IBM511 UBT International Business in 2019 Political Trends Case Study

Political Trends Affecting International Business in 2019
China and international trade
As of this writing, U.S.-China relations have soured further after the arrest of Huawei’s Meng Wanzhou in Canada. This appears to represent a warning shot and marks the Trump administration’s resolve to mitigate the trade imbalance, alleged currency manipulation, cyber threats and loss of American intellectual property.
Yet, strained U.S.-China relations seem to cut deeper as the two superpowers are embroiled in an arms race from space to 5G and chip production. The world is watching to see if tariffs represent the long-term trade policy of the United States.
U.S. companies are actively working to restructure their global supply chains, including evaluating options in Mexico, Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam and Thailand. [i] Major retailers, such as Walmart and Best Buy, have indicated to their suppliers that they expect them to mitigate supply risk and are willing to pay more to do so.
Ironically, China is forging a relationship with Russia in opposition to the U.S. When the U.S. first entered into a relationship with China in the 1970s, it was to stem the tide of Russia. In a role reversal, Russia and China are cooperating on a range of policy issues, including energy and security. [ii]
Europe
A decade of crisis leaves Europe in political disarray. Debt, refugees and Brexit have taken a toll. Britain leaves the European Union in March, changing the political underpinnings in Europe. Brexit is not only costing British Prime Minister Theresa May control but is likely to plunge Europe further into economic turmoil.
Nationalist political parties are winning favor in Europe, including in Italy and Austria. EU elections take place in May. German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision not to seek re-election marks a turning point in 2021, as Europe loses its most influential leader at a critical time. [iii] Merkel’s contemporary, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, is slated to succeed her.
Impact of midterm elections & future legislation
The U.S. midterm election only served to widen the political divide as Democrats won the house and Republicans expanded their hold in the Senate. [iv] The “blue wave” was buoyed by the Democratic base, including white female voters under 30 years old. [v]
Democrats fared well in gubernatorial races, including wins in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan — states that would be impacted by a protracted trade war. [vi] Other states relying on exports include Texas, Kentucky and Tennessee. [vii]
In several states, such as Maine and Kansas, incoming Democratic governors have promised to expand Medicare, and measures in Nebraska, Idaho and Utah also provide new benefits to poor families. [viii] Republicans still hold a commanding lead in state legislatures. Democrats lost 968 seats in local state elections during the Obama administration but are now making up ground. [ix]
Democrats do not have enough votes to block President Donald Trump’s judicial appointments. He has already appointed more appellate judges in his first two years than any other president. He is likely to turn his attention to foreign policy, where Dems have less ability to impede his agenda.
But President Trump lacks enough political capital to set his domestic agenda without the support of Congressional moderates. Democrats have unfettered subpoena power and are likely to use it to investigate the President and his allies. [x] As of this writing, the Mueller findings are unknown.
Immigration and employment
Expect Trump to use executive order for action on immigration. The government is approving fewer L1 and H1B visas. [xvi] It is expected that the government will revise the H1B program in favor of highly skilled workers. [xvii]
Employers on the West Coast and Midwest are starving for workers, and the U.S. immigration policy is only exacerbating the hiring crisis.
U.S. military
The U.S. military is conducting an exhaustive review of its supply chain out of concern that its suppliers would not be able to ramp up during a conflict. [xviii] The Pentagon notes the struggle of airlines to increase capacity. Going into 2019, U.S. aerospace and defense contracts have big increases in backlogs. U.S. military also faces significant cyber threats and is having difficulty hiring qualified cyber experts. [xix] They are leaning on the private sector and ramping up standards and audits.
 Global trends
U.S. sanction on Iran may lack teeth without the support of America’s allies, many of whom are committed to the Iran nuclear deal. [xx] France has publicly called on European countries to defy the sanctions.
French President Emmanuel Macron’s call for a “European Army” is not taken seriously by most observers, who view it as a ploy meant to threaten Trump and the American socio-economic-military complex. Britain’s exit from the EU will reduce Europe’s military capabilities. Of NATO allies, over two thirds have committed to spend 2% of their GDP on defense. [xxi]
Trump is catching heat for inaction on Saudi Arabia. Should Trump break ranks, energy prices could be adversely affected.
Africa is a hotbed of economic activity, and China, Russia and others will try to influence its development. Internet connectivity is a boon to investment in education and local economies. [xxii] Corruption is still rampant in some countries with unstable political systems.
The winner in strained U.S.-China relations will be other Asian countries with low cost labor. There will be significant change in Asia in 2019, where there will be elections in India, Indonesia and the Philippines. [xxiii]
While economic strife continues in some Central and South American countries, Brazil is another potential benefactor. Brazil has already seen an uptick in demand of soybeans after China imposed a tariff. [xxiv] Economic strength could stabilize the politics within the region.
 

