Black Lives Matter.

Black Lives Matter.
Essentially your question is: How can we understand/analyze the Black Lives Matter movement from the perspective of your chosen theory/theorist (s)?
This is your opportunity to practice applying theory to an actual empirical case.
ESSAY 1600 words. essay that draws on the bellow readings that uses theory to analyze this newspaper .
The purpose of this essay is to apply theory to an empirical case, in this case the “data” is that which is found in the newspaper articles. So treat the article as the data which will be analyzed using the theoretical framework of your choice, as long as it draws specifically on the readings bellow, you have the option of instead using the novel “A Thousand Splendid Suns” by Khaled Hosseini as the “source” for this essay. In this case the events of the novel and their impacts on the characters can be analyzed using the theoretical framework of your choice, as long as it draws specifically on the readings required in the readings bellow.
Topic: Black Lives Matter
Sources: http://blacklivesmatter.com/ This is your primary source. You should read and draw on the main sections Who We Are and What We Believe in your essay.
The second source is http://www.blacklivesmattersyllabus.com/ the Black Lives Matter Syllabus of Professor Frank Leon Roberts. You can use any resources from that website to draw on for “data” examples to support your argument. There are news items, videos, writings. You do not need to use or draw on ALL of them, you can choose anything you find useful to support your argument.
Objective: Use the “data” from your sources to analyse the Black Lives Matter Movement through any of the theoretical lenses/frameworks you have studied this term. While you can draw on more than one theorist or framework, remember that you are striving for a strong coherent essay, so it might be more effective to carefully choose and limit the scope of your theoretical framework. The same goes for the data, you should focus on one or two aspects of the movement for your essay, rather than trying to cover all of them.
Essentially your question is: How can we understand/analyze the Black Lives Matter movement from the perspective of your chosen theory/theorist (s)?
This is your opportunity to practice applying theory to an actual empirical case.
Sources:
http://www.blacklivesmattersyllabus.com/
: http://blacklivesmatter.com/
• Calhoun, Craig et al. (ed.) Contemporary Sociological Theory. 3rd Edition. (Malden, MA ; Oxford: Blackwell), 2012.
• Seidman, Steven & Alexander, Jeffrey C. The New Social Theory Reader. 2nd Edition. (London: Routledge), 2008.
• Giddens, Anthony (2002) Runaway World Profile Books
• Okun, Rob. (ed) (2014). Voice Male: The Untold Story of the Pro-feminist Men’s Movement. Interlink Publishing.
• Castells, Manuel (2013) Communication Power, Oxford University Press.
• Morozov, Evgeny (2014) To Save Everything, Click Here. Penguin

Introduction to Part IX Modernity and Postmodernity, pp. 491-498
• Bauman, Zygmunt. “Modernity and the Holocaust” [1989]
• Beck, Ulrich. “The Cosmopolitan Perspective”, [2000] pp. 325-335.
• Kaldor, Mary. “Global Civil Society: An Answer to War”, [2003] pp. 252-260
• Wallerstein, Immanuel. “The Modern World-System in Crisis” [2004].
• Bourdieu
• Introduction. pp. 325-333.
• Structures, Habitus, Practices
• Bourdieu: The Forms of Capital (in reader)
• https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm
• Camic, C. (1986). The matter of habit. American journal of sociology, 1039-1087. (in reader) http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/chwe/austen/camic1996.pdf
• Introduction to Micro-sociology, pp. 25-34.
• Goffman, Erving. “The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life” [1959.
• Hochschild, Arlie R., (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure.American journal of sociology, 551-575. (In reader).
• http://www.manuallabours.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Hoschild-article.pdf
Introduction, pp.389-397.
• Smith, Dorothy E. “The Conceptual Practices of Power” [1990].
• Hill Collins, Patricia. “Black Feminist Epistemology [1990]”.
• Fanon, Frantz. “Black Skin, White Masks” [1952], pp. 337-345.
• Patterson, Orlando. “The Paradoxes of Integration” [1997], pp. 346-354.
• Said, Edward. “Orientalism”, [1978] pp. 423-426.
• Omit and Winant, “Racial Formation”, [1986] pp.405-415.
• Frankenburg, Ruth. “The Mirage of an Unmarked Whiteness”, [2001] pp.416-422.
• Fraser, Nancy “ From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a Post-socialist Age” pp. 188-196
• Connell, R.W. “Gender as a Social Practice”, [2005] pp. 369-375. (from Masculinities)
• [In: Voice Male (2014) Edited by Rob A. Okun]
• Pp 1-48 Brief History of Profeminist Men’s Movement
• Pp 127-147 Color Lines
• Pp 211-258 Men and Feminism
• Pp. 287-339 Overcoming Violence
• Dahlberg, L. and Siapera, E. (eds) (2007) Radical Democracy Theories and the Internet; (In reader)
• Castells, M. (2013) Communication Power (Chapters 1-3, pp. 10-136)
• Morozov, E. (2013) To Save Everything Click Here (Chapters 1-2, Chapter 4-5, pp. 1-62, pp. 100-180)


