youth,” by Hogler Elischberger, Jessica Glazier, Eric Hill, and Lynn Baker-Verduzco present an overview study that looks at the frames of mind U.S. grown-ups have toward transgender youngsters and youths. There were 281 people (128 male, 152 females, and 1 missing data) that took an interest in the review and detailed that had “for the most part positive frames of mind toward transgender minors” (Elischberger, Glazier, Hill, Verduzco, 2016, p. 199). The overview initially surveys the disposition grown-ups had toward transgender individuals by posing a progression of inquiries. It at that point surveys their conduct expectations with two theoretical circumstances. The examination finished up with the ‘assumed reasons for sex atypicality, where the members were approached to show how emphatically organic (nature) and ecological (support) cause influence atypical conduct (Elischberger et. al., 2016, p.203). The article, “Young men Don’t Cry’ or Do They? Mentalities Toward and Beliefs About Transgender Youth,” by Hogler Elischberger, Jessica Glazier, Eric Hill, and Lynn Baker-Verduzco presents a review study that inspects the frames of mind U.S. grown-ups have toward transgender youngsters and teenagers. There were 281 people (128 male, 152 females, and 1 missing data) that took an interest in the overview and detailed that had “by and large great frames of mind toward transgender minors” (Elischberger, Glazier, Hill, Verduzco, 2016, p. 199). The study initially surveys the frame of mind grown-ups had toward transgender individuals by posing a progression of inquiries. It at that point surveys their conduct goals with two theoretical circumstances. The investigation closed with the ‘assumed reasons for sex atypicality, where the members were approached to demonstrate how emphatically organic (nature) and ecological (sustain) cause influence atypical conduct (Elischberger et. al., 2016, p.203). The study initially surveys the members frames of mind, with a progression of disposition explanations. The members utilized a 10-point Likert type scale extending from 1, totally deviate, and 10, totally consent to see rate their frames of mind toward the rundown of proclamations gave. The announcements given included “By and by, I see this sexual orientation atypical conduct as an issue in light of the fact that … Six of these announcements were given that varied as far as the reason refered to for the objection: … it is against my ethics, … it repudiates my religious perspectives, B… it will hurt the tyke’s [teenager’s] current associations with their companions, B… it will be a terrible impact on other kids [teenagers],… it might affect the kid’s [teenage>
GET ANSWER
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
Superior Essay Writers | The Patient Experience and Partnering in Care was first posted on August 24, 2019 at 2:41 pm.
©2019 "Graduate Paper Help". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@graduatepaperhelp.com
Superior Essay Writers | The Patient Experience and Partnering in Care was first posted on August 24, 2019 at 2:41 pm.
©2019 "Essay Lords | Bringing Excellence to students world wide". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@Academicheroes.com.us
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"