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

View of International Trade

Question Description

Do you believe that foreign trade helps or hurts the economy overall? Be sure to define what you mean by “helps” or “hurts.” (There is no “right” or “wrong” here.)
Explain your answer using economic concepts or theories. (This is where you gain or lose points – be sure your economic reasoning is solid.)
Has your understanding of International Trade and Trade Policy changed after studying the economic theory behind it? Explain briefly.
I’ll provide the ebook information to the selected tutor. Minmum of 350 words required.
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

UK exiting from the European Union has diversified Britain into two different voices from their own perspectives

Question Description

This is a homework for Environment class, need to answer question and write 600 words about what your thought after read the article, and in the end of the paragraph, write a your own question that you want to ask about this article( include your reference). This is the question you need to solve and write about ” Following World War II, Germany and France initiated discussions to align themselves in a way which would promote rebuilding, future growth and stability. The European Economic Community was formed in 1957 with the six original members: Germany, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Italy joining forces to create the EEC. Great Britain joined in 1973, and remained committed as the EEC transformed into the customs union we now know as the European Union (EU) until the June 23, 2016 vote on the referendum to have Great Britain exit the EU prevailed.
As you read through the information about the effect of BREXIT on the BBC’s website, consider the reasons for the founding nations to have formed the original agreement. Do you think Great Britain made the right decision to leave?”
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-32810887
And then, if that is ok for you, I really need you to read two reviews below here, and you just need to write what you think, 350 words for each of review.
1. The issue of UK exiting from the European Union has diversified Britain into two different voices from their own perspectives. Even though some experts have advocated the consequences of BREXIT, UK citizens still believe that it is worth the risk to withdraw from the EU. After reading the article and doing some deeper research about the issue, I honestly do not have a strong belief on either exiting or remaining in the EU. I do think either way has its own benefits and its own disadvantages. I understand as a UK citizen, the reason that they support BREXIT is because they want to try to protect jobs from other EU members and decrease social instability, such as to terrorist attacks, or crimes due to the free labor movement. However, referring to the article that I have found from the New York Times. it stated that after the referendum, the British economy has appeared to forecast the negatives impacts from BREXIT, such as “Around 10,000 finance jobs will either be moved away from Britain, or created overseas”or “major financial companies in Britain say they will move staff members or operations overseas”. On the business side, the profits will most likely decease and also simultaneously result in job cuts in terms of exiting the common market.
I have heard the reasons from people who support BREXIT, they think rather than using the money towards helping their public health and societal welfare than throwing an abundance of money into the EU but with no signifiant economic performance. Furthermore, the immigration policy is another big concern that they want to exit out. Nevertheless, I think BREXIT can only resolve these issues only for the short term run, and in the future, there are still a lot of challenges that they are facing, especially involving in international trading and trade agreements with other nations, such as renegotiating with a fair free trade agreement. On the other hand, when there is a limitation on the free labor movement, the labor costs of the security industry and also in the manufacturing industry in Britain will increase significantly. Also, I believe the tourist industry will be effected as well, such as a higher flight fees and the monetary exchange. Furthermore, the cost of the construction industry and also the petrochemical industry will grow ascribable to the increase of the tariffs. From my personal perspective, I tend to support British to remain in the EU more than exiting because of the convenience of traveling process and foreign investment process from a foreigner’s view. For the long term run, British should consider the relationship with other nations, instead of focusing on their domestic development. Being isolated from other nations in the global trading environment will affect their trade openness. Ultimately, it will lead to their economic failure and the biggest victim could be their citizens in the end.
what is your thought:
2. I think the United Kingdom is in conflict as to whether the decision to leave the European Union will turn out good or bad for them. This is evident by how close the vote was (with 52% voting to leave, and 48% voting to stay in). Now, it will be up to Prime Minister May to convince them that the decision will be good for the UK in the long-term. She will need to set them as ease about this decision, including the UK citizens who have left to work in the EU, and the EU citizens who have entered UK to work. I think most people in the current EU, whether they are UK citizens or not, will want to know how it will effect them personally such as their citizenship status, job status, and social/economic welfare.
I think the positive points she will likely focus on will be: 1) job and industry opportunities for UK (and maybe EU?) citizens within the UK. 2) economic growth for UK with freedom to leave the EU single market and enter the free trade market. 3) increased domestic production within the UK of the goods and services they have a comparative advantage on. 4) national security for UK citizens through immigration and work visa management 5) self regulation and independent control of their fiscal policies, social and economic affairs without the EU supranational being involved.
However, there are many negative impacts that Prime Minister May will need to acknowledge and develop a plan to address, such as 1) the lower spending power for UK, with the declining value of the pound 2) rising inflation with increasing costs. Both of these directly impact the overall welfare of the UK society. Although the UK decision to exit is based on protectionism of their own interest, power, and economic well-being, it will negatively hurt many people. The members and citizens of the remaining EU nations will also be impacted through loss of jobs.
The EU was established to unify and strengthen the European nations after WWII. I’m concerned that the departure of the UK might lead to the eventual departure of other countries from the EU. I wonder if Prime Minister May has taken this into consideration. Some might follow the UK, and decide to exit as well. If so, how will these departures impact the economic strength and social welfare of the EU? Will it eventually dissolve?
what is your thought:
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Effect of Nigerian currency on International Trade and its Effect on Long Term International Trade Goals,business and finance

Effect of Nigerian currency on International Trade and its Effect on Long Term International Trade Goals,business and finance
Topic: Effect of Nigerian currency on International Trade and its Effect on Long Term International Trade Goals.
Write a doctoral Problem Statement of about 300 words; Purpose Statement; and Research Questions. APA Format.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"