Place an order with us to get a customized paper similar to this or any related topic. NB: The assignment will be done from scratch and it
will be 100% original.
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Perspectives in Criminology

Assessment:
RESEARCH Essay (2,000 Words) Worth: 60%
Due:
BEFORE Friday 27 May, 2016, 5:00 PM
Write an essay answering one of the following questions:
1. Citing examples, discuss the relationship between neoliberal ideology and corporate crime.
2. Discuss recent public concern surrounding outlaw motorcycle gangs in relation to law and order politics. Has a “law and order common sense” been produced in public and media discourse? How and to what effect?
3. Discuss how the process of privatisation can be seen as related to risk, fear and insecurity using the example of the growth of the private security industry.
4. The International Criminal Court receives criticism for being unable to fulfil its mandate. Critically discuss the contradictions that its goal of “global justice” raises in relation to issues of sovereignty.
• Please note that for this assignment you are required to cite at least 10 academic references. Note: Wikipedia, lecture notes and media articles are NOT academic references. If you do use media articles, these will be considered in addition to your required references.
• Students are strongly encouraged to extend their research to additional readings. Please visit the library website for literacy resources.
• Assessment guidance will be provided in tutorials.
1. ESSAY PREPARATIONS AND RESEARCH:
• You need to relate your essay to the specific topic provided in this Guide. You cannot create your own topic. It is essential that you read the instructions for your assignment.
• You are expected to have basic knowledge about how to do academic research (both online and in the Library). If you would like help, or are unsure about how to research academic material, please ask either your unit coordinator or tutor for help. If you do require help, please ensure that you that approach your teaching staff well before the assignment due date.
• Wikipedia is not an academic source!
• Make sure you follow the Harvard referencing style guide from the UWS Library website.
• Preparation is key to good writing. The more time you spend mapping out your assignment, the more likely it is that you will produce a coherent and convincing argument.
2. ESSAY STRUCTURE, CONTENT AND PRESENTATION:
• Your essay should be 1.5 or double spaced.
• Your assignment should be sufficiently titled so as to indicate the question you have selected.
• Your reference list must be included at the end of your essay. Failure to include a reference list can result in an automatic failure and can constitute serious academic misconduct.
• Avoid overly long sentences and. Simple is better.
3. BEFORE SUBMISSION:
• You need to read your essay prior to submission. If it doesn’t make sense to you, it won’t make sense to your marker either.
• RUN A SPELLING AND GRAMMAR CHECK.
• Make sure all your references are fully and properly acknowledged (including page numbers for direct quotations
—————–
Recommended Readings
Week 1: Introduction to Perspectives in Criminology
• Garland, D 2001, ‘The new culture of crime control’, in The culture of control: crime and social order in contemporary society, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 167-92.
• Garland, D & Sparks, R 2000, ‘Criminology, social theory and the challenge of our times’, in Criminology and social theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1-22.
Week 2: Globalisation and the Changing Nature of Crime
• Aas, F 2007, ‘Crime, fear and social exclusion in the global village’, in Globalization and crime, Sage, London, pp. 1-26.
• Gillespie, W 2006, ‘Capitalist world-economy, globalization, and violence: implications for criminology and social justice’, International Criminal Justice Review, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 20-44.
Week 3: Neoliberalism, Responsibilisation and Shifting Forms of Crime Prevention
• Muncie, J 2005, ‘The globalization of crime control – the case of youth and juvenile justice: neo-liberalism, policy convergence and international conventions’, Theoretical Criminology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35-64.
• O’Malley, P 2008, ‘Neo-liberalism and risk in criminology’, in T Anthony & C Cunneen (eds), The critical criminology companion, Hawkins Press, Sydney, pp. 55-67.
Week 4: Sovereignty, Transnational Crime and the Impact of its Counter-measures
• McCulloch, J 2007, ‘Transnational crime as productive fiction’, Social Justice, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 19-32.
• Pickering, S 2004, ‘The production of sovereignty and the rise of transversal policing: people-smuggling and federal policing’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 362-79.
Week 5: Law and Order Trends
• Brown, D & Hogg, R 1996, ‘Law and order commonsense’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 175-91.
• Kraska, PB 2007, ‘Militarization and policing – its relevance to 21st century police’, Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 501-13.
Week 6: Corporate Crime and Crimes Against the Environment.
• Friedrichs, DO 2007, ‘White-collar crime in a postmodern, globalized world’, in H Pontell & G Geis (eds), International handbook of white-collar and corporate crime, Springer, New York, pp. 163-84.
