Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

This chapter is very challenging for me to do based

/in /by

Question This chapter is very challenging for me to do based on what the instructor criteria is. could you help me with this? Thank you.First criteria: objective you must prove you meet is “Represent and express philosophical reasoning about defining human death by writing clear and concise analytical and argumentative prose.”Q. Can There Be Agreement as to What Constitutes Human Death?Second criteria: “Explain and apply the principles and methods of academic disciplines (for example, philosophy) to the study of social and individual behavior,” and the related module 12 learning objective you must prove you meet is “Apply a method of philosophy (for example, “necessary and sufficient conditions”) to the study of individual behavior related to defining human death.”

Does gender have normative significance?

Question Does gender have normative significance?

I uploaded everything in the description below so please read carefully and

I uploaded everything in the description below so please read carefully and follow it

other religious traditions and report on them

This project is to get us to explore some other religious traditions and report on them for the benefit of yourself, your classmates, and, I must admit, your instructor.NOTE:Before we get started, I want to note explicitly that Wikipedia.com is completely off-limits for this project.There have been too many poorly written articles and misrepresentations of religious systems that it is not a reliable tool.You are given plenty of resources below (or find your own) that students can go to the academic sites or even the websites of the groups’ themselves.Students will be providing either a video presentation, audio presentation, PowerPoint, or paper based on the following tasks.Task:Submission:I.Part 1: Religious Questions Students are asked to respond to four of the following questions (or craft your own) that highlight the key ideas, rituals, behaviors, scriptures, etc. of the religious group you have researched.At least one question must be a “belief” question and at least one question must be a “behavior” question.Each question should have a response more than 150 words (which means a minimum total of 600 words for Part 1).Also, be sure to cite (even if it just the web link) where you are getting the information.More points will be awarded if students are using the official website of the religious group in question.In these cases, be sure to include the link.Belief questions:Behavior questions:Students can also write their own questions and just catalog them into either a “belief” or “behavior” question.Students can also ask a “belonging” question inquiring into how does one join the group or what makes a person a member of that group.II.Part 2: Why choose that religion?In 200 words (or more), note why you selected that particular religion and a specific question you would ask a participant of that religion.Research Websites:Websites to use for the project (let me know if you find others so I can add them to the list)Hartford Institute for Religion ResearchBBC Religious Groups Site:http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/Association of Religious Data Archives Site: Religion Facts’ The Big Religion Chart:http://www.religionfacts.com/big-religion-chart

Week 4 – Philosophical Essay Outline DUE: Sep 1, 2019 11:55 PMGrade

Week 4 – Philosophical Essay Outline DUE: Sep 1, 2019 11:55 PMGrade DetailsGradeN/A Gradebook CommentsNoneAssignment DetailsOpen DateAug 5, 2019 12:05 AMGraded?YesPoints Possible100.0Resubmissions Allowed?NoAttachments checked for originality?YesTop of FormAssignment InstructionsGoal: Students will create a detailed outline for the week 7 Philosophical Essay.Course Objectives: 2, 3,

Case Studies: Lehman Brothers, British Petroleum, Monsanto, Merck, Goodyear, Perdue Farms

The topic I pick was GMOsIn this written assignment, you will present your work on the case analysis using selected components of an argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster,

I uploaded the description for the assignment below, so please read it

I uploaded the description for the assignment below, so please read it carefully because it worth a lot of points

I uploaded everything below so u can see the assignment good. Please

I uploaded everything below so u can see the assignment good. Please I need a good work for it

