Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

Write a 400–600 word essay in a Word document.Are leaders born or

/in /by

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Write a 400–600 word essay in a Word document.Are leaders born or made? Explain. How does your position on this topic align with your leadership journey? Include a closing paragraph detailing your action plan for maintaining academic success in the MBA program.

– have to be around 1000 word- double space- plane english research

– have to be around 1000 word- double space- plane english research paper- 3 or 4 work citation

– have to be around 1000 word- double space- plane english research

– have to be around 1000 word- double space- plane english research paper- 3 or 4 work citation

read the directions project proposal

I chose option 1 because it was the easiest option out of the other options. Please complete the project proposal. This will be followed by the project assignment, which is posted below. Your focus is the one page project proposal. You need to complete what i have made bold. 1 double spaced page which will talk about the steps you will have to take to finish the project. Come up with a workable plan for the creative project. For this assignment, I am asking you to write a proposal for your upcoming creative project (see the detailed instructions for that project below). Your proposal should explain the option you picked, why you picked it, and a list of the steps you will have to take to finish the project, as well as any questions you have about the project. You should also consider if your project will require citations (if you are using other people’s intellectual property like images, music, or text) and how you will incorporate those citations into your project. The purpose of this proposal is to come up with a workable plan for your creative project that I can check and give you feedback on, as necessary.Length: 1 page double spaced. Proposal due: Wednesday, July 31. Upload to this assignment.Creative Project AssignmentIn English classes we tend to focus on analysis and argumentation through papers and exams; however, there are many other ways a person can respond to and interpret a text. This creative project is your chance to explore a different mode of interpretation by imagining yourself as an author, by imagining yourself as a book publicist, or by imagining yourself as an illustrator. Choose one of the options below.Option 1: Creative WritingIf you choose this option, you will write an original short story related to the theme of growing up or developing personal identity using one of the techniques we’ve observed in our books this semester. Those include:Your creative writing should be 3 pages long double spaced (or 3 pages of comic strip). It can be fiction or based on real life (yours or someone you know – with names changed if you want).You must also include a one paragraph reflection at the end that discusses which technique you picked from the list, why you picked it, and why you think it is or is not effective in telling a story now that you’ve tried it yourself. Talk about how doing this creative writing helped you learn or understand something more about a book/theme from this class. You will submit the actual project on the Creative Project assignment page.

Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part IPrewritingDue Week 3 and worth

Assignment 1.1: Conflicting Viewpoints Essay – Part IPrewritingDue Week 3 and worth 30 pointsWhen looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view? This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe” – or at least consider – the reasons for an opposing view on an issue.The assignment is divided into two (2) parts.In Part I of the assignment (due Week 3), you will first read a book excerpt about critical thinking processes: “The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful” at http://www.procon.org/sourcefiles/believinggame.pdf. Next, you will review the Procon.org Website in order to gather information. Then, you will engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.Note: In Part II of the assignment (due Week 5), you will write an essay geared towards synthesizing your ideas.Part I – Prewriting: Follow the instructions below for this prewriting activity. Use complete sentences and adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

needs to be 300 word

I attached some pictures of both chapters Please find attached my lecture on Confucianism and ethics:http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/extwidget/preview/partner_id/1316541/uiconf_id/13696302/entry_id/0_8r1vji4f/embed/legacy?Also, an interesting and informative film on the life and teachings of Confucius: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH2cWXmKlzE

“Identifying Misleading Information in an Argument”Find an online article (news, magazine, journal,

“Identifying Misleading Information in an Argument”Find an online article (news, magazine, journal, etc.) on any subject that interests you that uses statistics to make its conclusion. Share a link in this thread.Now answser these questions about that article:AND RESPOND TO THIS POST:Velten RE: Week 5 DiscussionCOLLAPSEGood morning Class and Dr. WessResearchers all agree that smartphones and technology is changing our brains and the way we act (Sudakow, 1). There have been many studies about the impact of technology on our brains, behaviors, and how we act (Sudakow, 1). There are some statistic’s that show how smartphones are the main technology that is affecting it. This article goes on to list 6 different statistics surrounding this topic.The premise is that smartphones are affecting our brains and how we act. The conclusion is that the statistics from the research are really not showing proof that this is the case. The actual fact is that almost all the researches of the study agree that they just don’t know how all this new technology is changing our brains (Sudakow, 1).Some of these stats can be misleading like over half of college students unlock their phones more than 60 a times a day. They could be using their phones to study. I do believe that technology and especially devices have affected us in some way, but to the extent of changing our brains and damaging them, I’m not sure. I guess time will tell. Sources

for testimonial paper on “Ready Player One”

