GB 512 Stanford University Benefits of Maine Aging Population Paper

Question Description

I don’t understand this Business question and need help to study.

 

Final Project – need to provide a complete and revised document

Proposal Due: You have worked through the process of putting together your persuasive researched proposal addressing a business problem. You saw an example with how graphics can sometimes convey information more effectively than words. You have reviewed comments from your instructor, and have taken your ideas through several stages.

The proposal must be no fewer than 2,500 words, no more than 3,000. The word count includes all components. The purpose of establishing a word count is to ensure the topic chosen is neither too big nor too small. Also, writing within parameters is a common requirement in business communications.

The problem or issue need not be enormous.

For the researched proposal, you will identify a problem or issue in your present or past workplace. The Assignment objective is to propose a solution to the problem or issue, and to present that solution to a decision-maker or group of decision-makers who can implement the recommendation. You will support your proposal with research.

Over the course of the term, you will develop a concrete, practical solution to the problem that can be implemented. Reference sources will be included that explain the problem, issue, and/or support the solution.

The proposal must be between 2,500 to 3,000 words using APA format for your citations and references. The proposal itself should be single spaced with double spacing between paragraphs. The word count includes all components. The purpose of establishing a word count is to ensure the topic chosen is neither too big nor too small. Also, writing within parameters is a common requirement in business communications.

Checklist:

• Cover page or letter, depending upon the audience, which explains the attached proposal

• Table of contents

• Executive summary as introduction summarizing the content — uses subheadings to break up text and separate sections

• Statement and general analysis of the problem using research

• Assessment of the problem from various stakeholders’ viewpoints

• Includes a minimum of one original graphic

• Conclusion stated as a recommendation for implementation of the solution

• End matter includes reference page and any other data suitable for this section of the report

• Provide at least five cited sources, one of which is from a peer-reviewed journal and no more than two personal interviews and the paper contains no more than 15 percent direct quotes

• Use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation

meeting the requirement of the course.

need to provide a complete and revised document

— Met the word count of 3000 words.

— Citations in the body paragraphs.

— No blatant grammatical errors.

— Follow the APA format for citations and writing.

— Follow the content requirements in the research proposal template. Make sure you discuss/present all the pertinent sections in your Week 5 paper: Table of Contents, Memo, Executive Summary, Body (Background, Benefits, Recommendations, etc.), Conclusion, and References section.

Adheres to assigned format—single spaced, double space between paragraphs, cover page, table of contents, and references.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP

Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
Instructions to Student
 In total this assessment consist of 12 questions. Answer five questions. Question
number one which are numerical based questions is compulsory. Then you can
select any four questions out of 11 questions from Q2 to Q12 and answer
accordingly.
 Deadline of submission: 01/07/2020 23:59 pm
 The marks received on the assignment will be scaled down to the actual
weightage of the assignment which is 50 marks
 Formative feedback on the complete assignment draft will be provided if the
draft is submitted at least 10 days before the final submission date.
 Feedback after final evaluation will be provided by 10/07/2020
 Maximum word limit: 1500 words
Module Learning Outcomes
The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully
1. Recognize the necessity of changing organization structures in different concepts in a practical
situation.
2. Calculate ETO’s (Economical Trade Off) in various supply chain situations.
IN SEMESTER (INDIVIDUAL) ASSIGNMENT – SPRING
2020
(Assessment 2)
Module Code: BUSS – B – 3001 Module Name: Transport Management
Level: 3 Max. Marks: 100
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
Assignment Objective
After the completion of the assignment, the students would be able to understand and apply the various
concepts of Transport Management in practical situations.
Assignment Tasks
Q1. Solve the following: (Compulsory question) 4*5 = 20 Marks
a)
Pressure on the quay
Weight of the container: 32 tons
Length of the reachstacker: 4 meters
Length of the arm 14 meters.
Pls calculate the pressure on the quay.
32
tons
20
Quay
??
What is the
pressure on
the quay
What is the axle pressure on the front axle (which is standing on the quay)?
b) The volume of a 45’ container is 86.65 m3. The internal measures are:
– Length: 44’5” ft
– Width: 8’5” ft
What is the height of the container?
c) You received 180*20ft containers and the standard ratio of 40ft containers. How much TEU
did you receive?
d) How much we can load in a container, when the container has a content of 32 m 3
(32000
litre) and the product sugar has a S.G of 1.2?
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
Q2. In your lectures on introduction to transport management, you must have come across the
three subsystems of distribution logistics. With the help of the figure, explain in brief about these
three subsystem of distribution logistics? (5+5+5+5= 20 Marks)
Q3. In your lectures you have studied about the concept of standardization and normalization. In
Oman the directorate general for specifications and measurements (DGSM) is the national
standards body. Mention the activities for which DGSM is responsible in Oman? (20 Marks)
Q4. What are loading units? Explain in brief about each type of loading units as discussed in the
lectures (5+ 15 = 20 Marks)
Q5. In the lectures you have studied about the handling equipment’s. Explain in brief about each
type of handling equipment’s? (20 Marks)
Q6. Locomotives can be equipped “Bo-Bo “or “Co- Co”. What does that mean? Mention the
features of diesel and electrical locomotives? (5+ 15 = 20 Marks)
Q7. What do you understand by Deep sea shipping? Compare and contrast between Aframax ships
and cape size ships? (5+ 15 = 20 Marks)
Q8. As discussed in the lectures, explain briefly the main features of the various types of Cruise
liners? (20 Marks)
Q9. In your lectures, you have studied about the airlines and air cargo. In those context highlight
the main features / characteristics of the air cargo market in Oman? (20 Marks)
Q10. Differentiate between the followings? (2* 10 = 20 Marks)
a) Liberalization and Privatization
b) Modal Split and Modal Shift
Q11. What are dangerous goods? Explain briefly the various classifications of dangerous goods?
(20 Marks)
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
Q12. By giving examples, explain what is meant by perishable transport? Also highlight the
advantages and disadvantages of airfreight, road transport, rail transport and barges/shortsea for
transporting perishable goods in the context of Oman? (20 Marks)
Rules & Regulations:
The assignment needs to be done bearing in mind the following
1. For the assignment students are expected to refer to secondary data and literature sources as well
as primary data. All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style.
2. The assignment should contain direct answers, diagrams and calculations if necessary.
3. The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using
CU Harvard Style and page numbers.
4. Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name, Session, your name, ID, and the name
of the faculty.
5. The assignment should be done in Word, font size 12, font style Times New Roman, text color
black, colors can be used ONLY in appendices; main body of the report should be black and white.
6. Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle.
7. If found necessary, Viva may be conducted after the assignment submission as per the
dates informed earlier.
Guidelines:
 Assignment must be computer typed.
 Font – Times New Roman
 Font – Style – Regular
 Font – Size – 12
 Heading should be with Font Size 14, Bold, Capital and Underline.
 Explain with suitable diagrams wherever required. Diagrams must be drawn using suitable
software or by pencil.
 Each student has to do the assignment individually.
 You can refer books in e-Library or use internet resource. But you should not cut and paste
material from internet nor provide photocopied material from books. The assignment answers
should be in your own words after understanding the matter from the above resources.
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
Important Policies to be followed
1. Student Academic Integrity Policy*:
MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation
of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of
violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled.
All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the below
mentioned categories:
1. Plagiarism
2. Malpractice
3. Ghost Writing
4. Collusion
5. Other cases
If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module, the
student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of
plagiarism.
1. Plagiarism
A. First offence of plagiarism
I. If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in
any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the
assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of
deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed.
II. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the
date he or she is advised to re-submit.
III. If the re-submitted work is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment will be
awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one
week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark.
B. Second offence of plagiarism
If any student is caught second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a
subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which plagiarism
is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A warning of
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo counselling
session in such cases.
2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion
A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghost writing/Collusion
If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module
and shall be required to re-register the module
B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghost writing/Collusion
If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for
an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student
shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign
an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases.
3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation
If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student
shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as
recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic
Affairs.
4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation:
If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment
component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student shall
fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional level
academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs.
5. Other cases
If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases”
mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an
institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The
committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take
appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity violation
which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module
fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence.
6. Types/Variations of Cases:
I. If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be
applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone needs
to be resubmitted.
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
II. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as
having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students
III. If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will be
applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs
to be resubmitted.
All students of the group would be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism and the
policy will then be applied to all the students of the group.
IV. If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment
component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual
reflection), the following will be applicable:
a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group
will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be
applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted
as per the policy.
b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual
assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that
student alone.
c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole
assessment.
* For further details Refer to MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy in Student Handbook.
2. Late Submission Regulations:
It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments.
As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working days)
for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained for the
submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of submission
till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a period of one
week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and will be awarded
a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed due to extenuating
circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without imposing the late
submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be one week from the
original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to submit the supporting
certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the assessment and the decision
of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The late submission policy shall be
applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of the original last date of
submission.
Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if
required.
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy
To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects involved
including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects are
expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly the
following shall apply.
 Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical
standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions.
 Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and
approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.
 Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of microbial,
animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety
Committee.
 Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended
uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the
commencement of research.
 Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only
for the intended purpose of research.
Assessment Evaluation Criteria
Classification
And % Range
Reflection and critical
analysis.
Knowledge and
Understanding/
Application of Theory
Evidence of Reading
Referencing and
Bibliography
Presentation, Grammar
and Spelling
Outstanding (90-100)%
Highly competent
analytical skills and
reflective practice,
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values and
principles and professional
development planning.
Extensive knowledge and
depth of understanding of
principles and concepts
and /or outstanding
application of theory in
practice.
Evidence of reading an
extensive range of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable
workplace strategies,
policies and procedures.
