Critical Article Review Essay Assignment | Online Homework Help
You shall write a critical review essay of the following two articles: I am attaching those articles Kaspersson, Maria. “Prosecution and public participation — the case of early modern Sweden.” In Crime, Law and Popular Culture in Europe, 1500–1900. 2008. Reprint. Ed. Richard McMahon, 96–117. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge, 2013. (e-book) Kesselring, K. J. “Bodies of Evidence: Sex and Murder (or Gender and Homicide) in Early Modern England, c. 1500–1680.” Gender & History 27, no. 2 (August 2015): 245– 62. A Critical Article Review Essay should offer some insight into the content of the articles under review, but especially highlight the main ideas or themes addressed in the material in question. Among the items to consider are the historians’ approach (methodology), the time frame, geographical focus, questions of distinctions between social ranks and other socially constructed variables, and the foundation of source materials used by the author. What are the most notable strengths and weaknesses of the work under examination? Did the authors have a clearly-stated thesis and were their arguments convincing? Why or why not? It helps to have a focus question to guide the narrative. Students are encouraged to develop their own focus question, but are free to use the following in their essay: How did authorities in pre-modern Sweden differ from those in pre-modern England in their dealings with crime and conflict, and what does this tell us about social norms in pre-modern Europe? The length of the Critical Article Review Essay is 1500 words (double spaced, including endnotes), plus title page. Do not exceed the number of required pages. Follow the Chicago Manual of Style format for the essay, including the endnotes, margins, title page, line spacing, paper size, font type/size, and pagination. The Critical Article Review Essay is worth 25 percent of the final course grade, and the points are allocated as follows: 5 points for structure of the essay (title page, pagination, endnotes); 5 points for the mechanics of writing (spelling, grammar, syntax, punctuation, transition sentences, paragraph structure); 15 points for the coherence and depth of the arguments presented (clear evidence of thorough reading and understanding of the material under discussion; ability to analyse and conceptualize the main ideas of the articles under review; and clarity of presentation that includes a well-articulated introduction and conclusion). PLEASE MAKE IT PLAGIARISM FREE AND DO NOT USE VERY HARD WORDING, AND PLEASE FOLLOW ALL OF THE INSTRUCTIONS. I am attaching those two articles that you have to work on for this essay.E-book Kaspersson Maria kesselring K J article