You are finding sources for Testimonial (Research) Final PaperIn approximately 500 words (3 pages) compile and write an annotated bibliography of three academic, literature-based outside sources that are related to your Ready Player One Testimonial (Research) Paper.You are finding sources for Testimonial (Research) Final PaperYou DO NOT need an extra works cited page for this assignment because each entry should already have one above it.Here is my topic: Topic #3In my testimonial research paper, I will explain the theme of escaping and show the positive and negative effect on living in an unreal life as the main character does. The advance of technology helps people evaluate in their research and the dreams by realizing they want and need. They can even create an extension of themselves living in another world and realization they future situations and life. By definition, the escapism is the fact of being obsessed by a virtual world. The book Ready Player One partially show the theme of escapism which is seen in the character with Wade. Wade describes his experience in the OASIS as the world so that they could forget the difficulties they encounter in life. Thus I will focus on analyzing the positive and negative part of the OASIS because they abused when being online by the constant use of virtual reality.Example of an annotated Bibliography: Douglas, Mary. “Red Riding Hood: An interpretation from anthropology.” Folklore 106.1/2 (1995): 1. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 7 March 2014.In this article, Douglas bases much of the interpretation on the research conducted by Yvonne Verdier. The fieldwork involved learning from the eldest women in the village of Minot, Burgundy. Much effort is displayed in examining the earlier French versions of the story before the revisions by Perrault and Grimm. Douglas offers several references of cannibalism and sexual connotations that are prevalent in the early French versions. Hence, the historical information is insightful, and will be useful in comparing the earlier versions to the current account of the narratives written by Perrault and Grimm. Also, I find the article’s examples and reasoning that the tale is a fantasy to be helpful in preparing my analysis of the story.Formatting: The sources you find must be closed related to the topic!!! Must be academic sources from the library or library databases!!!

Give two examples of situations you might encounter as a human service

Give two examples of situations you might encounter as a human service professional that would fall under these categories. What services would you recommend and what benefit would you expect they would provide? The three major types of supportive services are family resource, support, and educational services; family-centered services; and intensive family crisis services.

the transcripts of the TWO TED talks and answer the following questions.

The first TED Talk is called: “The Biology of Our Best and Worst Selves” | Robert Sapolskyyou can search for it online to WATCH or I have attached the transcripts of both.The second TED Talk is called: “How Books Can Open Your Mind” | Lisa Bu1. What is the speaker’s main argument? Or what is her thesis?2. Name at least 3 specific examples/pieces of evidence she uses to support her argument?3. What was the biggest takeaway that you had from this video? What interested you the most?

You have included many important considerations in this essay, and it is

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays You have included many important considerations in this essay, and it is evident that you have engaged with the prompt to guide your analysis. However, the essay lacks a strong thesis that makes a claim about the approaches of the two articles and previews the contents of the paper. Looking to the body of the essay, each of your paragraphs takes on a different consideration, but often these pieces of analysis are lacking concrete reference to the two articles. At times, you speak about the articles, but often there is a lack of specificity and evidence from the text to adequately and clearly support your claims. Lastly, remember that this is a comparative paper, which means that you should likely be applying your criteria to an exploration of both articles. This is a good start, but significant revision is needed in order for your argument to come through more clearly. Comparative Text Analysis (Essay 1) (650-800 words) This comparative paper will help you weigh textual evidence more carefully as you examine the different treatments two writers give the same subject. You will be analyzing two of our assigned texts, “Free Speech is Flunking Out on College Campuses” by Rampell and “Restoring Free Speech on Campus” by Stone and Creely. The purpose of the assignment is to help you perceive distortions in the writers’ use of evidence, assess the reliability of the writers, recognize biases, and draw inferences from the data they present. Allow some of the following questions to guide your analysis: Dispute over FactsDisputes about EvidenceDifferences in Patterns of ThoughtFor this essay, you will need to produce a thesis statement which should be underlined. Think of the thesis statement of a one sentence preview of the argument you will make in your essay. Be sure to provide specific detail in the thesis to better forecast the content of the paper. Additionally, you will want to be sure that each of your body paragraphs begins with a strong topic sentence that identifies the paragraph’s content to the reader. Think of your topic sentence as a mini-thesis. Remember to use the PIE paragraph structure we talked about this week to provide strong claims, specific examples from the text, and then explicit explanation of their significance.

