Can you also, please help me to respond to this discussion below

Can you also, please help me to respond to this discussion below from one of the classmates. Thank youSee Attached350-400 wordsPlease provide a business oriented perspectiveAPA

• analyze the three basic categories of tort law: negligent

Question

• analyze the three basic categories of tort law: negligent torts, intentional torts, and strict liability. [Chapter 3, Pages 42-43]. Then, identify the four elements necessary to show the plaintiff presented a prima facie case of negligence Rationalize your answer by using applicable legal precedents.

Discussion 1) If judges are supposed to make decisions on

Question Discussion 1) If judges are supposed to make decisions on an issue based solely on the facts and applicable law, what is the role of ethical norms in influencing a judge’s decision?2) Compare and contrast criminal law and civil law.3) Compare and contrast substantive law and procedural law.

1.Traditional career paths emphasize strict upward mobility within an organization. How does

1.Traditional career paths emphasize strict upward mobility within an organization. How does mobility differ in organizations with innovative career paths? List three innovative career paths discussed in this chapter and describe how mobility occurs in each.2.A sound promotion policy is important. List the characteristics necessary for an effective promotion policy.4.What information should be included in the targeted internal communication message?Book: Staffing Organizations by Herbert Heneman III

This is for California. Please just use your own research. Thank you,

This is for California. Please just use your own research. Thank you, For this assignment, you will need to conduct legal research online and in the LEXIS/NEXIS database of the Rasmussen College Library.Locate and read two court opinions relating to two court cases in your state (or the state of your choosing) in which the issue of piercing of the corporate veil was ruled upon. Write a two paragraph summary of the facts and legal issues in each of the cases selected. Also, explain any ethical issues that you feel were present in either of the cases and describe how the outcome of the two cases could impact other businesses. Include full citation information, formatted per Harvard Blue Book, for each case discussed, as well as any other sources you use.

This is for California For this assignment, you will need to conduct

This is for California For this assignment, you will need to conduct legal research online and in the LEXIS/NEXIS database of the Rasmussen College Library.Locate and read a court opinion in your state in which a corporate officer was held criminally liable for the actions of the corporation. Write a brief of the case using the following format:

Assignment Requirements:List of research topics.Please select the topic from the list and

Assignment Requirements:List of research topics.Please select the topic from the list and let me know, on which topic can you work ?

Purpose of Assignment The purpose of this assignment is for students to

Purpose of Assignment The purpose of this assignment is for students to learn process flowcharting/improving a process and summarizing the results. Microsoft® PowerPoint® (or other software such as Vizio, Microsoft® Word, etc.) Assignment Steps Select a complex process from your personal life or work. (I am a real estate agent in Texas. Please use the process of a real estate agent for this assignment) Use Microsoft® PowerPoint® or other software, such as Vizio, Microsoft® Word, etc. to create a flowchart of the as-is process. Define metrics and measure the current process. Use process improvement techniques to improve the process. Use Microsoft® PowerPoint® or other software, such as Vizio, Microsoft® Word, etc. to create an improved process flowchart. Use judgmental forecasting, which is your professional judgement, to ascertain how the future process will perform according to your metrics.Develop a 525-word executive summary in which you describe your process improvement project (including the as-is process flowchart and the improved process flowchart). Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.Submit your assignment.Submit the flow chart and the 525-word executive summary in the same file. You can use word document for both. Use in-text citations according to references used. list all references used.

What is the international business environment, who are the major players, and

What is the international business environment, who are the major players, and what forces are behind its growth? In order to understand global business, work through the activities. You will then be prepared to engage in case studies and activities to explore deeper.Investigate the international business environment.Read ebook Chapter 1.Reflect on:WatchLocate at least three companies that would be considered International. Research where they do business, what business they engage in, and the impact they have on underdeveloped, developing, and developed nations.Answer:When going international, companies today often research new locations as potential markets as well as potential sites for operations.What specific benefits can companies gain from the globalization of markets and production? Explain.Opponents of globalization say that it has many negative consequences for jobs and wages, income inequality, culture, sovereignty, and the environment.What are some positive outcomes of globalization for each of these topics?