Accurate referencing and
bibliography correctly
using appropriate
referencing style
Excellent presentation,
logically structured, using
correct grammar and
spelling, excellent crossreferencing and links to
supporting evidence
Excellent (80-90)%
Strong analytical skills and
reflective practice used,
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values,
principles and
competencies and
professional development
planning.
Excellent knowledge and
understanding of principles
and concepts and /or
excellent knowledge and
understanding of the
application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading a wide
range of educational
literature/research and
where applicable,
workplace strategies,
policies and procedures.
Appropriate referencing
and bibliography correctly
using appropriate
referencing style
Good presentation,
competently structured,
using correct grammar and
spelling, clear and easy to
use links to supporting
evidence
Very Good Quality
(70-80) %
Good use of analytical skills
and reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values,
principles and
competencies and
professional development
planning.
Good knowledge or key
principles and concepts
and/or good knowledge of
the application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading a good
range of educational
literature/research and
where applicable workplace
strategies, policies and
procedures.
Generally well referenced
with correct use of the
appropriate referencing
style
Reasonable presentation,
completely structured,
acceptable grammar and
spelling, acceptable links to
supporting evidence
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
Good (Acceptable)
(60-70) %
Acceptable use of analytical
skills and reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values,
principles and
competencies and
professional development
planning.
Acceptable knowledge of
key principles and concepts
and/or knowledge of the
application of theory in
practice
Evidence of reading an
appropriate range of
educational
literature/research and
where applicable, relevant
workplace policies and
procedures
Adequate referencing.
Generally accurate use of
appropriate referencing
style
Adequate presentation and
structure, acceptable
grammar and spelling,
adequate links to
supporting evidence
Adequate/ Satisfactory
(50-60) %
Adequate use of analytical
skills and reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
professional values,
principles and
competencies and
professional development
planning.
Adequate knowledge of key
principles and concepts
and/or satisfactory
evidence of the application
of theory in practice.
Evidence of minimal
reading of educational
literature/research and
where applicable relevant
workplace policies and
procedures
Adequate referencing.
Appropriate referencing
style used but may contain
some inaccuracies.
Weak presentation ,
satisfactory structure,
grammar and spelling, links
to supporting evidence
Weak /Poor
(all learning outcomes not
adequately met)
(40-50) %
Little use of analytical skills
and reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
competencies and/or
professional development
planning. Professional
values and principles not
reflected in the submission.
and/or
Insufficient/no use of
analytical skills and
reflective practice
demonstrating personal
learning and growth,
insight into required
competencies and
professional development
planning
Little evidence of
knowledge of key
principles or concepts
and/or little evidence of
the application of theory in
practice
and/or
No evidence of knowledge
of key principles or
concepts and/or no
evidence of application of
theory in practice
Little or no evidence of
reading outside of the
course textbook and/or
reference to relevant work
place policies and
procedures
and/or
No evidence of reading
outside of the course
textbook and/or reference
to relevant workplace
policies and procedures
Little or no referencing,
incorrect style, or very
inaccurate use of
appropriate referencing
style
Poor presentation,
grammar and spelling, links
to supporting evidence
and/or
Unacceptable
presentation, grammar
and spelling, structure is
very poor, links to
supporting evidence
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
Student Declaration for Coursework
(To be scanned and attached with coursework report after signing)
I/We confirm that this submission is part of a coursework (as chosen below) undertaken in
semester _____________________________________ towards completion of the following module:
Module Name and Code: _____________________________________________________________________________
(Please tick the correct choice below)
Individual Assignment or Case Study
Group Assignment or Case Study/Mini Project (in this case, all members have to sign
below in space provided)
I/We declare that the coursework report submitted by me/us is original, duly written by
me/us and has not been copied in part or in whole from any other source except where duly
acknowledged. All use of previously published work (from books, journals, magazines,
internet sources etc.) has been acknowledged within the main report to an item in the
References or Bibliography lists. I/we also agree that an electronic copy of this report may
be stored and used for the purposes of plagiarism prevention and detection.
I/We also acknowledge that I am/we are aware of MEC Student Academic Integrity Policy
and Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy and the disciplinary action that shall be taken in
case of violation of the policies. Further, in case of group work each of us in the group are
equally responsible for the group component and liable for application of penalty on policy
violation.
Document Name & Type Student Declaration for
coursework Form Author/Department Head, Centre for
Academic Practices
Approval Date 27/03/2018 Effective Date 29/03/2018
Review Date 25/04/2019 Next Review Date 24/04/2020
Transport Management (BUSS B 3001) Spring Online 2020-CW 2 (Assignment 2) Session A,B,C,D&E-QP
Student ID, Name and Sign: ______________________________________________________________
Date: _______________________________________________
MEC_CAP_FOR_004_01 Page 11 of 11
Controlled Copy. Printed copies of this document are uncontrolled. The controlled version of this document is available on the
CMS.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Prince Sultan University Corona Pandemic on the Global Airline Industry Paper

