BSB51918 DIPLOMA OF LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT

/in /by

Task 1

Assessment Instructions
For this task, you must plan and undertake an audit of the documented frameworks of the WHS management system at a workplace and report on the outcomes to the WHS manager there.

  • Develop a plan and timeline for the WHS systems documentation audit. This must be approved by the facilitator before the process goes further. The facilitator will provide details of the workplace you will be visiting (your college premises) and will have discussed the project with the WHS manger there.
  • Arrange appointment with WHS manager at the workplace and discuss the plan. Be prepared for alterations according to time and availability. Evidence can be in the form of meeting minutes. These should be discussed with the assessor also. Specifically discuss the quality systems framework that the organisation has and the impacts that it has on the WHS system.
  • Develop the audit checklist and check it with the assessor and the workplace WHS manger. Ensure that the checklist clearly evaluates the WHS system in line with the organisation’s quality systems framework.
  • Undertake the audit using the documents provided by the manager and any areas of work that you might visit.
    Analyse the results of the audit, providing summaries for the data in tables where appropriate. Propose actions to address any problems that might become obvious. Ensure that you include hazard identification for each of the stages that will be involved in making these changes to the workplace. Suggest some methods for communicating the findings to the managers and employees as part of the report.
  • Present the audit report to the WHS manager.

To be deemed competent you will need to successfully demonstrate the following:

  • Plan of audit process including time line for completion.
  • Development of audit checklist.
  • Log book of activities including brief minutes of meetings and all development time and actions undertaken.
  • Audit report including data summaries, analysis and proposals for action (including hazard identification) and communication strategies.

Task 2

Assessment Instructions
There is a large amount of WHS data in the workplace which can provide useful information on a variety of areas. As an effective manager you must be able to summarise and analyse a variety of WHS data which has been given to you. You must also be able to identify trends and suggest possible actions to address any issues arising from the data.
Procedure

  • Carefully read through all the WHS data you have been given. Ask the facilitator if anything is not clear.
  • Group and summarise the data using tables and graphs. For example, you might consider calculating and graphs for Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate, Average Time Lost Rate, Medically Treated Injury Frequency Rate etc.
  • Identify trends and patterns within the data.
  • Analyse these patterns and other factors to produce an action plan to deal with any identified WHS issues.
  • Compile a report using the work you have done in steps 2-4.
  • Ask your facilitator for further clarification.

To be deemed competent you will need to successfully demonstrate the following:

  • The report should include tables and graphs.
  • The report should include analysis of the data and suggestion of actions to address issues arising from the data analysis.

Task 3

Assessment Instructions
This is an individual assessment. You are required to answer a series of questions. You must answer all of the questions below, and include examples where appropriate. Please ensure that you have answered each question with an appropriate level of detail. If you need help understanding any questions, ask your assessor to explain.
Procedure

  • Read the questions carefully and provide the most suitable answer in writing in the space provided.
  • Ask the facilitator if any of the questions are unclear.

To be deemed competent you will need to successfully demonstrate the following:

  • Each question must be answered completely.