Welcome to the discussion. In this course you will be introduced to

Welcome to the discussion. In this course you will be introduced to a topic in the discussion. The first week of the module you will write about your initial thoughts after reviewing the resources. The initial post should be at least 300 words. During the following week you will reply to at least two of your classmates. The replies should be at least 100 words. See the discussion rubric for more details on grading. Discussions should always be completed prior to “class.” If you are in an online class or an on ground course this is prior to the lesson portion of the week. Are you ready to begin?1. Watch Africa’s next boom2. Watch Want to help Africa? Do business here3. Watch Invest in Africa’s own solutions4. Initial Post:

Activity 1: Market Entry Strategy Project:In your small group select a country

Activity 1: Market Entry Strategy Project:In your small group select a country that interests you. You will need to do library research and internet searches for this activity. For the country your team is researching, integrate your answers to the following questions into your completed MESP report. Your report should be between 3 -5 pages, double spaced. Each member of the team should contribute to the report so that it sounds like one voice, not four disjointed reports.1. Work with a small group to read through the case. Then discuss the two questions.2. Share what you discussed with the class in an instructor led discussion.Activity 3: Where in the World Is It?Understanding where countries are located in the world is essential to developing an understanding and appreciation for International Business. Location, climate, proximity to transportation, and other issues have a major impact on what business can occur and what resources are available for business.Work with your group to complete the Map exercise in the appendix of Chapter 1. Study the maps in the text. You will need this information as you move on to study the effect of culture, economics and politics.Submit MESP report in Moodle. Upload report to each member’s Moodle site.

Suppose Ned sells Flanders a flat screen TV. Flanders paid

Question Suppose Ned sells Flanders a flat screen TV. Flanders paid for the TV with a bad check, so the contract was voidable. Then Flanders gave you the flat screen as a gift for your graduation present. What kind of title do you have for the TV? 

Ethical Issues in the Professions and Business: Assignment Chapter 5

Question Ethical Issues in the Professions and Business: Assignment Chapter 5 Study QsQUESTION 3. Hinduism and the Bhagavad Gita Question 3a. What are the Characteristics of a person of Peace (Siochain as we Irish folk say)? Provide a brief description of each one.1.Intelligence – when a man abandons all the desires of his mind and is satisfied in his self by the self alone.2.34.5.Question 3b. What are the 3 elements of the Overarching Theme. Follow the format included below.1. 2. 3. 3 c. How do these 3 elements pertain and guide our work in the world? Why do we Work?

What are the key features of a bond? 200 words at leastWhat

What are the key features of a bond? 200 words at leastWhat are call provisions and sinking fund provisions? Do these provisions make bonds more or less risky? 250 words at leastPlease professional writing.I appreciate your help very much.

What is the relationship between human resource management (HRM) and

Question What is the relationship between human resource management (HRM) and human resource development (HRD)? Identify one pro and one con for HRM and HRD as contributing factors to business success. course hero

Referencing this week’s readings and lecture, describe the quality issues related to

Referencing this week’s readings and lecture, describe the quality issues related to reporting revenue. What is the importance of understanding various inventory valuation methods in determining the quality of reported profits?

Even though firms follow the accounting rules (GAAP) when presenting their financial

Even though firms follow the accounting rules (GAAP) when presenting their financial statements, it is still possible for conflicts of interest to exist between what management wants investors and creditors to see and the economic reality of transactions. Explain how this can occur.

In organizational behavior – what method of providing feedback to

Question In organizational behavior – what method of providing feedback to employees is most effective for supervisors who want to emphasize trust and transparency?

Hello! About case study ” Something ‘s Rotten in Hondo”

Question Hello! About case study ” Something ‘s Rotten in Hondo” If you were George ,what would you do?Why?/How(Three option,includes advantage,disadvantage,SWOT choice )

class=”ql-cursor”> Read the facts of the U.S. Supreme Court below.

