Engineering Ethics

Engineering Ethics
Engineering is recognized as a profession due to the fact that it relates to other professions like the law which demand a lot of knowledge. With that in mind, like any other existing profession, the professionals in this field are controlled by engineering ethics codes. This paper has prioritized the discussion of the three main code with the sub-areas covered in them basing on the story given below. Basically, these codes limit irregularities that could occur under the title Engineering (Whitbeck).
Mr. James Mahoney a 42-Year-old man, had multiple contracts of constructing buildings at Zion Estate. His multiple contracts came from the fact that his work has made a total sellout on him proving his upper-class certificate from California Polytechnic State University as legit. Regardless the love of clients in working with him at Zion Estate, out of the nine contracts given, he ended up canceling three of them. The cancellation came from the personal conflict which emerged in the middle between two clients, one who owned two construction mansions, and the other one wanted a bio plant system in her compound. According to Mahoney, he disregarded the proposed materials provided for the construction of the mansion which was weak and of low quality. Besides the advice of the Engineer, the owner insisted on their use. The Bio plant as well had low-quality metals and cement, but the owner adamant for their use. Mr. James had to terminate both contracts as he respected ethic codes connected to his profession.
The first ethic code is the Licensee’s Obligation to Society. There are restrictions on this code such as; (a) licensees in public welfare recognition as the first priority in conducting services to clients. Mr. James always had his Bachelor’s certificate with him to prove his credentials, and the multiple contracts explain the faith of his certificate. (b) Licensees shall seal and approve surveys and design documents for standards checking. Mr. Mahoney’s construction designs passed all the standards, hence the name sellout from his work. Lastly but not least (c) licensees shall not allow name use of a firm or personal name which has been exposed to fraud or dishonesty in the professional practice. This indicates that Mr. James was an honest engineer with no irregularities allowing him to continue using his name in the business.
The second code is referred as Licensee’s Obligation to Employer and Clients. Under this code we have; (a) licensees shall only undertake assignments when experience and education in the specified field of technical engineering and survey are involved. California Polytechnic State University is known as one of the best Engineering school and has provided a recommendation for Mr. James pertaining his education background. (b) Licensees shall not give seals or signatures to plans without competence or those produced without personal supervisions. This ensures that the proposed plan is of standards since it has been cross-checked by supervisors for assurance. Lastly but not least on this code is (c) licensees shall make a disclosure of service provision if the employers or clients provides conflicts of interest which could affect their service judgments or quality. Mr. James contract contamination with the two clients totally explains this code.
The last Ethic code is Licensee’s Obligation to Other Licensees. One of its components is Licensees shall not permit the wrong presentation of academic qualifications. The school recommendation from the university advocates Mr. James being qualified. The Second one is Licensees shall not give, receive or offer valuable considerations or gifts either directly or indirect for job security. In other words, it out rules corruption in this profession. Lastly is the licensees not to injure either directly or indirectly the reputation, practice or prospect of the profession. The named engineer from the story highly values these professional ethics from conducting proper construction which is safe to surround people which are additionally explained by the massive client preference on his work.
In conclusion, engineering ethics can be said to be the best guiding tools for this profession. They generally advocate for transparency and quality service provision, which in turn boost the profession name.

Work Cited
Whitbeck, Caroline. Ethics in engineering practice and research. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

The post Engineering Ethics appeared first on Essaybishops.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"