QUESTION 1: Complete the table below by ticking one column for each document:
QUESTION 2: Resources and Responsibility Case Study
John has noticed an increase in the number of injuries and back discomfort among the warehouse staff after the introduction of a number of new products. He has therefore developed a new policy on manual order picking to address some of the issues.
The policy is noted below:
Policy 234 – Manual Order Picking
All manual order picking tasks will be undertaken safely with appropriate equipment used to maximise employees working in the Best Working Zone – close to the body between the shoulders and knees.
Question 2a: Identify four human and four financial resources that will be required for this policy to operate effectively.
Question 2b: Identify three responsibilities that the different employees and managers will have for the implementation of this policy.
QUESTION 3: Hazard and Risk Control Case Study
Mario has recently started his own plumbing supplies business after many years experience as a contract plumber. He knows the many hazards that face plumbers on the job but now has to think through those associated with his new shop and warehouse. He needs a forklift to move boxes of fittings and piping and some tall racking in the warehouse to provide the storage space for bulk lots. He will need unloading space for trucks as well as parking areas for customers. His shop will need appropriate lighting and shelving and a helpful customer service counter area. He will also need to consider the security of his warehouse and shop at night.
Identify three key hazards, assess their risk using the table on the following page and suggest two control strategies for each of them. Ensure that one of the controls is to be from the lower end of the control hierarchy and one of them is to be from the higher end.
Risk Assessment Table
Risk Assessment Table
QUESTION 4: Induction and Training Case Study
Mario has some new staff beginning next week. He needs to ensure that they are ready to start work safely and are able to continue to work safely, building his business over the years to come.
Question 4a: Develop a list of broad headings for six induction activities for Mario’s employees using the format given below.
Question 4b: Note six key areas of training and competency that will be important to support the WHS management system in the company. Ensure that you think through all of the areas of responsibility that his staff will have.
QUESTION 5: Communication Case Study
Mario has realised that WHS management has a lot to do with communication and good relevant ongoing systems. He realises that he needs to plan communication methods that are helpful for his managers as well as his employees.
Develop a list of six communication strategies for Mario’s company using format given below. Indicate which are more appropriate for managers, for employees and which will be useful both by noting this in the right column of the table. Ensure that there is at least one from each of the managers, employees or both categories.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

PROJ6000 PRINCIPLES OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY ASSESSMENT

/in /by

 

ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and Title PROJ6000 Principles of Project Management
Assessment Assessment 2 – Project Selection Methods and Initial Documents
Individual/Group Individual
Length 1500 words
Learning Outcomes Successful completion of this assignment will result in achievement of the following subject learning outcomes:

  1. Understand PMBOK knowledge areas and process groups and their role, relevance and impact on project management best practice and PMI’s Code of Ethics.
  2. Critically compare and contrast project management approaches and their appropriateness for managing a variety of project types.
  3. Apply appropriate project management tools and techniques, paying particular attention to risk management.
Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 3
Weighting 35%
Total Marks 35 Marks

 
Context:
A project is a temporary Endeavour undertaken to provide an expected and beneficial outcome. A project life cycle is the series of phases that a project passes through from its initiation to its closure. Project goals should align with organisational goals such as improved operations or increased revenues, reducing costs or improving efficiencies.
Before resources can be committed to a project, the reason for its proposal and the benefits it is expected to deliver need to be understood by people in positions empowered to make decisions about the expenditure of an organisation’s resources. The selection of organisational projects is typically performed through a method of classification and review of the project’s business case. That method of course should be applied consistently to all project proposals.
Instructions:
For this assessment, you research different methods of selecting projects and examine the initiation process. You also consider the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) guide and, more specifically, explore the initiation documents.
Assessment 2: Project Selection Methods and Initiation Documents (35%)
In essay writing, use the given/approved project throughout this assessment.
As you have discovered in your learning resources, examine project selection methods that can be applied appropriately to the given project and processes to conduct these methods. Consider the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and describe the initial process group and project documents that are created or used as inputs for a new project.
Your assessment should contain 1500 words.
Output and Submission:
Submit your completed assessment by the end of Module 3.
Learning Resources:
Government of Tasmania (n. d.). PM-902 Business Case (Small) Template & Guide. Retrieved from http://www.egovernment.tas.gov.au/project_management/getting_started_in_project_ma nagement
Herman, B. and Siegelaub, J. (2009). Is this really worth the effort?: The need for a business case. Retrieved from https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/need-business-case-6730
Laureate Education (Producer). (2013) The practice of project management [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Learning and Academic Skills Unit. (2016). Academic Writing Guide. APA 6th ed. Sydney, Australia: Laureate Australia.
NSW Treasury. (2018). NSW Government Business Case Guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.treasury.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2018-08/TPP18- 06%20%20NSW%20Government%20Business%20Case%20Guidelines.pdf
Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
Project Management Institute. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: PMI.
Project Management Institute. (n.d.). Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Retrieved from http://www.pmi.org/About-Us/Ethics/Code-of-Ethics.aspx
Wysocki, R. K. (2014). Effective project management: Traditional, agile, extreme (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
Document: Guidelines for Statement of Work (PDF)
Assessment Criteria:
The assessment will be graded using the Learning Rubrics below and is worth 35% of the total for the subject.