your take/stance on passing an English course without having enough language and grammar skills? Include at-least three references

What is your take/stance on passing an English course without having enough language and grammar skills? Include at-least three references.The introduction is well-structured. a hook statement and a good thesis statement are included.20pointsThe introduction is structured well with the thesis statement with minor missing details.15pointsThe introduction is included with a thesis statement along with major errors.7pointsThe introduction is not found.0pointsThe author makes a compelling argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. All supporting topic/point is clearly stated and discussed as stated in the thesis statement. The word count/presentation length is adequate. Analytic claims are supported with evidence from the text (and possibly, context). Each piece of evidence is examined closely, as the author moves through a critical analysis that offers a specific reading of the text.15pointsThe author makes an argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. However, all topics are not discussed. The author provides textual (and perhaps, contextual) evidence that support the claim. However, argument is not convincing because either the author has not provided enough evidence to support his/her points/claims or the author has failed to demonstrate the connection between evidences and claims.12pointsThe author’s argument is either not argumentative in nature or is not debatable. The author may provide some textual evidence. However, parts of the “argument” are not convincing.7pointsThe author makes no claims about how the essay works argumentatively. The content of the supporting paragraph is unclear. The topic sentences are not clearly stated. Word count/ presentation length not met.0pointsThe author makes a compelling argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. All supporting topic/point is clearly stated and discussed as stated in the thesis statement. The word count/presentation length is adequate. Analytic claims are supported with evidence from the text (and possibly, context). Each piece of evidence is examined closely, as the author moves through a critical analysis that offers a specific reading of the text.15pointsThe author makes an argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. However, all topics are not discussed. The author provides textual (and perhaps, contextual) evidence that support the claim. However, argument is not convincing because either the author has not provided enough evidence to support his/her points/claims or the author has failed to demonstrate the connections between evidences and claims.12pointsThe author’s argument is either not argumentative in nature or is not debatable. The author may provide some textual evidence. However, parts of the “argument” are not convincing.7pointsThe author makes no claims about how the essay works argumentatively. The content of the supporting paragraph is unclear. The topic sentences are not clearly stated. Word count/ presentation length not met.0pointsThe author makes a compelling argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. All supporting topic/point is clearly stated and discussed as stated in the thesis statement. The word count/presentation length is adequate. Analytic claims are supported with evidence from the text (and possibly, context). Each piece of evidence is examined closely, as the author moves through a critical analysis that offers a specific reading of the text.15pointsThe author makes an argument about how the essay works argumentatively. Content is clearly stated. However, all topics are not discussed. The author provides textual (and perhaps, contextual) evidence that support the claim. However, argument is not convincing because either the author has not provided enough evidence to support his/her points/claims or the author has failed to demonstrate the connections between evidences and claims.12pointsThe author’s argument is either not argumentative in nature or is not debatable. The author may provide some textual evidence. However, parts of the “argument” are not convincing.7pointsThe author makes no claims about how the essay works argumentatively. The content of the supporting paragraph is unclear. The topic sentences are not clearly stated. Word count/ presentation length not met.0pointsConclusion is well structured. Recommendation is given by the author.15pointsConclusion is present, but part of the information is missing.12pointsConclusion is structured with lack of precision and recommendation.7pointsConclusion is not included.0pointsThe author follows an APA format, Title page, headings, and reference page are included per APA format. Essay references 3 well-chosen sources, which are scholarly/peer-reviewed journal article. In-text citations and reference list are complete and correct according to APA guidelines10pointsThe author follows an APA format and includes title page, headings, and reference page, but there are minor mistakes. Essay references fewer than 3 relevant sources, one of which is a scholarly/peer-reviewed journal article. In-text citations and reference list follow APA guidelines, with few major errors.7pointsThe author encounters major mistakes in following an APA format. More than one items (title, headings, and reference page are missing. Essay references fewer than 2 sources and/or does not include a scholarly/peer-reviewed journal article. In-text citations and reference list contain numerous errors in APA style. One missing/incorrect in-text citation and/or reference.4pointsEssay references are not included and if they are included and none of them are scholarly/peer-reviewed journal article. Missing in-text citations and/or reference list.0pointsThe writing is appropriately academic in tone/style and is virtually free of grammatical and mechanical errors.10pointsThe writing is academic in style and contains only a few grammatical and mechanical errors.7pointsThe writing style may not be appropriate to academic contexts; it contains numerous, repeated errors.4pointsThe writing style is inappropriate and full of distracting errors0points

