Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

The Organized/Disorganized Typology of Serial Murder: Myth or Model

/in /by

The Organized/Disorganized Typology of Serial Murder
This article is aimed at providing an insight into the viability of the organized and disorganized typologies. Serial killers can be categorized to be either organized or disorganized. Not many researches have been conducted to test the use of this kind of typology in classifying serial killers. One analysis has been undertaken, and it has been realized that some flaws exist in the typology. But amusingly, this typology is still being used by the security personnel to develop profiles of criminals and in courts and form arguments for prosecution purposes. Raw information from murder scenes is subjected to analysis using the dichotomous model. The hypothesis of the model are them tested to come up with concrete conclusions on the case
There is a correlation between my topic of choice of study and the theme of the article. They both focus on serial killers and their behavior with the main focus being on understanding the psychological factors playing a part in the motivation of the killers. My topic of interest is explained in the article. I can be able to tell the killers tendencies as well be able to predict potential next targets. Classification of a murder case to be either organized or disorganized is based on the analysis of the victims, the weapons used, forensic reports as well as the crime scenes. The model proposes that the behavior and personality traits of a murdering criminal can be judged by inferring to the crime scene.
An organized offender is the one whose exhibits organization in the way he castrates his murder plot. He is considered to be a person of high intelligence compared to his counterpart, the disorganized offender. When analysing an organized offender, you can say that he has high employability chances because of his intelligence that is displayed in the way he plans his murders. The model asserts that this kind of offender is likely to leave with the weapon which he committed the crime with to minimize on chances of being tracked by the evidence at the scene.
The disorganized offender is said to be below the average level of intelligence and is socially incompetent. His crime scenes are characterized by the presence of several shreds of evidence ranging from the tools he used to commit murder, semen specimens and most importantly fingerprints. Therefore, the outstanding feature between the two offenders is the strategies employed and preplanning of the killing. The disorganized offender murder cases are spontaneous while the others’ are pre-planned and organized.
A research was conducted to test the viability of this model. Psychometric methods of content analysis were used to collects and analyze datain order to develop the conclusions on the model (Alison 112). The sampling method is used as well in the collection of the data. Additionally, journals and books were used to compare between cases. Out of one hundred murder cases that were handled, thirty-nine of them displayed consistency of planned actions. These hundred cases were used to represent the general murder cases that have been and will be, committed. Therefore, this results to an extent prove the hypotheses of the model. Douglas in his crime classification manual developed a third category of offenders who were referred to as the mixed offenders. It’s hard to categorize this kind of offenders to be either organized or disorganized.in most cases, murders that involve such a variety of offenders are mostly unplanned for and involves gangs (Douglas,48). What’s is important to note is that the organization of the offenders is used to make inference on the psychology of the offender. That is if the murder scene seems to be organized then the offender is likely to be an organized person and vice versa is as well correct.
The research employed some assumptions, in the development of this theory. Firstly it is assumed that the people’s criminal actions can be distinctively placed between either of the two categories of the dichotomy. Secondly, it is expected that the criteria co-occur consistently. That is, certain characteristics can only be associated with one of the sides of the dichotomy. For example violence in the scene is always meant to mean disorganization of the offenders. Thirdly, the article assumes that there are clear boundaries to which one can be categorized.
The major critique of this article is the assumption of the human being to fall in either of the defined categories. We are in the twenty-first century where human beings can display multiple characteristics depending on the situation at hand. For example, a disorganized person, for fear of being caught and persecuted, might resort to plan his murder to avoid a mistake that could leave a tonne of evidence at the crime scene. Or on the other hand, a person, out of instincts and reflex responses, might commit murder which he had not planned for, therefore leaving the impression that a perpetrator is a disorganized person which is not the case.
Besides the organized and the disorganized model, Jenkins introduces us to the predictable and respectable model. This model evaluates the possibilities of the murderer committing the act. An access is made into the person’s personal life to establish the presence or absence of factors that would contribute to the crime. People who do drugs are at higher risk of committing murder compared to those who do not (Jenkins, 77). This is because of the notion that drugs tend to impair a person’s ability to think straight and make informed decisions when under the influence.
The article is very informative. Therefore, reliable. This article should be made available not only to students but to the public as it will help to expand their knowledge on some of the reason why we experience some situations which depict the existence of social psychopathy within our society. The methodology used to conclude adds to the credibility of the articles. Besides, the people who were involved in conducting the research were highly trained security personnel. Therefore the chances of things going wrong within the study are very minimal. Besides basing the credibility of the article on the researchers, it’s as well essential to acknowledge the relevance of the research, in relation to the modern social problems. Therefore, it’s research that any person can relate to hence reflective.
Discussion and conclusions
The primary focus of the article was to discuss issues to do with serial killing. The typology analogy should only concentrate on the cases of serial killers. But on the contrary, it looks like all criminal activities even those that do not involve murder have, the quality of either side of the dichotomy has to be attached to the case. Additionally, the dichotomy theory is used in the evaluation of a highly sensitive case while not many types of research have been conducted to test its hypothesis. For a model to fully embraced and be used for reference, it should have undergone several tests to eliminate the possibilities of making the wrong decisions. The hypothesis is not entirely a bad idea as it has proved to be helpful in some instances. The right thing to do would to conducts tests on it as it will help realize and fix the flaws of the dichotomy. Despite the challenges, we cannot ignore the advantages of dichotomy. Profiling of criminals has helped in studying the trends of criminals.
Additionally, you can be able to tell the real intentions of the perpetrators, even though it does not guarantee a hundred percent chances of working. It could be sexual or just psychological. Thorough profiling as well you can monitor the movements of a criminal. Therefore the authorities could use this information to avoid future damages by the criminal by keeping a track on his movements.

PLACE YOUR ORDER WITH US AND GET A 40% DISCOUNT

The Organized/Disorganized Typology of Serial Murder: Myth or Model was first posted on August 13, 2019 at 10:07 am.
©2019 "Essay Lords | Bringing Excellence to students world wide". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@Academicheroes.com.us

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"