TLAW301 – Taxation Law – Written Assessment Please chose ONE (1) of the following cases and prepare an analysis: • Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Stone 2005 ATC 4234.1 • Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 355.2 • Commissioner of Taxation v McNeil [2007] HCA 5.3 • Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Myer Emporium Ltd (1987) 163 CLR 199.4

/in /by

TLAW301 – Taxation Law – Written Assessment
Please chose ONE (1) of the following cases and prepare an analysis:
• Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Stone 2005 ATC 4234.1
• Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 355.2
• Commissioner of Taxation v McNeil [2007] HCA 5.3
• Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Myer Emporium Ltd (1987) 163 CLR 199.4
• Bywater Investments Limited & Ors v. Commissioner of Taxation [2016] HCA 45.5
The report will be due by midnight (AEST) on Friday, 22 May 2020. Submissions MUST be made via Turnitin.
Please ensure that your case analysis does not exceed the 2500 word limit (excluding footnotes and bibliography).
In preparing the report, please ensure that you refer to the Prescribed Textbook and the Recommended Reading and
Resources listed in the Course Outline. You should also refer to any relevant materials from the secondary sources listed
in the course outline as well as the materials posted on Moodle by your lecturer (e.g. the Reading and Analysing Case Law
Aide, the Legal Essay Checklist and the Legal Writing Resource).
Students are being asked to undertake this assessment task to encourage the development of a range of skills as indicated
by the assessment criteria. The assessment criteria are as follows:
• Clear and concise statement of the relevant facts and legal issue(s) in the case.
• Clear and concise expression of own ideas about the case using appropriate legal language.
• Careful organisation so that ideas develop logically through the analysis.
• Thoughtful analysis of the judgement(s).
• Correctness of grammar, spelling etc.
• Adherence to principles of academic honesty with regard to the preparation and submission of assessments.
• Management of own workload to meet deadlines (self-assessment)
Please read through and think about these criteria so that you are clear about how your work is going to be assessed.
If you have any questions please e-mail me at claudia.andrea.mitchell@top.edu.au.
1 Electronically available from http://eresources.hcourt.gov.au/showCase/2005/HCA/21
2 Electronically available from http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/1982/8.html
3 Electronically available from http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2007/5.html
4 Electronically available from http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/1987/18.html
5 Electronically available from http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCA/2016/45.html

[Button id=”1″]

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

NCS3203 Law and Ethics in Healthcare, Semester 1, 2020 Case study analysis assignment brief: You are required to watch the Assessment three assessment video, available on Bb under the assessment’s items tab > Assessment 3 case study analysis essay> Case study analysis brief and video. Your overall aim is to demonstrate your understanding of the unit content (legal and ethical issues, including professional codes and standards) and how they apply to the context of the case study in the video provided.

/in /by

NCS3203 Law and Ethics in Healthcare, Semester 1, 2020

Case study analysis assignment brief:
You are required to watch the Assessment three assessment video, available on Bb under the assessment’s items tab > Assessment 3 case study analysis essay> Case study analysis brief and video.
Your overall aim is to demonstrate your understanding of the unit content (legal and ethical issues, including professional codes and standards) and how they apply to the context of the case study in the video provided. To do this you will provide an analysis: a detailed examination. Use the applicable parts of the case study discussed in the video to demonstrate your understanding of the unit content e.g. beneficence, deontology, duty of care, tort of negligence, Registered Nurses Standards for Practice etc.
This case study analysis essay word limit is 2000 (plus or minus 10% as per the School of Nursing & Midwifery Undergraduate Assignment Guidelines). All words are calculated towards the word limit except for the title page, direct quotes and end-text references. If you write less or more than this, penalties will apply. If you write less, it is unlikely you will have covered all aspects of the assignment.
This assignment has a weighting of 60%.
The assignment will be marked using the School of Nursing and Midwifery standard marking rubric, which you will find on the unit Blackboard site. Please read each criterion carefully and reflect the positive criteria in your essay. The following assignment brief is structured under the same headings as the marking rubric, please consider both documents carefully as you construct your essay.

