Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Re: Topic 2 DQ 1
Qualitative research can be very broad and include data in cultural behaviors, a person’s lived experiences, and those who are involved in performing specific actions (Green and Johnson, 2018). All of this data can become overwhelming, as a new researcher it can even get chaotic and feel out of control (Erlingsson and Brysiewicz, 2017). A good starting point as recommended by Erlingsson and Brysiewicz (2017) is to start with transcribing the interviews into text, this will help to condense meaning units, help with coding, and categorizing the data. Condensing, coding and categorizing will happen many times in the data analysis process. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper. There are also software options that can help assist with collecting, however, Erlingsson and Brysiewicz (2017) state “A major drawback is that qualitative analysis software can be prohibitively expensive”, and they suggest to use data templates to with A, B, and C, columns that codes can be separated into categories for theme/experiance, code/event, and categories/emotions, memories (Erlingsson and Brysiewicz, 2017). Lastly it is important to keep your main research topic in the forefront of you mind and not be swayed by the data collected or allow yourself to become biased from the data. Getting overwhelmed is easy to do but staying focused and tracking your data with a template is the best and most economic way to assess and manage the data collected.Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001Grand Canyon University (Ed). (2018). Nursing research: Understanding methods for best practice. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs433v/nursing-research-understanding-methods-for-best-practice/v1.1/#/chapter/2

Re: Topic 2 DQ 2
Three types of qualitative research are phenomenological, grounded theory, and ethnographic research. “Phenomenology research is used to study people through their lived experiences” (Helbig, 2018). Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.Phenomenological research is aimed at examining how people perceive, and comprehend a particular situation that they have personally experienced. The data is collected primarily through in-depth conversations and interviews; however, some studies may collect data from diaries, drawings, or observation. The sample size is usually small, often 10 or less participants which may lead to questionable results. An example topic of phenomenology research is “What is it like to experience a natural disaster mass evacuation, such as during hurricane Katrina?” Topic 2: Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research
Grounded theory research is based on symbolic reaction theory where it is used to discover problems that exist in a social scene and how the person views or deals with them. Grounded theory helps close the gap between theory and empirical research. Data is reviewed by the researcher and repeated ideas, concepts or elements become apparent, and are tagged with codes, which have been extracted from the data. Eventually the codes can be grouped into concepts, and then into categories which may later become the basis for new theory. Grounded theorists and phenomenologists are alike in that they, collect and analyze data from a subjects’ perspectives. Both involve social aspects, and true life experiences, and seek to explore a subject’s experiences in their living environment. However, grounded theory describes or explains the phenomenon understudy, and how a person views it. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.Lastly, ethnographic research. Ethnographic research is the study of people and cultures, many times, by observation (Helbig, 2018). Ethnographic research “describes the various systems and relationships that surround everyday life of individuals and sometimes specific cultural practices” (Kilman, 2016). An example of ethnographic study would be of religion and/or language. Topic 2: Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

References:

Grand Canyon University (Ed). (2018). Nursing research: Understanding methods for best practice. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs433v/nursing-research-understanding-methods-for-best-practice/v1.1/#/chapter/2

Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research. Retrieved from https://www.rgs.org/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?nodeguid=7ad9b8d4-6a93-4269-94d2-585983364b51&lang=en-GB

Sbaraini, A., Carter, S. M., Evans, R. W., & Blinkhorn, A. (2011). How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices. BMC medical research methodology, 11, 128. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-128

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-433V NRS-433V-O500 Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations 200.0

Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%) 3: Satisfactory (83.00%) 4: Good (94.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%)
Content 75.0%
Qualitative Studies 5.0% Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research. N/A N/A Two articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Background of Study 10.0% Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue 15.0% Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Significant information and detail are required. A general discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Some rational or information is needed. A discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Minor detail or rational is needed for clarity or support. A clear discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is presented. The articles demonstrate strong support in answering the proposed PICOT question. The interventions and comparison groups in the articles strongly compare to those identified in the PICOT question. Topic 2: Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Method of Study 15.0% Discussion on the method of study for each article is omitted. The comparison of study methods is omitted or incomplete. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is incomplete. A benefit and a limitation of each method are omitted or incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies. A general discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is summarized. A benefit and a limitation of each method are summarized. There some inaccuracies or partial omissions. More information is needed. A discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is generally described. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. There minor are inaccuracies. Some detail is required for accuracy or clarity. A thorough discussion on the method of study for each article is presented. The comparison of study methods is described in detail. A benefit and a limitation of each method are presented. The discussion demonstrates a solid understanding of research methods. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Results of Study 15.0% Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is incomplete. A summary of the study results includes findings and implications for nursing practice but lacks relevant details and explanation. There are some omissions or inaccuracies. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. Overall, the discussion includes some relevant details and explanation. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Ethical Considerations 15.0% Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is incomplete. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is included but lacks relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is summarized but there are significant inaccuracies or omissions. Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is discussed but there are some inaccuracies, or some information is needed. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.Discussion of ethical considerations when conducting nursing research is complete and includes relevant details and explanation. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity. Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation. A detailed discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented. Topic 2: Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Format 10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Topic 2: Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research. Research Ethics and Evaluating Qualitative Research Paper.