I have 4 discussion for my class and I need to write

I have 4 discussion for my class and I need to write 50 words for each discussion and replay to my classmate in about 30 words.Check the attatahced file for more information Discussion # 7View the Toulmin Argument PowerPoint Presentation. View the PowerPoint in slide show mode. Pause slide one and provide responses to the inference questions and place your responses in Discussion Board Thread 7. Respond to ONE peer’s response by elaborating on his or her response.Discussion # 9: The Case of Slip or TripComplete Toulmin Activity 3: The Case of Slip or Trip, use the sentence frame to compose your answer, and upload your response to Bb Discussion Thread 9. Respond to at least ONE classmate’s post. Respond to the strength(s) or weakness (es) presented in your classmate’s argument/reasoning. You may select the hyperlink or view the activity handout in the Week Three Documents Folder. Toulmin Activity 3: The Case of Slip or TripDiscussion # 10Read PA Ch. 5: “The UnFree Speech Movement” by Sol Stern, pp. 168-171. Answer questions 1-6 and place in Bb Discussion Thread 10. Respond to at least TWO classmate’s responses. Discussion # 11: finding and evaluating sources

Please answer these 7 questions I attached 3 of my classmate answers

Please answer these 7 questions I attached 3 of my classmate answers you juts need to do paraphrase1) Carey blames the current student-loan problem on years of “greed, inattention, and failed policy” (para. 1). Is he right to assume his readers will agree with him, or should he have provided evidence to support this statement? Explain.2) In paragraph 2, Carey says that income-contingent loans would end “forever” all student-loan defaults. After reading Carey’s explanation, how would you define income-contingent loans?3) What evidence does Carey present to support his proposal? If income-contingent loans are such a good idea, why hasn’t the government tried them before?4) What kind of appeal does Carey make in paragraph 7? In your opinion, how effective is this appeal?5) Where does Carey address arguments against his proposal? List these arguments. Which argument do you think presents the most effective challenge to Carey’s position? Why?6) In paragraph 16, Carey calls the student-loan system “an out-of-control monster tearing at the fabric of civil society.” In paragraph 18, he says, “The students at the barricades are right to be angry.” Do you think he is exaggerating, or is this strong language justified?7) In paragraph 17, Carey lists problems that income-contingent loans will not solve. Does this paragraph undercut (or even contradict) his statement in paragraph 2 that income-contingent loans would end student-loan defaults? Explain.

video and answer questions an about 300 words

Please watch two videos and answer the questions in about 300 words:Video 1:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtW2rrLHs08

