1. I agree that the Reid technique was clearly used because the

1. I agree that the Reid technique was clearly used because the entire interrogation was only performed with the intent of receiving a confession. It also does seem as though Butler was more of a non-emotional. Throughout the process, he did not show much emotion and was questioned in a more accusatory manner, which is how non-emotional offenders are usually questioned. The confession Butler gave was obviously false. As you stated, an officer admitted to not having heard Butler say what was on the written confession and physical abuse was used in order to receive his oral confession. He provided his confession only out of desperation to escape an awful situation. You make a good point that they trusted the eyewitness’ memory too much. After he identified Butler as the one who killed his wife, the detectives immediately concluded that he was guilty and did not bother investigating any other suspects. They did not even attempt to see if Butler had an alibi for the time that the crime occurred. I definitely agree that the overall process would have been improved if the investigators had simply tried to find evidence other than the eyewitness’ statement.2. I agree that Brenton Butler was not the one who made the false confession, it was the officer who came up with the story to make him seem guilty. All Butler did was sign it after being forced into a state of fear by being physically assaulted by the detective and continuously being told he was the one who committed the murder. I also think that it was the officers’ fault that they only gave the husband one option in potential suspects. If you only have one option then, of course, you are going to pick it. If they would have done a line-up, either live or picture, then I do not think the husband would be able to pick someone given the fact that he only had a quick look at the suspect’s face. I was also very frustrated that the officers picked up the first black male they saw and called him the suspect. With the broad description given by the husband, the officers should have asked other eyewitnesses or looked for cameras in the area. Anything other than picking up the first person they saw would have been better.

Using 400-600 words respond to the following questions:George is a college student

Using 400-600 words respond to the following questions:George is a college student in North Carolina. Every weekend, he drives into Georgia to visit his family. George’s family is well-respected and are influential members of their community. They are wealthy enough to give George a good education and supply him with an upscale, flashy, and expensive automobile. George is very religious, has extremely high ethics, but is also an eccentric and unique individual. He does not follow the trends in clothing or personal presentation. He has long hair, a flashy car, and wears “hippie” attire. Every time he travels through the northern counties of Georgia, he is either stopped by the Georgia Highway Patrol or the local sheriff’s office. They stop him because he fits the profile of a drug dealer.The Georgia Highway Patrol and the local sheriff’s office have policies and procedures pertaining to drug trafficking. The highway that George is traveling is known as a “drug pipeline.” On his last trip home, George passed a large city, and the highway patrol stopped him. This officer carried tools and a battery-powered screwdriver. He proceeded to take George’s car apart, piece by piece. When he did not find drugs, this officer just drove off, leaving George stranded. It was found that this officer just received a commendation for the highest amount of drug busts on this highway. Support your answers with scholarly sources and research into the laws and policies of LOUISIANA.

Using 400-600 words respond to the following questions:George is a college student

American State and Local Politics

1. Do you believe the United States should change to a direct democracy or remain a representative democracy? Explain your answer. Give an example of how you think the democracy in the United States would be helped or hurt if the country switched to a direct democracy. Use facts to support your opinion.Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary.2. In your own words, summarize the methods used for state constitutional change, including how the initiative device affects state politics.Your response should be at least 75 words in length.3. Contrast the differences and similarities between a direct democracy and a representative democracy.Your response should be at least 75 words in length.

criminal justice in digital forensics discussion post

During the initial direct examination process, a testifying expert witness must first qualify their expertise within court. For this to happen, the testifying expert must demonstrate competence within the subject, as well as qualification through a combination of subject knowledge, skill, training, and education (Sapir, 2007). To accomplish this, an attorney may ask various questions to help demonstrate to the court the competence and knowledge of the testifying expert. For example, an attorney may ask the expert to tell the court about details regarding where the individual received their education and what degree or degrees they hold. The expert may also be asked to give a length of time they have spent in the area of expertise. Additional questions may include current place of employment, present title, current position, licensing in the field, any publications within the field of expertise, any honors or awards received in the field of expertise, or number of times the witness has testified in court as an expert witness within the field (Sapir, 2007).While an attorney who called the expert witness will be asking questions to help qualify the expert witness, the opposing counsel will likely ask questions to call into question the expertise of the witness in attempts to discredit the witness. This can be done through various methods to include attacking potential biases of the expert witness or to attack the expert’s qualifications (Evans, 2017). Exploiting possible presence of financial bias within the expert witness is a common technique in which the opposing counsel may call into question the presence of bias due to the witness providing their expert testimony for a fee (Evans, 2017). On the other hand, the opposing counsel may attack the witness’ credentials by identifying a list of relevant certifications within the field which the witness does not possess (Evans, 2017).An expert who demonstrates contradictions within their testimony may appear incompetent within court which would call into question the evidence collected and produced by that expert. To avoid contradictions during a testimony in court, expert witnesses should prepare for their direct examination prior to court. It is recommended for an attorney to prepare the expert witness on a separate date prior to the testimony date. The preparation includes reviewing related facts, timeline, legal standards, familiarization with any prepared demonstrative evidence, and anything the expert intends to use when testifying (Harlan