Assessment Attributes Fail (0-49) Pass (50-64) Credit (65-74) Distinction (75-84) High Distinction (85-100)
Content, Audience and Purpose 
10%		 Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Demonstrates limited awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Consistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment.
Correct citation of key resources and evidence 
10%		 Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. 
There are mistakes in the APA style.		 Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. 
There are no mistakes in the APA style.		 Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. 
There are no mistakes in the APA style.		 Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence 
There are no mistakes in the APA style.		 Demonstrates use of high- quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence 
There are no mistakes in the APA style.
Effective Communication 
30%		 Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments.
Knowledge and Limited understanding of Knowledge or Thorough knowledge or Highly developed A sophisticated
understanding 
60%		 required concepts and knowledge i.e. a business case and the differing uses of a SoW. 
Key components of the assignment are not addressed.		 understanding of the field or discipline (a business case and the differing uses of a SoW). 
Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.
 
Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.		 understanding of the field or discipline/s (a business case and the differing uses of a SoW). 
Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.
 
Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.		 understanding of the field or discipline/s (a business case and the differing uses of a SoW). 
Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
 
Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.		 understanding of the field or discipline/s (a business case and the differing uses of a SoW). 
Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
 
Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.

 
Maxima LT is the largest retail trade operator in the Baltic States, and it achieved the turnover of EUR 1.85 billion in 2006. It shows around 21 % growth in turnover from the previous year 2005 and the company forecasts a 20% growth in turnover this year (2007). Currently the company operates over 370 retail outlets in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Bulgaria. The number of shops by country is as follows: Lithuania
– 209, Latvia – 115, Estonia – 39, Bulgaria – 17. All together MAXIMA LT has around 14,500 employees in Lithuania. In other countries MAXIMA LT has some 8,500 employees.
Key findings
MAXIMA is the largest employer in the Baltics and it recognises that its strength are largely based on its employees whose professionalism, loyalty and spirit have played a crucial role when the business has built its position as the leading retailer in the Baltic countries. A MAXIMUM has set the strategic objective to recruit, train and keep the best employees and to earn their loyalty. On top of that, it seeks to maximise the output by applying as many automated work processes as possible. As part of the business planning MAXIMA stores and shopping centres are positioned at shopping-friendly locations. Issues that are considered in the decision-making include the size of the local populace, the traffic and flow of shoppers, the convenience for shoppers to access the store by private and public transport. The name of the entire chain, MAXIMA is seen as a guarantee for uniform quality and the best prices. In order to take into account the different needs of shoppers, the outlets come in different sizes and different formats including local community stores, stores designed for large city districts or towns with populations of 12,000 – 30,000, and the largest regional and national shopping centres are hypermarkets that offer the most extensive assortment of goods.

Nature and Organisation of R&D in services

MAXIMA have no dedicated R&D unit. However, each organisational unit is charged with responsibility to survey trends/novelties in their respective areas and make proposals for improvement projects. Also the organisation improvements are assigned to the managers at all organisational levels. Systematic R&D in services is partly built into the corporate strategy process that utilises the Balanced Scorecard methodology. Gaps between existing situation and strategic objectives are filled in with strategic initiatives/projects. Responsible managers are assigned to implement the projects and budgets are assigned to those projects that are accepted for further development.
Although MAXIMA have developed high level of competency in the new shops construction projects, it seeks to continuously improve competencies in managing strategic projects. The company’s major challenges are to ensure a critical mass of project-minded people and to manage timely involvement and communication on project activities within the large organisation.
The cornerstone of the business is the provision of convenience shopping to customers – through suitable shopping formats and services available within in them. In addition to traditional retailing activities, the service offer includes mobile communications services (through a provider owned by MAXIMA), insurance services, MAXIMA has recently launched the air ticket vouchers service with an airline partner (customers can buy air ticket vouchers at check-out counters in shops). A MAXIMUM is also testing a new service which allows customers to pay their communication services bills at check-out counters in the retail outlets. The company operates a Customer loyalty card programme that provides its members access – at privileged terms – to services of partner businesses working in pharmacy, petrol and other sectors. Within supermarket and hypermarket formats MAXIMA stores have dedicated space for tenants who provide a wide array of services to shoppers.
A MAXIMUM also has firm plans to continue to add new services to its existing portfolio. In terms of services efficiency, MAXIMA constantly analyses customer self-service options and invest heavily into supply chain improvements. In terms of public funding EU structural funds are used to support staff competence development in the service organisation.
 
