Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

how do I find the perimeter of the shaded triangle

/in /by

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Question how do I find the perimeter of the shaded triangle ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment Capture.JPG

Use two products: one that is relatively price inelastic and

Question Use two products: one that is relatively price inelastic and another that is relatively price elastic. 1.Determine the product’s relative price elasticity by considering the Determinants of the Price Elasticity of Demand .2.Define the products in terms of the determinants.3.Describe how increases in the price would affect total revenue. Would it make good business sense to be the one producing and selling these products? Why or why not?

Question Multiple Choice Questions In Aleks Pie Chart. Accounting 100. Complete 11 Questions

Multiple Choice Questions In Aleks Pie Chart. Accounting 100. Complete 11 Questions must be answered. (3) Times to Master The Question. I Will Provide User Name and Password.

Estimate the efficiency of CSMA assuming that maximum propagation delay

Question Estimate the efficiency of CSMA assuming that maximum propagation delay is 240ns, transmission rate of the shared link is 15Mbps and maximum frame size is 2KB. How much should we increase the transmission rate of the shared link so that slotted ALOHA can compete with CSMA and have the same efficiency.

Question Based on your chosen organization (OMANTEL). Answer the following questions:1) Describe the

Based on your chosen organization (OMANTEL). Answer the following questions:1) Describe the methods used by the organization to reward, recognize and manage the performance of its employees.2) Recommend how the organization can improve this process and explain why your recommendations would improve employee performance and business performance.Include a reference list that contains at least 2-3 professional or scholarly resources.

identify 10 trends, practices, or devices which are currently used

Question identify 10 trends, practices, or devices which are currently used or may be used in the future of policing, a brief scenario that illustrates the effectiveness of the trend, practice, or device, an issue or concern with the trend, practice, or device.