• White, R 2005, ’Environmental crime in global context: exploring the theoretical and emprical complexities’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 271-85
Week 7: Crime, Space and Social Exclusion
• Martin, G 2011, ‘Showcasing security: the politics of policing space at the 2007 Sydney APEC meeting’, Policing and Society, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 27-48.
• Young, J 1999, ‘From inclusive to exclusive society’, in The exclusive society: social exclusion, crime and difference in late modernity, Sage, London, pp. 1-30.
Week 9: State Crimes, War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity
• Green, P & Ward, T 2004, ‘War crimes’, in State crime: governments, violence and corruption, Pluto Press, London, pp. 147-64.
• Grewcock, M 2008, ‘State crime: some conceptual issues’, in T Anthony & C Cunneen (eds), The critical criminology companion, Hawkins Press, Leichhardt, Australia, pp. 146-57.
Week 10: Torture and Indefinite Detention
• Pratt, J 1995, ‘Dangerousness, risk and technologies of power’, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 3-31.
• Stanley, E 2008, ‘Torture and terror’, in T Anthony & C Cunneen (eds), The critical criminology companion, Hawkins Press, Leichhardt, Australia, pp. 158-68.
Week 11: Privatisation and the Growth of Criminal Justice
• Loader, I 2000, ‘Plural policing and democratic governance’, Social & Legal Studies, vol. 9, pp. 323-45.
• Pratt, J 2008, ‘Penal populism and the contemporary role of punishment’, in T Anthony & C Cunneen (eds), The critical criminology companion, Hawkins Press, Leichhardt, Australia, pp. 265-76.
Week 12: Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism
• McCulloch, J & Pickering, S 2009, ‘Pre-crime and counter-terrorism: imagining future crime in the ‘war on terror”, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 628-45.
• Michaelsen, C 2012, ‘The triviality of terrorism’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 431-49.
Week 13: Global Criminal Justice Administration
• Findlay, M 2008, ‘Globalised crime and governance: the outcomes for understanding international criminal justice’, in T Anthony & C Cunneen (eds), The critical criminology companion, Hawkins Press, Leichhardt, Australia, pp. 315-29.
• Kwon, O 2007, ‘The challenge of an international criminal trial as seen from the bench’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 360-76.
Additional Readings:
• Agamben, G 1998, ‘Part One: the logic of sovereignty’, in Homo sacer: sovereign power and bare life, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 4-46.
• Brown, D 2008, ‘Giving voice: the prisoner and discursive citizenship’, in T Anthony & C Cunneen (eds), The critical criminology companion,Hawkins Press, Leichhardt, Australia, pp. 228-39.
• Christie, N 2000, ‘Dangerous states’, in M Brown & J Pratt (eds), Dangerous offenders: punishment and social order, Routledge, London, pp. 181-92.
• Cohen, S 1995, ‘State crimes of previous regimes: knowledge, accountability, and the policing of the past’, Law & Social Inquiry, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 7-50.
• Findlay, M 1999, Globalisation of crime: understanding traditional relationships in contexts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• Foucault, M 2003, ‘Confronting governments: human rights’, in P Rabinow & N Rose (eds), The essential Foucault: selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984, New Press, New York, pp. 64-5.
• Foucault, M 2003, ‘Security, territory, and population’, in P Rabinow & N Rose (eds), The essential Foucault: selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954-1984, New Press, New York, pp. 259-61.
• Garland, D 1996, ‘The limits of the sovereign state: strategies of crime control in contemporary society’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 445-71.
• Hill, S & Beger, R 2009, ‘A paramilitary policing juggernaut’, Social Justice, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 25-40.
• Hubbard, P 2003, ‘Fear and loathing at the multiplex: everyday anxiety in the post-industrial city’, Capital & Class, vol. 27, no. 80, pp. 51-75.
• Lister, S 2006, ‘Painting the town blue: the pluralisation of policing’, Criminal Justice Matters, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 22-3.
• Massari, M 2003, ‘Transnational organized crime between myth and reality – the social construction of a threat’, in F Allum & R Siebert (eds),Organized crime and the challenge to democracy, Routledge, London, pp. 55-69.
• McCulloch, J & Tham, J 2005, ‘Secret state, transparent subject: the Australian security intelligence organisation in the age of terror’ The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol. 38, no. 3: 400-15.
• Michalowski, R 2009, ‘Power, crime and criminology in the new imperial age’, Crime, Law and Social Change, vol. 51, no. 3-4, pp. 303-25.
• Sudbury, J 2000, Transatlantic visions: resisting the globalization of mass incarceration, Social Justice, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 133-49.
• Wood, J 2005, ‘Understanding global trends in policing: explanatory and normative dimensions’, in J Sheptycki & A Wardak (eds),Transnational and comparative criminology, Glasshouse Press, London, pp. 287-316.
• Zedner, L 2003, ‘Too much security’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 155-84.


