Coca-Cola and Corporate Social Responsibility

Review the article,
How Coca-Cola Came to Terms with its Own Water Crisis.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/05/31/how-coca-cola-came-to-terms-with-its-own-water-crisis/?noredirect=on
After reviewing the article address the following elements:

  1. Identify and discuss the CSR issue for Coca Cola.
  2. Identify and discuss Coca Cola’s strategies to address the issue.
  3. Discuss whether Coca Cola strategies resolved the issue and offer an alternative strategy you believe would help address the CSR issue.
    Make sure the paper body starts with a summary where there is a statement of thesis (overview of the points to be made), continues with a discussion
    (or specific answers to specific questions), and ends with a conclusion. The seven specific sections should be annotated and have specific answers.
    All papers should be written in the third person (he, he, it, and they). Make every effort not to shift to second person (you, your) as in, “When starting a
    company you need money.” Try to avoid shifting to the first person (I, we) as well. It is distracting to the reader and bad style to shift persons in a
    paper—students often do it in the middle of a sentence.
    The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:
    Write 750 words (approximately 3 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.
    Use font size 12 and 1” margins.
    Include cover page and reference page.
    At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
    No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
    Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other
    materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
    Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA
    style.
    References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal,
    government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.

Sample Solution

The post Coca-Cola and Corporate Social Responsibility appeared first on homework handlers.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”


Coca-Cola and Corporate Social Responsibility was first posted on May 21, 2020 at 1:01 am.
©2019 "Essay Lords | Bringing Excellence to students world wide". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@academicheroes

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

ITC506 Rational Arguments Assessment No: 3 ITC506|IT Ethics- Rational ArgumentsTaskTask 1 (8%): Argument VisualisationIn task 1 you will create a simple argument visualisation using the MindMup software and you will produce a report in task 2 which details the argument you construct in your argument visualisation.

ITC506 Rational Arguments Assessment No: 3 ITC506|IT Ethics- Rational Arguments

Task

Task 1 (8%): Argument Visualisation

In task 1 you will create a simple argument visualisation using the MindMup software and you will produce a report in task 2 which details the argument you construct in your argument visualisation.

Choose ONE of the following media articles or case studies:

  • The Ethics of “Giving People a Voice” and Political Advertising on Facebook (https://www.scu.edu/ethics-spotlight/social-media-and-democracy/the-ethics-of-giving- people-a-voice-and-political-advertising-on-facebook/)
  • The federal government’s response to the ACCC’s Digital Platforms Inquiry is a let down (https://theconversation.com/the-federal-governments-response-to-the-acccs-digital- platforms-inquiry-is-a-let-down-128775)
  • Countries Debate Openness of Future National IDs (https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/ computing/it/countries-debate-openness-of-future-national-ids) (https://spectrum.ieee.org/ robotics/medical-robots/would-you-trust-a-robot-surgeon-to-operate-on-you)
  • Weaponization of Social Media by Authoritarian States (https://www.scu.edu/ethics- spotlight/social-media-and-democracy/weaponization-of-social-media-by-authoritarian- states/)
  • Do We Want Robot Warriors to Decide Who Lives or Dies? (https://spectrum.ieee.org/ robotics/military-robots/do-we-want-robot-warriors-to-decide-who-lives-or-dies) (http://mediasmarts.ca/blog/what-do-you-meme-it%E2%80%99s-not-legal)

Now follow the instructions given below to complete the assessment task:

  • Use the title of the article/case study as the title of your argument visualisation so that the lecturer knows which article you are analysing.
  • Undertake further research about your chosen case and the ethical issue involved, to assist you in analysing it in your argument visualisation (and in your report in Task 2).
  • Identify some logical arguments and construct an argument visualisation using MindMup software. Your visualisation should contain the conclusion, and all of the reasons and objections leading to that conclusion.
  • Your argument visualisation should present a logical argument for your subsequent report in Task 2. Your report will develop these arguments based on a deeper analysis of the ethical issue(s).
  • Your report should contain all of the arguments contained in your visualisation, and you should not introduce new arguments in your report that are not in your visualisation.
  • When you have completed your visualisation, download it as a .pdf file and submit via EASTS.

