SHR011-6: Leadership Project

Coursework Information Sheet
To be supplied to students when they receive the coursework assignment task.

Unit Co-ordinator: John Grisby
Unit Name: Leadership Project
Unit Code: SHR011-6 (On campus; Off campus (Oman, Zurich & Poland)
Title of Coursework: Assignment 2: Report on Organisation and Sector Leadership
% weighting of final unit grade: 60%

 
Feedback details
The university policy is that you will receive prompt feedback on your work within 15 working days of the submission date.  Exceptionally where this is not achievable (for example due to staff sickness) you will be notified as soon as possible of the revised date and the reasons behind the change.

Submission Date: 3rd of May
Feedback Date: 15 working days
Details of how to access the feedback: BREO
  • Please refer to the Learning Outcomes and Threshold Criteria as detailed below
  • You must submit your work to BREO by the stated deadline (late submissions not accepted)
Core learning outcomes
On completion of this unit you should be able to: Assessment number
1 Demonstrate a critical appreciation of how types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions and how they impact people performance, followers and productivity. 1
2
2 Critically evaluate leadership/management styles, leadership problems and challenges and your personal leadership capabilities and needs for future development. 1
2

 

Threshold standards
Assessment number In order to pass the assessment you will need to:
1 Produce, to an acceptable standard, an evaluation and analysis of aspects of particular leadership issues in an organisation through the use of relevant leadership theory.
Compare and contrast differing leadership styles and behaviours in an organisation from differing cultural, geographic and historic perspectives.
2 Produce, to an acceptable standard, an assessment of how varying leadership styles impact upon the organisation and sector and systems
Produce a critical evaluation of the impact of some leadership types upon followers.
Reflect on some aspects of your leadership capability and needs for future personal and organisational development

The Task:
You will produce a written report of 3600 words (+/- 10%) that critically assesses and evaluates your organisation and sector using organisational systems and structures theory (vMEME) and all the types of approaches and models of organisational strategy it contains.
Critically analyse particular leadership problems and challenges through critical evaluation and appropriate application of theory

  1. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions
  2. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles impact people performance, productivity
  3. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles determine who will ‘follow and how’.
  4. Critically evaluate your personal leadership capabilities and critically analyse the need for future development

Through application of Seven Leadership Mindsets Theory (vMEME) you will have a tool (and the skill) to critically assess and evaluate all types of organisational and sector theories worldviews that include USA, UK, China, European countries, India, Oman, GCC, African countries, etc. Leadership is different depending on the relevant mindset (life conditions, how humans individuals adapt to successfully compete and socio-cultural elements). Inevitably leadership mindset impacts everything in a company – strategy, people, performance, productivity, etc.
Instruction: Please answer all of the following questions:
A suggested structure for the written report would include the following: This assignment can be divided into four equally weighted sections. These have been presented as four questions.
 

  1. Having considered the theory, research and science, characteristics of organisations identify and assess:
  1. The seven structures and systems present in your organisation
  2. Analyse and describe how the present Leadership Value Systems and Structures in your organisation impact on leadership, management and staff.
  3. Consider and analyse differences to your competitors (local or global)
  4. Consider to what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation
  1. Now that you understand your organisations structure consider your organisations sector. Critically analyse:
  2. How has your sector evolved?
  3. In what way do they differ to your competitors (local or global)
  4. To what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation

 

  1. Having examined change and transformation critically assess an analyse how to ensure your organisation’s continued growth and success, organisations need to undertake transformation and growth. 
  2. What kinds of changes are taking place in your sector and what do you believe the most successful organisations are doing to embrace the changes required to deliver continued success?
  3. To what extent is your organisation at the forefront of this transformation (or maybe it is trailing some of the best organisations in the sector). Give examples of specific actions and leadership behaviours you are seeing to underpin your view.
  4. Every organisation faces challenges and problems, which can be driven from rapid growth or serious decline. Identify and critically assess:
  1. The top two or three big issues your organisation is facing
  2. Key actions your organisation needs to take to put it on a path of future sustainable success.

 

Criteria Excellent 70% or higher Very Good 60-69% Good 50-59% Satisfactory 40-49% Marginal Fail 35-39% Fail 0 – 34%
Application of theory Draws on major theoretical contributors introduced in the unit and with substantial evidence of independent reading. Draws on most theoretical contributors introduced and with evidence of independent reading. Draws on a good range of theoretical contributors introduced but with limited evidence of wider reading. Attempts to apply   appropriate theory (ies) drawing on published sources introduced. Limited evidence of understanding key issues and concepts. Weak application of appropriate theories and models. Fails to demonstrate detailed understanding. Very little use of published sources. Very little or no attempt to use published sources.  No evidence of understanding key issues and concepts.
Analysis
 
Critical evaluation of an excellent range of directly relevant quality academic and practitioner sources. Demonstrates an excellent understanding and clear practical awareness of the challenges and opportunities in the integration of theory and practice.
 
