tanford University Contract Law & Monetary Terms Discussion School

Question Description
Can you help me understand this Business Law question?

Under contract law, what remedies do you have if the other party does not hold up their end of the bargain or does not perform to your standards? If you have hired a well-known performer to entertain at your event and they get a more lucrative offer to perform at another venue, can you enforce the contact and make them perform? Would you want them to perform if they did not want to?

Just do response each posted # 1 to 3 down below only

Posted 1

There are various remedies for breach of contract. One with which we are already familiar with from our study of tort law is damages. Damages can be both compensatory and punitive, however, fraud must be involved to recover punitive damages. In addition to damages, one may also be absolved of their duty to perform if the other party is in breach if it is a material breach.

There are some instances where money damages are insufficient and do not make the injured party whole. In those cases, specific performance or injunctions may be remedies for breach of contract. Specific performance essentially forces the party in breach to perform the actions they contacted to. For example, if a party contracts to buy a vintage car and the selling party decides not to sell after they enter into a contract, then the purchasing party could sue for specific performance. An injunction is very similar; however, it may not require the breaching party to perform exactly as a promised in the contract. Nevertheless, it does require a person to do something or refrain from doing something.

In your hypothetical, specific performance likely would not be required. An instance where specific performance may be required is if there were no other possible performers to hire for your event, however that is an unlikely remedy in this case. Personally, I would prefer to be compensated for my damages and then find a new performer given their lack of professionalism.

Posted 2

Most damages for breach of contract are remedied by monetary compensation. If the performer does not perform to my standards that is not a breach of contract, I can write a bad review based on my experience. Like Dave Chapelle once said during a comedy special while jokingly referencing Evil Knievel after a stunt “I get paid for the attempt!” Funny but true, if you go to a comedy show and the comedian is not funny, can you get your money back? NO!!! If I contract with an entertainer to perform and they do not, I will write it in the contract that they have to pay me the money I would have paid them, if they do not cancel with sufficient notice and I have to get someone else on short notice.
If I am the performer and I am asked to sign a contract, I want a 60 day cancellation policy, meaning I can cancel with no penalty no less than 60 days before the event. If I get an option to reschedule I would ask that it is within 1 year from the original date. I bought tickets for a comedy show with Martin Lawrence and a few more notable comedians that was scheduled for May 15, 2020, but it was cancelled and postponed due to COVID-19, and it is rescheduled for October 2021. I said how do they know I will still be interested in the act that far out, or still living in Florida, I requested a refund. I would ask for a 50% deposit upon signing the contract, I want the remainder within 48 hours of the end of the show, I want 25% off the drinks and 10% off the food sales. Plus, I am shopping the Netflix rights so NO recording during the show. My performance will be a one hour 30 minute set, with a 30 minute opening act, show starts at 7pm and ends roughly 9pm. Depending on ticket sales, I will negotiate a second time slot to start at 10pm and end at midnight. with the playbill stating One Night Only!! Call me for bookings.

Posted 3

There are three types of remedies when a contract is broken. Legal remedies are the amount of money that would compensate the party for their losses. Equitable damages require the guilty party to hold up their end of the deal. Restitution is a refund for the value of the benefits given in the deal.

In the example, you cannot force the entertainer to perform at your event. However, you can file for some sort of remedy, such as a full refund or for them to perform on a different date.

I don’t think I would want them to perform if they didn’t want to. I feel like I wouldn’t get the best performance out of them if they didn’t want to be there or would rather be someone else. However, if it were an event where a lot of people were in attendance, I would feel like a less than 100% performance would be better than no performance at all.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Stanford University Ethical Dilemmas Case Study Paper

Question Description

I’m trying to study for my Philosophy course and I need some help to understand this question.

 

Review the attached case and write an APA 6th formatted paper with ten (10) body pages—IN ADDITION to the title page, abstract, and references page—where you implement the Ethical Decision-Making Model (Links to an external site.) offered by Forester-Miller and Davis (1996).

Discuss what actions you would take as you proceed through the steps, documenting and defending your courses of actions and your final conclusions. Be sure to support your thoughts with at least two (2) peer-reviewed articles from the counseling literature that address the case’s topics.

Your paper should have a title page, abstract, and introduction that explains the crux of the case and prepares the reader for what follows, a body that is structured under APA 6th headings that coincide with the Ethical Decision-Making Model, a conclusion, and a reference page.

Case Scenario

Remember to review your VeriCite score. If your score is over 20%, revise and resubmit.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

BUS 150 Stanford Managing Fund of Human Resource Management Discussion

Discussion Question:

1. Tomax Corporation has 400 employees and wishes to develop a compensation policy to correspond to its dynamic business strategy. The company wishes to employ a high-quality workforce capable of responding to a competitive business environment. Suggest different compensation objectives to match Tomax’s business goals.

2.Since employees may differ in terms of their job performance, would it not be more feasible to determine the wage rate for each employee on the basis of his or her relative worth to the organization? Explain.

3. Describe the basic steps in conducting a wage and salary survey. What are some factors to consider? One of the objections to granting wage increases on a percentage basis is that the lowest-paid employees, who are having the most trouble making ends meet, get the smallest increase, while the highest-paid employees get the largest increase. Is this objection a valid one? Explain.

4. What is a compensation scorecard and how does it help align a company’s strategy with its compensation system?

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

BUS 3161A Stanford University My Understanding of Motivation Theories Paper

Question Description

I need support with this Business question so I can learn better.

 

Motivation lecture:https://youtu.be/IPYeCltXpxw

The topic of this discussion is…..Your Understanding of MOTIVATION Theories

Please reflect on the MOTIVATION theories we discussed in class. Given your own personal experiences with work or team environments, highlight how the different theories explain your behavior or the behavior of others you observed.

Some areas for thought include: observations regarding intrinsic or extrinsic rewards? The existence of motivating vs. hygiene factors? Were any aspects of goal-setting particularly helpful? Other theories that explain any phenomena that you experienced?

How can you use your knowledge of these theories to further your management development?

Complete as much of the assigned reading as you can before posting your primary responses each week. In general, strive to post as early as possible each week to better support robust online discussions.

 

  • Professionalism -Meaningless agreement is NOT acceptable. Be polite, but also strive to help your peers to see the position from another angle as needed. Ask for clarification when your peers are not clear, and offer additional insights or clarity where you can.
  • Quality NOT Quantity – Write concise yet thorough responses in all postings. Reference the text or relevant (and reputable) outside articles to better support your position, and cite in APA.
  • Grading Rubric: You can view the rubric by clicking on the three little dots in the upper right corner of the assignment instructions. Choose “view rubric”.
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"