Task 2 (17%): Applying Ethical Theories

Follow the instructions given below to complete the task.

  • Write a report based on your argument visualisation created in Task 1 and the media article or case study you selected in Task 1.
  • Undertake further research about your chosen case and the ethical issue involved, to assist you in analysing and discussing it in your report.
  • Analyse the ethical issue applying the classical ethical theories, including utilitarianism, deontology, contract, and virtue. Your report should present well- reasoned arguments, logically leading to appropriate recommendations.
  • You should not introduce new arguments in your report that were not contained in your argument visualisation, and your report should contain all of the arguments contained in your visualisation.
  • Write an overall conclusion that justifies your recommendations made in your report.
  • Include a Reference list at the end of your work, using the correct APA referencing style, corresponding to in-text citations. The word limit for the report is 1500 words +/-10%. Headings, citations, references and appendices do not count towards the word limit, but quotations do.

[Button id=”1″]

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Case study analysis assignment brief: You are required to watch the Assessment three assessment video, available on Bb under the assessment’s items tab Assessment 3 case study analysis essay Case study analysis brief and video.

Assessment Description Case Study Analysis Essay
Value 60%
Team or Individual Individual assessment
Format Length: 2000 words (plus or minus 10%).
Word (or similar) digital document.
The document should be formatted with double line spacing.
Due Date and time Week 13 Monday 25th May, 2020 at 0900
How to Submit Electronically via Blackboard Assessment 3 folder
Learning Outcomes 1-6
Professional Competencies N/A
Marking Criteria Please refer to Blackboard Assessment Assessment 3 Marking Guidelines/Rubric
Feedback Feedback results available via Blackboard My Grades
Case study analysis assignment brief:
You are required to watch the Assessment three assessment video, available on Bb under the assessment’s items tab Assessment 3 case study analysis essay Case study analysis brief and video.
Your overall aim is to demonstrate your understanding of the unit content (legal and ethical issues, including professional codes and standards) and how they apply to the context of the case study in the video provided. To do this you will provide an analysis: a detailed examination. Use the applicable parts of the case study discussed in the video to demonstrate your understanding of the unit content e.g. beneficence, deontology, duty of care, tort of negligence, Registered Nurses Standards for Practice etc.
This case study analysis essay word limit is 2000 (plus or minus 10% as per the School of Nursing & Midwifery
Undergraduate Assignment Guidelines). All words are calculated towards the word limit except for the title page, direct quotes and end-text references. If you write less or more than this, penalties will apply. If you write less, it is unlikely you will have covered all aspects of the assignment.
This assignment has a weighting of 60%.
The assignment will be marked using the School of Nursing and Midwifery standard marking rubric, which you will find on the unit Blackboard site. Please read each criterion carefully and reflect the positive criteria in your essay. The following assignment brief is structured under the same headings as the marking rubric, please consider both documents carefully as you construct your essay.
Content
You need to consider:
• the use of an ethical decision-making framework when planning your work.
• all the ethical and legal/professional concerns (introduced and discussed throughout the unit up to and including week 6) that the situation in the case study raises. Apply all the relevant unit content throughout the essay and relate it to the legal and ethical concerns that the situation in the case study raises.
• the possible actions (or inactions/omissions) that could be taken and the implications from a legal and ethical perspective. Think of the possible courses of action, and inaction that could be taken, and then consider, do any ethical theories support (or not) the actions that you discuss?
• you do not need to provide the ‘right’ answers. What you will be assessed on is your ability to determine the implications of different actions or inactions from a legal and ethical perspective.
• which ethical principles, doctrines or concepts apply to the actions/inactions put forward and if so, how?
• which torts or other legal concerns apply to your suggested actions/inactions?
• do any of the ethical principles conflict with each other or with the law?
• consider the application of professional codes of conduct and ethics
Application of critical thinking
You will be assessed on your ability to consider the implications of the suggested actions/inactions and the application of theory to practice. You will also be assessed on your ability to support the arguments you put forward with evidence from appropriate literature.
