Strategic Management

Strategic Management Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Module Leader: Dr Samuel Adomako 1 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Learning outcomes • Tools to assist in internal analysis • Identify organisational resources and capabilities and how these relate to the strategies of organisations. • Analyse how resources and capabilities might provide sustainable competitive advantage on the basis of their Value, Rarity, Inimitability and Organisational support (VRIO). • Diagnose resources and capabilities by means of benchmarking, VRIO analysis, value chain analysis, and SWOT analysis. 2 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Analysing an organisation’s resources and capabilities Options Environment Purpose Options Resources Options This session Choice Implement Five key questions related to strategic resources and capabilities ..Because they deliver value added 1. What are the resources and capabilities of an organisation? 2. Why do we have them at all? Three broad categories: •Tangible resources •Intangible resources •Organisational capabilities 3. Why are resources and capabilities important in strategy? …Because they deliver competitive advantage 5. What other company resources are also important? 4. How can we improve competitive advantage? Resources and capabilities: the key issues 5 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Foundations of resources and capabilities The resources and capabilities of an organisation contribute to its long-term survival and potentially to competitive advantage. • Resources are the assets that organisations have or can call upon (e.g. from partners or suppliers), that is ‘what we have’. • Capabilities (sometimes referred to as competences) are the ways those assets are used or deployed, that is ‘what we do well’ . 6 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Resources and capabilities 7 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Resource-based strategy The resource-based view (RBV) of strategy asserts that the competitive advantage and superior performance of an organisation are explained by the distinctiveness of its capabilities. It is sometimes also called the ‘capabilities view’. 8 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Redundant capabilities • Capabilities, however effective in the past, can become less relevant as industries evolve and change. • Such ‘capabilities’ can become ‘rigidities’ that inhibit change and become a weakness. 9 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Resources and capabilities • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0_37_yASao 10 16 April 2020 POWERPOINT PRESENTATION TEMPLATE BLUE How do we analyse an organisation’s strategic resources and capabilities? Strategic Management tools: The VRIO and Value Chain Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Strategic capabilities and competitive advantage The four key criteria by which capabilities can be assessed in terms of providing a basis for achieving sustainable competitive advantage are: • value • rarity VRIO1 • inimitability and • organisational support 1Jay Barney: ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1 (1991), pp. 99–120. 12 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment VRIO 13 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment VRIO analysis A VRIO analysis helps to evaluate if, how and to what extent an organisation or company has resources and capabilities that are : (i) valuable; (ii) rare; (iii) inimitable; (iv) supported by the organisation. 14 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment VRIO V – Value of resources and capabilities Strategic capabilities are of value when they: • take advantage of opportunities and neutralise threats; • provide value to customers; • are provided at a cost that still allows an organisation to make an acceptable return 15 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment VRIO R – Rarity • Rare capabilities are those possessed uniquely by one organisation or only by a few others. (e.g. a company may have patented products, have supremely talented people or a powerful brand.) • Rarity could be temporary. (e.g. Patents expire, key individuals can leave or brands can be de-valued by adverse publicity.) 16 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment VRIO I – Inimitability Inimitable capabilities are those that competitors find difficult and costly to imitate, to obtain or to substitute. • Competitive advantage can be built on unique resources (a key individual or IT system) but these may not always be sustainable (key people leave or others acquire the same systems). • Sustainable advantage is more often found in (the way resources are managed, competences developed and deployed) and the way competences are linked together and integrated. 17 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Criteria for the inimitability of resources and capabilities 18 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment VRIO O – Organisational support The organisation must be suitably organised to support the valuable, rare and inimitable capabilities that it has. This includes appropriate processes and systems. 19 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment The VRIO Framework: Performance Implications Valuable? 20 Rare? Inimitable? Organised? Competitive impact No – – – Competitive disadvantage Yes No – – Competitive parity Yes Yes No – Short term competitive advantage Yes Yes Yes Yes Long term competitive advantage 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment VRIO Example 21 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Example: Amazon Resources/capabilities Valuable Rare Inimitable Organized Implication Brand image/equity Yes Yes Yes Yes Competitive advantage Customer base Yes Yes No Yes Temporary advantage Global presence Yes Yes No Yes Temporary advantage Customer loyalty Yes Yes No Yes Temporary advantage Technology Yes Yes No Yes Temporary advantage Product range Yes Yes Yes Yes Competitive advantage 22 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment The value chain • The value chain describes the categories of activities within an organisation, which, together, create a product or service. • The value chain consists of five primary activities (which are directly concerned with the creation or delivery of a product or service) and four support activities (which help to improve the effectiveness or efficiency of primary activities). • Competitive advantage can be analysed in any of these activities. 