Your work: The aim of this assignment is to practice how to

Your work: The aim of this assignment is to practice how to use Kant’s and Utilitarian principles in a moral debate.a) If you argue against the argument below without any appeal to Kant’s and Utilitarian principles, you will not get a full credit for your work. b) If you argue against the death penalty problem in general, instead of debating the argument below, you will not get a full credit for your work.* Do not write any introduction. Write straight to the point.* Your work should not be longer than 1 page of text (double spaced)Pro Death Penalty Argument (Retentionist Argument):Premise 1) If we keep the death penalty, we run the risk of needlessly eradicating thelives of convicted murderers who might have been reformable (correctable).Premise 2) If we abolish the death penalty we run the risk of some innocent peoplebecoming future victims of the murderers (for example, the prison guards).Premise 3) Whether we choose to keep the death penalty or abolish it, there is a riskthat some human lives will be needlessly lost.Premise 4) We have no right to risk (endanger) lives of the innocent people.Conclusion 5) Therefore, it is our moral obligation to retain (keep) the death penalty.***TIP: Premise (1) supports your assignment; you do not need to debate this point.Readings fromShafer-Landau, Russ.The Fundamentals of Ethics, Russ Shafer-Landau, Oxford University Press. (2009) 89-102.

There aren’t “right” answers to the responses (except on the last one),

There aren’t “right” answers to the responses (except on the last one), there needs to be “supported” answers.The key to this exam is two fold:The essay submissions will be evaluated according to these requirements.Essay 1: (250-400 words; 10 points)* The important part of the response:WHY?WHY do you think what you think?What experiences have you had that lead you to think this way?What have you encountered in your life among family, friends, and classmates that drives your thinking on this issue?Essay 2: (250-400 words; 10 points)We are going to go all the way back to the beginning of the course (Module 1, Session 4) and thinking about how you (and your beliefs) relate to other religions.Into which “theological model” (according to Jones) would you place yourself?Essentially, how do you see your own belief system (if any) in relation to other systems?How do you and your own religious beliefs confront/interact with/incorporate other religious teachings?Here is a brief outline of the ideas.Be sure to show mastery of the concepts while presenting your own view. https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.us-…Scan the reading and be sure to grasp the key ideas of the different theological models on how to view other religions. Know the differences between the following approaches:Essay 3: (300-400 words; 15 points)Certainly, all Five Pillars of the Islamic faith are important. However, you have been selected to introduce the basics of Islam to a class of people with limited patience and attention spans. You have time to explain only the one “Pillar” that you feel best shows the true meaning of Islam. Which do you chose? Why?Essay 4: Final Semester Long Essay (35 points):Your friend is writing a blog post on suffering and how religions deal with it.She doesn’t know where to start.She is on the verge of abandoning religion all together (even coming from a fairly non-religious family) because she cannot find a good explanation for suffering in the world.

Help with discussion questions for each class

Edu Governance History1) As we begin to think about the goals of this course, let’s begin our discussion by asking the question, “Why do we have laws?”. In order to give a well-rounded response to this question, make sure you address:2) Why/How is social media a potential legal issue for teachers?3) Answer the five questions from Page/Slide 14 of Week 1 in Module 1, post your responses, and explain your answer to each in a sentence or two.Mathematics in Elem SchoolRead the following article, and discuss: Mirrors and Windows Into Student Noticing.https://www.nctm.org/Publications/Teaching-Children-Mathematics/2016/Vol22/Issue6/Mirrors-_-Windows-Into-Student-Noticing/ESOL Found: Cross Cultural ComPlease watch the following videos and consider the questions below.I Want You to Know Me: Sargent Shriver ESThe Importance of ELL Strategies – Immersion (Moises in Math Class)Remember, the characteristics of English Language Learners can be wide and vast. Based on your readings for this week and the videos above, discuss the steps you would take to identify an ELL in your classroom and address each of the following questions: Reading Foundations Elem Schl:Discuss Differentiating Instruction as Response to Intervention in the box on p. 49. Discuss how this will relate to your first practicum experience.Textbook required: see if its onlineVacca, J.L., Vacca, R.T., Gove, M.K., Burkey, L.C., Lenhart, L.A.,

Which of the following pairs are contrapositives? If God exists,

Question Which of the following pairs are contrapositives? If God exists, then there is no evil in the world.There is evil in the world if God does not exist. If there is evil in the world, then God does not exist.If God exists, then there is no evil in the world. If God exists, then there is no evil in the world.If there is no evil in the world, then God exists. If there is no evil in the world, then God exists.If God does not exist, then there is no evil in the world.