There is a minimum of 10 references required, although you should read widely and incorporate that reading into your assignment – the more relevant references, the better! The more you read, the more evidence you will find to weave into your essay and support your ethical and legal claims. References for this essay should be within 5 years of publication – unless it is sentinel work. References should be from a valid source (peer reviewed journals, government and official health organisation and professional on line websites and resources e.g. Department of Health, Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia etc., books) and all must be relevant to Australia. References should support the ethical and legal/professional information as oppose to nursing and medical diagnosis.
Do not leave areas in your work that are unsupported by evidence. Each paragraph should include a reference.
Check the similarity report and ensure that you have paraphrased information and provided a reference.
Structure & presentation
You should follow the School of Nursing and Midwifery Guidelines.
There is no need for headings, the paper should flow in one long sequence. See SNM assignment writing guidelines for layout.
You need to address the possible actions / inactions in a logical piece of writing that shows the possible implications of two different pathways of care / omission of care.
The main part of the assessment is that each of those areas (ethics and law) contains appropriate material.
Your introduction should succinctly introduce what will follow.
The main body should contain a logical and cohesive development of ideas and your ability to sustain logical arguments will be assessed.
Your conclusion should provide a summation of the key points of the work.
Full sentence structure is required.
Do not rewrite the case study. Discuss the relevant parts of the scenario as you apply the relevant ethical theories, concepts, principles, legal and professional elements of the unit content
It is recommended that you use the ethical decision making model discussed in the unit content (week 1 tutorial) to plan your work.
Referencing
You must comply with the ECU SNM assignment writing guidelines, follow these specific assignment instructions and use the ECU referencing guide to ensure all in-text and end-text references are correct. Please use the School of Nursing and Midwifery Assignment Guidelines and the ECU Referencing Guide to present your work. There is no excuse for deviating from these guidelines as they are available through several links, here, in the unit guide and on the Blackboard site. If you are unsure about referencing, see the Learning Consultant early in the semester. There have been some very recent changes to APA 6th referencing guidelines and now the latest version is APA7th. You will not be marked down for using APA6th, hover you may want to access resources from the library outlining the changes for the future.
English language proficiency (ELP)
As with all written assignment work that you undertake at ECU, you will be assessed for ELP within this assignment.
NCS3203 is not a prescribed unit for ELP, so the weighting against this criterion is not as high as in the prescribed units. However, you should make every effort to ensure that you pay close attention to the construction of sentences, ensuring spelling, grammar and syntax are correct.
Poor writing will detract from the content of the essay if you are unable to articulate the true meaning that you are trying to convey and this may lose valuable marks.
** If you are at all concerned about your written work please see support, from the academic writing resources available in the university, early in the semester (see tabs under ‘Finding Help’ on the left side of the Bb site).
General instructions for the assignment:
Please note your submission date, as detailed in your unit plan. You are strongly advised not to leave your submissions until the last day, rather you work on your assessments as you complete the tutorials, enabling you to focus on your studies whilst working around any practicum or personal commitments or other units, you will have two attempts to submit the essay assessment component through Turnitin, enabling you to review the similarity report. Remember, it can take up to 24 hours to generate this report.
Students can submit their written paper to Turnitin as per the dates outlined in the unit plan and assignment brief but no later than assignment submission deadline that is also stated within the unit plan. Keep your Turnitin receipt as evidence of submission. If you submit your case study late, 5% will be deducted for each day the assignment is late for up to seven days (including weekends) after the due date, at which point a mark of zero will be assigned. If a student wishes to apply for an extension from the Unit Coordinator, they are required to do so prior to the due date, in writing, using the correct ECU form for requesting extensions, stating the grounds for the extension request and any evidence to support the extension (e.g. a medical certificate).

The post Case study analysis assignment brief: You are required to watch the Assessment three assessment video, available on Bb under the assessment’s items tab Assessment 3 case study analysis essay Case study analysis brief and video. appeared first on Versed Writers.