Identify an article on foreign policy from a credible source

Question Identify an article on foreign policy from a credible source – local, a national or international newspaper, news magazine or television news. View article Six questions that will tell you what media to trust (Links to an external site.) in order to select a credible source.Discuss what stage of the process the policy is currently in.Who are the major players for and against the policy?What is the likelihood of the policy being implemented?. If not, why not?What recommendations might be helpful in getting to implementation?Six questions that will tell you what media to trustBY TOM ROSENSTIEL October 22, 2013You may encounter media today from any number of sources, from traditional news sources to social media to email.How do you know what to trust?Ask these six questions and they will unlock whether something is trustworthy.It’s easier than you think. They will make you a more critical thinker and save you from being misled. (These come the book “Blur: How to Know What to Believe in the Age of Information Overload” by myself and Bill Kovach).1. Type: What kind of content is this?Recognize first what kind of content you’re looking at.Is it a news story? Or is it an opinion piece? Is it an ad or what some people call native advertising produced by a company? Is it a reaction to someone else’s content?Knowing what you are looking at is the first step to figuring out what you can believe.””Part of knowing what you’re looking at involves knowing who produced the content. Is it a news organization? Or is it a publication that is sponsored by a think tank, or a political group or a corporation? (If the story or graphic you’re looking at came in a tweet or through a friend, look at the name of the organization, not just the name of the author. If you don’t know the organization, look it up online.)Another thing to know is where the organization gets its money. If it’s a non-profit or an advocacy group, where did that money come from? If that isn’t clear, that’s a problem.Does the content have an obvious political slant? There are a lot of new partisan sources for news now. Sometimes it’s hard to tell from any single story whether the source is political. One way to identify partisan or political leaning is to see whether all the stories seem to point in a particular ideological direction, or would tend to reinforce the views of one party. If they do, that is a tip off that the site really has a political viewpoint. It’s easy to recognize. Scan the stories quickly. You will know it when you see it, even if each story itself seems fairly straightforward.Knowing what you are looking at is the first step to figuring out what you can believe.2. Source: Who and what are the sources cited and why should I believe them?News content usually cites sources for the information provided. These are the people quoted, or the documents or reports or data being referred to.As you read, listen or watch a piece of content, note who is being cited. If it’s text, print it out and circle the sources. Is it a police official? A politician? What party? If it’s research, what organization produced it and what background if any is offered about them?A major part of understanding sources is recognizing the level of knowledge that someone might have—or how close it is to being first hand. There are lots of different kinds of sources.The key question is, how do they know? If it’s not clear, you should be more skeptical.””Sourceless News: Some news is actually “sourceless.” If the president says something on television or in public, the account may cite no source at all. It was a public event for all to see.The Journalist As Witness: The journalist or author could also be an eyewitness. In that case, the account may make it clear the author saw it but cite no one else.Credentialed Experts: In some cases, the author or journalist may have such obvious expertise or credentials that they are a credentialed author/source. Doctors who are also reporters (such as Dr. Nancy Schneiderman on NBC News or Sanjay Gupta on CNN) are examples. An opinion column written by Nobel prize-winning economist Paul Krugman is another example.Proximity of Knowledge: When we move to content that cites other sources, one question is how close is the source to the event. In other words, how well would they know what they are talking about? Are they a first-hand eyewitness? Or is it second-hand? In courtroom trials, only things that people saw for themselves are usually permissible as testimony. If they are an official source, such as police spokesperson, they are likely second- or third-hand witnesses, but they may be basing what they say on multiple first hand witnesses.The key question is, how do they know? If it’s not clear, you should be more skeptical.Distance in Time: Time is also a factor. Research shows the more time that has passed since an event, the more faulty memory is. Police investigators know this well. So ask yourself: how far in the past did this event occur before the witness was asked to recall it?If the source is a document (a study, or data), ask the same question: Who produced it and what background do you have on how the study was done and what other studies that group might have produced? There is no such thing as knowing too much about a source.Then there are outside experts who might be asked to comment based on their experience. Just because they are called an expert doesn’t mean they necessarily know a lot about this situation. Do they have a lot of experience with this kind of event? Have they done any research on this particular situation?The source could also be anonymous (journalists using sources without naming them, because that person could get in trouble). If so, what background is offered about how this source would know what he or she is talking about and why you should believe them? And why were they were allowed to remain anonymous? Sometimes journalists simply fail to identify the source for some statistic or assertion to save time or because they forget.Once you have identified who the sources are, ask one other thing: Do they have a bias?If so, that doesn’t necessarily mean what they have to say isn’t reliable. Think about whether they are a witness to facts or are just describing their opinion. They may be the perfect authority. But this also leads to the next question you should ask3. Evidence: What’s the evidence and how was it vetted?Evidence is closely related to but slightly different than source.Evidence is the proof that the sources offer for what they know. It overlaps with how close someone is to an event. But even highly credentialed sources may begin to speculate sometimes. They may be guessing.So, first, identify the evidence that any source is offering. Circle it. Write it down. Do it as an exercise a couple times. It becomes easy to recognize.Trust the material that offers more evidence, is more specific and more transparent about the proof being offered.””Is the evidence a document? Was it something the source saw as an eyewitness? Is it hearsay, or second-hand? Or