23 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment The value chain Source: Adapted with the permission of The Free Press, a Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc., from Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance by Michael E. Porter. Copyright © 1985, 1998 by Michael E. Porter. All rights reserved. 24 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Value Chain – Ryanair 25 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Value chain video 26 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Benchmarking Benchmarking is a means of understanding how an organisation compares with others – typically competitors. Two approaches to benchmarking: • Industry/sector benchmarking – comparing performance against other organisations in the same industry/sector against a set of performance indicators. • Best-in-class benchmarking – comparing an organisation’s performance or capabilities against ‘best-in-class’ performance – wherever that is found even in a very dif
ferent industry. (e.g. BA benchmarked its refuelling operations against Formula 1). 27 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Benchmarking – Performance Metrics • Financial Ratios: – Gross Profit Margin – Net Profit Margin – Return on capital employed (ROCE) – Liquid or Quick Ratio (the ability to convert assets into cash quickly and cheaply) – Gearing (ratio of a company’s debt to equity) 28 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Summary of Internal analysis INTERNAL ANALYSIS=STRENGTHS and WEAKNESSES https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mR9eICQJLXA 29 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Summary • To be distinctive and provide for sustainable competitive advantage, resources and capabilities need to fulfil the VRIO criteria of being Valuable, Rare, Inimitable and supported by the Organisation. Ways of diagnosing organisational resources and capabilities include: • VRIO analysis of resources and capabilities to evaluate if they contribute to competitive advantage. • Analysing an organisation’s value chain and value system to understand how value to a customer is created and can be developed. 30 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment References 31 • BARNEY, J. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120. • Johnson et al (2014) Chapters 3 and 4 • Prahalad, C. and G. Hamel (1990). “The Core Competence of the Corporation.” Harvard Business Review 68: 79-91. • Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Strategy. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York, Free Press, Simon and Schuster Adult Publishing Group. • TEECE, D. (2007) Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350. • Thompson, A., Peteraf, M., Gamble, A., Strickland, A. and Sutton, C. (2013) Crafting and Executing Strategy: the quest for competitive advantage, European Edition, McGraw-Hill, UK 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Next Lecture • How do we analyse external environment of an organization? 32 16 April 2020 Lecture 2: Strategic Capabilities and Internal Environment Strategic Management Lecture 3: Analysing the External Environment Module Leader: Dr Samuel Adomako 1 16 April 2020 Analysing the main elements of the environment Options Environment This session Purpose Options Resources Options Choice Implement Slide 2.3 Layers of the business environment Slide 2.4 Environmental analyses • Macro-environment -PESTEL • Industry and sector analysis -Porter’s Five Forces Framework The PESTEL framework PESTEL analysis highlights six environmental factors in particular: political, economic, social, technological, ecological and legal. Organisations need to consider: • The market environment (e.g. suppliers, customers and competitors). • The non-market environment (e.g. NGOs, Government, media and campaign groups). PESTEL analysis • Consider the general environment surrounding many businesses under six main headings: – – – – – – Political (e.g.,Brexit, stability). Economic (e.g., currency inflation, interest rates, taxation level) Sociological (cultural norms, attitudes to product, consumer preferences, age and gender distribution) Technological (internet, Blockchain, nano-technology) Ecological (Sustainability, waste management rules and regulations, green practices, climate change) Legal (e.g., Legislative issues, such as consumer protection laws, health and safety laws, licensing regulations) PESTEL helps to provide a list of potentially important issues influencing strategy. It is important to assess the impact of each factor. Using the PESTEL framework • Apply selectively – identify specific factors which impact on the environment, market and organisation in question. • Identify factors which are important currently but also consider which will become more important in the future. • Use data to support the points and analyse trends using up-to-date information. • Identify opportunities and threats – the main point of the exercise. 7 16 April 2020 PESTEL opportunities and threats for the oil industry Short Video on PESTLE 9 16 April 2020 Quick Test on PESTEL • Based on what we’ve discussed – you are a consultant advising Ryanair about Political risks in its environment. Which is the most relevant list in order of importance with 1. being the most important and 4. being the least important ….. 1. 2. 3. 