Property Crime And Practical Reflection

Think about what you learned this week about property crime and techniques of neutralization as you respond to the following:
1. List the differences between burglary, robbery, and theft of property.
2. Apply “techniques of neutralization” from your textbook to answer the following statement: Most students disapprove of cheating on exams, but some nonetheless cheat. List possible justifications such students might give for their cheating behavior. Which techniques of neutralization do these justifications illustrate?

Be sure to include a minimum of two outside sources for your post using APA OR SWS format, in-text citations, and a reference list.

•MUST use APA format or SWS which requires in-text citations and a reference list (examples of APA links are available under Course Info).
•Use sources from within the last 7 to 10 years.
•Refrain from personal pronouns (“I”, “me”, “we”, etc.) in your initial posts.
•Be sure to answer what is asked of you thoroughly.

Property Crime And Practical Reflection

Burglary, robbery, and property theft are crimes commonly classified under the same category for they are believed to involve unlawfully acquiring someone else’s possession. However, they are different crimes altogether. By definition, burglary consists in breaking into somebody else’s property, for example, a residence with an intent to commit a crime. Robbery is a crime that involves one forcefully taking something that does not belong to them. On the hand, theft of property is an act of objectively acquiring someone else’s property, and with no intention of returning it.
Although most students disapprove cheating on exams, some cheat, there are various reasons why they cheat, and they justifications to their actions. For example, a student caught cheating in an exam will blame the exam invigilator for introspective (Murdock et al., 2016). In this case, the student will argue that he would not have cheated if the invigilator was watchful, he will place the blame on the invigilator. Also, students will admit their action; however, they will argue that their cheating norm is not posing any danger or harm to anyone (Liebler, 2015). In other words, if their grades don’t affect anyone else’s, then what is the fuss? Additionally, the cheaters will point their action to a higher loyalty (Nonis & Swift 2015). For example, a student striving to hit a pass mark set by their parents or guardians feels more pressured to pass their exam. In this case, they will argue that they did not have a choice than to cheat. Three neutralization techniques are applied in the three examples above which include; victim blaming, denial of injury, and finally, citing a higher loyalty, respectively.
Conclusively, burglary, robbery, and property theft are serious crimes altogether despite their nature, and so is exam cheating. Students will always use neutralization techniques to justify exam cheating.

References
Liebler, R. (2015). Learning That It Is Okay to Cheat. College Student Journal, 49(2).
Murdock, T. B., Stephens, J. M., & Grotewiel, M. M. (2016). STUDENT DISHONESTY IN THE FACE OF ASSESSMENT. Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment, 186.
Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2015). Managing Academic Misconduct in the Classroom: A Discriminant Analysis of Subject and Situational Differences Between Cheaters and Non Cheaters. In Proceedings of the 1998 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference (pp. 56-61). Springer, Cham.

The post Property Crime And Practical Reflection appeared first on Essaycola.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"