Question Description

I need support with this Business question so I can learn better.

 

The essay must have an introduction, main body, and the conclusion

Word limit is maximum 2000 words

Reference Style APA (American Psychological Association)

Try to use the Digital Library of PSU to read academic articles from various databases OR use Google Scholar. Any paper that is not available on Google Scholar can be access through PSU digital library.

Digital Library of PSU: http://ezproxy.psu.edu.sa/login

Username: ezproxy

Password: ezproxy12

50% of references must be from academic sources for example journals and books and 50% from other webpages, magazines, etc.

Please use as many stats and facts and figures to support your argument from authentic sources as possible.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

CG02-5 Industrial Data Networks

What am I required to do in this assignment?
Introduction
This is an Individual Report (based on practical work). The prototype network and report Viva Voce will be conducted and evaluated individually.
Assessment 2A – Individual Report (based on practical work) (50%)
An Individual Report based on a produced prototype network in a PLC simulator. Non-submission will automatically result in failure of this
assessment. No late submission will generally be accepted.
Assessment 2B – Viva Voce (20%)
A Viva Voce will follow on 4 January 2021. Only students who have submitted the report are eligible to proceed with the Viva Voce. The Viva
Voce will be individually.
Tasks to be done
Choose one of the below scenarios and produce a prototype using PLC Simulation.
• Scenario 1: Produce a prototype for an industry to control 3 motors sequentially and START each motor one by one.
• Scenario 2: Produce a prototype to control lamp/light of the staircase in a two floor factory, using two switches, one at ground floor
and second at first floor.
Submission Deadline Marks and Feedback
Before 6pm on:
xxxxx
15 working days after deadline (All Levels) Programme)
xxxxx
Module title & code CG02-5 Industrial Data Networks
Assignment number and title 2A and 2B
Assessment type Individual Report (based on practical work) (50%)
Viva Voce (20%)
Weighting of assessment 70% (50 + 20)
Module learning outcomes On completion of this module you should be able to:
1. Appraise the industrial data network protocols and analyse the techniques used in
industrial data network.
2. Combine the industrial data network requirements and create a prototype network.
2
• Scenario 3: Produce a prototype to automatic Control the Lamp in factory storage Facility as if we press the switch all will be ON
together and more energy will be consumed.
• Scenario 4: Produce a prototype to initialize parameter when the industry machine is powered up so the operator does not require
to process all data again in case of power failure.
Actions:
1. Evaluate the given situation.
2. Analyse functional and non-functional requirements.
3. Produce a prototype network in a suitable simulator.
4. Measure the performance of your prototype.
5. Prepare a report with the findings and interpretations.
Deliverables
A report with a minimum of 2500 words covering the following tasks is expected.
The structure of the report should be as follows:
• Problem Description
• Problem Diagram
• Problem Solution
• List of Inputs/Output
• PLC diagram
• Program Description
• Runtime Test Cases
• Conclusion and Recommendation
• References
Key Deliverables and Important Dates:
Last date for submission of draft: (xxxxx). Send the draft by e-mail to your teacher, Ms Zainab
Any draft submission after this date will not be accepted.
Last date for Final Submission: (xxxxx). The final report should be submitted in MOVE on or before (xxxxx, 6:00 PM). Nonsubmission will automatically result in failure of that assessment. No late submission will generally be accepted.
Each student must submit the report individually in the module’s MOVE page. The submission will be followed by a viva-voce.
Is there a size limit?
(2500 words)
What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from Module Descriptor)
Design a prototype network in a suitable simulator and submit a report with appropriate rationale, followed by a viva-voce of
the report and artefact developed.
3
How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?
Justify your design choice and demonstrate understanding of the design choice for developing certain components of a
wireless networking system for a given scenario.
How does assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?
During the scheduled sessions an introduction, overview and practical activities will be provided enabling students to appraise
and apply the technologies in simulated, virtual or real environments.
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.
You can use them to evaluate your own work and estimate your grade before you submit.
N
o
Criterion Weighin
g (%)
Sub Standard /
No Attempt
(0 Marks)
Poor
(20 Marks)
Satisfactory
(40 Marks)
Good
(50 Marks)
Very Good
(60 Marks)
Excellent
(70 Marks)
Outstanding
(100 Marks)
Rubrics for Report (50%)
1 Problem
Description
15% No problem
description is
provided.
Fails to identify,
summarize, or
explain the
main problem
or
question.
Represents the
problem
inaccurately or
inappropriately.
Limited/incomplet
e identification of
problems and
summarization or
explanation of the
main problem or
questions.
Identifies
main issues
but does not
summarize or
explain them
clearly or
sufficiently.
Successfully
identifies and
summarizes
the main
issues, but
does not
explain
why/how they
are problems
or create
questions.
Correctly and
completely
identifies and
summarizes
the main
issues, and
correctly
explain why
they are
problems or
create
questions but
does not
identify
clearly how
to address
them.
Clearly
identifies and
summarizes
main issues
and
successfully
explains
why/how
they are
problems or
questions;
and identifies
embedded or
implicit
issues,
addressing
their
relationships
to each
other.
5
3 Problem
Solution
15% No solution
found.
Solution
provided is not
relevant to the
topic.
General solution
was provided. No
evidence of own
ideas given.
Student tried
the solution
on the
points/issues
identified in
problem
description
section.
Limited
Solutions of
own ideas are
proposed.
Student tried
the solution on
the
points/issues
identified in
the problem
description
section and
some relevant
solutions of
own ideas are
proposed.
