describes how you anticipate the concepts from this course will apply to your professional life.

Question Description

describes how you anticipate the concepts from this course will apply to your professional life. This paper should be written with your current situation in mind and looking forward, but not applying the course’s concepts retrospectively to a past situation.
Among the questions you should address in this paper are:

  •  What are the most relevant concepts from the course to you?
  •  How do you anticipate those concepts impacting you professionally?
  •  How will you apply these concepts to your future work?
  •  (Optional) What from this course has made an impact on you personally or professionally as youhave progressed through this course?
  •  What from this course do you anticipate having the greatest impact on you professionally as youmove forward in your career?
  •  Knowing what you know after taking this course, what will you do differently from now on?As you answer these questions, be as specific as possible. Don’t just say, “I found the concept of culture to be relevant to me.” Write specifically about how you would apply a certain model to a situation.The important criteria in this paper are application and specificity. Your success in this paper will depend not only on how well you demonstrate an understanding of concepts, but on how well you can apply them to real world situations. The more specificity you bring to your discussion, the better the application will be.This paper should be written at a level consistent with a graduate program. However, as this is a highly personal paper, it is acceptable—and advisable—to write in the first-person. Think of this paper as telling a story—a personal one about you and your work.I envision this paper to be in the neighborhood of 6-12 pages.

Course Objectives: After successfully completing this course, students will be able to:

  •  Understand the Integrated Cultural Framework
  •  Appreciate the role of culture (both internal and external) in organizations
  •  More fully understand the communication/culture/change link
  •  Better appreciate the value of cultural diversity
  •  Have a more realistic view of international careers, including the impact on lifestyle
  •  Define leadership
  •  Contrast management and leadership
  •  See the international dimensions of leadership
  •  See the international and cultural dimensions of ethics
  •  Negotiate cross-culturally
  •  Apply the various concepts from this course to real-world situations
  •  Analyze cases involving cross-cultural aspects of business
  •  Write about cross-cultural issues
  •  Orally present cross-cultural case analyses

Required Readings
Adler, N.J.& Gunderson, A. (2007) International dimensions of organizational behavior (5th Ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Mallinger, M. & Rossy, G. (1999). Integrated cultural framework.
Cohen, E. (2007) “Global considerations for corporate universities” In M. Allen (ed.), The next
generation of corporate universities. San Francisco: Pfeiffer. (On Sakai). Please download the following cases and articles from the following website:
https://hbsp.harvard.edu/import/679447
How to steer clear of pitfalls in cross-cultural negotiations. Harvard article.Oil and Wasser. Harvard case.
Shanghai real estate (A). Harvard case.
What gets lost in translation. Harvard article.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Introduction to Management: Discuss 2 problems found in Amazon and give solutions

Discuss 2 problems found in Amazon and give solutions

Question Description

  • Words: 1,500 words, not counting the reference list.
  • A minimum of 5 references is required to pass Assignment 1.
  • The slide set How to prepare,develop and write the Case Study assignment located in the Assignment 1 link is essential reading before you begin your assignment. It is full of helpful steps, skills and resources you will need to pass the assignment.
  • You need to demonstrate your skills in using the scholarly literature (journal articles and text books) to develop your analysis. – Critically evaluate key management concepts within multidisciplinary contexts. – Explain foundational contributions to management theories to inform contemporary practices.
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Organizational Change – Project-Focused Groups

Question Description

  1,000–1,500 words
You are now in a meeting with your HRD team and preparing to meet all the Pegasus department heads. Your group has recommended reorganizing Pegasus into project-focused groups; in other words, engineers, computer aided design (CAD) designers, scientists, and model makers will work together on specific projects. Senior management is in favor of the idea, as it reminds them of how they worked together when they started the company. Some newer members of the team doubt that this structure will work in the now-large Pegasus organization. Discuss the following:

  1. Discuss organizational interventions to recommend. Take into consideration your previous diagnosis and the emotional state of your employees from your interview.
  2. Include a brief description of each intervention of priority and why you chose this intervention.
  3. Discuss research methods, including the comparative benefits of quantitative and qualitative research. Ask yourself these questions:
    • How will I measure the success or failure of this strategy?
    • What research processes will I use to determine if the strategy is helping or harming Pegasus

***Please review attached documents***

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Company analysis report

Question Description

The Task:
Locally, nationally and internationally, there are many organisations whose failure has been determined at least in part by key organisational behaviour and people factors. Recently, the media has reported on a number of organisations that have engaged in unethical (wrong or bad) or grossly incompetent behaviour where organisational behaviour and people issues played a key role. For example, culture, leadership, and motivation and reward systems were antecedents to Volkswagen’s disgrace in 2015, which is having severe consequences for its stakeholders.
What you are required to do:
1. Choose a real case of an organisational failure (e.g., unethical or grossly incompetent conduct). Describe briefly what happened, the context, and the consequences of the failure for the organisation’s stakeholders.
2. Analyse the organisational behaviour factors that contributed to the failure. These may be individual, group or organisational factors. Your analysis should include a relevant analytical framework (e.g. SWOT or stakeholder analysis).
3. Describe what the organisation did post-failure to prevent a reoccurrence and to recover the organisation’s reputation and stakeholder’s trust. Evaluate the effectiveness of the organisation’s response to the failure, and make recommendations for what could have been done better and/or moving forward. In making these recommendations, be pragmatic and specific (i.e. make recommendations that are viable and within the organisation’s capacity to implement).
In conducting your analysis:
1. Apply relevant models, concepts, theories and literature in the field of organisational behaviour. You are expected to incorporate relevant research and theory from the broader organisational behaviour literature (e.g., journal articles and/or books), not just the text and course materials (in addition to ‘other’ sources, your reference list should include a minimum of ten journal articles, which can include the five artices you examined in Assignment One); Page 9 of 9
2. Conduct desk research to obtain information and/or data and examples to illustrate and support your analysis, evaluation and recommendations (e.g. media reports, interviews, independent investigation reports, organisational reports, etc.). Choosing a Case: • The organisational failure must have occurred in the last 10 years.
• It is recommended that you choose a case where the failure was of considerable magnitude. That is, the failure caused some kind of harm to one or more of the organisation’s stakeholders (e.g. employees, customers, shareholders, suppliers, the community, the organisation’s board etc.). • You may not analyse a case that has been used in class (e.g. Google, Nike), nor may you derive your analysis from an existing case study. You will be advised by your LIC the cases planned for the unit.
• Beyond these requirements, the choice of case is at your discretion. Students are expected to select a case they are familiar with (e.g. from personal experience, or through their network). Note, all ‘personal’ case information will be treated as private and confidential. Students who have difficulty identifying a case from their own experience should discuss with their LIC, who will provide guidance re. suitable cases.
2. Project Report. Your project report should not exceed 2,500 words. Appendices and references are not included in the word count; however you cannot assume that appendicised material will be read in detail. Please include a word count on the front page of your assignment and ensure that you reference appropriately. Assignments below/exceeding the word limit in excess of 10% will be penalised
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"