are they speculating about someone’s motives or what they might have done?Next, what if anything did the author do to verify this evidence? Did they check with a lot of sources? Do these sources disagree? Can you see how they vetted the evidence?If the report is specific, that helps. If it says “scientists agree,” that isn’t all that specific. But if it says they interviewed 15 scientists and they all agreed, you have a better idea of how much authority there is. If they say scientists examined 10 years of peer-reviewed scholarly research, more than 10,000 pieces of research, that is even more evidence.Look for signs of a method-a method of verification. If you can see how the author or reporter checked or corroborated the evidence-if the method is explicit-that is a sign of more credible work.Looking for these signs-and identifying what evidence a story contains-isn’t as hard as it might sound. You simply need to start looking for it. And once you do, you will trust the material that offers more evidence, is more specific and more transparent about the proof being offered.4. Interpretation: Is the main point of the piece proven by the evidence?Most media content offers a thesis, or main point, of some kind.The one exception might be a straightforward account of a breaking news event. Most other stories, however, are built around an idea, a trend, or even some angle on a news event. Even content that isn’t narrative usually has a thesis or a point. For instance, most charts point you to a conclusion — like the number of people with jobs in America is going down or baseball salaries are going up.So the fourth step in knowing whether something is reliable is to ask whether this main point makes sense, and whether the conclusions are supported by the evidence offered.In other words, think about what conclusions are being drawn. Do they follow logically from what has been cited? Sometimes this is a matter of some conclusions making sense but others going too far. Are too many conclusions being drawn from evidence that doesn’t support all of them?We should expect enough evidence to prove the case. We shouldn’t just take someone’s word. The more evidence the better.””One concept to keep in mind here is people may wrongly assume that because two events occurred the first one must have caused the second one. In fact, it could be a coincidence. Or the second event could have been caused by something else. This is a common mistake that people make from looking at data.One way to test conclusions is ask if the same evidence might be used to draw a different interpretation. In science, there is a concept for this called the null hypothesis. It refers to the idea that whatever hypothesis a scientist is trying to test, one should also examine the possibility that there is another explanation.Here’s an example of the null hypothesis. If research shows that younger people are more inclined to use social media than older people, someone might think that they use social media because they are young. If that were the case, then logically, they would stop when they become old. But that is probably wrong. It might be they use social media more because they understand it better, and they will keep using it as they get older. That would be the null hypothesis.When looking at media content, it means asking whether there might be a different conclusion to draw from the evidence in the story or content than the one presented.To see if a story or segment or other form of media content lives up to its thesis, there are some simple indicators.First, we should expect enough evidence to prove the case. We shouldn’t just take someone’s word. The more evidence the better.Second, we should expect that the other side(s) are given a good hearing. Ask yourself this: are alternative views given the chance to make their best argument. If the alternative views are weakly presented, be skeptical.Third, what is unknown, unanswered, unclear, should be acknowledged. Usually, news is simply the best obtainable version of events at the moment. Tomorrow we will know more. The best accounts admit this, and help us even more by acknowledging where the weak spots are.Fourth, the best news providers and publishers let us know when new information comes along that contradicts or fills in what was thought before. These publishers feel responsibility for giving misinformation or partial information that may have left a wrong impression. They show that sense of responsibility by letting know when a better view has come along.All of these are signs that the publisher is mindful of the null hypothesis, or that an alternative thesis might be as good or a better explanation. The man the police suspected initially might have been innocent. The conventional wisdom that in the long run the vote in Congress would hurt the Republican party was wrong.Look for signs, in other words, that the author is skeptical and open minded.5. Completeness: What’s missing?Most content should lead to more questions. An important step in being a critical, questioning consumer is to ask yourself what you don’t understand about a subject. Look back at the piece. Did you miss something? Or was it not there?If there was important information missing from the story, that is a problem. If something was explained so poorly that it wasn’t clear, that’s also a problem.If something was missing and the story explained why—this couldn’t be answered yet—that is a good thing.The point of any news content is not just to tell you something. It should be to create understanding and also to help you to react or take action. So sometimes what might be missing from a story or segment or piece of content is what you can do about it.6. Knowledge: Am I learning every day what I need?This last, sixth question is less about checking one story than checking yourself to see if you are spending your media time well. It’s almost like calorie counting.Think about what media you consumed yesterday. What did you learn about? What did you read about? It can be hard to remember. But try. Jot down what you consumed for a couple days. You might be surprised. It also might not have been done in a conventional way. Maybe it came through social media. Or conversation. It’s still consuming news.Here are some questions you can ask yourself to see if you are learning what you think you shouldWhat are some things you hear people talking about that you wished you understood better? Where could you go to learn? Could I explain this situation to someone?Look at top stories on a website or a newspaper front page? How many of them are you familiar with? Do you think you should understand them?This process of critical thinking about media is something we all do. When you decide what to click on, what to read, and when you lose interest and stop reading, you are making critical decisions about what matters and what you trust or what you don’t understand. These six questions are the same ones that editors and producers in the media world use to edit stories and make up web pages.In the age when we are all both editors and consumers, we all need to know them.