[Button id=”1″]

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

COMP3781 Cybersecurity – Threat analysis and securing the network

COMP3781 Cybersecurity – Threat analysis and securing the network
Submit your assignment through FLO by midday Friday 15th May 5 pm, Week 9.
Saeed Rehman
College of Science and
Engineering
Flinders University,
Abstract— The objective of the assignment is to critically evaluate the existing information security management of an organization, identify the threats (internally and externally) and propose a Threat Model to effectively mitigate and manage the information security of the organization.
This assignment hand out will guide you through the requirement for submission of assignment 2 report. A case study is given in appendix A. You have to critically evaluate the threats to the organization and submit a research report. You must follow the IEEE two-column template for submission of your research report. The submission should be through the FLO hand-in on Friday 29th May by 5 pm.
Keywords—cybersecurity, comp3781, comp9781, Flinders, college of science and engineering
I. INTRODUCTION
Information is the key for a successful and profitable business operation. The information flows in and out of the organisation through the clients and employees. Confidentiality, Availability and Integrity of information are related to flow of information in/out of the organisation. This assignment is concerned with PREPARATION of a Threat Model Analysis (TMA) of an organisation given in appendix A.
TMA is an analysis that helps determine the security risks posed to a product, application, network, or environment, and how attacks can show up. The goal is to determine which threats require mitigation and how to mitigate them. TMA is the first step toward securing the critical assets/information/business of the organisation. Threats can be both internally and externally. An organisation should have a well-established threat model to tackle an incident arising due to internal or external threats.
Reference [1,2] are two recommended search platforms that index a wide variety of academic research papers. You can search the literature for threat analysis.
While submitting the report, be mindful of the university academic integrity (https://students.flinders.edu.au/mycourse/academic-integrity ).
II. LEARNING OUTCOMES
The purpose of this assignment is to support the following Learning Outcomes (LO) for this topic:
COMP3781 – Cybersecurity
S1-2020
• LO1: Understand, Evaluate & Identify Network Security Threats
• LO2: Secure Ethernet, Wireless and Mobile Networks
• LO3: Security Design at Different Levels of the OSI model
• LO4: Implement Intrusion Detection & Prevention
• LO5: Apply Authentication, Authorisation and Accounting Tools & Techniques
• LO6: Implementing Firewall Technologies
• LO7: Ongoing Management of a Secure Network
III. DELIVERABLES
You are to make a report of 1500-2000 words. The emphasis of the report should be on analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of knowledge of business and information security. Your research report must address the following main points. (This is not the final structure but a hint of how you report might look like)
1. Abstract
2. Background of the organisation
3. Classification of information, processes, assets etc.
4. Critical evaluation of the existing network and possible threats to information/network.
5. Threat model of the organization (include step 3, 4 information)
6. Business impact analysis after threat modelling
(include information from step 5)
7. Discussion
8. Conclusion and summary
9. References
A. Additional Notes
• The report should have a strong research focus – it should not be a simple storytelling of existing work.
• You should attempt to focus on current SECURITY
THREATS AND MITIGATION TECHNIQUES.
• Your report should be written using the IEEE conference template. This document is written in the two columns format. You should follow the same structure. A template is uploaded on the FLO.
• Carefully cite and reference all sources. Your report can also follow the structure as explained in the template.
• Marks will be awarded as per the rubric. Your work should be properly cited both in text and bibliography.
• Your bibliography should be recent, not older than 2010. If using references older then provide justification in an appendix.
• Peer review marking process will follow submissions
B. 2.3 Grading and submission
• The assignment is worth 30% of your total semester grade
Figure 1: Company B network architecture [3]
• Late submission shall incur a penalty as per official statement of assessment methods (S1, 2020).
• Marking rubric is given in appendix B.
• Your work needs to be submitted to the hand-in box on FLO
• Check the due date and time on the assignment hand-in box on FLO; this overrides any date on this document
• All extension requests are to be submitted at least 48 hours prior to the due day of the assignment.
• All requests will be processed electronically, request in person will not be accepted
IV. ACADEMIC REFERENCES
• Use academic referencing in either IEEE or Harvard or
APA formats. Use only one format throughout the report
• Minimum of 10 academic references or relevant industry white papers
• Search platforms for references.
REFERENCES
[1] Google scholar. (2020). Googlescholar, Available at:https://scholar.google.com/ [Accessed 5 Mar.2020]
[2] ResearchGate. (2020). ResearchGate | Find and share research. [online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/ [Accessed 5 Mar. 2020].