Content
You need to consider:
• the use of an ethical decision-making framework when planning your work.
• all the ethical and legal/professional concerns (introduced and discussed throughout the unit up to and including week 6) that the situation in the case study raises. Apply all the relevant unit content throughout the essay and relate it to the legal and ethical concerns that the situation in the case study raises.
• the possible actions (or inactions/omissions) that could be taken and the implications from a legal and ethical perspective. Think of the possible courses of action, and inaction that could be taken, and then consider, do any ethical theories support (or not) the actions that you discuss?
• you do not need to provide the ‘right’ answers. What you will be assessed on is your ability to determine the implications of different actions or inactions from a legal and ethical perspective.
• which ethical principles, doctrines or concepts apply to the actions/inactions put forward and if so, how?
• which torts or other legal concerns apply to your suggested actions/inactions?
• do any of the ethical principles conflict with each other or with the law?
• consider the application of professional codes of conduct and ethics

Application of critical thinking
You will be assessed on your ability to consider the implications of the suggested actions/inactions and the application of theory to practice. You will also be assessed on your ability to support the arguments you put forward with evidence from appropriate literature.
There is a minimum of 10 references required, although you should read widely and incorporate that reading into your assignment – the more relevant references, the better! The more you read, the more evidence you will find to weave into your essay and support your ethical and legal claims. References for this essay should be within 5 years of publication – unless it is sentinel work. References should be from a valid source (peer reviewed journals, government and official health organisation and professional on line websites and resources e.g. Department of Health, Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia etc., books) and all must be relevant to Australia. References should support the ethical and legal/professional information as oppose to nursing and medical diagnosis.
Do not leave areas in your work that are unsupported by evidence. Each paragraph should include a reference.
Check the similarity report and ensure that you have paraphrased information and provided a reference.

Structure & presentation
You should follow the School of Nursing and Midwifery Guidelines.
There is no need for headings, the paper should flow in one long sequence. See SNM assignment writing guidelines for layout.
You need to address the possible actions / inactions in a logical piece of writing that shows the possible implications of two different pathways of care / omission of care.
The main part of the assessment is that each of those areas (ethics and law) contains appropriate material.
Your introduction should succinctly introduce what will follow.
The main body should contain a logical and cohesive development of ideas and your ability to sustain logical arguments will be assessed.
Your conclusion should provide a summation of the key points of the work.
Full sentence structure is required.
Do not rewrite the case study. Discuss the relevant parts of the scenario as you apply the relevant ethical theories, concepts, principles, legal and professional elements of the unit content

[Button id=”1″]

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Clinical Sciences 2 Clinical Update Semester 1 2020 Clinical updates are concise articles designed for educational purposes on clinical issues that relate to practice. You can find some examples of clinical updates in the “My Assessments” folder. Please note these are examples only and may not meet all the requirements of this assignment. There are also some examples of previous student papers that received a HD. This assignment is a 2000 word clinical update on one of the topics below. Due date is Week 10, 0900hrs Monday, May 4th 2019 via Turnitin. Topics:

/in /by

Clinical Sciences 2

Clinical Update Semester 1 2020

Clinical updates are concise articles designed for educational purposes on clinical issues that relate to practice. You can find some examples of clinical updates in the “My Assessments” folder. Please note these are examples only and may not meet all the requirements of this assignment. There are also some examples of previous student papers that received a HD.
This assignment is a 2000 word clinical update on one of the topics below.
Due date is Week 10, 0900hrs Monday, May 4th 2019 via Turnitin.