Place an order with us to get a customized paper similar to this or any related topic. NB: The assignment will be done from scratch and it
will be 100% original.
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Sociology and religion observation

For this essay, you can either conduct an observation of a religious ceremony/ritual (3.1) or analyse a hyperreal religion of your choice on the Internet (3.2). This report should be based on the proposal you put forward in part A and include the changes and feedback recommended by your tutor. 3.1 Observation of a religious ceremony/ritual You will be asked to attend by yourself, or in a small group, a religious setting (e.g. a church mass, or another religious ceremony that you will have discussed with your tutor/lecturer).
The field visit is an opportunity to apply the theory encountered in the unit. While undertaking observation, students are reminded to take care not to interfere with the religious practice of the congregation. Do NOT film and/or take pictures during the religious ceremony and be discreet when taking notes. In week 3 we will commence organising our approach to this field work session. More information for these field notes will be provided at the following lecturers and tutorials, which will be structured as follows.
3.1.1. Sub­analysis:
Choose one of these sub­analysis for your observation, or plan one yourself. These will help you as a guide, but you do not have to follow them.

  1. Ethnicity:

What are the different ethnic associations present in the ceremony? If in a church, is there any evidence of these ethnic associations in commemorative plaques in the congregation, in the sermon, in the background of the clergy? Note: Do not forget to explain how you measure ‘ethnicity’.

  1. Gender:

Can our observation of the Liturgy, the theodicy, and/or the hierarchy tell us about the group’s relation to the maintenance or alteration of gender relations in our society?

  1. Art and Aesthetics (The Venue):

What is the architectural form of the venue? What devices of light and colour have been used to create an atmosphere in the venue? What is the atmosphere; is it a continuation of the world outside or a radical contrast? What forms of art surround you in the church; how do they support the liturgy? …

  1. Religious Leaders:

Apply Weber’s typology of Religious Actors to describe the ceremonies (See lecture) and observe them.