Question Compare and contrast the differences between marriage and civil partnership? In addtional

Compare and contrast the differences between marriage and civil partnership? In addtional to whatever you write and research could you firstly address the cases and required/recommended reading materials in the attched module guilde-seminars 2-4 cover it. I might not have attached all the articles. Please use subheadings and OSCOLA footnote/referencing and could you write clearly and not descriptively and evidence base your arugment. . Could you consider the following: Focus on Steinfeld and Keidan (2017) as Hale’s judgement is curial. – Consider Lawrence v Gallegher (2012)-Consider the religious significane of marriage and the fact many religions would not accept same-sex marriage. Should religious objections be relevant to the law on marriage? -Consider the differences in the legal consequences of marriage. -Consider the differences in the legal consequences of marriage. -Is there a Human Right to marriage, Marriage Sex Act 2013, what issues might arise? Consider the Equality act and opposite sex couples views on being discrinminated against in civil partnerships. -Why is a sexual component important to marriage? – Consider Wilkinson v Kitzinger/ Harding (2007) and Auchmuty articles, why same sex marriage is still a feminist issue. -Consider whether the current law is discriminatory on the grounds of sex and sexuality. Bamforth (2007) discusses these issues. – I wondered about the Human Fertillisation Embrryology Act 2008, section 42, now allows a civil partner to be treated as parent of the child born. – Religious attitudes to marriage. Is this a good reason again allowing same sex marriage.-Look at same-sex activits views on marriage and equality. – Please look at data and statistics where relevant to your answer and consider (why people marry) and I wondered what would be lost if marriage ceased to have legal significance and whether this might be relevant. – Reforms legally/state and comparatively in the globe in dealing with marriage and civil partnership. Please consider the Barker and Monk artcile (2015) where relevant. There are additonal articles not attached. Let me know if I need to send the,. Barker, N.J. (2014) Why care? Deserving family members and the conservative movement for broader recognition. In Wallbank, J and Herring, J. (eds) Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law. Abingdon: Routledge Bamforth, N. (2007) The benefits of marriage in all but name? Same-sex couples and the Civil Partnership Act 2004. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 19, 133. Life. Oxford: OUP Elaine Sutherland, Step Closer to Same-sex Marriage throughout Europe, An Analysis’ (2011) 15 Edinburgh Law Review 97-102 Fineman, M. (2004) The Automony Myth. Oxford: OUP

How does Clausewitz’s paradoxical trinity explain the changes to the character of warfare from the methods used by Frederick the Great to those that followed in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries?

Include the question that you are addressing on a cover sheet or on the top of thefirst page of the essay.i. The essay must include documentation in the form of either endnotes orfootnotes (but NOT in-text citations) [See Annex A for endnote andfootnote format].ii. It is entirely feasible to complete this requirement using ONLY H100course materials. You may, however, use additional scholarly sources ifyou wish to do so. Should you use outside sources, you must include abibliography at the end of the essay [See Annex A for bibliographyformat].iii. Keep in mind that while you may discuss the implications of the essaytopic for today’s military, this is a history paper. You will be assessed onyour ability to use history as a tool for informing professional judgment.iv. The argumentative essay must conform to the writing standards found inthe annexes to this H100 Syllabus and Book of Readings. Those standardsare in conformity with Student Text 22-2, Leader Communication(31 March 2016).v. DMH instructors are not allowed to review drafts of essays prior tosubmission.c. Argumentative EssaysBooks On War, by Carl Von Clausewitz ISBN: 0691018545

which shapes could match each diagonal and why src=”/qa/attachment/8321507/” alt=”Capture.JPG”

Question which shapes could match each diagonal and why src=”/qa/attachment/8321507/” alt=”Capture.JPG” /> Attachment 1 Attachment 2 ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment Capture.JPG ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment Capture.JPG

Question Explain the offering of a product or service, of Mountain Equipment Co-op

Get college assignment help at Smashing Essays Explain the offering of a product or service, of Mountain Equipment Co-op MEC in Canada, and highlight the arguments for its sustainability, and provide criticism of what they could do better as a company. These arguments must use the context we’ve developed in class and should draw upon the language used about creativity, scalability, responsiveness, glocality and circularity as a test of both the social and environmental virtues. You may also refer to human bias, ethical guidelines or any of the “Ages” discussed in chapters 1-6. Please submit your written response component of this project to the assigned dropbox folder for formal evaluation and grading.

Is Demand equal to the price level in the economy

Question Is Demand equal to the price level in the economy times the liquidity function ?

Question Consider an organisational change that you have recently experienced. 1. Write a

Consider an organisational change that you have recently experienced. 1. Write a reflective essay that indicates how you personally transitioned in the change. 2. Reflecting on the content of the unit identify the concepts, theories and tools you feel would be most helpful if you were invited to advise your organisation about how best to manage change.