Dear Students
You may find the following information/assumptions about Maxima case study useful to understand and propose business cases and apply the selection methods to them.

  1. Consider that the organisation in 2006 has a turnover of EUR 85 Billion (as per the case study) and their goal is to reach EUR 4 Billion in 2012.
  2. Consider the following Mission/Vision/Values of the organisation:

Maxima’s” mission We responsibly create value by ensuring the best price, assortment, and customer service.
Vision Most valued Retail Company in Lithuania.
Values:
We work for the customers

  • We work in such a way that makes customers want to come back again.
  • We treat our customers fairly.·
  • We offer what customers need.

Everyone is important·

  • I treat someone the way I want to be treated.·
  • I respectfully communicate with colleagues, partners, and clients.
  • I am a responsible member of the community.

A united team·

  • We listen to each other.·
  • We share knowledge and experience.
  • We respect the work and time of others.

I just do it·

  • We are active.·
  • We take responsibility.
  • We support initiatives.

(Source: Maxima Lt (n.d.) About us. Maxima Lt. Retrieved from https://www.maxima.lt/en/about-company/about-us)

  1. Consider that, for the company to achieve the above, they have 3 different So think about what could be 3 new projects that the organisation could do to achieve that. Please explain briefly in your assessment what are these ideas for new projects (assume you’ll have 3 business cases).
  2. From the 3 business cases, consider and apply different selection methods that Maxima could used to select one of the 3 projects (follow the Assessment brief requirements for it)
  3. From this process, choose one of these ideas/business cases to be initiated as a project and describe the Initial Process Group according to the PMBOK (follow the Assessment brief requirements of it)
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

THL124 MARKETING AND BUSINESS FOR THE SERVICE SECTOR ASSESSMENT ANSWERS

/in /by

Assessment Brief:
London Is A City Of Events And Festivals. Every Year, There Are A Huge Range Of Activities For The Visitors To See And Do Along The River Themes With Entertainment, Food And Drink To Enjoy. They Can Also Expect Fireworks, Live Music And Grand Parades.
TASK: 
In Your Role As A Marketing Manager For Your London Based Tourism Hospitality Event Organisation, You Have Ben Briefed By The Senior Management Team To Develop A Marketing Plan In Relation To One Of The Following Options:
A: Create A Marketing Plan For An Existing Tourism, Hospitality Or Events Product/Service To Increase Customer Engagement And Sales During Any Chosen Event In London In 2019.
B: Create A Marketing Plan For The Development Of A New Tourism, Hospitality Or Events Product/Service To Increase Customer Engagement And Sales During Any Chosen Event In London In 2019.
Module Leader: Leteechia Rungasamy
learning outcomes
Testing learning outcomes 1‐3 and contributing 50% of the final module mark.
Learning outcomes upon successful completion of this module, students will have demonstrated: ‐ :
Knowledge

  1. Knowledge of the fundamentals of marketing and its application to the tourism, hospitality and events sectors in its broadest
  2. Knowledge of business processes as a complex system of analysis, planning and implementation in tourism, hospitality and
  3. Knowledge of the role of the tourism, hospitality and events consumer within marketing and business

Skills:

  1. The ability to apply knowledge to the creation of a business and marketing plan for use in the tourism, hospitality and events sectors.