Part 1: Please find an argument to analyze. Be creative!

Question Part 1: Please find an argument to analyze. Be creative! Some suggestions are to use a commercial, letter to the editor (or op/ed piece). Analyze the argument you choose. What is the main purpose of the argument? Is it inductive? Deductive? Are there any fallacies being used? If so, which ones?Part 2:Does the argument align with a philosophical theory or theorist? Choose one philosophical theory or theorist and explain – from that perspective – what you would change to make the argument better. Think about the steps that you could use to improve the argument. For example, if you pick Socrates as a theorist think of how Socrates would reflect upon and engage the argument for change.  Look for common fallacies like:Circular thinking – typically restating the premise in the conclusion and creating a “circular” argumentAppeals to authority – generally this fallacy considers an argument that we should listen to based on some “false” or “non” authority. Is this happening in your argument example?False cause – in this fallacy the writer or speaker attributes a “false” cause to some effect or result (often you will see superstitious thinking used here).Sweeping generalizations – this fallacy occurs when an individual makes generalizations (usually stereotypical thinking)Equivocation – in this fallacy a person confuses two senses of the meaning of a word (like a free animal- is it free because it doesn’t cost anything or is it free because it is not in a “cage”?)Red herring – very common in political settings. This fallacy is a distraction (think of a big red fish – pretty distracting, right?)Utilize at least 2 credible sources to support the arguments presented in the paper. Your paper should be 4-6 in length

Address each of the following worldview questions. 1. Why is

Question Address each of the following worldview questions. 1. Why is it possible to know anything at all? 2. How do we know what is right and wrong?

I chose three distinct informal logic fallacies. Make sure to

Question I chose three distinct informal logic fallacies. Make sure to identify the specific fallacy committed by each example. Explain how the fallacies were used and the context in which they occurred. Finally, explain how the person should have presented the argument in order to avoid committing this logical error. 1.    Begging the question Fallacy2.    Red Herring Fallacy 3.    Appeal to popular opinion FallacyBelow is an example:Begging the Question    P: There is only one true God    C:  Therefore, Christianity is the only true religion.Begging the question is an expression of a person’s own beliefs. If a person already has the same belief, they will go along with what is said. If they don’t believe the initial premise then they will not believe the conclusion.

Socrates compared his philosophical method to midwifery becauseSelect one:a. His

Question Socrates compared his philosophical method to midwifery becauseSelect one:a. His work was just as important for the community.b. He felt pregnant with ideas.c. He only helped his students deliver their own ideas, instead of teaching them himself.

analyze polls and surveys.

Question analyze polls and surveys.

What are the differences between duties of friendship and favors?

Question  What are the differences between duties of friendship and favors? Using some of her examples, discuss why English holds that grown children do not owe their parents anything? What, on her view, is wrong with the “owing” paradigm?

Discuss LaFollette’s argument for licensing of parents. What is prior

Question  Discuss LaFollette’s argument for licensing of parents. What is prior restraint? Discuss why LaFollette believes that his account of licensing of parents is not in tension with our belief in the wrongness of prior restraint.

Can There Be Agreement as to What Constitutes Human Death?

Question Can There Be Agreement as to What Constitutes Human Death? 

The final project asks you to demonstrate that you have gained mastery

The final project asks you to demonstrate that you have gained mastery of these objectives:Throughout this course, you have discovered how looking at life from different perspectives expands your view of the world, and provides a richer experience of life both individually and collectively. Instructions: In this final project, tell your story through a presentation and reflection on how other people may perceive your story.

The post This chapter is very challenging for me to do based appeared first on Smashing Essays.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"