Qatar University Effects of Leadership on Motivation in PDO Company Paper

Question Description

learning outcomes:

  1. Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding

Critical appreciation of how types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions and how they impact people performance, followers and productivity.

  1. Demonstrate the following skills and abilities

Critically evaluate leadership/management styles, leadership problems and challenges and your personal leadership capabilities and needs for future development.
Produce a written report of that critically assesses and evaluates Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) using organisational systems and structures theory (vMEME) and all the types of approaches and models of organisational strategy it contains.
Critically analyse particular leadership problems and challenges through critical evaluation and appropriate application of theory
1. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles differ depending on history, culture, geographic life and conditions
2. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles impact people performance, productivity
3. Critically evaluate how certain types of leadership/management styles determine who will ‘follow and how’.
4. Critically evaluate your personal leadership capabilities and critically analyse the need for future development
Through application of Seven Leadership Mindsets Theory (vMEME) you will have a tool (and the skill) to critically assess and evaluate all types of organisational and sector theories worldviews that include USA, UK, China, European countries, India, Oman, GCC, African countries, etc. Leadership is different depending on the relevant mindset (life conditions, how humans individuals adapt to successfully compete and socio-cultural elements). Inevitably leadership mindset impacts everything in a company – strategy, people, performance, productivity, etc.
1. From a consideration of the theory, research, science, and characteristics of organisations identify and assess:

  1. The seven structures and systems present in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO)
  2. Analyse and describe how the present Leadership Value Systems and Structures in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO)impact on leadership, management and staff.
  3. Consider and analyse differences to your competitors (local or global)
  4. Consider to what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation

2. Now that you understand your organisations’ structure consider Petroleum Development Oman (PDO)’ sector. Critically analyse:

  • How has your sector evolved?
  • In what way do they differ to your competitors (local or global)
  • To what extent are these differences positive points of differentiation or negative traits of the organisation

3. Having examined change and transformation critically assess an analyse how to ensure Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) continued growth and success, organisations need to undertake transformation and growth.

  • What kinds of changes are taking place in your sector and what do you believe the most successful organisations are doing to embrace the changes required to deliver continued success?
  • To what extent is the Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) at the forefront of this transformation (or maybe it is trailing some of the best organisations in the sector). Give examples of specific actions and leadership behaviours you are seeing to underpin your view.

4. Every organisation faces challenges and problems, which can be driven from rapid growth or serious decline. Identify and critically assess:

  1. The top two or three big issues in Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) is facing
  2. Key actions Petroleum Development Oman (PDO) needs to take to put it on a path of future sustainable success.

Very important notes:

  • Assess and demonstrate understanding of how varying leadership styles impact upon the organisation and sector and systems
  • Evaluate and compare the impact of leadership types upon followers.
  • Reflect on aspects of your leadership capability and needs for future personal and organisational development

*** Words count = 3200 words.
*** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Understanding and Leading Change – A/508/0529 – Determine how barriers to change influence leadership decisionmaking And apply a range of leadership approaches to a change initiative.