Assessment

This module has two assessments.
Assessment 1: Individual Project (50%) and Assessment 2: Examination (50%).
Assessment 1: Individual Written Project (50%)
For this assessment, you will produce individually a formal written project of approximately 2500 words excluding references and appendices. This assesses learning outcomes 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Please read carefully the following instructions:
Assessment 1 Brief:
Background
London is a city of events and festivals. Every year, there are a huge range of activities for the visitors to see and do along the river Thames with entertainment, food & drink to enjoy. They can also expect fireworks, live music and grand parades. Mayor of London (2019) states “these events offer something different, keeping the crowds entertained and ensuring that they remain as a cherished memory in their minds for many years to come.”
Task:
In your role as a Marketing Manager for your London based tourism/hospitality/event organisation, you have been briefed by the senior management team to develop a marketing plan in relation to ONE of the following options:
A: Create a marketing plan for an existing tourism, hospitality or events product/service to increase customer engagement and sales during any chosen Event in London in 2019.
B: Create a marketing plan for the development of a new tourism, hospitality or events product/service to increase customer engagement and sales during in any chosen Event in London in 2019.

Assessment 1 deadline: Individual Written Project ‐ TBC

Provisional marks and feedback are released within four working weeks of your submission.
Word count: 2500 words
It is  important to adhere to the prescribed  word  count limit to avoid  any penalties.
Your word count excludes table of title page, table of content, any appendices and reference
list/bibliography. The word count must be stated at the bottom of your title page. Please note falsifying the word count is classed as an academic misconduct.
Table 1 Applied Penalties for exceeding the word count.

Word limit Penalty Actual Word Count
Exceeds limit by up to 10% No penalty – tolerance band(see below) 3300
Exceeds limit by 10.1-20% -5% 3301 – 3600
Exceeds limit by 20.1-30% -10 % 3601 – 3900
Exceeds limit by 30.1-40% -15 % 3901 – 4200
Exceeds limit by 40.1-50% -20 % 4201 – 4500
Exceeds limit by more than 50% Mark of zero 4501+

For further information see AQH‐F14 Policy on Penalties for Exceeding the Prescribed Word
Limit for an assignment https://goo.gl/ckLmDZ.

Assessment 2:

Written Exam (50%)
Exam Date: (Exact date, place and time – TBC)
Testing learning outcomes 1‐3 and contributing 50% of the final module mark.

Assessment Criteria

Your seminar tutor on the basis of the following general criteria will assess the paper:

  • The university generic assessment criteria
  • Discretion – additional credit may be awarded to a student who tackles a difficult subject well.
  • The “Presentation” element of the Generic Assessment Criteria will be used to assess the report

Assessment Regulations

For further information regarding Assessment Regulations, extenuating circumstances or extensions and academic integrity, please refer to your Programme Handbook on the University of Sunderland in London information page on Canvas.

Reading List

Please access your reading list from the library website. To access it, please go to https://moduleresources.sunderland.ac.uk/ and search for your module.

Submission guidelines

There are currently two steps that you need to follow to ensure that you successfully submit your work for marking. Your submission links will become available approximately 3 weeks prior to your submission deadline, along with detailed instructions on how to submit your assignment, but in the meantime please feel free to also watch this Assignment Submission Instructions video.

Grading

You will be marked in accordance to the University of Sunderland assessment criteria attached below. The assessment criteria covers; Relevance, Knowledge, Analysis, Argument and Structure, Critical Evaluation, Presentation, Reference to Literature.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

SCM120 SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT

/in /by
Pages/Words limit: 2,500 words max
Company:   FUNDBOX Company which is Fintech startup company

MSc Supply Chain Management and Global Logistics
Module: Supply Chain Finance and Risk Management [SCM120]

  • Please Note: You are permitted to upload your Coursework in the final submission area as many times as you like before the deadline. You will receive a similarity/originality score which represents what the Turnitin system identifies as work similar to another source. The originality score can take over 24 hours to generate, especially at busy times e.g. submission deadline.
  • If you upload the wrong version of your Coursework, you are able to upload the correct version of your Coursework via the same submission area. You simply need to click on the ‘submit paper’ button again and submit your new version before the  deadline.

