Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

Assignment: Creating a Flowchart

Assignment: Creating a Flowchart

Workflow analysis aims to determine workflow patterns that maximize the

effective use of resources and minimize activities that do not add value. There are a variety of tools that can be used to analyze the workflow of processes and clarify potential avenues for eliminating waste. Flowcharts are a basic and commonly used workflow analysis method that can help highlight areas in need of streamlining.

In this Assignment, you select a common event that occurs regularly in your and make a flowchart representing the workflow. You analyze the process you have diagrammed and propose changes for improvement.and and organization

To prepare:

Application Assignment 2: Part 2 – Developingan Advocacy CampaignThe following application, Part 2, will be due in Week 7.To prepare:Review Chapter 3 of Milstead, J. A. (2016).Health policy and politics: A nurse’sguide(5th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.In the first assignment, you reflected on whether the policy you would like topromote could best be achieved through the development of new legislation, or achange in an existing law or regulation. Refine as necessary using any feedback fromyour first paper.Contemplate how existing laws or regulations may affect how you proceed inadvocating for your proposed policy.Consider how you could influence legislators or other policymakers to enact thepolicy you propose.Think about the obstacles of the legislative process that may prevent yourproposed policy from being implemented as intended.To complete:Part Two will have approximately 3–4 pages of content plus a title page and references.Part Two will address the following:Explain whether your proposed policy could be enacted through a modification ofexisting law or regulation or the creation of new legislation/regulation.Explain how existing laws or regulations could affect your advocacy efforts. Besure to cite and reference the laws and regulations using primary sources.Provide an analysis of the methods you could use to influence legislators or otherpolicymakers to support your policy. In particular, explain how you would use the “threelegs” of lobbying in your advocacy efforts.oSummarize obstacles that could arise in the legislative processand how to overcome these hurdles.oPaste the rubric at the end of your paper.By Day 7 of Week 7This Assignment is due.Content-Main Posting30 (30%) – 30 (30%)-Main posting addresses all criteria with 75% of post exceptional depth and breadth supported bycredible references27 (27%) – 29 (29%)-Main posting addresses all criteria with 75% of post exceptional depth and breadth supported bycredible references
Background image of page 1
24 (24%) – 26 (26%)Main posting meets expectations. All criteria are addressed with 50% containing good breadthand depth.21 (21%) – 23 (23%)Main posting addresses most of the criteria. One to two criterion are not addressed orsuperficially addressed.0 (0%) – 20 (20%)Main posting does not address all of criteria, superficially addresses criteria. Two or more criteriaare not addressed.Course Requirements and Attendance20 (20%) – 20 (20%)-Responds to two colleagues’ with posts that are reflective, are justified with credible sources,and ask questions that extend the discussion.18 (18%) – 19 (19%)-Responds to two colleagues’ with posts that are reflective, are justified with credible sources,and ask questions that extend the discussion.16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Responds to a minimum of two colleagues’ posts, are reflective, and ask questions that extendthe discussion. One post is justified by a credible source.14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Responds to less than two colleagues’ posts. Posts are on topic, may have some depth, orquestions. May extend the discussion. No credible sources are cited0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Responds to less than two colleagues’ posts. Posts may not be on topic, lack depth, do not posequestions that extend the discussionScholarly Writing Quality30 (30%) – 30 (30%)-The main posting clearly addresses the discussion criteria and is written concisely. The mainposting is cited with more than two credible references that adhere to the correct format per theAPA Manual 6th Edition. No spelling or grammatical errors. ***The use of scholarly sources orreal life experiences needs to be included to deepen the discussion and earn points in reply tofellow students.27 (27%) – 29 (29%)
Background image of page 2

Show 

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"