  1. Ceremony Attendance

(Congregation and Interaction) Are there any patterns in the way people look like and the way they distribute themselves in the venue. Who and how many of them are praying and following the different stages of the ceremony? … Analyse the interaction and the congregation.

  1. Interaction Between Priest(s) and Congregation (Ritual)

Public display of Priest ? Integration of people and the level of involvement?

  1. g) One sub­analysis of your choice (e.g. emotion, body, …)

3.1.2. Writing up:
Here are two ways to write the report: the story­telling and the analytical approaches:

  1. Story­telling

The first one follows a story­telling approach and provides a detailed descriptive account of what was observed. There is a danger that the story­telling can become the sole purpose, and thus becomes atheoretical, non­analytic and non­critical You have to make sure that if you follow this approach, you address the literature, your research and the theories. Your style of writing is more free but make sure that your essay is structured, and that there is a bibliography.

  1. b) Analytical approach: (please choose and follow this Analytical approach)

Please follow the different sub­headings for writing your essay if you do not follow the story­telling approach:

  1. The title A short, descriptive summary of the report ­ preferably including a mention of the setting and, perhaps, something about the pattern you explain or the explanation you develop. Do NOT use vague titles, like ‘Sociology of Religion Field Notes’
  2. Statement of the Problem

This is the introduction to your project (and your paper). It is the most important paragraph in your paper. Briefly state what you were trying to understand (e.g. the setting, questions, or patterns).

  1. Methodology

Describe how you went about doing your research, e.g. what setting did you pick, how many hours did you spend observing, did you have a special role to play or were you just an observer, did your observing affect the interaction, how many people were involved, how much previous contact had you had with this setting, did you read any books or articles in helping you develop explanations etc. Were there any ethical issues associated with the research? In other words, try to mention anything about your methodology that may have affected your results.

  1. The Patterns

Address the major patterns you noticed at the ceremony, supplementing your description with diagrams, tables and quotations. For example, you might note that the people were (or were not) geographically distributed according to sex ­ and supplement your description with a diagram of the setting, showing the distribution of men and women. Be sure to label your diagram ­e.g., ‘Figure 1’ ­ so that you can refer to it in the text ­ e.g. (see Figure 1).
Similarly, you may be able to describe how interaction patterns varied by social factors such as age or gender, then show in a table the relevant data. ­ sure to explain how you got the figures for your table in the preceding methodology section or in a footnote to the particular table. ­ Likewise, you can describe a pattern and then give a quotation from your field notes to illustrate what you describe. ­ When quoting from your field notes, indent and single space.When quoting from your field notes, indent and single space. ­ Be sure that you describe each pattern in the text, as well as illustrating (when appropriate) with evidence.

  1. The Explanation

Refer to the pattern(s) (that you will have described in the preceding section) that you intend to explain and develop your explanation. Document your explanations whenever possible (e.g. with diagrams, tables, or quotes from your field notes). Then briefly discuss how other (alternative or additional) explanations might also be possible.

  1. Discussion

Point out the strengths and weaknesses in your research and in your explanations. Suggest what kinds of research are needed to test or further develop your explanations.