Critical evaluation of a very good range of relevant quality academic and practitioner sources. Demonstrates a very good understanding and practical awareness of the challenges and opportunities in the integration of theory and practice. Less in-depth than for an A grade. Critical evaluation of a good range of relevant quality academic and practitioner sources. Demonstrates a good understanding of challenges and opportunities in integrating theory and practice.
 
 
Critical evaluation of some relevant quality academic and practitioner sources.  Demonstrate an adequate knowledge and understanding of challenges and opportunities in integrating theory and practice.
Lacks critical analysis and fails to demonstrate an understanding of relevant challenges and opportunities. A random collection of statements with no attempt to use evidence to support the arguments. Nothing of value to the task.
Conclusions Conclusions are valid and clearly derived from in-depth analysis and reflection drawing on application of major theoretical contributors and experiential learning.  Entirely convincing. Conclusions are clearly derived from in-depth analysis through application of most major theoretical contributors and experiential learning.   Largely convincing Conclusions are mainly derived from analysis through application of theoretical contributors and experiential learning.   Limited and not entirely convincing. Conclusions are acceptable but not clearly derived from analysis through application of theoretical contributors and experiential learning.   Validity of conclusions is unconvincing. Conclusions do not follow from the evidence and argument presented. A random collection of statements based on the student’s own point of view with little or no attempt to draw analysis to conclusions.
Recommendations Clear and appropriate recommendations. Professional applicability. Clear and appropriate recommendations. Less comprehensive than for an A grade. Recommendations are reasonably clear and mostly realistic Recommendations are satisfactory but rather vague. Doubtful feasibility Recommendations are unclear or unrealistic No attempt to identify appropriate recommendations
Presentation and Referencing
 
Clearly and concisely structured in report format, sourced throughout and with a comprehensive bibliography. Clearly and concisely structured in report format, sourced throughout and with a good bibliography. Well-structured in report format, sourced throughout and with an adequate bibliography.
 
Acceptable but not in report format. Few citations and a passable bibliography.
 
Few citations and no bibliography. Not in report format. Poorly structured.
 
No citations and not in report format. Poorly structured

Leadership

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Qatar University Effects of Leadership on Motivation in PDO Company Paper

Question Description

learning outcomes:

  1. Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding

Critical appreciation of how types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions and how they impact people performance, followers and productivity.

  1. Demonstrate the following skills and abilities

Critically evaluate leadership/management styles, leadership problems and challenges and your personal leadership capabilities and needs for future development.
Produce a written report of that critically assesses and evaluates Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) using organisational systems and structures theory (vMEME) and all the types of approaches and models of organisational strategy it contains.
Critically analyse particular leadership problems and challenges through critical evaluation and appropriate application of theory
1. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions
2. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles impact people performance, productivity
3. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles determine who will ‘follow and how’.
4. Critically evaluate your personal leadership capabilities and critically analyse the need for future development
Through application of Seven Leadership Mindsets Theory (vMEME) you will have a tool (and the skill) to critically assess and evaluate all types of organisational and sector theories worldviews that include USA, UK, China, European countries, India, Oman, GCC, African countries, etc. Leadership is different depending on the relevant mindset (life conditions, how humans individuals adapt to successfully compete and socio-cultural elements). Inevitably leadership mindset impacts everything in a company – strategy, people, performance, productivity, etc.
1. From a consideration of the theory, research, science, and characteristics of organisations identify and assess:

  1. The seven structures and systems present in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO)
  2. Analyse and describe how the present Leadership Value Systems and Structures in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO)impact on leadership, management and staff.
  3. Consider and analyse differences to your competitors (local or global)
  4. Consider to what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation

2. Now that you understand your organisations’ structure consider Petroleum Development Oman (PDO)’ sector. Critically analyse:

  • How has your sector evolved?
  • In what way do they differ to your competitors (local or global)
  • To what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation

3. Having examined change and transformation critically assess an analyse how to ensure Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) continued growth and success, organisations need to undertake transformation and growth.

  • What kinds of changes are taking place in your sector and what do you believe the most successful organisations are doing to embrace the changes required to deliver continued success?
  • To what extent is the Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) at the forefront of this transformation (or maybe it is trailing some of the best organisations in the sector). Give examples of specific actions and leadership behaviours you are seeing to underpin your view.