A a given line has the equation 10x 2y

Question A a given line has the equation 10x 2y mine equals -2 what is the line equation in slope intercept form of the line parallel and passes through 0, 12

How does the United Emirates, compare with the other GCC

Question How does the United Emirates, compare with the other GCC countries in terms of total population and the non immigrant population as a percentage of total population?

Do corresponding angles form a C pattern?In any n-sided polygon

Question Do corresponding angles form a C pattern?In any n-sided polygon what is the sum of exterior angles?In any n-sided polygon what is the sum of the interior angles?

How do I find the value of every unknown angle

Question How do I find the value of every unknown angle to the nearest tenth of a degree Attachment 1 Attachment 2 ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment Capture.JPG ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment Capture.JPG

Which of the following statements do you agree with most

Question Which of the following statements do you agree with most and why? Bureaucracies are inherently anti-democratic. Bureaucrats derive their power from their position in the structure, not from their relations with the people they are supposed to serve. The people are not masters of the bureaucracy, but its clients. — Alan Keyes Bureaucracy is not an obstacle to democracy but an inevitable complement to it. — Joseph A. Schumpeter

All the truth is out: The week politics went tabloid

Book Review AssignmentINSTRUCTIONSBook Review Instructions: Remember to make your own copy before turning in original, since the original will be retained by instructor. You will be sending this to me using the assignment link below. Refer to the course information section for a tutorial on how to use the assignment tool.APPROVED BOOK, AUTHOR’S SOURCE AND PROFESSIONAL REVIEWApproved Book, Author’s Source and Professional Review (5 points out of 100)You must choose a History book by a single author (no autobiographies nor edited works) at least 200 pages long, related to the time period in U.S. history covered in this course and get it approved by the instructor. You must also locate the author’s information (use Biography in Context database to find Contemporary Author’s) and a professional review (an article about the book in a magazine such as Library Journal — use Academic Search Complete or JSTOR databases.)Book Review Information SiteThis link below contains information on how to locate your book review. This document will give you detailed instructions on how to locate a professional review for your book as well as information on your author in Contemporary Authors.FORMAT AND CONTENTReview Format (25 points out of 100)1. Cover Page:Center the underlined title of the book reviewed, the author’s name, Reviewed by: Your Name, the class (History 1302), and the due date.2. Minimum Length:Four (4) complete pages of typed textDouble-spacedUse spell-check to correct spelling errors3. Margins and Font:One (1) inch marginsLeft justify the marginFont size is 10-12 pointNumber pages consecutively excluding the cover pageHeader should be in the upper right hand corner with your last name before page number

Question Marketing has been accused of “making people buy” as well as putting

Marketing has been accused of “making people buy” as well as putting profits before social responsibility. Chapter 1 has defined the “4 Ps – persons, place, promotion and price as those factors over which companies have some controls. Chapter 3 focuses on those areas that companies can’t control but can influence. Your first assignment is to evaluate many of these “uncontrollable factors” giving rational points of view on the following questions1. Is it ethical to market products that might be harmful to consumers? For instance, cars kill over 30000 citizens a year2. As most of you know, cigarette advertising is banned from most mass media – Why then can beer and alcohol advertisers use these venues?3. When he was Mayor Michael Blumberg proposed a ban on any “sweet drinks” more than 16 ounces. Although it was ruled illegal by the courts, other cities (notably Mexico City and Philadelphia) have started to introduce this kind of legislation. The new mayor of New York , Bill Di Blasio, is thinking about reintroducing this proposal. Cities are taxing large drinks, cigarettes and even banning certain options such as kids’ “Happy Meals” at McDonalds. Is this an intrusion into personal freedoms? How should suppliers of these products react? 4. Should gun manufacturers be allowed to advertise?5. From the above we can deduce that the government is the biggest uncontrollable factor facing companies – how far should the government intrude on the free market choice? Click on the following for a relevant articles: http://nyti.ms/1OVpNT3,http://nyti.ms/25gfcd1

Will the price level always rise when AD increases? Take

Question Will the price level always rise when AD increases? Take time to review a graph of a macro equilibrium to get a good visual, before answering this question. Explain your answer and provide your rationale.

The post how do I find the perimeter of the shaded triangle appeared first on Smashing Essays.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"