Provide a challenge that forensics experts might have applying the research to an investigation.

/>

In the document attached read the persons response and answer the above question.

 ATTACHMENT PREVIEW Download attachment

Societies in today’s world are becoming more and more dependent on open networks suchas Internet where commercial activities, business transactions and government services arerealized. This has led to the fast development of new cyber threats and information securityissues which are utilized by cyber criminals. Mistrust for telecommunications and computernetwork technologies have tremendous socio-economic impacts on global enterprises aswell as individuals.Moreover, the occurrence of international frauds often requires the investigation of factsthat occur across international borders. They are also often subject to different jurisdictionsand legal systems. The increased complexity of the communication and networkinginfrastructure is making investigation of the crimes difficult. Clues of illegal digital activitiesare often buried in large volumes of data that is hard to inspect in order to detect crimes andcollect evidence.In this day and age, the majority of correspondence is not paper based. Even whenhardcopies of information are distributed, the probability that a soft copy still exists on theauthor’s computer is very high. As previously suggested in the introduction, As described bySommer [14], acquiring a copy (image) of a disk would be the first essential step inevidence preservation. However, with standard hard disk capacities of 80GB and increasingstorage media sizes, the imaging and examination processes will inevitably take longer.This is the basis for CFSs worries concerning increasing storage capacities.During my research of this week topic on the advancement of digital forensics research,I took interest in Mobile Forensics Technology and how law enforcement officers/agenciesall around the world are using this technology to resolve crime.Mobile device dataacquisition, in addition to traditional digital data sources, is a key component of anydefensible discovery protocol. However, acquisition of mobile device forensic data is oftenfar more complicated than many people realize and can encompass much more than justcell phones. As the personal and professional use of mobile device technology continues to

View the Answer

grow, organizations involved with investigations, regulatory actions, and lawsuits mustunderstand the steps they need to take and best practices involved with mobile forensicdata collection. Failing to do so can lead to missed opportunities, wasted time and money,and even increased legal trouble.While some mobile devices can be collected by creating an image – liketraditional hard drive collections – many mobile device collections are not animage per se, rather an acquisition of data. Biometric approaches may be moreconvenient, but they are not necessarily legally protected the way passwordsare. For example, the Virginia Circuit Court has ruled that pass codes areprotected, while ±ngerprints are not. In Riley v. California, the U.S. SupremeCourt ruled that a person can be compelled to unlock a device. And the recentshooting in San Bernardino, California, has raised First Amendment issuesaround Apple’s willingness to unlock a phone.