Topic 1: Theories of LeadershipDefine leadership. Then identify and discuss the major

Topic 1: Theories of LeadershipDefine leadership. Then identify and discuss the major theories of leadership (trait, behavioral, contingency, leader-member exchange, and decision theory). Which theory do you think is most effective in a criminal justice organization? Why?Topic 2: Identify, compare, and contrast the Charismatic Leader and the Transformational Leader.Define discuss and compare the Charismatic Leader and the Transformational Leader. When is each effective? What are the weaknesses of each? Give an example of when a criminal justice organization would employ each.

Download Unit 4 Assignment summary.Instructions: Answer the following questions in essays that

Download Unit 4 Assignment summary.Instructions: Answer the following questions in essays that comprehensively discuss the issues raised by each question. Your answers should be written with correct punctuation, grammar, and citations. Your answers also should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate your knowledge of the topics raised by the question. To formulate your responses be sure to utilize your text and research at least two other sources for additional insight and assistance in creating real-world scenarios where applicable.Leadership and Organizational Conflict(PLEASE NOTE: This essay will require outside research. Use at least two credible sources beyond the text material and discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used.)You may consult the Online Library, the internet, the textbook, other course material, and any other outside resources in supporting your task, using proper citations in APA style.

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read The United States of

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read The United States of America and the International Criminal Court (Links to an external site.), Between Cosmopolitan and American Democracy: Understanding US Opposition to the International Criminal Court (Links to an external site.), and pages 477-480 and 483 of the Routledge Handbook of Critical Criminology (Links to an external site.).The United States has refused to join the International Criminal Court (ICC) since its inception. The issue of the United States’ reluctance to join the ICC continues to be a matter of international debate. This week’s assignment requires you to take a position on whether or not the United States should formally join, and accept the jurisdiction of, the International Criminal Court. Avoid notions of jingoism, and examine the international community and the responsibilities of the United States as an international actor in both civilian and military affairs. Make sure to explain the consequences of not joining or a decision to join the ICC.In your paper,The International Criminal Law paper:For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an external site.).*Note: You are encouraged to integrate any feedback from your instructor and upload the assignment to your ePortfolio.

Prior to beginning work on this video presentation, read Plea and Charge

Prior to beginning work on this video presentation, read Plea and Charge Bargaining: Research Summary (Links to an external site.) and The Unnecessary Evil of Plea Bargaining: An Unconstitutional Conditions Problem and a Not-So-Least Restrictive Alternative (Links to an external site.). Additionally, watch Due Process: Let’s Make a Deal: The Plea Bargain (Aired 12/9/12) (Links to an external site.).Well over 90% of criminal cases in the United States are concluded through a plea bargain—a significant number of those for the crime initially charged (the defendant does not plead guilty to a lesser crime than charged). As future criminal justice professionals, it is important for you to fully understand the purposes, goals, and procedures for plea agreements. In this video presentation, weigh the significance of plea bargains and the impact eliminating them would have upon the criminal justice system. Pay close attention to the limited role that judges play in plea bargains. Choose your side wisely; you will be defending your position in your video!Prepare a two- to three-minute video presentation with detailing the following information:Please note that oral presentations will take place in the Canvas discussion forum. This oral presentation will be available for both the instructor and your fellow classmates to view.Recording or uploading a video:For advice and information on webcam presentations, see Webcam Recording Do’s and Don’ts (Links to an external site.).