4. Every organisation faces challenges and problems, which can be driven from rapid growth or serious decline. Identify and critically assess:

  1. The top two or three big issues in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) is facing
  2. Key actions Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) needs to take to put it on a path of future sustainable success.

Very important notes:

  • Assess and demonstrate understanding of how varying leadership styles impact upon the organisation and sector and systems
  • Evaluate and compare the impact of leadership types upon followers.
  • Reflect on aspects of your leadership capability and needs for future personal and organisational development

*** Words count = 3200 words.
*** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Understanding and Leading Change – A/508/0529 – Determine how barriers to change influence leadership decisionmaking And apply a range of leadership approaches to a change initiative.

SubmissionFormat:
1. The submission is in the form of a 15-minute individual PowerPoint presentation and 5
minutes allocated for questions.
2. The presentation slides and speaker notes should be submitted as one copy and uploaded
to turnitin.
3. You are required to make effective use of PowerPoint headings, bullet points and
subsections as appropriate.
4. Your research should be referenced using the Harvard referencing system. Please also
provide a bibliography using the Harvard referencing system.
5. The recommended word limit is 1,500 to 2,000 words, including speaker notes, although
you will not be penalised for exceeding the total word limit.
6. The file must be saved in the format: student ID-ULC-Formative-A2, for formative
submission and student ID-ULC-Summative-A2, for summative assignment.
7. In case of extenuating situations, the relevant college policies apply
Unit Learning Outcomes:
LO3. Determine how barriers to change influence leadership decision-making
LO 4. Apply a range of leadership approaches to a change initiative.
2
AssignmentBrief andGuidance:
With reference to the case study given below you are required to prepare and present a power
point presentation critically evaluating the following
1. Force field analysis in the context of meeting organizational objectives.
2. The effectiveness of leadership approaches.
3. Models of change management.
CASE STUDY : FUTURE OF HUAWEI
Innovation is increasingly important to Chinese businesses – and will become even more as
service-oriented economy emerges. China is already one of the most prominent providers of R&D.
Recent research by Roland Berger shows that China’s share of R&D expenditure worldwide rose to
about 14 per cent in the period between 2007 and 2012. Among China’s innovation stars is Huawei.
Huawei Technologies, founded in 1987 by Ren Zhengfei, is organized around three core business
segments: a carrier network business group, an enterprise business group, and a consumer
business group. With its main office in Shenzhen, Huawei is a private company in which the founder
owns about 1.4 per cent of the shares with the remainder owned by some 70,000 of the company’s
150,000 employees.
Huawei’s innovativeness is demonstrated by its industrious acquisition of patents. By the end of
2010, Huawei had fled 49,040 patent applications (31,869 patent applications in China, 8,892
international patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, and 8,279 overseas patent
applications). Of the 17,765 authorized patents granted, 3,060 were overseas patents.
As a result, the world has started to look at Huawei, with an increased interest but also with some
suspicion. For example, the US has pushed Huawei to the periphery of its telecom market, due to
fears of espionage and suspicion that the company’s products are subsidized by cheap loans from
Chinese banks. Other regions, including the UK, have been more accepting.
Innovation results It would be straightforward to observe that Huawei is innovative in nature
and, therefore, successful. Rather, innovation is a result of Huawei’s values, vision and procedures.
In the case of Huawei, innovation is an outcome. It is not innovation that drives Huawei’s success,
but the process that creates innovation which drives success. This process is grounded in valuedriven leadership; leadership that defines the company’s vision and direction.
Huawei’s Chairman and founder, Ren Zhengfei, is a unique personality who, for the last 25
years, has gained a reputation for leading his company like an army. Ren Zhengfei served in the
People’s Liberation Army and the outside world has mainly focused on the consequences of his
directive leadership style. One famous and widely shared story is that employees are obliged to
take a siesta by sleeping under their desk. This overlooks the role of values in his leadership.
Communication Zhengfei has emphasized that openness, competition and collaboration
complement each other. He strives for a company culture where people’s minds are the main asset
and resource. As such, the ideas of his people complement the company’s values to produce
innovation. Leadership achieves results through a desire to continuously improve and grow rather
than from a desire to simply beat the competition by being first.
3
Relationships matter Zhengfei says: “I do not know anything about technology, but I can bring
people together to work for the collective.” This statement signals a strong belief that there is
infinite strength in organization and collective efforts. Great things, in his view, can only be realized
if everyone is aware that as individuals, they are not that significant. It is all about working
together. He claims that when he founded Huawei, he no longer acted as a technical expert, but
became an organizer.
Humble leadership Zhengfei emphasizes his strength in putting people together and his belief in
the value of talking from the core to do ‘good’ for the organization. His philosophy seems to be