SubmissionFormat:
1. The submission is in the form of a 15-minute individual PowerPoint presentation and 5
minutes allocated for questions.
2. The presentation slides and speaker notes should be submitted as one copy and uploaded
to turnitin.
3. You are required to make effective use of PowerPoint headings, bullet points and
subsections as appropriate.
4. Your research should be referenced using the Harvard referencing system. Please also
provide a bibliography using the Harvard referencing system.
5. The recommended word limit is 1,500 to 2,000 words, including speaker notes, although
you will not be penalised for exceeding the total word limit.
6. The file must be saved in the format: student ID-ULC-Formative-A2, for formative
submission and student ID-ULC-Summative-A2, for summative assignment.
7. In case of extenuating situations, the relevant college policies apply
Unit Learning Outcomes:
LO3. Determine how barriers to change influence leadership decision-making
LO 4. Apply a range of leadership approaches to a change initiative.
2
AssignmentBrief andGuidance:
With reference to the case study given below you are required to prepare and present a power
point presentation critically evaluating the following
1. Force field analysis in the context of meeting organizational objectives.
2. The effectiveness of leadership approaches.
3. Models of change management.
CASE STUDY : FUTURE OF HUAWEI
Innovation is increasingly important to Chinese businesses – and will become even more as
service-oriented economy emerges. China is already one of the most prominent providers of R&D.
Recent research by Roland Berger shows that China’s share of R&D expenditure worldwide rose to
about 14 per cent in the period between 2007 and 2012. Among China’s innovation stars is Huawei.
Huawei Technologies, founded in 1987 by Ren Zhengfei, is organized around three core business
segments: a carrier network business group, an enterprise business group, and a consumer
business group. With its main office in Shenzhen, Huawei is a private company in which the founder
owns about 1.4 per cent of the shares with the remainder owned by some 70,000 of the company’s
150,000 employees.
Huawei’s innovativeness is demonstrated by its industrious acquisition of patents. By the end of
2010, Huawei had fled 49,040 patent applications (31,869 patent applications in China, 8,892
international patent applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty, and 8,279 overseas patent
applications). Of the 17,765 authorized patents granted, 3,060 were overseas patents.
As a result, the world has started to look at Huawei, with an increased interest but also with some
suspicion. For example, the US has pushed Huawei to the periphery of its telecom market, due to
fears of espionage and suspicion that the company’s products are subsidized by cheap loans from
Chinese banks. Other regions, including the UK, have been more accepting.
Innovation results It would be straightforward to observe that Huawei is innovative in nature
and, therefore, successful. Rather, innovation is a result of Huawei’s values, vision and procedures.
In the case of Huawei, innovation is an outcome. It is not innovation that drives Huawei’s success,
but the process that creates innovation which drives success. This process is grounded in valuedriven leadership; leadership that defines the company’s vision and direction.
Huawei’s Chairman and founder, Ren Zhengfei, is a unique personality who, for the last 25
years, has gained a reputation for leading his company like an army. Ren Zhengfei served in the
People’s Liberation Army and the outside world has mainly focused on the consequences of his
directive leadership style. One famous and widely shared story is that employees are obliged to
take a siesta by sleeping under their desk. This overlooks the role of values in his leadership.
Communication Zhengfei has emphasized that openness, competition and collaboration
complement each other. He strives for a company culture where people’s minds are the main asset
and resource. As such, the ideas of his people complement the company’s values to produce
innovation. Leadership achieves results through a desire to continuously improve and grow rather
than from a desire to simply beat the competition by being first.
3
Relationships matter Zhengfei says: “I do not know anything about technology, but I can bring
people together to work for the collective.” This statement signals a strong belief that there is
infinite strength in organization and collective efforts. Great things, in his view, can only be realized
if everyone is aware that as individuals, they are not that significant. It is all about working
together. He claims that when he founded Huawei, he no longer acted as a technical expert, but
became an organizer.
Humble leadership Zhengfei emphasizes his strength in putting people together and his belief in
the value of talking from the core to do ‘good’ for the organization. His philosophy seems to be
best served by displaying humble leadership. Value-driven leadership Zhengfei argues that the core
value in business should be customers first. According to him, Huawei should always listen to
customers’ needs and expectations and this input should fuel the whole enterprise. It implies that
product development is not simply based on a reactive strategy towards what the competitors are
doing but, rather, on a belief that transformations happen with close collaboration between the
developer and the buyer. This means not simply producing to produce, but rather production based
on the recognition of true needs.
Having a vision – being proactive in the late 1990s, Huawei was doubling its revenue from year
to year. Most of its top managers concluded that they no longer needed much help from foreign
experts. Not Zhengfei. Even in such prosperous times, he did not hesitate to ask IBM to help in
developing and implementing better management systems. This example not only illustrates the
openness of the founder but also signals the proactive nature of his leadership.
When a follower becomes a leader All of this has contributed to the fact that Huawei is better
prepared than most Chinese companies to start thinking as a global rather than a local player, and
to act as an independent entity in a largely government-driven economy.
Huawei challenges:
Today, the challenge for Huawei is to act as a true leader of the industry. And the path to true
leadership is never easy nor smooth. The company faces several challenges in an ever more
complex and global industry.
The primary challenge: lies in maintaining the company’s global leading position while at the
same time trying to incorporate an international focus further into the management of the
company. Now, about two-thirds of the company’s revenue is generated internationally.
Furthermore, overseas offices of Huawei are increasingly localized. For example, the company’s
R&D centers in the US (Santa Clara, Austin, Texas), Canada, Japan, Sweden, Munich, UK and Russia
primarily help in recruiting local talent. Huawei is also faced with many Chinese expats coming back
home. These expats, however, do not think in terms of the old and traditional Chinese management
models.
Huawei must work on several management issues inside the company while at the same time
creating a more open company culture (ie. increased international market share will lead to
demands for greater transparency). These changes will be necessary to stay on top of the industry
without compromising the existence and effectiveness of its innovation strategies based on a
strong value driven culture.
4
As Zhengfei prepares to pass on the leadership baton, it is imperative that leadership becomes
more shared without compromising the value that brought success and innovation. Huawei is
already known for employing a rotating system of CEOs, which fits with its belief that talent from
within the company can move through the ranks. Huawei is a big fan of the idea that anyone can be
transferred across different functions in order to prepare for a long-term career within the
company. The view is that the company will benefit in the long term when people are generalists
rather than specialists. It is unlikely that future leaders will embody the company’s values as
Zhengfei has done.
Huawei needs to work on making sure that its future leaders fully understand the values that
promote the company’s success and innovation. At the same time, they must also be given the
latitude and time to make the values their own. Values can only drive innovation and create a
supporting culture if the values are endorsed by leadership that is perceived as authentic and
sincere. The challenges faced by Huawei and its responses suggest that it is moving in the direction
of becoming a learning organization with shared leadership and management through values.
A learning organization is characterized by the presence of a learning climate that is
participative in nature. In this climate, senior managers and junior employees work and experiment
together to try out new ideas and failure is allowed in the pursuit of growth and progress. Across
different levels within the company, everyone can participate in the value-creation process. And
exactly, because of this reason, it is important that the values that make the company are widely
recognized and supported. Huawei is paving the way for a change, so that the change is embraced,
allowing innovation to follow. This idea is reflected in a proverb used by the company: “The only
thing unchanged is change”.
Source:
Cremer, David & Zhang, Jess. (2014). Huawei to the future. Business Strategy Review. 25, Available at:
http://www.jite.org/documents/DCVol03/v03-01-Huawei.pdf (Accessed: 20th September 2019)