Respond to the following questions. Use your own words- no cites/references please;

Respond to the following questions. Use your own words- no cites/references please; grammar and spelling are important; only thorough responses will receive full credit. 1. Have you completed criminological theory class before? Did you enjoy it? What did you learn from it?2. Identify and explain one of the theories covered in this unit. Why do you think theories evolve and change over time? Do you think some of the criminological theories we currently have will be nonsense in 20 years? Why or why not?3. Have you ever been the victim of a crime or has anyone you know been a victim of a crime? If yes, what were the costs associated with the victimization? How did you or the individual you know handle being victimized?4. Why is ethics so important in criminal justice research? What could happen if a researcher was not ethical?5. What effect does the media have on crime? Can this be controlled; why or why not? If it can be controlled, how do we accomplish that?

8- to-10 slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which you develop and present to the class a summary of this sociological theory?

Psychologists and sociologists have developed multiple theories to explain criminal behavior and the circumstances that might lead one into a life of crime. Some of these theories include the Strain theory, Differential Association theory, Delinquent Subcultures theory, Cultural Transmission theory, Differential Opportunity theory, Social Control theory, and Ethnic Succession theory. As a team, choose and present one of the sociological theories.Create an 8- to-10 slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which you develop and present to the class a summary of this sociological theory. Your presentation should:Record your presentation with Bongo.Refer to the How to Complete Group Project section of the Bongo Support page, and follow the instructions on how to record your video.Review the other Learning Team presentations, and respond to them within Bongo. Refer to the Peer Review Support Page for information on how to provide feedback on your classmates’ presentation.Note: Click on Bongo Access under the Course Syllabus.Consider the following criteria when providing constructive feedback and offer suggestions on improving the presentation:

1.) Find out from insurance company’s websites or other internet sources the

1.) Find out from insurance company’s websites or other internet sources the makes, models, and years of the top ten vehicles most often stolen in your state and in your nearest metropolitan area. Chart your results.2.) Read the auto theft paragraph in box 5.1 on page 141 of your text. Do you agree or disagree with the author? Give the rationale for your stance.3.) As a victim rights advocate, draw up a comprehensive checklist of all the victim oriented services that could and should be offered by user friendly police departments.

the following in a minimum of 175 words:

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: In Week 1 the differences and similarities between organized crime and terrorism were explored. It is not always an easy task to define a particular group as a terrorist group or an organized crime group.

1.We in the United States have very present what it is to

1.We in the United States have very present what it is to be a victim or target of domestic terrorist and transnational terrorist. I believe that many of the mass shootings that have happened here in the United States are acts of terror. Specially the one that happened here in El Paso, Tx. Having someone travel from across the state to target certain people I would consider that a domestic terrorist attack. The difference between terrorist and organized crime is the political views that are involved. Criminal Organizations do not have a political view that strive the organization to do what they are doing. They both are looking for power and plant fear in the people but in different ways. Narco-terrorism is the trade of narcotics internationally.2.Both terrorism and organized crime have many similarities as they are there to cause harm and terror amongst the public, they both have agendas but both also have differences and different agendas from one another. Organized crime is exactly that organized in which they specialize in dealing drugs, human trafficking and any other crimes you can think of, they run at a business level with different tiers of responsibilities from the head man or woman that runs the operations to the simple run of the mill ground hand in finding recruitment and dealing drugs making money for the business. Terrorism is both foreign and domestic meaning that it can happen by its own countries citizens and citizens from other countries. They usually have a political agenda in which they want to cripple the country in a way so devastating that the country may or may not be able to recover. In a way organized crime can be considered terrorism as they may not have a political agenda but they will and will try to do everything in their power to make money to support their business like function.