I need to do Paraphrase for these 5 questions and I already

I need to do Paraphrase for these 5 questions and I already give you three answers for each question Answer (1)1. How does the writer attempt to establish common ground? Do you think she is successful?The writer attempts to establish common ground by asserting that despite cellphones being disruptive in class, they should be incorporated into lessons. She also says that the cellphones should be turned off when students are taking a test.I do believe she was successful. She presents a stance and benefits for both sides effectively.2. What evidence does the writer supply to support her position?The writer presents valuable evidence in support of her position that cellphones should not be allowed in class. She argues that studies conducted show that cellphones are distractive when used in class. She also asserts that when cellphones are used in class, students’ ability to concentrate is affected negatively. She also avers that the use of cell phones encourages cheating. These are pieces of evidence she uses to support her claim.3. Other than reinforcing the writer’s position, what else is the conclusion trying to achieve?The writer tries to apply a common ground of the argument so as to achieve some compromises.4. How does the concluding statement reinforce agreement and compromise?Despite her stand, the writer agrees that it is in everyone’s interest that policies should be enacted for the success of education. The policies should consider both sides.5. How would this essay be different if it were written as a traditional (as opposed to a Rogerian) argument?There would be no common ground reached upon. The writer would have highlighted her points without putting into consideration the other sides’ argument. She would be interested in convincing the audience.Answer (2)1. She addresses both sides of the argument, she is considerate and empathizes with the other side, she shows that she has listened to what they have said, and is willing to do so. This gives her further merit to be listened to by the opposing side.2. She provides statistics and facts about cell phone usage in class and also considers what the opposing side has to say before providing rebuttals, warrants, and qualifiers. She tries to address the topic from multiple angles.3. The conclusion tries to persuade the other side to be willing to go along with it, through diplomacy rather than force.4. She states how it is understandable for students to feel that way, but also states it is understandable why professors should be able to tell them to turn it off, appealing to the greater good of the institution.5. It would be more argumentative, it would omit and censor much of the opposing argument’s point of view, and it would less logical, simply forcing biased evidence on someone without nearly the tact or rebuttal this provided.Answer (3)1. The writer attempts to establish common ground in the first few paragraphs. In the first paragraph, she states that, “Both students and instructors know that cell phone use- including texting- during class can be disruptive”. She also states that the primary goal of a school is to provide a respectful learning environment. I think that these are a great start to effectively presenting evidence that not allowing cell phones in the classroom is beneficial to everyone. It appeals to both sides, teachers and students, about the issue.2. The writer has the position that cell phones should not be allowed in class. In paragraph three, she begins presenting her view. She says, “recent studies have shown how distracting cells phones can be during class… In addition, texting in class decreases students ability to focus, lowers test performance, and lessens students retention of class material”. She also quotes another study that found cellphone use to have a negative impact on the person using it as well as those around them. She also elaborates on how cell phones can encourage cheating and provide a false sense of security for students during an emergency.3. The conclusion again attempts to find that common ground between the two sides. While she does reinforce her own position, she is still trying to show why not allowing cell phones in a classroom setting is more beneficial to everyone.4. In the concluding statement, the author points out that “it is in everyones best interest” to ensure that cell phones do not prohibit the learning environment. To allow for everyone to be successful, rules must be put in place by the educators and then followed by the students.5. A traditional argument would have taken the stance that not allowing cell phone use in the classroom is clearly the only solution. It would have promoted that over all other options, not offering any compromises or attempts at understanding the other side of the argument. Since a traditional argument is more about, “I am right and you are wrong” during an argument, it would have attacked the opposing view rather than finding common ground to create a solution.

This week we have looked at the value of using LinkedIn to

This week we have looked at the value of using LinkedIn to create an online presence. For your post this week, identify three goals that hope to achieve with your LinkedIn account and what tools that we have learned about you are using to accomplish this.

Use invention techniques to evaluate this online English 1301 course. Narrow your

Use invention techniques to evaluate this online English 1301 course. Narrow your focus specifically to this online course you’re currently enrolled in this semester. Identify clear criteria (articles, quizzes, tests, peer interaction, etc.) you’ll evaluate in this course as it relates to online education and learning.The key to effective evaluative writing is starting off with a clear and precise argument. Your main argument is what you will use to perform the evaluation. You may want to argue that one criteria is better than another based on its various reasons. Other evaluators might argue the differences between skills learned from each area of criteria. Whatever the main argument may be for your evaluative essay, make sure that your argument is clear.Write a working draft of 300—600 words. Make sure your working draft includes the elements of an evaluation and that it meets the criteria described in the Evaluation Essay Rubric . When you have completed your working draft, format it in MLA.

poverty and homelessness in metro vancouver

Needs around 16001800 words in simple language not in high level and needs urls where u get information

You have done the research part before, so you just need to

You have done the research part before, so you just need to keep doing this Slides assignmentAll requirement will be in this slides

the linkages between the poverty and the homelessness in metro vancouver?

Topic should be cover the affordabilty housing in metro vancouver and impacts of homelessness and how poverty is interlinked with honelessness And i need urls links i will cite down later on

The post Write a 400–600 word essay in a Word document.Are leaders born or appeared first on Smashing Essays.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"