Question class=”ql-cursor”>Read the facts of the U.S. Supreme Court below. Then answer the questions:Discussion Questions: 1. Is peer-to-peer file sharing the same as copyright infringement? 2. What do you think of the ethics of peer-to-peer file sharing? 3. Who is harmed by the activity? 4. Who is helped? 5. Do you think the users of Napster should have had permission to download the copyrighted music? Why or why not?Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v Grokster, Ltd.  545 U.S. 913 (2005)Facts     Grokster, Ltd, and StreamCast Networks, Inc. (Respondents/defendants) distribute free software products that allow computer users to share electronic files through peer-to-peer networks.  With no central computer server required in these networks, the high-bandwidth capacity server storage space issues disappear.  Since copies of a file (Particularly a popular one) are available on many users’ computers, file requests and retrievals move faster than on other types of networks, and can take place between any computers that remain connected to the network without risk of a server glitch.  Peer-to-peer networks are used by universities, government agencies, corporations, and libraries to store and distribute electronic files.      Grokster and StreamCast software users have generally used the software networks for sharing copyrighted music and video files without authorization.  A group of copyright holders (MGM for short, but including motion picture studios, recording companies, songwriters, and music publishers) (Petitioners) sued Grokster and StreamCast for their users’ copyright infringements through the distribution of their software that allows users to reproduce and distribute copyrighted works in violation of the Copyright Act.        Grokster and StreamCast do not know when files are copied, but MGM commissioned a statistician to conduct a systematic search, and his study showed that nearly 90 percent of the files available for download were copyrighted works…[t]he probable scope of copyright infringement is staggering.  Grokster and StreamCast dispute this figure and argue that free copying even of copyrighted works may be authorized by the rightholders.  They also argue that potential noninfgringing uses of their software are significant, although infrequent in use.  Some musical performers have gained new audiences by distributing their copyrighted works for free across peer-to-peer networks, and some distributors of unprotected content have used peer-to-peer networks to disseminate files, Shakespeare being an example.  StreamCast has given Morpheus users the opportunity to download the briefs in this very case, though their popularity has not been quantified.     StreamCast gave away a software program of a kind known as OpenNap, designed as compatible with the Napster program.  The OpenNap program was engineered “to leverage Napster’s 50 million user base.”      One StreamCast proposed ad read: “Napster Inc. has announced that it will soon begin charging you a fee.  That’s if the courts don’t order it shut down first.   What will you do to get around it?”  Another proposed ad touted StreamCast’s software as the “#1 alternative to Napster” and asked “[w]hen the lights went off at Napter . . . where did the users go?”  StreamCast even planned to flaunt the illegal uses of its software; when it launched the OpenNap network, the chief technology officer of the company averred that “[t]he goal is to get in trouble with the law and get sued.  It’s the best way to get in tne new[s].”  Grokster launched its own OpenNap system called Swaptor and inserted digital codes into its website so that computer users using Web search engines to look for “Napster” or “[f]ree filesharing” would be directed to the Grokster website, where they could download the Grokster software.      Grokster and StreamCast receive no revenue from users, who obtain the software itself for nothing.  Instead, both companies generate income by selling advertising space, and they stream the advertising to Grokster and Morpheus users while they are employing the programs.  As the number of users of each program increases, advertising opportunities become worth more.  While there is doubtless some demand for free Shakespeare, the evidence shows that free access to copyrighted work is most important to users.     The District Court held that those who used the Grokster and Morpheus software to download copyrighted media files directly infringed MGM’s copyrights, but granted summary judgment in favor of Grokster and StreamCast as to any liability arising from distribution of the then current versions of their software.  The Court of Appeals affirmed.  MGM appealed.JUDICIAL OPINIONSOUTER, JusticeThe question is under what circumstances the distributor of a product capable of both lawful and unlawful use is liable for acts of copyright infringement by third parties using the product . . .     Digital distribution of copyrighted material threatens copyright holders as never before, because every copy is identical to the original, copying is easy, and many people (especially the young) use file-sharing software to download copyrighted works.  As the case has been presented to us, these fears are said to be offset by the different concern that imposing liability, not only on infringers but on distributors of software based on its potential for unlawful use, could limit further development of beneficial technologies.      The argument for imposing indirect liability in this case is, however, a powerful one, given the number of infringing downloads that occur every day using StreamCast’s and Grokster’s software.  When a widely shared service or product is used to commit infringement, it may be impossible to enforce rights in the protected work effectively against all direct infringers, the only protected work effectively against all direct infringers, the only practical alternative being to go against the distributor of the copying device for secondary liability on a theory of contributory or vicarious infringement.      