[3] Microsoft Biztalk. (2020). Microsoft, Available at https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa559935.aspx [Accessed 5 Mar.2020]
APPENDIX A: CASE STUDY
This case study is adapted from Microsoft Biztalk server [3]. Ninjasoft is a software company. Its business model relies on electronic transactions with key customers and suppliers. It uses a BizTalk Server implementation for its transactions. BizTalk Server manages transactions and communications between internal and external applications. Ninjasoft communicates with approximately 85 internal applications and 2300 trading partners. It currently processes approximately 2.5 million documents per month and estimates that it will process 6 million documents per month by the end of 2020.
A. Potential Threats and Security Concerns
Ninjasoft wants to make sure that it receives and processes only messages from authenticated sources. It also wants to make sure that it can receive and retrieve documents from outside its corporate network as safely as possible. The firewall that separates Ninjasoft’s corporate network from the Internet only lets through traffic from port 80 and port 443. The firewall rejects all other traffic.
B. Security Architecture
Figure 1 shows the network architecture of Ninjasoft. BizTalk Server is used as a message broker to communicate between internal applications and to process, send, and receive correctly formatted messages to and from its suppliers and customers. It has to process internal and external documents in different formats. This includes flat files and XML documents.
Ninjasoft uses a single firewall to separate its corporate computers from the Internet. As an added layer of security, it incorporates Internet Protocol security (IPsec) communication between all its corporate servers and workstations that reside within the corporate network. It also uses IPsec to encrypt all communications within its internal domain.
Ninjasoft uses a file share server to receive flat files. This file share server resides outside its corporate network and domain. A firewall separates the file share server from the corporate network. Ninjasoft’s external partners post their flat file documents on this file share server, and they communicate with the file share server through an encrypted Point-to-Point Tunnelling Protocol (PPTP) pipeline. It protects access to the file share server by partner passwords that expire every 30 days.
Ninjasoft has created a custom file-movement application that retrieves the flat file documents from the file share server and sends them to BizTalk Server for additional processing. The internal applications for Ninjasoft also use the custom file-movement application to pass flat files to BizTalk Server. BizTalk Server transforms these documents and sends them to Ninjasoft’s trading partners.
Before BizTalk Server transforms the partner data to the internal application formats, it validates that it has an entry for the sender, receiver, and document type. If BizTalk Server receives a message for which it does not have an entry for either the sender, receiver, or document type, BizTalk Server rejects the message, and the operations team of Ninjasoft review the message. The internal applications send messages in a variety of formats that include EDIFACT, flat file, XML, and ANSI X12.
Ninjasoft also receives documents through HTTPS from internal and external sources. External partners post their documents to a Web server outside the corporate network. A firewall separates this Web server from the corporate network. The custom file-movement application also retrieves the documents posted through HTTPS. Ninjasoft uses a third-party product to encrypt and sign messages to its trading partners. As an additional piece of security, Ninjasoft performs a nightly audit on all the servers to make sure they have the correct security settings. Ninjasoft logs all exceptions for review.
If some information is missing or not clear then you can make assumption but do explain that in your report.
Appendix B
Element Criteria Marks Excellent
(85%- 100%) Good
(75-84) Satisfacto ry (65-74) Fair (50-64) Poor
(0-49)



• Balanced background, relevant and legitimate information to understand the context of the organisation. Explanation and evaluation of security risks and their impact on the business continuity of the organisation.
A thesis statement providing a direction for the report, either by a statement of a position or
hypothesis
Clear explanation of any assumption
made for the thread model analysis
5




• In-depth discussion and elaboration of the threats faced by the organisation, internally and externally.
Effectiveness of the threat analysis, supported by the literature Effectiveness of the proposed mitigation techniques and technologies, while considering implementation and testing.
Embedding the threat model into the
new secure network design Summarizing all the threats preferably in a table with four or more columns (threat, description, impact, mitigation)
20




• •
• Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next without the need for headings.
Authors writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources
In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the report.
Client centric report for the reader to gain important insights.
Correct IEEE template is used
References/bibliography are correct,
and cite all data in text and
bibliography
Credible and properly formatted bibliography

The post COMP3781 Cybersecurity – Threat analysis and securing the network appeared first on Versed Writers.

[Button id=”1″]

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"