and contrasting nasa and the us army

This is an organizational analysis paper (APA)the paper will consist of comparing and contrasting nasa and the us army it will have 3 parts1stpart is the Introduction (introduce your topic and paper)2ndpart-Purpose – You will use the mission statement for both NASA AND THE U.S ARMY put it in your own words-Activities- what did these public organizations engage in (activities)-Structure- they are both hierarchies but talk about how tall and flat they are and why3rdpart then you will be applying the environmental factors and determining the effect upon internal/external and formal/informal processes.looks at how environmental factors impact an organization. There are nine such environmental factors discussed in your text. You should discuss how at least three of these impact the organizations specified in the essay. 1. economic 2.political3.technologyfor an exampleLook at NASA and ask yourself “How important is space exploration to the country?” Is it a higher priority than ensuring voting rights or eliminating poverty? If your answer is “No”, then how were we able to send a man to the moon during a time of great social unrest when economic resources were hotly contested? Leadership inside and outside the organization were determining factors. How was the necessary technology developed? Formally by taking advantage of the pool of highly talented employees and reorganization of the agency structure, and informally through alliances with academia that have subsequently been formalized.How does the Army prosper and continue to grow during a time of relative peace when many are looking forward the savings believed inherent in a “peace dividend”? Leadership redefines organizational purpose periodically by reidentifying the main threat to national security. Is the Army’s main function really protection from terrorism, or is that the current favorite? How does the Army develop new technologies? Does it have that talent within itself or must it go elsewhere?another example If I talk about 9/11, that would be the environmental factor and technology, economics, political, are the external and internal factors. I would ask externally and internally what changed and what is the result? How did it affect the (army, NASA) internally and externally? Informally and formally, how did things get done?Using your example of 9/11, this event occurred outside the organization of the Army but had a significant impact upon it, resulting in changes to mission, activities, and structure. This is an external stimuli producing a multitude of internal effects. 9/11 also impacted on NASA, heightening concerns about security, creating changes in program priorities, and absorbing scarce financial resources in the global war on terror. Such internal effects become manifest in regards to various organizational processes that can broadly be categorized as formal or informal and occasionally again as internal or external.the highlighted sections are incorrect Make changes to the highlighted sections and add what is needed4thpartthen conclusion reference page

and contrasting nasa and the us army

Organizational Analysis paperthe paper will consist of comparing and contrasting nasa and the us army it will have 3 parts1stpart is the Introduction (introduce your topic and paper)the paper will consist of comparing and contrasting nasa and the us army it will have 3 parts2ndpart-Purpose – You will use the mission statement for both NASA AND THE U.S ARMY put it in your own words-Activities- what did these public organizations engage in (activities)-Structure- they are both hierarchies but talk about how tall and flat they are and why3rdpart then you will be applying the environmental factors and determining the effect upon internal/external and formal/informal processes.looks at how environmental factors impact an organization. There are nine such environmental factors discussed in your text. You should discuss how at least three of these impact the organizations specified in the essay. 1. economic 2.political3.technologyfor an exampleLook at NASA and ask yourself “How important is space exploration to the country?” Is it a higher priority than ensuring voting rights or eliminating poverty? If your answer is “No”, then how were we able to send a man to the moon during a time of great social unrest when economic resources were hotly contested? Leadership inside and outside the organization were determining factors. How was the necessary technology developed? Formally by taking advantage of the pool of highly talented employees and reorganization of the agency structure, and informally through alliances with academia that have subsequently been formalized.How does the Army prosper and continue to grow during a time of relative peace when many are looking forward the savings believed inherent in a “peace dividend”? Leadership redefines organizational purpose periodically by reidentifying the main threat to national security. Is the Army’s main function really protection from terrorism, or is that the current favorite? How does the Army develop new technologies? Does it have that talent within itself or must it go elsewhere?another example If I talk about 9/11, that would be the environmental factor and technology, economics, political, are the external and internal factors. I would ask externally and internally what changed and what is the result? How did it affect the (army, NASA) internally and externally? Informally and formally, how did things get done?Using your example of 9/11, this event occurred outside the organization of the Army but had a significant impact upon it, resulting in changes to mission, activities, and structure. This is an external stimuli producing a multitude of internal effects. 9/11 also impacted on NASA, heightening concerns about security, creating changes in program priorities, and absorbing scarce financial resources in the global war on terror. Such internal effects become manifest in regards to various organizational processes that can broadly be categorized as formal or informal and occasionally again as internal or external.the highlighted sections are incorrect Make changes to the highlighted sections and add what is needed4thpartthen conclusion