  1. Summary

In a brief paragraph, summarise the main points of your report.
Submitting the assignment
Attach your field notes (which need not be rewritten or typed) to the original copy. ASSIGNMENTS CANNOT BE MARKED UNLESS THE ORIGINAL FIELD NOTES ARE ATTACHED.
Useful references: You must address the literature for your essay (from the readings or from other sources). Experience has shown, that, a minimum of 6­8 additional sources are needed to cover the topics adequately. For inspiration on observational research of religious groups, you can check for example:
Capper, D. (2003) Scientific Empathy, American Buddhism, and the Ethnography of Religion. Culture and Religion. 4 (2), 233­253.
Giordan, G. and Pace, E. (2012) Religion and the Social Order, Volume 22 : Mapping Religion and Spirituality in a Postsecular World . Leiden, Brill.
Manville, J. (1997) “The gendered organization of an Australian Parish” Sociology of Religion. 58 (1), 25­38.
Lowney, K. (1998) “Teenage Satanism as Oppositional Youth Subculture’ in L. Dawson ed. Cults in Context: Readings in the Study of New Religious Movements, New Brunswick, N.J., 313­337, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 23, pp. 453­484.
Ono, A. (2012) You gotta throw away culture once you become Christian: How ‘culture’ is Redefined among Aboriginal Pentecostal Christians in Rural New South Wales. Oceania. 82 (1): 74–85.
Sutcliffe, S. (2003) Children of the New Age: A History of Spiritual Practices, Routledge, London (Chapters 6 and 7)
Sutcliffe S. ed. (2004) Religion: Empirical Studies, Ashgate, Aldershot.
Williams, R. R. (2015) Seeing Religion: Toward a Visual Sociology of Religion . Routledge.
Wood, M. (2010) W(h)ither new age studies? The uses of ethnography in a contested field of scholarship . Religion and Society. 1: 76.
And any references that are explaining the religious group you are studying. And any chapters on observation and/or Field Work from any Research Method Books at the library


Place an order with us to get a customized paper similar to this or any related topic. NB: The assignment will be done from scratch and it
will be 100% original
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Economy

Economy
To successfully complete this course, you must write an
essay based on information found in your textbook Sociology:
The Basics, Twelfth Edition, by John J. Macionis and selected
readings from Seeing Ourselves: Classic, Contemporary, and
Cultural Readings in Sociology by John J. Macionis and Nijole
V. Benokraitis. The great thing about this assignment is
there is NO outside research necessary!
Based on the subjects below, you will choose one of the topics
and submit a well-written argument based on one of the
topics that is 750 to 1,000 words in length. Remember: If
you use the exact word of any of the authors, you must use
quotation marks and cite the information properly. Visit
www2.liu.edu/cwis/cwp/library/workshop/citapa.htm to
learn more about proper formatting of citations for both
in-text and a reference page.
Begin by reviewing Chapter 8, ?Social Stratification,? beginning
on page 186 in your textbook. In addition, read ?Some
Principles of Stratification? by Kingsley Davis and Wilbert E.
Moore beginning on page 201 and ?Nickel-and-Dimed: On
(Not) Getting by in America? by Barbara Ehrenreich beginning
on page 209 in your reader.
Sections of Chapter 8 discuss social stratification as either a
positive or at least necessary part of society; the first article
in your reader further discusses this concept. The second
article by Ehrenreich focuses on the loss of high-paying jobs.
Based on all that you?ve read, choose one of the readings,
argue if a family can survive on a minimum wage income and
if America can be America with the loss of higher-paying jobs
or if stratification is necessary and positive in America.
The purpose of your paper is to use factual information from
your research to persuade readers that your position on
the chosen subject is the most suitable, logical way to
view the topic.
Your essay assignment must include
1. A cover sheet
2. The body of your paper (750?1,000 words)
3. A reference page, if needed
As stated earlier, you are to choose one of the assigned topics
and create a thoughtful, well-written essay of 750 to
1,000 words based solely from the sources provided (i.e.,
your textbook and the reader). If you use the exact words of
any of the authors, you are required to use quotation marks
and provide proper citations both in the text and a properly
formatted reference page. If you don?t know how to do this,
please refer to www2.liu.edu/cwis/cwp/library/workshop/
citapa.htm to learn more about proper formatting of
citations for both in-text and a reference page.
Format your paper using a standard font, such as Times New
Roman, 12 point, double-spaced. Set the margins at a standard
1 inch on all sides. Since you?ve given your information
on the cover sheet, no header is necessary. The standard
style format for citations is American Psychological
Association (APA). If you need help with this, refer to
www2.liu.edu/cwis/cwp/library/workshop/citapa.htm.
The books are Society The Basics by John J. Macionis Twelfth Edition and Seeing Ourselves by John Macionis and Nijole V. Benokraitis Eighth
Edition


Place an order with us to get a customized paper similar to this or any related topic. NB: The assignment will be done from scratch and it
will be 100% original
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"