Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

LLD100A Stanford Entrepreneurs v Small Business Owners Rhetorical Analysis Paper

Purpose & Audience
Purposes:

  • To develop your understanding of rhetoric by investigating how a writer constructed a professional document or text in your major field
  • To practice analytical thinking and clear writing[1]

Audience: Your instructor, your classmates, and other faculty members on the ENGL & LLD 100A review committee.
Writing Steps
Step 1: Select a document to analyze
Choose a piece of writing that was written by a professional in your major or a field that is closely related to your major. The text should be at least 3 pages long so that you will have enough material to analyze and write about.
These writings may include, but are not limited to:

  • Academic and trade publications (journals, newsletters, articles)
  • Company web sites (Internet and Intranet)
  • Professional society web sites (e.g., Federal or State Bar Association, the National Association of State Foresters, Society for Technical Communication, etc.)
  • Internal correspondence (the audience is within the same company or organization as the writer), for example: memos, policy & procedure documents, reports such as audit reports, project status reports, proposals, lab reports, etc.
  • External correspondence (the audience is outside the same company or organization as the writer), for example: letters or reports to customers or vendors, sales or marketing materials, external blogs, newsletters, etc.

Note:   There are many sample documents available on the web.  Use a Google search to find these in your discipline.  You can also ask people you know who are working in your major field for a document they may have written.  Ask your professors in your major courses for suggestions as well.
Step 2: Analyze the paper you selected
As a preliminary step, before you actually write the first draft of your paper, try to answer the following questions about the document you are analyzing:

  • What do you think was the author’s purpose in producing this writing?
  • Who was the intended audience?
  • What genre does it represent?
  • What style and tone did the author use? (formal, informal)
  • What rhetorical appeals did the writer use? (ethos, pathos, and logos—these terms will be explained in class)
  • What strategies were used to develop ideas? (description, narration, process analysis, compare and contrast, cause and effect, etc.)
  • How is the text organized, and why do you think the author chose this particular organizational pattern? Is there a particular format that is used?
  • Why do you think the author included or omitted particular information?
  • What kinds of evidence did the author include to support his/her point of view, and how was that evidence used?

 
Step 3:  Decide which rhetorical appeals and strategies you will focus on in your paper.  A writer might use many appeals and strategies, but some are more important than others in achieving the writer’s purpose.  So you need to be selective; choose those that you think are the most important (or most interesting) and write about them in your body paragraphs.
 
Step 4: Write your first draft (see “Suggested Organization” below).
Step 5: Participate in Peer Review of First Draft
On the day of the peer review, bring to class the following:

  • A copy of your first draft (approximately 1300 words single-spaced; see “Suggested Organization”)
  • A copy of the document that you analyzed
  • A copy of the peer review form

 
Step 6: Write the Second Draft for Teacher Conference
Use the feedback from your peer reviewer to guide you as you revise and create a second draft. When you come to the conference, bring the following:

  • A copy of the paper that you analyzed
  • Your second draft (aim for 1500 words)
  • Your peer reviewer’s comments

 
Step 7: Write and submit the Third Draft (in most cases, this will be the Final Draft)
Using the feedback you got from your instructor, revise your paper and submit it to Canvas (depending on your instructor).   Please follow the format guidelines given below.
 
Suggested Organization of your Paper
Introduction
Write an introductory paragraph with several sentences that do the following:

  • Introduce the paper you plan to analyze. Identify the author and describe the circumstances under which the paper was written. (You may have to guess based on the content and purpose.) Give the full title of the paper, when it was written and who was the intended audience.  Describe what you think was the writer’s purpose: What did he/she want to achieve? What do you think the author wanted the reader to think or do after reading this paper?
  • Identify the rhetorical appeals and strategies used by the author, and identify those that you plan to discuss in your analysis (preview statement). Note that you do not have to discuss in depth all of the strategies the author uses.

 
Analysis
Each paragraph in the body should have its own topic sentence and a unified focus. For this analysis, you could write one paragraph on each of the rhetorical appeals/strategies you mentioned in the introduction. In each of these body paragraphs, it is useful to:

  • Define the rhetorical appeal/strategy you are going to write about (you may quote or paraphrase from your course readings)
  • Quote or paraphrase 2-3 examples from the paper that illustrate the use of that appeal/strategy
  • Explain how or why the example illustrates the appeal/strategy and how the appeal/strategy contributed to author’s purpose

Conclusion
The purpose of the conclusion is to (a) summarize briefly the main points of your analysis and (b) explain the significance of your analysis by considering the following questions:

  • Was the author successful in using the various rhetorical appeals and strategies for the intended audience and purpose? Give examples.
  • What changes might you recommend to the author to better achieve his/her purpose?

 
Format Guidelines

  • Your final draft should be approximately 1500 words, with 1-inch margins and 12 point Times Roman font. Use headings and subheadings for the sections to guide the reader.  Please number your pages.
  • The final draft of the report is to be submitted on Canvas.
  • Make sure you save your document as a Word document.

 
Things to Keep For Your Portfolio

  • A copy of the document that you chose to analyze.
  • All drafts produced for this assignment.
  • A copy of instructor comments and peer reviews on your earlier drafts.
  • A clean (unmarked) copy of your final draft

Important Dates

First draft due (1300 words min); Mandatory peer review  
Conference with instructor — bring a 2nd draft based on peer review (1400 words min)  
Semi-Final  draft due on Canvas (1500 words)  

 
[1] This assignment has been adapted from a similar one developed by Julian Heather and Fiona Glade at CSU Sacramento.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"