Compare and contrast the views of science and progress in science presented in thecourse texts with your own.
Compare and contrast the views of science and progress in science presented in thecourse texts with your own.Thomas Kuhn’s, Chalmers and Mayr presented different popular views of science and progressin science as well.Discussion about science, philosophy, evolution, and progress seem to havebeing been around for centuries and seem to be experiencing a healthy revival. In order to do acomparison with my own views of science and progress, first it is very important to analyzeKuhn’s, Chalmers and Mayr’s opinions. Thomas Kuhn is better known for being the mostinfluential authors in the scientific community. The reason is because of his concepts on howscience should progress and how it should not. A new term was also introduced to the scientificcommunity which was “Paradigm”. Kuhn concept of progress in science is when a scientificcommunity collect facts and observations. When a scientist have all their observations, thoughts,ideas, and data recorded, that would be the perfect time to create a theory.2.What are the differences between Kuhn’s and Mayr’s view, and can these differences beexplained by the different sciences the two authors work in?Mayr usually argued that there is a wide distribution of the rates of progress for revolution.Means that Darwin’s theory of evolution was accepted immediately which had a revolutionaryimpact, while natural selection required a long period of investigation to be widely accepted.Kuhn’s view of revolution states that there are long periods of normal science intervened byrevolutionary advances that overrides previous thinking.3.Is a universal scientific method necessary for either of these views of science, or do youagree with Chalmers that a universal method is not possible?