best served by displaying humble leadership. Value-driven leadership Zhengfei argues that the core
value in business should be customers first. According to him, Huawei should always listen to
customers’ needs and expectations and this input should fuel the whole enterprise. It implies that
product development is not simply based on a reactive strategy towards what the competitors are
doing but, rather, on a belief that transformations happen with close collaboration between the
developer and the buyer. This means not simply producing to produce, but rather production based
on the recognition of true needs.
Having a vision – being proactive in the late 1990s, Huawei was doubling its revenue from year
to year. Most of its top managers concluded that they no longer needed much help from foreign
experts. Not Zhengfei. Even in such prosperous times, he did not hesitate to ask IBM to help in
developing and implementing better management systems. This example not only illustrates the
openness of the founder but also signals the proactive nature of his leadership.
When a follower becomes a leader All of this has contributed to the fact that Huawei is better
prepared than most Chinese companies to start thinking as a global rather than a local player, and
to act as an independent entity in a largely government-driven economy.
Huawei challenges:
Today, the challenge for Huawei is to act as a true leader of the industry. And the path to true
leadership is never easy nor smooth. The company faces several challenges in an ever more
complex and global industry.
The primary challenge: lies in maintaining the company’s global leading position while at the
same time trying to incorporate an international focus further into the management of the
company. Now, about two-thirds of the company’s revenue is generated internationally.
Furthermore, overseas offices of Huawei are increasingly localized. For example, the company’s
R&D centers in the US (Santa Clara, Austin, Texas), Canada, Japan, Sweden, Munich, UK and Russia
primarily help in recruiting local talent. Huawei is also faced with many Chinese expats coming back
home. These expats, however, do not think in terms of the old and traditional Chinese management
models.
Huawei must work on several management issues inside the company while at the same time
creating a more open company culture (ie. increased international market share will lead to
demands for greater transparency). These changes will be necessary to stay on top of the industry
without compromising the existence and effectiveness of its innovation strategies based on a
strong value driven culture.
4
As Zhengfei prepares to pass on the leadership baton, it is imperative that leadership becomes
more shared without compromising the value that brought success and innovation. Huawei is
already known for employing a rotating system of CEOs, which fits with its belief that talent from
within the company can move through the ranks. Huawei is a big fan of the idea that anyone can be
transferred across different functions in order to prepare for a long-term career within the
company. The view is that the company will benefit in the long term when people are generalists
rather than specialists. It is unlikely that future leaders will embody the company’s values as
Zhengfei has done.
Huawei needs to work on making sure that its future leaders fully understand the values that
promote the company’s success and innovation. At the same time, they must also be given the
latitude and time to make the values their own. Values can only drive innovation and create a
supporting culture if the values are endorsed by leadership that is perceived as authentic and
sincere. The challenges faced by Huawei and its responses suggest that it is moving in the direction
of becoming a learning organization with shared leadership and management through values.
A learning organization is characterized by the presence of a learning climate that is
participative in nature. In this climate, senior managers and junior employees work and experiment
together to try out new ideas and failure is allowed in the pursuit of growth and progress. Across
different levels within the company, everyone can participate in the value-creation process. And
exactly, because of this reason, it is important that the values that make the company are widely
recognized and supported. Huawei is paving the way for a change, so that the change is embraced,
allowing innovation to follow. This idea is reflected in a proverb used by the company: “The only
thing unchanged is change”.
Source:
Cremer, David & Zhang, Jess. (2014). Huawei to the future. Business Strategy Review. 25, Available at:
http://www.jite.org/documents/DCVol03/v03-01-Huawei.pdf (Accessed: 20th September 2019)

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Week 4 – Assignment: Analyze Trait, Skills, and Behavioral Leadership Approaches

WRITING
Week 4 – Assignment: Analyze Trait, Skills, and Behavioral Leadership Approaches

Northcentral University

Question Description

Analyzing the trait, skills, and behavioral leadership approaches can be helpful in understanding how to improve your leadership style. Utilize the assigned readings for the course, as well as additional applicable scholarly sources, to describe (in sufficient detail) by using supportive references that cite the following: 1) each of these three leadership approaches, 2) the traits, skills, and behaviors of effective leaders you have experienced, 3) the traits, skills, and behaviors you believe you possess that make you an effective educational leader, and 4) the traits, skills, and behaviors you believe you would like to change to improve your effectiveness as an educational leader.
Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages
References: 3-5 scholarly resources
Tags: 
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"