and contrasting nasa and the us army

Organizational Analysis paper (APA)the paper will consist of comparing and contrasting nasa and the us army it will have 3 parts1stpart is the Introduction (introduce your topic and paper)the paper will consist of comparing and contrasting nasa and the us army it will have 3 parts2ndpart-Purpose – You will use the mission statement for both NASA AND THE U.S ARMY put it in your own words-Activities- what did these public organizations engage in (activities)-Structure- they are both hierarchies but talk about how tall and flat they are and why3rdpart then you will be applying the environmental factors and determining the effect upon internal/external and formal/informal processes.looks at how environmental factors impact an organization. There are nine such environmental factors discussed in your text. You should discuss how at least three of these impact the organizations specified in the essay. 1. economic 2.political3.technologyfor an exampleLook at NASA and ask yourself “How important is space exploration to the country?” Is it a higher priority than ensuring voting rights or eliminating poverty? If your answer is “No”, then how were we able to send a man to the moon during a time of great social unrest when economic resources were hotly contested? Leadership inside and outside the organization were determining factors. How was the necessary technology developed? Formally by taking advantage of the pool of highly talented employees and reorganization of the agency structure, and informally through alliances with academia that have subsequently been formalized.How does the Army prosper and continue to grow during a time of relative peace when many are looking forward the savings believed inherent in a “peace dividend”? Leadership redefines organizational purpose periodically by reidentifying the main threat to national security. Is the Army’s main function really protection from terrorism, or is that the current favorite? How does the Army develop new technologies? Does it have that talent within itself or must it go elsewhere?another example If I talk about 9/11, that would be the environmental factor and technology, economics, political, are the external and internal factors. I would ask externally and internally what changed and what is the result? How did it affect the (army, NASA) internally and externally? Informally and formally, how did things get done?Using your example of 9/11, this event occurred outside the organization of the Army but had a significant impact upon it, resulting in changes to mission, activities, and structure. This is an external stimuli producing a multitude of internal effects. 9/11 also impacted on NASA, heightening concerns about security, creating changes in program priorities, and absorbing scarce financial resources in the global war on terror. Such internal effects become manifest in regards to various organizational processes that can broadly be categorized as formal or informal and occasionally again as internal or external.the highlighted sections are incorrect Make changes to the highlighted sections and add what is needed4thpartthen the conclusionReference page REMEMBER Begin with Chapter 1 and ask “What is an organization?”; all organizations consist of three things. These three things determine the type of organization that we are dealing with and help to categorize them. Chapter 2 elaborates on the third criteria, it being the most varied. These three factors can be reduced to three simple questions that provide the basic framework for an organizational analysis. This basic analysis comprises 30% of your grade on the essay.Chapter 3 looks at how environmental factors impact an organization. There are nine such environmental factors discussed in your text. You should discuss how at least three of these impact the organizations specified in the essay. This is the second layer of your analysis and worth another 30% of your grade.Finally, the analysis is enriched by addressing the added complexity of internal/external and formal/informal mechanisms affecting organizational processes such as communications, leadership, and motivation. This effort is again worth 30% of your grade.

for your Personal and Professional Reflection (Component Three)

Your completed capstone project is due in Module Seven, and up to this point in the course, you have been primarily focused on the first two components of your project. However, it is important to also keep in mind the third component, the personal and professional reflection, and to begin working on it now.In this journal assignment, begin to draft your thoughts for what you will write for component three of your final project. Share with your instructor your thoughts on any/all of the following:This assignment is pass/fail and graded based on completion . The feedback your instructor provides should be considered and incorporated into your final project submission in Module Seven. For additional details on the third component of your capstone project, please refer to the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document.

I agree that the Reid technique was clearly used because the entire

I agree that the Reid technique was clearly used because the entire interrogation was only performed with the intent of receiving a confession. It also does seem as though Butler was more of a non-emotional. Throughout the process, he did not show much emotion and was questioned in a more accusatory manner, which is how non-emotional offenders are usually questioned. The confession Butler gave was obviously false. As you stated, an officer admitted to not having heard Butler say what was on the written confession and physical abuse was used in order to receive his oral confession. He provided his confession only out of desperation to escape an awful situation. You make a good point that they trusted the eyewitness’ memory too much. After he identified Butler as the one who killed his wife, the detectives immediately concluded that he was guilty and did not bother investigating any other suspects. They did not even attempt to see if Butler had an alibi for the time that the crime occurred. I definitely agree that the overall process would have been improved if the investigators had simply tried to find evidence other than the eyewitness’ statement.