4. Tensions between US And N Korea Increased political instability in OPEC countries BREXIT The US government eliminates travel tax on its flights from Europe. Key issues for macro environmental analysis …. • Are you interpreting signals as opportunities or risks ? • Are they real signals or just noise? • Timing – “the future is not a far-off point: it arrives in daily doses that must be noticed and understood” (Vijay Govindarajan, 2016) • How can you prepare your organization for non linear changes and chance events? – Identifying – Low risk testing – Invest in what you can control but understand, respect and hedge against what you can’t. Industry Analysis 12 16 April 2020 Industries, markets and sectors An industry is a group of firms producing products and services that are essentially the same. For example, the automobile industry and the airline industry. A market is a group of customers for specific products or services that are essentially the same (e.g. the market for luxury cars in Germany). A sector is a broad industry group (or a group of markets) especially in the public sector (e.g. the health sector). 13 16 April 2020 What is your competitive group? • Define your industry – By sector – By scope – is it global / regional / international / national / more local ?? Industry and sector environments: the key topics Competitive forces: The five forces framework Porter’s Five Forces Framework helps identify the attractiveness of an industry in terms of five competitive forces: • The threat of entry. • The threat of substitutes. • The bargaining power of buyers. • The bargaining power of suppliers and. • The extent of rivalry between competitors. The five forces constitute an industry’s ‘structure’. 16 16 April 2020 The five forces framework Source: Adapted from Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors by Michael E. Porter, copyright © 1980, 1998 by The Free Press. All rights reserved. Rivalry between existing competitors Competitive rivals are organisations with similar products and services aimed at the same customer group and are direct competitors in the same industry/market (distinct from substitutes). The degree of rivalry depends on: • Competitor concentration and balance. • Industry growth rate. • High fixed costs. • High exit barriers. • Low differentiation 18 16 April 2020 The threat of entry Barriers to entry are the factors that need to be overcome by new entrants if they are to compete. The threat of entry is low when the barriers to entry are high and vice versa. The main barriers to entry are: • Economies of scale/Experience/Network effects. • Access to supply and distribution channels. • Differentiation and market penetration costs. • Legislation or government restrictions (e.g. licensing). • Expected retaliation • Incumbency advantages 19 16 April 2020 The threat of substitutes Substitutes are products or services that offer a similar benefit to an industry’s products or services, but have a different nature i.e. they are from outside the industry. Customers will switch to alternatives (and thus the threat increases) if: • The price/performance ratio of the substitute is superior (e.g. aluminium is more expensive than steel but it is more cost efficient for car parts) • The substitute benefits from an innovation that improves customer satisfaction (e.g. high speed trains can be quicker than airlines from city centre to city centr
e on short haul routes). • Extra-industry effects. Substitutes come from outside the incumbents’ industry which forces managers to look outside their own industry to consider more distant threats and constraints 20 16 April 2020 The bargaining power of buyers Buyers are the organisation’s immediate customers, not necessarily the ultimate consumers. If buyers are powerful, then they can demand cheap prices or product/service improvements to reduce profits. Buyer power is likely to be high when: • Buyers are concentrated. • Buyers have low switching costs. • Buyers can supply their own inputs (backward vertical integration). • Low buyer profits (under pressure to improve profits) and the purchased inputs have a low impact on quality (can cut costs without loss of quality). 21 16 April 2020 The bargaining power of suppliers Suppliers are those who supply what organisations need to produce the product or service. Powerful suppliers can reduce an organisation’s profits. Supplier power is likely to be high when: • The suppliers are concentrated (few of them). • Suppliers provide a specialist or rare input. • Switching costs are high (it is disruptive or expensive to change suppliers). • Suppliers can integrate forwards (e.g. low-cost airlines have cut out the use of travel agents). 22 16 April 2020 Implications of five forces analysis • Which industries/markets to enter or leave? – it helps identify the attractiveness of industries. • What influence can be exerted? Identifies strategies that can influence the impact of the five forces. E.g. building barriers to entry by becoming more vertically integrated. • The forces may have a different impact on different organisations. E.g. large firms can deal with barriers to entry more easily than small firms. 23 16 April 2020 Michael Porter on 5 forces in Industry analysis 24 16 April 2020 Issues in five forces analysis • Defining the ‘right’ industry. Applying the model at the most appropriate level – not necessarily the whole industry. E.g. the European low-cost airline industry rather than airlines globally. • Converging industries – particularly in the high tech arenas – where industries overlap (e.g. digital industries – mobile phones/cameras/mp3 players). • Complementary organisations – which enhance the attractiveness of a business to customers or suppliers. Microsoft Windows and McAfee computer security systems are complementors. This can almost be considered as a sixth force. 25 16 April 2020 Steps in an industry analysis There are several important steps in an industry analysis before and after analysing the five forces: 1. Define the industry clearly. 2. Identify the actors of each of the five forces and any different groups within them and the basis for this. 3. Determine the underlying factors of, and the total strength of, each force. 4. Assess the overall industry structure and attractiveness. 5. Assess recent and expected future changes for each force. 6. Determine how to position your business in relation to each of the five forces. 26 16 April 2020 Industry types Growth and life-cycle analysis • Theory suggests that businesses go through various phases of development • Strategies will change with each phase Maturity …