Topics:
Topic
Points to consider

Alzheimer’s

Aetiology, pathophysiology and incidence world / national Diagnostic methods/tests
Clinical course and prognosis
Treatment options
Public health implications

Tuberculosis
Aetiology, pathophysiology and incidence world / national
Diagnostic methods/tests
Clinical course and prognosis
Treatment options
Public health implications

Chronic Heart Failure
Aetiology, pathophysiology and incidence world / national
Diagnostic methods/tests
Clinical course and prognosis
Treatment options
Public health implications

Osteoporosis
Aetiology, pathophysiology and incidence world / national
Diagnostic methods/tests
Clinical course and prognosis
Treatment options
Public health implications

When you submit your clinical update to Turnitin, please use the link provided in Blackboard. Late submissions will be submitted through the Late Submission link provided in Blackboard. When you submit your file, please ensure your “Submission Title” on the Submit Turnitin Assignment page contains the topic title, eg.“Chronic Heart Failure” or “Tuberculosis”. Nothing else is required for the title. Please also ensure you get a receipt; no receipt means it is not submitted.

The format of your clinical update and any innovative ideas you use to present your topic is your choice, but you must include:

• Introduction:

Provide epidemiological data to illustrate relevant the topic is (Australia and worldwide), definition/explanation about the nature of the condition/disease process, objectives and scope and structure of your paper. A good introduction will get the reader’s interest.

• Aetiology & pathogenesis:

➢ Causes of the disease and risk factors
➢ Explanation of anatomy/physiology where appropriate
➢ Pathogenesis, i.e. how the disease progresses and complications
➢ Implications for public health

• Clinical manifestations:

Explain the signs and symptoms.

• Diagnostic process:

Provide information on a comprehensive diagnostic work-up with rationales

• Treatment:

➢ Implications for pharmacological management (types, action, dosage, side effects)
➢ Non-pharmacological treatment options
➢ Health promotion
➢ Provide rationales for your treatment options, based on the literature

• Conclusion:

This should include a summary of the most relevant points for the practice of a registered nurse. Do not introduce new material. This could be summarised as bullet points.

General points:
Please follow the SNM Guide to Assignment Presentation and Submission
• Only submit via TurnItIn, no hardcopy required. Don’t forget to keep your submission receipt, if you have no receipt the submission has not been finalised.

• This assignment is all about the process of researching a topic and being able to articulate your findings in a comprehensive and logical sequence using appropriate professional language.

• Make sure you use approved abbreviations and write in the third person.

• Graphs, figures, tables and flow charts are a great way of illustrating and summarising key points. Check the SNM Assignment Presentation and Submission guidelines on how to number and name these correctly.

• Your clinical update should facilitate peer learning: use an appropriate language level suitable for RNs, not mums and dads! Ensure that content is relevant to nursing practice, i.e. sufficient depth of information but not too detailed. Assume some knowledge as you are addressing RNs, e.g. no need to explain the anatomy of the heart or medical terminology.

• Support your discussion with relevant and recent literature and websites. Use peer-reviewed articles, evidence based research and best practice guidelines (Australian and international if relevant, e.g. WHO). Do not use public access medical websites designed for non-health professionals, eg. eMedicine, MayoClinic, BetterHealthChannel, GPNotes,etc.

• Read the marking criteria of the rubric; it is a good guide for how much emphasis needs to be placed on each section.

• Although the general content of the assignment is like the example clinical update articles, the formatting is still according to the SNM Presentation and Submission guidelines with regards to layout (font, spacing, margins) and referencing.

[Button id=”1″]

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Town hall

/in /by

View any one of the Town hall held and who was the presenting instructor?

  • In which week was the town hall held and who was the presenting instructor?
  • Identify one economic thinker and explain what that thinker said that could be used to understand the current economic crisis.
  • Identify an example of how the discussion at the town hall related one of the topics we have discussed in the discussions

Sample Solution

The post Town hall appeared first on homework handlers.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

Town hall was first posted on May 21, 2020 at 2:02 am.
©2019 "Essay Lords | Bringing Excellence to students world wide". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@academicheroes

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"