GV4401 Global Governance – ASEAN And The Decline Of APEC In Asian Regional Cooperation Is A Clear Example Of The Decline In The Power Of The US In Global Governance

Essay Questions
1. International forums such as UN have been heavily criticised for including non democratic-authoritarian states as members of the organisation. From this perspective, which arguments have been put forward by the scholarly to justify the inclusion of these kinds of regimes in democratic forums, particularly in the UN?
2. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank is a clear challenge to the western created Global governance system. Discuss
3. The United Nations Security Council is no longer fit for purpose would a greater voice from the developing world led to a successful reform or is greater reform needed?
4. From a realist perspective can the International Criminal Court function as part of the global governance system?
5. Food and water insecurity will be the main driving force in global governance?
6. Does the presents of the great powers at the heart of global governance prevent it from becoming a democracy system?
7. Is rise of ASEAN and the decline of APEC in Asian Regional cooperation is a clear example of the decline in the power of the US in global governance?
8. The Responsibility to protect policy has been seen as a key driver for Humanitarian Intervention. Has this policy improved global security?
9. Is the World Trade Organisation the solution to the UK trade issue post-brexit?

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Global forces and the Western European brewing industry

University Dublin City University (DCU)
Subject Business Strategy

Global forces and the Western European brewing industry

Richard Whittington
This case is centred on the Western European brewing industry and examines how brewers have responded to increasing competitive pressure by consolidation through acquisitions, alliances and internationalisation. By 2013, the question is: how much further can these strategies go?
 
In the second decade of the twenty-first century, European brewers faced a surprising paradox. The traditional centre of the beer industry worldwide and home to some of the world’s largest brewers, Europe, was turning off beer. Western European beer consumption had fallen by nearly 10% between 2006 and 2011, while burgeoning in emerg­ing markets worldwide (see Table 1). In 2011, Europe’s largest market, Germany, ranked only fifth in the world with 5% of world consumption, behind China (24%), the USA (13%), Brazil (7%) and Russia (5%). China and Brazil are expected to grow at 5.5% a year between 2011 and 2016.
Table 2 details the long-term trends in Western European beer consumption. A decline in traditional key markets is due to several factors. Governments are campaigning strongly against drinking and driving, affecting the propensity to drink beer in restaurants, pubs and bars. There is increas­ing awareness of the effects of alcohol on health and fitness. Particularly in the United Kingdom, there is growing hostility to so-called ‘binge drinking’: excessive alcohol consumption in pubs and clubs. Wines have also become increasingly popular in Northern European markets. However, beer con­sumption per capita varies widely between countries, being four times higher in Germany than in Italy, for example. Some traditionally low-consumption West European markets have been showing good growth.
The drive against drinking and driving and binge drinking has helped shift sales from the ‘on-trade’ (beer consumed on the premises, as in pubs or restaurants) to the ‘off-trade’ (retail). The Western European off-trade increased from 46% of volume in 2006 to 59% in 2011. The off-trade is increasingly dominated by large supermar­ket chains such as Tesco and Carrefour, which often use cut-price offers on beer in order to lure people into their shops. More than one-fifth of beer volume is now sold through supermarkets. German retailers such as Aldi and Lidl have had considerable success with their own ‘private-label’ (rather than brewery-branded) beers.
Pubs have suffered – in the United Kingdom, an esti­mated 18 pubs closed per week during 2012. However,
Table 1 World beer consumption, 2006-11 (million litres)

Geographies 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
World 169,102.9 178,909.6 182,741.5 183,463.7 185,969.2 189,430.6
Asia Pacific 50,945.8 56,211.6 58,646.5 61,197.3 64,113.6 66,973.0
Australasia 2,138.2 2,164.3 2,197.3 2,200.0 2,097.3 2,026.2
Eastern Europe 23,634.5 26,124.5 26,212.8 24,655.9 23,907.8 23,666.1
Latin America 26,146.2 27,612.9 28,436.5 28,834.7 29,683.6 30,747.2
Middle East and Africa 9,928.1 10,362.0 11,091.2 11,683.7 12,382.4 13,121.6
North America 26,523.9 26,901.5 27,210.5 26,795.6 26,260.8 25,848.5
Western Europe 29,786.2 29,532.9 28,946.7 28,096.5 27,523.8 27,048.0

Source: Euromonitor, 2012
An earlier version of this case was written by Mike Blee. It has been substantially updated by Richard Whittington. It is intended as a basis for class discussion, not as an illustration of good or bad practice. Not to be reproduced or quoted without permission. © Richard Whittington 2013.
GLOBAL FORCES AND THE WESTERN EUROPEAN BREWING INDUSTRY
Table 2 European beer consumption by country and year (hundreds of litres)