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Leadership Project SHR011-6: Muscat College Organizational Leadership Aspects Project

Unit title & code Leadership Project SHR011-6
Assignment number and title Assessment 2 – Summative Assessment
Assignment type Report
Weighting of assignment 100%
Size or length of assessment 3,600 words +-10%
Unit learning outcomes 1.     Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding
Critical appreciation of how types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions and how they impact people performance, followers and productivity.
 
 
2.      Demonstrate the following skills and abilities
Critically evaluate leadership/management styles, leadership problems and challenges and your personal leadership capabilities and needs for future development.
 
 
What am I required to do in this assignment?
You will produce a written report of 3,600 words (+/- 10%) that critically assesses and evaluates your organisation and sector using organisational systems and structures theory (vMEME) and all the types of approaches and models of organisational strategy it contains.
Critically analyse particular leadership problems and challenges through critical evaluation and appropriate application of theory
1.    Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions
2.    Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles impact people performance, productivity
3.    Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles determine who will ‘follow and how’.
4.    Critically evaluate your personal leadership capabilities and critically analyse the need for future development
Through application of Seven Leadership Mindsets Theory (vMEME) you will have a tool (and the skill) to critically assess and evaluate all types of organisational and sector theories worldviews that include USA, UK, China, European countries, India, Oman, GCC, African countries, etc. Leadership is different depending on the relevant mindset (life conditions, how humans individuals adapt to successfully compete and socio-cultural elements). Inevitably leadership mindset impacts everything in a company – strategy, people, performance, productivity, etc.
 
A suggested structure for the written report would include the following: This assignment can be divided into four sections.
 
1. From a consideration of the theory, research, science, and characteristics of organisations identify and assess:

  1. The seven structures and systems present in your organisation
  2. Analyse and describe how the present Leadership Value Systems and Structures in your organisation impact on leadership, management and staff.
  3. Consider and analyse differences to your competitors (local or global)
  4. Consider to what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation

2. Now that you understand your organisations’ structure consider your organisations’ sector. Critically analyse:
a.    How has your sector evolved?
b.    In what way do they differ to your competitors (local or global)
c.    To what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation
 
3. Having examined change and transformation critically assess an analyse how to ensure your organisation’s continued growth and success, organisations need to undertake transformation and growth.

a.    What kinds of changes are taking place in your sector and what do you believe the most successful organisations are doing to embrace the changes required to deliver continued success?
b.    To what extent is your organisation at the forefront of this transformation (or maybe it is trailing some of the best organisations in the sector). Give examples of specific actions and leadership behaviours you are seeing to underpin your view.
4. Every organisation faces challenges and problems, which can be driven from rapid growth or serious decline. Identify and critically assess:

  1. The top two or three big issues your organisation is facing
  2. Key actions your organisation needs to take to put it on a path of future sustainable success.
What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)
 
In order to pass the assessment you will need to:
·      Assess and demonstrate understanding of how varying leadership styles impact upon the organisation and sector and systems
·      Evaluate and compare the impact of leadership types upon followers.
·      Reflect on aspects of your leadership capability and needs for future personal and organisational development
 
 
 
 
 
 
How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?
 
