We can deliver n Advanced Financial Accounting (ACC3012-N)
There are arguments that understanding accounting practices in their organizational contexts requires more than a technical description of accounting information systems as they are conceived and designed in abstract. What is required are studies of the way in which accounting systems become embodied in organizational systems of accountability. There are a number comparative accounting behavioural (CAB) models which are used to understand and explain apparent accounting differences.
Task:
Select two countries and collect data that presents the similarities and differences of the accounting, auditing and financial systems and practices in those nations. You must use explanatory CAB models ( E.g Nobes, Hofstede or Gray) to explore the collected data. This essay expects you collect sufficient data about the two countries (Please collect secondary data and stick with document review as a data collection method) in order to evaluate and criticise the chosen model.
Please ensure that you consider the availability and volume of data available for each chosen country so that you can sufficiently undertake a critical and evaluative analysis. Insufficient data will impede your ability to undertake a full analysis via a CAB model. Furthermore, please ensure you collect only secondary data, and utilise a document review process the data collection process.
Marking criteria
| Description of chosen model | 20% |
| Data collection and data analysis | 25% |
| Critical evaluation of the model | 25% |
| Introduction and conclusion | 10% |
| Appropriateness of the material referenced and Written presentation | 10% |
| Wiki presentation and contribution | 10% |
| Total | 100% |
Guidelines for Presentation of Assessed Work
Assignment Format
Your assignment should consist of the following:
- Title Page.
- Reference List.
- Appendices (if applicable).
Title Page
This should contain the following information:
- Name of programme (and pathway if applicable).
- Your name, preferably in a larger font and highlighted.
- Module title (exactly as identified in your module guide or specification).
- Module code (exactly as identified in your module guide or specification).
- Module leader or group tutor.
- The assignment title.
- The date of submission.
- The word count of your essay
The Assignment
This should be presented as follows:
- Text should be in a minimum of font size 12 in Arial (this document is in Arial size 12)
- Line spacing of 1.5 (one and a half) as a minimum.
- Margin sizes should be the default ones used in Microsoft Word (usually 2.54 cm left and right, 2.54cm top and bottom).
- A clear gap should be left between paragraphs to make it clear where they start and end.
- Each page should be numbered as a minimum standard. As you become more skilled in word processing, you are encouraged to include a header or footer that includes your name and the module code.
- All work must be proof read and spell checked to rectify spelling and typographical errors.
- You should use an appropriate academic writing style (see http://dissc.tees.ac.uk/Writing/Style/Contents.htm for further help).
The Reference List
This should:
- Start on a new page entitled ‘Reference List’ rather than ‘Bibliography’.
- Not include a separate bibliography.
- Be presented with a clear gap between references.
- Be presented following the University standard style format. For guidance see References information on the Learning Hub site (http://dissc.tees.ac.uk/references/Content.htm) .
Appendices
These should be clearly numbered and appropriately referred to in your assignment and should not include information that is essential for the main body of the assignment. Appendices should not be used as a device for getting around the word limit.
Presentation
The assignment and WIKI presentation you have to submit through available link on the blackboard.
Rename the document
You should use student number and name to rename the document.
Word Limit
The word count of the assignment is 1500.
| Advanced Financial Accounting
Marking Criteria |
| 90%-100%
Exceptional work. Presentation is logical, error-free and, where appropriate, creative. There is an in-depth understanding of issues/problems and excellent critical/deep engagement with the material and concepts involved. Very skilful interpretation of data. Arguments, ideas and, where appropriate, solutions are presented coherently and fully underpinned by thorough research and reading. |
| 80%-89%
Outstanding work with presentation of a very high standard. There is comprehensive understanding of key concepts and knowledge and clear evidence of critical analysis and insight. Accurate interpretation of data with arguments, ideas and solutions presented effectively and based on strong research and reading. |
| 70%-79%
Extremely good work with presentation of a high standard. Demonstrates an excellent knowledge base with a clear understanding of the issues and application to practice where appropriate. There is some effective critical and analytical application of relevant research and reading. |
| 60%-69%
The work is very good, logically structured and presented to a high standard. Demonstrates a strong knowledge base with a clear understanding of the issues and application to practice where appropriate. There is some critical and analytical application of relevant research. |
| 50%-59%
The work is clearly presented and logically structured. It shows evidence of a sound understanding of the topic and addresses major issues. The work contains some discussion and interpretation of relevant perspectives although further development of the arguments presented would be beneficial. There are examples of critical reflection and evidence of application of theory to practice. |
| 40%-49%
Adequate presentation. The work displays basic knowledge and understanding of the topic but is largely descriptive. There is an attempt to bring together different ideas and concepts although this would have been strengthened by the inclusion of further key issues. The structure of the work requires attention to its coherence and logical development of content. The link between theory and practice, where appropriate, is somewhat tenuous and its development would enhance the work considerably. |
| 30%-39% – Fail
The work is poorly presented and contains numerous errors, inconsistencies and omissions with limited use of source material. The work displays a weak knowledge base and a lack of sufficient understanding of the topic. There is little or no evidence of the application of theory to practice where appropriate. It contains many unsupported statements with little attempt to bring issues together and lacks critical analysis and reflection. |
| 29% and below – Fail
The work is very poorly presented and contains numerous serious errors, inconsistencies and omissions with little use of source material. The work displays a very weak knowledge base and a lack of sufficient understanding of the topic. There is little or no evidence of the application of theory to practice where appropriate. It contains many unsupported statements with little attempt to bring issues together and there is a complete lack of critical analysis and reflection. |
The post We can deliver n Advanced Financial Accounting (ACC3012-N) appeared first on Smashing Essays.
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"
