I need a critique of any one of these
I need a critique of any one of these
David Brooks—”The Social Animal”
/>http://www.ted.com/talks/david_brooks_the_social_animal
· Joe Kowan—”How I Beat Stage Fright”
http://www.ted.com/talks/joe_kowan_how_i_beat_stage_fright
· Melissa Marshall—”Talk Nerdy To Me”
http://www.ted.com/talks/melissa_marshall_talk_nerdy_to_me
· Sherry Turkle—”Connected, but Alone?
http://www.ted.com/talks/sherry_turkle_alone_together
It doesn’t need to be super well done, my prof is very lenient on his grades and attached will be a rubric and guidelines to follow.
ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachmentInventionA.Evaluate the research sources using specific examples to support youropinion.1. Was it evident that the speaker had researched the subject carefully?2. Did the speaker use carefully documented supporting materials thatindicated a depth of research?3. What were your findings from checking the bibliography in the library?4. Could the speaker successfully answer questions posed following thespeech?B.Apply the three proofs, and explain why you choose to evaluate the speakerthat way.1. Consider ethical proof (ethos).a. In your opinion, did the speaker know what he/she was talkingabout?b. What is your overall impression of the speaker’s knowledge onthe subject?c. Did the speaker treat this subject as a vital topic and seem greatlyinterested in sharing the information?2. Consider emotional proof (pathos).a. How did the speaker show you how you have a need for thisinformation?b. How did the speaker arouse your information on the subjectmatter?c. How did you witness the speaker try to adapt the speech to yourinterests?3. Consider logical proof (logos).a. Evaluate the evidence.1. To what degree was the evidence plentiful?2. How well did the speaker do with documenting theevidence?3. Was the evidence related back to subpoint with which it waspaired?b. Evaluate the reasoning.1. How well did the evidence used actually support thesubpoints?2. How well was the evidence made clear and relatable for theaudience to process it clearly?ArrangementC.Evaluate the introduction.1. How well did the attention-getter capture your attention?2. Discuss the speaker’s effectiveness with capturing your attentionimmediately.3. How did the speaker providing his/her qualifications as a speaker add ordetract from the introduction?4. Did the introduction indicate what direction the speech would take?5. Was the thesis clearly presented during the introduction?6. Did the speaker hit all of his or her main points during the overview andgive the audience a clear sense of how the topic would be approached?7. What other items of significance did you notice from the introduction?D.Evaluate the body.1. Which organizational pattern was used to arrange this speech?
View the Answera. Was this the most effective choice?b. What made it an effective or ineffective choice?2. Were the main points clearly stated?a. Were transitions used to support the flow of ideas?b. Where the main points emphasized clearly and then supported?3. Were the main points clearly tied to the thesis?a. Was this evident in the presentation?b. Was this evident as written on the outline?4. Did the supporting points relate directly to the main points?5. Do you think that without an outline the audience could easily follow thisspeech?6. What were both the strongest and weakest points of the body?E.Evaluate the conclusion.1. Did the conclusion provide a summary of the presentation?a. Were the main points reviewed?b. Was the thesis re-emphasized?2. Did the speaker include any new information that he/she should not have?3. Did the speaker have trouble concluding the presentation?StyleF.Evaluate the word choice.1. How clear was the speaker’s language?2. Did the speaker define any technical terminology?3. Did the speaker explain each point concisely?a. Did the speaker make an effort to avoid excessive verbiage?b. What portions of the presentation seemed too long or too short?4. Was the language appropriate for the audience?5. Were there any particularly vivid supporting materials?6. Did the speaker use correct grammar?G.Evaluate the use of visual aids in terms of clarity.1. Were the slides useful in reinforcing the material?a. Did the speaker use the slides to reinforce his/her ideas ratherthan vice versa?b. Was the text clear and simple?2. Did the slide aid in your understanding of the materials?DeliveryH.Evaluate the presentation skills.1. Rate the speaker’s eye contact.a. Did the use of notes hinder the eye contact?b. Did the speaker speak to the audience rather than thePowerpoint?2. Did the speaker employ extemporaneous delivery?a. Did parts of the presentation sound memorized?b. Did the speaker seem well prepared to make this type of delivery?3. How well did the speaker seem to handle nervous energy?a. Did you notice anything distracting?b. Did the speaker seem to put nervous energy to good use?4. Discuss the speaker’s effectiveness with use of voice.a. What about the speaker’s expressivity, use of pause, andvolume?b. Were a lot of cluttering words present?
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"