In Sony Corp. v Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. at 434, this Court addressed a claim that secondary liability for infringement can arise from the very distribution of a commercial product. . . .Because the VCR was “capable of commercially significant noninfringing uses,” we held the manufacturer could not be faulted solely on the basis of its distribution.      In sum, where an article is “good for nothing else” but infringement, there is no legitimate public interest in its unlicensed availability, and there is no injustice in presuming or imputing an intent to infringe. . . .Conversely, the doctrine absolves the equivocal conduct of selling an item with substantial lawful as well as unlawful uses, and limits liability to instances of more acute fault than the mere understanding that some of one’s products will misused.  It leaves breathing room for innovation and a vigorous commerce.      Grokster and StreamCast reply by citing evidence that their software can be used to reproduce public domain works, and they point to copyright holders who actually encourage copying.  Even if infringement is the principal practice with their sortware today, they argue, the noninfringing uses are significant and will grow.      Because the Circuit found the StreamCast and Grokster software capable of substantial lawful use, it concluded on the basis of its reading of Sony that neither company could be held liable, since there was no showing that their software, being without any central server, afforded them knowledge and specific unlawful uses.      This view of Sony, however, was in error, converting the case from one about liability resting on imputed intent to one about liability on any theory.     . . .Nothing in Sonyrequires courts to ignore evidence of intent if there is such evidence, and the case was never meant to foreclose rules of fault-based liability derived from the common law.     The classic case of direct evidence of unlawful purpose occurs when one induces commission of infringement by another, or “entic[es] or persuad[es] another” to infringe, Black’s Law Dictionary 790 (8th ed. 2004), as by advertising.  Thus at common law a copyright or patent defendant who “not only expected but invoked [infringing use] by advertisement” was liable for infringement “on principles recognized in every part of the law.”      For the same reasons that Sonytook the staple-article doctrine of patent law as a model for its copyright safeharbor rule, the inducement rule, too, is a sensible one for copyright.  We adopt it here, holding that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties.  We are, of course, mindful of the need to keep from trenching on regular commerce or discouraging the development of technologies with lawful and unlawful potential.  The inducement rule, instead, premises liability on purposeful, culpable expression and conduct, and thus does nothing to compromise legitimate commerce or discourage innovation having a lawful promise.      Here, the summary judgment record is replete with other evidence that Grokster and StreamCast, unlike the manufacturer and distributor in Sony, acted with a purpose to cause copyright violations by use of software suitable for illegal use.     . . . [e]ach company showed itself to be aiming to satisfy a known source of demand for copyright infringement, the market comprising former Napster users.  StreamCast’s internal documents made constant reference to Napster, it initially distributed its Morpheus software through an OpenNap program compatible with Napster, it advertised its Open/Nap program to Napster users, and its Morpheus software functions as Napster did except that it could be used to distribute more kinds of files, including, copyrighted movies and software programs.  Grokster’s name is apparently derived from Napster, it too initially offered an OpenNap program, its software’s function is likewise comparable to Napster’s, and it attempted to divert queries for Napster onto its own Web site.  Grokster and StreamCast’s efforts to supply services to form Napster users, deprived of a mechanism to copy and distribute what were overwhelmingly infringing files, indicate a principle, if not exclusive, intent on the part of each to bring about infringement.      [Neither company] attempted to develop filtering tools or other mechanisms to diminish the infringing activity using their software.  As the record shows, the more the software is used, the more ads are sent out and the greater the advertising revenue becomes.  Since the extent of the software’s use determines the gain to the distributors, the commercial sense of their enterprise turns on high-volume use, which the record shows is infringing.  This evidence alone would not justify an inference of unlawful intent, but viewed in the context of the entire record its import is clear. . . .The unlawful objective is unmistakable.     We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression or other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties.  The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 

Please follow the first PDF to do this essay. First PDF is

Please follow the first PDF to do this essay. First PDF is assignment, and second PDF is source’s link, 3-5 PDF is the examples. It was need 1200-1800. I will put 1800 words let you do it, but could you turn in two PDF to me, first one is 1200 words, second one is 1800 words. Because draft 1 need 1200 words, but we have draft 2 is 1800 words. Thanks, please working carefully.

The post Can you also, please help me to respond to this discussion below appeared first on Smashing Essays.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"