Best writers. Best papers. Let professionals take care of your academic papers

Order a similar paper and get 15% discount on your first order with us
Use the following coupon "FIRST15"
ORDER NOW

Supply Chain Management Strategy

Assessment Information

This assignment is designed to assess learning
outcomes:

  1. Critically assess the strategic impact of Supply
    Chain Management, and organization competitiveness in different industrial
    contexts (LO1).
  2. Apply knowledge and critical evaluation of organizational
    strategic direction to the development of Supply Chain and operations resources
    and capabilities (LO2). 
  3. Contrast and critically discuss different ways of
    assessing organizational and Supply Chain performance (LO5).

This assignment is an
individual assignment.

This assignment
requires you to….

  • engage
    more comprehensively with a select topic area of the module by writing a
    2,000 word essay which critically analyses ONE journal article, which
    covers a topic area covered by the module.
  • The
    essay should include the perspective of the student on one or more topics
    presented in the paper, and utilise a minimum of 5 academic sources
    (ie peer reviewed journal articles or text books) to be used to pass this
    assessment.

Students are
invited to select one of the ten journal articles provided on moodle.
Alternatively they may wish to select an alternative article of their choice.
In this instance, the student must confirm with their tutor that their selected
article is suitable for the assessment.

The following
journals are potential sources for articles although students are not limited
to these however:

  • Journal of
    purchasing and supply management
  • International journal of physical
    distribution & logistics management
  • Supply chain management
  • International journal of transport
    management
  • European journal of purchasing &
    supply management
  • Journal of Business Logistics
  • International Journal of Operations and
    Production Management
  • Harvard Business Review

Criteria for Assessment

This table details
the weightings of the six criteria by which your work will
be assessed.

Criteria Proportion of
overall module mark
1. Introduction/summary

Has the student introduced the chosen
topic well and are concepts clearly defined?

Have they
stated the main objectives of the journal article?

How well has
the student summarized the journal article?

10%
2. Review of select literature

Has the student
reviewed the most relevant theories and ideas related to their area of
focus been discussed?

What insights
have they drawn from the literature?

30%
3. Critical Analysis

Is there a
clear and logical flow to the arguments the student has presented?

Have they reviewed the main findings of
the article against research and practice?

Has the student critically evaluated the
research method(s) used by the authors and identified any notable limitations?

Are the
student’s arguments supported by theory and/or practice?

Is their discussion clear and
coherent?

Have they linked the theory and
practical aspects?

45%
4. Conclusion

Does the student’s
conclusion address the ‘so what?’ question? Ie what are the key points
from this discussion and its implications?

Is the
student’s position clearly summarized?

 

5%
5. Accurate citations
and referencing
5%
6. Presentation, grammar
and spelling
5%
Total 100% (x 50% of module weighting)

Word Count

The maximum word count allowed is 2,000 words.

There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after
internal moderation) for work exceeding the word limit by 10% or more.

The word limit
includes quotations, but excludes the bibliography and references.

How to submit your assessment

The assessment must be submitted by XXXXXXXXXXXXX No paper copies are required. You can access the submission link through the module web.

  • Your
    coursework will be given a zero mark if you do not submit a copy through
    Turnitin. Please take care to ensure that you have fully submitted your work.
  • All
    work submitted after the submission deadline without a valid and approved
    reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero.
  • The University wants you to do your best. However we know that sometimes events happen
    which mean that you can’t submit your coursework by the deadline – these events
    should be beyond your control and not easy to predict.  If this happens,
    you can apply for an extension to your deadline for up to two weeks, or if you
    need longer, you can apply for a deferral, which takes you to the next
    assessment period (for example, to the resit period following the main
    Assessment Boards). You must apply before the deadline.

You will find information about the process and what is or is not
considered to be an event beyond your control at https://share.coventry.ac.uk/students/Registry/Pages/Deferrals-and-Extension.aspx

  • Students
    MUST keep a copy and/or an electronic file of their assignment.
  • Checks
    will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved
    plagiarism checking websites.

GUIDELINES AND BACKGROUND TO THIS ASSIGNMENT

Plagiarism

As part of your study you will be involved in carrying out research and
using this when writing up your coursework. It is important that you correctly
acknowledge someone else’s writing, thoughts or ideas and that you do not
attempt to pass this off as your own work. 
Doing so is known as plagiarism. 
It is not acceptable to copy from another source without acknowledging
that it is someone else’s writing or thinking. This includes using
paraphrasing as well as direct quotations. You are expected to correctly cite
and reference the works of others. The Centre for Academic Writing provides
documents to help you get this right. If you are unsure, please
visit www.coventry.ac.uk/caw.  You
can also check your understanding of academic conduct by completing the Good
Academic Practice quiz available on Moodle.

Moodle includes a
plagiarism detection system and assessors are experienced enough to recognise
plagiarism when it occurs. Copying another student’s work, using previous work of your own or
copying large sections from a book or the internet are examples of plagiarism
and carry serious consequences. Please familiarise yourself
with the CU Harvard Reference Style (on Moodle) and use it
correctly to avoid a case of plagiarism or cheating being brought.  Again, if you are unsure, please contact the Centre for Academic Writing, your
Academic Personal Tutor or a member of the course team.

Return of Marked Work

You can expect to have marked work returned to you within
15 working days for level 1 and 2, 10 working days for level 3 and M level). If
for any reason there is a delay you will be kept informed. Marks and feedback
will be provided online/ face to face. As always, marks will have been
internally moderated only, and will therefore be provisional; your mark will be
formally agreed later in the year once the external examiner has completed his
/ her review.

The post Supply Chain Management Strategy appeared first on Smashing Essays.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"