Have to write an analytical summary paper based on the article : The role of the corporate HR function in global talent management.(attached) Description of what the instruction is looking for is on page 5 of the syllabus (attached) I also have to compare this article to the same topic discussed in textbook: Human Resource Managment: Gaining a Competitive Advantage 10th edition by Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart and Wright. The questions that need to be answered are on page 6 of the syllabus (attached). I have also attached a sample of what the paper should look like and the rubric it will be graded against.

	Poor (0-3)	Good (4-7)	Best (8-10)
I. The most important point of the article. Citing evidence for support.	Main point is not stated. No evidence for support provided.	Main point of the article is identified but is not clearly stated. Supporting evidence is not clearly stated.	Main point is clearly stated and supporting evidence is clearly stated.
II. Article and the text.	No effort is made to relate the article’s content to the content in course readings.	Some effort is made to connect the article’s content to our text or other readings.	Effort relating the article’s concepts to our course readings is evident and clearly stated.
III. What are the assumptions &/or biases?	No statement about assumptions or biases is made.	Assumptions and biases are addressed but not clearly stated.	Assumptions and biases are addressed and clearly stated
IV. How do the author’s points resonate with your experience?	No discussion relating the learner’s experience to the article’s concepts or point of view.	There is discussion relating the learner’s experience to the article’s concepts and/or point of view but these are not clearly stated.	Learner discusses her/his experience in regard to the author’s concepts or point of view.
V. What is new, or why is nothing new? What are your questions?	No discussion of ideas or thinking that is new to the learner; no effort to project why these topics are familiar.  No questions are posed by the learner.	Learner makes moderate effort to discuss new ideas or to explore why these ideas are familiar.  Questions are posed about the article’s content.	Learner has a substantive discussion about new ideas or explores in some depth why these ideas are not new to him or her.  Questions are posed about the article’s content.
Total