TRANSFORMER DEMAND ANALYSIS PROJECT
A-Cat Corporation
Jessica Sand
Southern New Hampshire University
QSO-510
TRANSFORMER DEMAND ANALYSIS PROJECT
Introduction to the Problem
My analysis is focused on A-Cat’s Corporation need to determine the number of transformers needed to satisfy the demand. The firm had previously relied upon archaic methods in projecting how many transformers will be needed to meet customer demand. What they referred to as usual method was to look at the sales figures of the last two to three months and the sales figures of the preceding two years in the same period or the months in questions. They would then guess as to how many transformers will be needed. This case represents a failure in the inventory control and forecasting techniques which can result in big losses as they the management of the company admit it to be characterized by a cycle of either too many transformers in stock (overstocking) and , when the stock is not enough to meet our normal production levels and needs (under stocking).
This is the scenario A-Cat Corporation is facing and hence the need for a more accurate forecasting tool to ensure proper stock control and ensure it reduces cost (shortage costs and holding or the carrying costs) and enhances overall profitability. The main stakeholders of A-Cat Corporation mainly originate from within (internal stakeholders) which include A-Cat’s president who is not named and the person who appears to be in charge, Mittra- vice-president of operations. This responsibility has been directly relegated to Ratnaparkhi who is operations head, to develop an analysis of the data and present a report with recommendations which will help satisfy the need of the external stakeholder who are mainly customer.
Analysis Plan & Quantitative Factors
The main quantitative factors that affect the performance of operational processes is mainly the poor approximations and forecast of inventory and demand levels. Inventory and demand levels are very crucial to the performance of any ideal manufacturing firm such as A-Cat Corporation.
This is because both deterministic model and stochastic inventory models concur to the fact that the amount of inventory to be ordered or stock emanates from the demand. Indeed the
Anova single factor has facilitated by noting that there is change. i.e The results (F = 6.871 and p = 0.003202) suggest that indeed the mean number of transformers has changed over the period 2006–2008.
| ANOVA | |||||||||||
| Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit | |||||
| Between Groups | 214772.2 | 2 | 107386.1 | 6.870739 | 0.003202 | 3.284918 | |||||
| Within Groups | 515773 | 33 | 15629.48 | ||||||||
| Total | 730545.2 | 35 | |||||||||
The under-estimation of demand will lead to low amount of ordered against the high demand which may arise during the period. In this case the firm will suffer from acute shortage costs as it tries to issue irregular orders to satisfy the extra demand as well as idle capacity especially the warehouse section and the intellectual assets. Over-estimation at the expense of declining demand leads to accumulation of inventory. This will lead to high holding or carrying costs. The fact that the firm is using mean as a central point is unfounded as it is supposed to use the EOQ to determine its optimal inventory it needs to order. The presence of quantifiable errors in mean and the guess work is very costly as aforementioned. The mean has talked of at least 745 transformers but EOQ will accurately provide the optimal level of order.
Problem Statement
The case of A-Cat Corporation presents the need for differential approach to applied demand forecasting and analysis. This requires overall collaboration from downstream vendor to upstream consumer. The demand systems of it has been using as a manufacturing firm are general, having estimations that are far necessarily not realistic neither do they possess reasonable accuracy in the modern flat world. Our evaluation will consider the comprehension of the differential demand systems and derive the absolute and relative inventory forecasts for A-Cat Corporation.
I address the estimation and projection issues and point out that, unlike most parametric and semi-nonparametric demand forecast systems such as moving average and exponential smoothing. The problem in this revolves around the efficient and accurate method that A-Cat Corporation can to forecast its inventory to ensure it meets transformer demand levels. This will ensure the firm reduce the costs resulting from poor inventory management. The other problem revolves around the relationship between sales of refrigerators which seems to be influencing transformer demand.
Strategy to Addresses the Problem
Due to the strategic importance of Inventory Management in respect to demand levels, there exists an undeniable need for a systematic analysis before deciding accurately on the best and most reasonable method in estimating the demand level to help in creating a good inventory sourcing mechanism. There is need to use a more systematic analysis for evaluating components of the company’s inventory for outsourcing may be useful to practitioners and analyzing information on current inventory forecasting techniques. The best expertise choice is used to implement the moving average and exponential smoothing in forecasting demand of transformers. In the inventory management model, I will propose the EOQ model to ensure optimal orders to reduce high ordering and carrying costs of inputs.
Illustration; Using 2-Month Moving Average using Microsoft Word, the transformer Demand for 2009 can be extracted as shown.
| 2-Month MA | ||||
| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | |
| 779 | 845 | 857 | 838.5 | |
| 802 | 739 | 881 | 869.0 | |
| 818 | 871 | 937 | 909.0 | |
| 888 | 927 | 1159 | 1048.0 | |
| 898 | 1133 | 1072 | 1155.5 | |
| 902 | 1124 | 1246 | 1159.0 | |
| 916 | 1056 | 1198 | 1222.0 | |
| 708 | 889 | 922 | 1060.0 | |
| 695 | 857 | 798 | 860.0 | |
| 708 | 772 | 879 | 838.5 | |
| 716 | 751 | 945 | 912.0 | |
| 784 | 820 | 990 | 967.5 |
This will ensure A-Cat Corporation is complements a robust statistical process control (quality control) program to monitor the quality of its transformers. Without proper forecast of inventory, the quality is at stake because customers view the presence of inventory as quality service.
REFERENCES
Agueda E.T.& Eva R. L.,
(1996) .Research on tourist demand in Spain: An analysis and
summary”,
The Tourist Review, 51(1),29 – 33
Barnett A.W, & Serletis A. (2009),. The Differential
Approach to Demand Analysis and the
Rotterdam Model, in Daniel J. Slottje (ed.) Quantifying Consumer Preferences
(Contributions to Economic
Analysis, Volume 288) Emerald Group Publishing Limited,
61 – 81.
Claveria O, &
Datzira J., (2010) .Forecasting tourism demand using consumer
expectations”,
Tourism Review, 65(1),18 – 36
Udo G., (2000). Using
analytic hierarchy process to analyze the information technology
outsourcing
decision. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100 (9), 421 – 429.