Under what circumstances would an encyclopedia article written in 2018, on the subject of the Roman Empire, be considered a primary source? Question 3 options: if the encyclopedia article’s author was a pacifist opposed to all violence if a historian was using it to understand how roads were constructed in the Roman Empire if the encyclopedia article was more accurate about the topic than ancient Roman military records were if a historian was using it to examine how 21st-century scholars wrote about the history of the Roman Empire
Under what circumstances would an encyclopedia article written in 2018, on the subject of the Roman Empire, be
considered a primary source?
Question 3 options:
if the encyclopedia article’s author was a pacifist opposed to all violence
if a historian was using it to understand how roads were constructed in the Roman Empire
if the encyclopedia article was more accurate about the topic than ancient Roman military records were
if a historian was using it to examine how 21st-century scholars wrote about the history of the Roman Empire