 
This assignment builds on our learning achieved in the first part of the unit, but changes focus from the individual to the organization.
In the first session we examine leadership in the context of  organisations systems and structures using the Seven Organisation Sector Mindset Thinking Systems and Structures model
 
In the second session we explore whether leadership structures and systems are related to specific industries and sectors.
 
The third session focusses on Organisational Transformation and Change and examines variations of change taking place in organisations.
 
The final session looks forward to the design and delivery of an intelligent strategy whereby resources are aligned to deliver effective strategic plans and projects
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Annotated Annotated

Question Description

For this assignment you will review a previous article assignment and then you will create an annotation for the new reference identified. You will write 2 pages 12 font times roman ,citations, not including title or reference page
Pre-Assignment:
First, add to your list of references from the library assignment in Week 4 by identifying an additional article related to the research topic you used to create your outline during Week 4.
Article Assignment attached
Assignment:
For this assignment, use the guidelines and resources you have reviewed and create an annotated bibliography using the one of the following sources:
Holt, D., Palmer, S., Gosper, M., Sankey, M., & Allan, G. (2014). Framing and enhancing distributed leadership in the quality management of online learning environments in higher education. Distance Education35(3), 382-399. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.955261.
http://proxy1.ncu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswss&AN=000343903700008&site=eds-live
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

SHR011-6: Leadership Project

Coursework Information Sheet
To be supplied to students when they receive the coursework assignment task.

Unit Co-ordinator: John Grisby
Unit Name: Leadership Project
Unit Code: SHR011-6 (On campus; Off campus (Oman, Zurich & Poland)
Title of Coursework: Assignment 2: Report on Organisation and Sector Leadership
% weighting of final unit grade: 60%

 
Feedback details
The university policy is that you will receive prompt feedback on your work within 15 working days of the submission date.  Exceptionally where this is not achievable (for example due to staff sickness) you will be notified as soon as possible of the revised date and the reasons behind the change.

Submission Date: 3rd of May
Feedback Date: 15 working days
Details of how to access the feedback: BREO
  • Please refer to the Learning Outcomes and Threshold Criteria as detailed below
  • You must submit your work to BREO by the stated deadline (late submissions not accepted)
Core learning outcomes
On completion of this unit you should be able to: Assessment number
1 Demonstrate a critical appreciation of how types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions and how they impact people performance, followers and productivity. 1
2
2 Critically evaluate leadership/management styles, leadership problems and challenges and your personal leadership capabilities and needs for future development. 1
2

 

Threshold standards
Assessment number In order to pass the assessment you will need to:
1 Produce, to an acceptable standard, an evaluation and analysis of aspects of particular leadership issues in an organisation through the use of relevant leadership theory.
Compare and contrast differing leadership styles and behaviours in an organisation from differing cultural, geographic and historic perspectives.
2 Produce, to an acceptable standard, an assessment of how varying leadership styles impact upon the organisation and sector and systems
Produce a critical evaluation of the impact of some leadership types upon followers.
Reflect on some aspects of your leadership capability and needs for future personal and organisational development

The Task:
You will produce a written report of 3600 words (+/- 10%) that critically assesses and evaluates your organisation and sector using organisational systems and structures theory (vMEME) and all the types of approaches and models of organisational strategy it contains.
Critically analyse particular leadership problems and challenges through critical evaluation and appropriate application of theory

  1. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions
  2. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles impact people performance, productivity
  3. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles determine who will ‘follow and how’.
  4. Critically evaluate your personal leadership capabilities and critically analyse the need for future development

Through application of Seven Leadership Mindsets Theory (vMEME) you will have a tool (and the skill) to critically assess and evaluate all types of organisational and sector theories worldviews that include USA, UK, China, European countries, India, Oman, GCC, African countries, etc. Leadership is different depending on the relevant mindset (life conditions, how humans individuals adapt to successfully compete and socio-cultural elements). Inevitably leadership mindset impacts everything in a company – strategy, people, performance, productivity, etc.
Instruction: Please answer all of the following questions:
A suggested structure for the written report would include the following: This assignment can be divided into four equally weighted sections. These have been presented as four questions.
 