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Week 4 – Assignment: Analyze Trait, Skills, and Behavioral Leadership Approaches

WRITING
Week 4 – Assignment: Analyze Trait, Skills, and Behavioral Leadership Approaches

Northcentral University

Question Description

Analyzing the trait, skills, and behavioral leadership approaches can be helpful in understanding how to improve your leadership style. Utilize the assigned readings for the course, as well as additional applicable scholarly sources, to describe (in sufficient detail) by using supportive references that cite the following: 1) each of these three leadership approaches, 2) the traits, skills, and behaviors of effective leaders you have experienced, 3) the traits, skills, and behaviors you believe you possess that make you an effective educational leader, and 4) the traits, skills, and behaviors you believe you would like to change to improve your effectiveness as an educational leader.
Length: 5-7 pages, not including title and reference pages
References: 3-5 scholarly resources
Tags: 
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

BUS 501: Organisational Behaviour and Leadership

COURSE:
Master of Business Administration
Master of Business Research
Unit: Organisational Behaviour and Leadership
Unit Code: BUS 501
Type of Assessment: Assessment 4 – Major OB Assignment
Unit Learning Outcomes addressed: Learning outcomes – (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e)
(a)  Demonstrate a critical understanding of organisational behaviour.
(b)  Demonstrate an ability to synthesise and apply knowledge and understanding of contemporary theories and research on organisational behaviour to the analysis of case study and research data.
(c)  Demonstrate an ability to research in depth an element of organisational behaviour, and present a coherent argument in essay form.
(d)  Integrate biblical frameworks into a contemporary understanding of leadership and organisational behaviour.
(e)   Apply knowledge in a critical evaluation of the organisation in light of a specific element of organisational behaviour, within an overview of organisational behaviour theory.
Criteria for Assessment: ·         Criterion 1 – Description of the organisation – (5/50)
·         Criterion 2 – Understanding of organisational behaviour concepts or theories – (10/50)
·         Criterion 3 – Organisational behaviour/leadership issue analysis – (10/50)
·         Criterion 4 – Recommendations (20/50)
·         Criterion 5 – References and structure – (5/50)
Assessment Task: The purpose of this assessment is to allow students take on a management perspective to analyse organisational behaviour and leadership and propose recommendations with the aim of improving the situation. This project seeks to create a case study of an organization that requires a change intervention.
 