In doing so, this will delete the previous version which you submitted and your new updated version will replace it. Therefore your Turnitin similarity score should not be affected. If there is a change in your Turnitin similarity score, it will be due to any changes you may have made to your Coursework.

  • Please note, when the due date is reached, the version you have submitted last, will be considered as your final submission and it will be the version that is marked.
  • Once the due date has passed, it will not be possible for you to upload a different version of your assessment. Therefore, you must ensure you have submitted the correct version of your assessment which you wish to be marked, by the due date.

Your overall total word count should not exceed 2,500 words (Weighted at 30% of final mark for the module)

Course Work Description:

In class we have learned that traditional banks and Fintechs (innovative start-ups in the financial technology sector) offer supply chain finance solutions. In recent years many different Fintechs have emerged. All of these Fintechs are somewhat different in their value proposition.

This coursework consists of two parts:

  1. Provide an overview on the competitive landscape of these Fintechs (40% of report). You can easily identify these Fintechs by browsing the internet.
  2. Select a Fintech of your choosing and describe their value proposition in detail (60% of report). In particular, describe what products they offer and how they differ from their key competitors. What would you recommend the Fintech do in order to become more successful in the future? Support your recommendations by a rigorous analysis of the chosen Fintech

For the report, you may want to add an introduction section with a general overview and a conclusion section that summarises your findings.
Upon completion of this project, you will have gained a deeper understanding of how technology shapes the financial flow of a company. The project will draw upon the skills, concepts and models addressed throughout the module and apply them in a real-world setting.
With this course work you should

  • Conduct research and synthesise the relevant information;
  • Identify and use appropriate analytical concepts and frameworks from the module;
  • Develop a systematic recommendation for the identified operations challenge;
  • Communicate clearly and present your work to professional standards.
Meeting assignment objective – was the objective understood?
Research – was relevant data collected for the analysis and final recommendations?
Theory to practice – is there a clear link from theory learned from the course to structure thinking,analyse the case, and build credibility for practical actions?
Recommendations – did suggested actions follow logically from the data and analysis?
Presentation – was the project clearly structured, explained well, and produced to good standard?
Knowledge and understanding – is there clear evidence of knowledge and understanding of the theories and concepts from the academic literature discussed in class, from the reading list and fromwider reading?
Argument, structure, and style – was the work structured with clarity, relevance and coherence; ability to argue a case; clear evidence of analysis and logical thought; use of evidence to supportarguments; appropriate academic style with correct referencing?
Critical analysis – is there critically engagement and evaluation with material; recognition ofalternative interpretations; synthesis of the literature showing willingness to apply an independent approach or interpretation; avoidance of excessive generalizations or gross oversimplifications?

 

Instructions:

Assessment Criteria:

Please refer to Appendix B of the Programme Regulations for detailed Assessment Criteria.

Plagiarism:

This is cheating. Do not be tempted and certainly do not succumb to temptation. Plagiarised copies are invariably rooted out and severe penalties apply. All assignment submissions are electronically tested for plagiarism. More information may be accessed via:
https://supplychain.elearning.london.ac.uk/mod/lesson/view.php?id=487

Penalties for exceeding the word count:

There are penalties for exceeding the specified word count.

  • The maximum word limit for this coursework assignment is 2,500 words (excluding the list of references).
  • You may use less than 2,500 words but in so doing you may be penalising yourself as it is likely to be challenging to respond to the coursework
  • You MUST state an accurate word count (excluding the list of references) at the end of your work. If you do not state an accurate word count your mark will be reduced by 5
  • The content within the main body of text comprises the overall word count, including in-text citations, references, quotes, heading and sub-headings. The cover page, reference list and any appendices do not count towards the overall word
  • If you submit more than 2,500 words the following penalties apply:
  1. Up to 5% more than 2,500 words – no penalty
  2. 5% to 10% more than 2,500 words – your mark will be reduced by 5 marks;
  3. For more than 10% than 2,500 words you will receive zero marks for this work.
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"