Ideas
proposed are
mostly
correct and
relevant to
points/issues
identified in
the problem
description
section. Adds
some value
to the body
of
knowledge.
Ideas
proposed are
completely
relevant and
practical to
the
points/issues
identified in
the problem
description
section. Adds
consistent
amount of
value to the
body of
knowledge.
4 List of Inputs/
Output
5% No Inputs/
Output found.
Provided points
are not
relevant. Lacks
Inputs/
Output.
Provided points
are mostly
irrelevant. Lacks
Inputs/
Output.
Inputs/
Output is
provided and
few
points/key
issues are
identified.
Inputs/
Output is
provided.
Explanation is
missing.
Inputs/
Output and
explanation
found are
mostly
relevant.
A critical
Inputs/
Output is
found with
detailed and
relevant
explanation.
5 PLC diagram 25% No PLC diagram
found or design
is generally
inappropriate.
PLC diagram is
mostly
inappropriate
and
disorganized.
Satisfactory detail
provided in the
design. Limited
components were
used. Design is
not logically
organized.
The PLC
diagram is
partially
correct. Some
essential
components
are either
missing or
not logically
linked to the
design.
Design is
somehow
organized.
The PLC
diagram is
mostly correct.
However, there
are few
essential
components
that are either
missing or not
logically linked
to the design.
Design is
organized.
The PLC
diagram is
correct.
The scenario
is very clearly
illustrated in
the design.
Proper use of
components.
Design is very
organized.
An
outstanding
PLC diagram.
The scenario
is very clearly
illustrated in
the design.
Proper use of
components.
Design is very
organized.
Expectations
are exceeded.
6
6 Program
Description
20% No program
description
can be found.
Program
description
presented are
not coherent to
the expected
results of the
scenario.
Limited/incomplet
e program
description are
provided.
Interpretation of
idea is either
missing,
ambiguous, or
incomplete.
Program
description is
partially
complete.
Analysis of
program are
somehow
appropriate.
Program
description is
mostly
complete.
Analysis of
program are
appropriate.
Correct and
complete
program
description
are provided
for the
chosen
scenario.
Analysis of
program are
appropriate
and welljustified.
Outstanding
program
description
are provided
for the
chosen
scenarios.
Analysis of
program are
appropriate
and welljustified.
Expectations
are exceeded.
7 Runtime Test
Cases
10% No runtime test
cases found.
Provided points
are not
relevant. Lacks
runtime test
cases.
Provided points
are mostly
irrelevant. Lacks
runtime test
cases.
Runtime test
cases are
done and few
key points
are identified.
Runtime test
cases are done.
Explanation is
missing.
Runtime test
cases found
are mostly
relevant.
An
outstanding
runtime test
cases are
found with
detailed and
relevant
explanation.
8 Conclusion and
Recommendatio
n
5% No conclusion
and
recommendatio
n found.
Conclusion and
recommendatio
n provided is
not relevant to
the topic.
General or mostly
irrelevant
conclusion and
recommendation
provided.
Few relevant
points are
given that
somehow
reflected the
outcome of
the study. No
suggestions
for further
studies given.
Some relevant
points are
given that
partially
reflected the
outcomes of
the study.
Suggestions for
further studies
given but are
not feasible for
implementatio
n.
Relevant
conclusion
that reflected
the outcomes
of the study
are given.
Some points
were drawn
from the
actual work
done. It
includes
suggestions
for further
studies that
The
conclusion
adequately
reflected the
outcomes of
the study and
is relevant to
the actual
work done. It
includes
suggestions
for further
studies that
are feasible.
7
are somehow
feasible.
9 References 5% No references
found.
References
provided are
not
appropriate.
Mostly
inappropriate
references
provided. Just a
list of sources
found which are
not academically
acceptable (ex.
Wikipedia, Blogs,
etc.)
Reference list
is provided
and the
sources are
somehow
relevant.
No in-text
citations
found.
Reference list is
provided and
the sources are
relevant.
Few in-text
citations are
found.
Academically
accepted
reference list
is provided.
Proper in-text
citations are
found.
A proper
Harvard
referencing
style is
followed and
all the
sources are
academically
accepted.
Rubrics for Viva Voce
N
o
Criterion Weighin
g (%)
Sub Standard /
No Attempt
(0 Marks)
Poor
(20 Marks)
Satisfactory
(40 Marks)
Good
(50 Marks)
Very Good
(60 Marks)
Excellent
(70 Marks)
Outstanding
(100 Marks)
1 Demonstratio
n
50 % Unable to show
proof of
knowledge and
skill in the
artefact
developed
Student shows
limited
knowledge of
the artefact
developed.
Attempt to
showcase
system
functionalities
was
unsuccessful.
Student shows an
acceptable level
of knowledge and
skills in the
artefact
developed. Few
functionalities
were successfully
demonstrated.
Student
shows a good
level of
knowledge
and skills in
the artefact
developed.
Majority of
the
functionalitie
s were
successfully
demonstrate
d.
Student shows
a good level of
knowledge and
skills in the
artefact
developed.
Most of the
functionalities
were
successfully
demonstrated.
Student was
able to
showcase
technical skills.
Student
shows a very
good level of
knowledge
and skills in
the artefact
developed.
All of the
functionalitie
s were
successfully
demonstrate
d. Student
has
showcased
his/her
technical
skills in the
Student
shows high
level of
knowledge
and skills in
the artefact
developed.
All of the
functionalitie
s were
successfully
demonstrate
d. Student
has
showcased
his/her
technical
skills in the
8
subject area
with
confidence.
subject area
with
confidence.
Student’s
performance
during the
demo is
exemplary.
2 Viva 50 % Unable to
answer any
question.
Student lacks
understanding
of the topic.
Student shows
a shallow
understanding
of the topic.
Answers to
questions are
irrelevant.
Student shows a
limited
understanding of
the topic. Few
questions are
answered
correctly without
elaboration.
Student
shows a good
understandin
g of the topic.
Most
questions are
answered
correctly but
with very
limited
elaboration.
Student shows
a very good
understanding
of the topic.
Most questions
are answered
correctly with
proper
elaboration.
Student
shows an indepth
understandin
g of the topic.
All answers to
questions are
correct and
logically
articulated.
Student
shows an indepth
understandin
g of the topic.
All answers to
questions are
correct and
logically
articulated.
Answers
provided are
supported by
examples or
real-world
scenarios.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"