  1. Having considered the theory, research and science, characteristics of organisations identify and assess:
  1. The seven structures and systems present in your organisation
  2. Analyse and describe how the present Leadership Value Systems and Structures in your organisation impact on leadership, management and staff.
  3. Consider and analyse differences to your competitors (local or global)
  4. Consider to what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation
  1. Now that you understand your organisations structure consider your organisations sector. Critically analyse:
  2. How has your sector evolved?
  3. In what way do they differ to your competitors (local or global)
  4. To what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation

 

  1. Having examined change and transformation critically assess an analyse how to ensure your organisation’s continued growth and success, organisations need to undertake transformation and growth. 
  2. What kinds of changes are taking place in your sector and what do you believe the most successful organisations are doing to embrace the changes required to deliver continued success?
  3. To what extent is your organisation at the forefront of this transformation (or maybe it is trailing some of the best organisations in the sector). Give examples of specific actions and leadership behaviours you are seeing to underpin your view.
  4. Every organisation faces challenges and problems, which can be driven from rapid growth or serious decline. Identify and critically assess:
  1. The top two or three big issues your organisation is facing
  2. Key actions your organisation needs to take to put it on a path of future sustainable success.

 

Criteria Excellent 70% or higher Very Good 60-69% Good 50-59% Satisfactory 40-49% Marginal Fail 35-39% Fail 0 – 34%
Application of theory Draws on major theoretical contributors introduced in the unit and with substantial evidence of independent reading. Draws on most theoretical contributors introduced and with evidence of independent reading. Draws on a good range of theoretical contributors introduced but with limited evidence of wider reading. Attempts to apply   appropriate theory (ies) drawing on published sources introduced. Limited evidence of understanding key issues and concepts. Weak application of appropriate theories and models. Fails to demonstrate detailed understanding. Very little use of published sources. Very little or no attempt to use published sources.  No evidence of understanding key issues and concepts.
Analysis
 
Critical evaluation of an excellent range of directly relevant quality academic and practitioner sources. Demonstrates an excellent understanding and clear practical awareness of the challenges and opportunities in the integration of theory and practice.
 
Critical evaluation of a very good range of relevant quality academic and practitioner sources. Demonstrates a very good understanding and practical awareness of the challenges and opportunities in the integration of theory and practice. Less in-depth than for an A grade. Critical evaluation of a good range of relevant quality academic and practitioner sources. Demonstrates a good understanding of challenges and opportunities in integrating theory and practice.
 
 
Critical evaluation of some relevant quality academic and practitioner sources.  Demonstrate an adequate knowledge and understanding of challenges and opportunities in integrating theory and practice.
Lacks critical analysis and fails to demonstrate an understanding of relevant challenges and opportunities. A random collection of statements with no attempt to use evidence to support the arguments. Nothing of value to the task.
Conclusions Conclusions are valid and clearly derived from in-depth analysis and reflection drawing on application of major theoretical contributors and experiential learning.  Entirely convincing. Conclusions are clearly derived from in-depth analysis through application of most major theoretical contributors and experiential learning.   Largely convincing Conclusions are mainly derived from analysis through application of theoretical contributors and experiential learning.   Limited and not entirely convincing. Conclusions are acceptable but not clearly derived from analysis through application of theoretical contributors and experiential learning.   Validity of conclusions is unconvincing. Conclusions do not follow from the evidence and argument presented. A random collection of statements based on the student’s own point of view with little or no attempt to draw analysis to conclusions.
Recommendations Clear and appropriate recommendations. Professional applicability. Clear and appropriate recommendations. Less comprehensive than for an A grade. Recommendations are reasonably clear and mostly realistic Recommendations are satisfactory but rather vague. Doubtful feasibility Recommendations are unclear or unrealistic No attempt to identify appropriate recommendations
Presentation and Referencing
 
Clearly and concisely structured in report format, sourced throughout and with a comprehensive bibliography. Clearly and concisely structured in report format, sourced throughout and with a good bibliography. Well-structured in report format, sourced throughout and with an adequate bibliography.
 
Acceptable but not in report format. Few citations and a passable bibliography.
 
Few citations and no bibliography. Not in report format. Poorly structured.
 
No citations and not in report format. Poorly structured

Leadership

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"