Students will be required to choose an organisation that they are familiar with and analyse it using relevant organisational behaviour and leadership theories or frameworks to identify areas where improvements need to be made.
 
The organisational change project covers the following:
1.    An introduction to the organisation.
2.    Description and analysis of the organisational behaviour or leadership issue
3.    Literature review – overview of application theories to the identified issue
4.    Evaluation of possible alternative solutions required to improve the situation.
5.    Recommendations of the most suitable strategies.
6.    Conclusion
 
Submission Date: Week 14 (online submission via Turnitin)
Total Mark & Weighting: 50 marks (50%)
Students are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved extension or without approved extenuating circumstances incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day,
calculated from the total mark e.g. a task marked out of 35 will incur a 1.75-mark penalty per calendar day.

 
General notes for assignment
 
Assignments should usually incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion, and will be fully referenced including a reference list.
 
The word count for the assessment is 3000 words (+/- 10%)
 
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count
 
 
General Notes for Referencing
 
References are assessed for their quality. You should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. Your textbook can be used as a reference, but not the lecturer notes. We want to see evidence that you can conduct your own research. Also, in order to help markers, determine students’ understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number/s if shown in the original.
Work that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalized.
 
 
Marking Guide (Rubric):
 
Your assessment would be marked based on the following marking guideline.
 
Total marks – 50
 

Criteria Mark Fail Pass
 
Credit
 
Distinction High Distinction
Criterion 1
Description of the organisation
5 Below 5.0 5.0 – 6.0 6.5 – 7.0 7.5 – 8.0 8.5 and above
Limited and incomplete description, missing many elements Adequate description of, missing a few elements Good and thorough description, includes all elements Very good and thorough description, includes all elements Exceptional and thorough description, includes all elements
Criterion 2
Understanding of organisational behaviour and leadership theories or concepts
10 Below 5.0 5.0 – 6.0 6.5 – 7.0 7.5 – 8.0 8.5 and above
Understanding of the individual concepts or theories not demonstrated Understanding of the individual concepts or theories is satisfactory Understanding of the individual concepts or theories is sound Understanding of the individual concepts or theories is detailed Understanding of the individual concepts or theories is highly integrated
Criterion 3
Organisational behaviour/leadership issue analysis
10 Below 5.0 5.0 – 6.0 6.5 – 7.0 7.5 – 8.0 8.5 and above
Lack of critical analysis of the organisational behaviour/leadership issue
Relevant theories or concepts not applied in the analysis
Limited critical analysis of the organisational behaviour/leadership issue
Limited application of the relevant theories or concepts in the analysis
Some critical analysis of the organisational behaviour/leadership issue
Relevant theories or concepts have been applied in the analysis
Competent level of critical analysis of the organisational behaviour/leadership issue
Relevant theories or concepts have been correctly applied in the analysis
Clear and thorough critical analysis of the organisational behaviour/leadership issue
Relevant theories or concepts been adequately applied in the analysis
Criterion 4
Recommendations
20 Below 10.0 10.0 – 12.0 12.5 – 14.0 14.5 – 16.0 16.5 and above
Limited, insufficient analysis of strategies with few and unclear recommendations Analysis of strategies with fairly established recommendations for implementation. Good analysis of strategies with established recommendations for implementation. Very good analysis of strategies with established recommendations for implementation. Exceptionally thorough analysis of strategies with clearly established recommendations for implementation.
Criterion 5
Structure and mechanics
–       Coherence and organization
–       APA format
 
5 Below 2.5 2.5 – 3.0 3.5 – 3.8 3.9 – 4.4  4.5 and above
An unfocussed, incoherent essay, characterized by disorganization and/or missing required sections.
References are inconsistent with required format; a notable number of errors present.
A somewhat focused, slightly incoherent essay, characterized by some disorganization and/or missing required sections.
References are inconsistent with required format; a number of errors present.
A somewhat coherent and organized essay and including most required sections.
Referencing format is adhered to throughout the essay, with some errors present.
A clear and coherent essay, organized and including all required sections.
Referencing format is rigorously adhered to throughout the essay, with very few errors present.
An exceptionally clear, concise and coherent essay, critically organized and including all required sections.
Referencing format is rigorously adhered to throughout the essay, with no errors present.

 

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"