Country 1980 2000 2007 2011
Austria 7,651 8,762 9,100 9,105
Belgium 12,945 10,064 9,137 8,574
Denmark 6,698 5,452 4,840 3,654
Finland 2,738 4,024 4,073 4,732
France 23,745 21,420 18,781 20,000
Germany1 89,820 103,105 91,000 87,655
Greece N/A 4,288 4,600 4,005
Ireland 4,174 5,594 5,193 4,721
Italy 9,539 16,289 17,766 17,715
Netherlands 12,213 13,129 12,910 11,974
Norway2 7,651 2,327 2,670 2,426
Portugal 3,534 6,453 6,200 5,320
Spain 20,065 29,151 35,658 35,196
Sweden 3,935 5,011 4,900 4,806
Switzerland2 4,433 4,194 4,489 4,626
UK 65,490 57,007 51,300 44,843

Notes
1 1980 excludes GDR; figures adjusted
2 Non-EU countries
Source: based on information from www.Brewersofeurope.org
although on-trade volumes are falling in Europe, the sales values are generally rising, as brewers introduce higher-priced premium products such as non-alcoholic beers, craft beers and fruit-flavoured beers. On the other hand, a good deal of this increasing demand for premium products is being satisfied by the import of apparently exotic beers from overseas (see Table 3). Imports are further encouraged by international supermarket chains.
Table 3 Imports of beer by country

Country Imports 2002 (% of consumption) Imports 2011 (% of consumption)
Austria 5.1 7.4
Belgium 4.7 12.8
Denmark 2.6 10.5
Finland 2.3 10.1
France 23.0 42.9
Germany 3.1 8.5
Greece 4.1 14.2
Ireland N/A 42.5
Italy 27.2 36.0
Netherlands 3.2 20.3
Norway 5.4 3.3
Portugal 1.1 1.7
Spain 11.7 7.4
Sweden N/A 24.1
Switzerland 15.4 23.3
United Kingdom 10.9 21.2

Note: Import figures do not include beers brewed under licence in the home country; also countries vary in measuring per cent of consumption.
Source: based on information from www.Brewersofeurope.org
Brewers’ main purchasing costs are packaging (account­ing for around half of non-labour costs), raw materials (such as barley) and energy. The European packaging industry is highly concentrated, dominated by international com­panies such as Crown (in cans) and Owens-Illinois (in glass bottles). In the United Kingdom, for example, there are just three can makers: Ball Packaging Europe, Crown Bevcan and REXAM.
Acquisition, licensing and strategic alliances have all occurred as the leading brewers battle to control the market. There are global pressures for consolidation due to over-capacity within the industry, the need to contain costs and benefits of leveraging strong brands. For example, the world’s largest brewer, A-B InBev, originates from the 2004 merger of Belgian brewer Interbrew with AmBev, the Brazilian brewery group, and the 2008 acquisition of the American brewer Anheuser-Busch. In 2002, South African Breweries acquired the Miller Group (USA) and Pilsner Urquell in the Czech Republic, becoming SABMiller, SABMiller in turn bought Dutch specialist Grolsch in 2007, formed a joint venture with Molson Coors in the USA in 2008, and bought the Australian brewery Fosters in 2011, Players in the fast-growing Chinese and Latin American markets are being snapped up by the large international brewers too: Dutch Heineken bought Mexico’s second-largest brewery, FEMSA, in 2010 and the Asia Pacific Brewery of Singapore in 2012.
Table 4 lists the world’s top 10 brewing companies, which accounted for more than 60% of world beer volumes in 2011. However, there are still many specialist, regional and microbreweries. Germany, with its pub-brewing tradi­tion (the Brauhaus), still had 1,341 separate breweries in 2011, owned by 1,315 separate brewing companies. Nonetheless, market concentration has increased in Western Europe: in 2000 the top two players (Heineken and Interbrew) had 19.3% of the market, while in 2011 the top two players (Heineken and Carlsberg) held 27.4% of the market, with A-B InBev accounting for a further 9.8%.
Concentration in the industry has led to concerns about anti-competitive practices. The European Commission fined Heineken and Kronenbourg in 2004 for price-fixing in France, and Heineken, Grolsch and Bavaria in 2007 for a price-fixing cartel in the Dutch market. In the United Kingdom, half of pubs are still tied to major brewers for their supply and it is alleged that these so-called ‘beer ties’ add around 6-7% to pub beer prices: in 2009 the UK com­petition regulator officially rejected a complaint of anti­competitive practices, but encouraged brewers to allow its tied pubs to feature independent beers. In 2013, the US Department of Justice forced A-B InBev to sell the American assets of its Mexican acquisition Modelo, which would have taken the world’s largest brewer from 40% to 46% of the American market (Molson Coors controlled another 30%).
GLOBAL FORCES AND THE WESTERN EUROPEAN BREWING INDUSTRY  569
Table 4 The world’s top 10 brewery companies by volume, 2000 and 2011

Company Share global volume (%) Company Share global volume (%)
Anheuser-Busch (US) 8.8 A-B InBev (Belgium) 18.2
AmBev (Brazil) 4.6 SABMiller(UK) 9.8
Heineken (The Netherlands) 4.3 Heineken (The Netherlands) 8.8
Interbrew (Belgium) 4.0 Carlsberg (Denmark) 5.5
Miller (US) 3.6 China Resources (China) 5.4
SAB (South Africa) 3.3 Tsingtao (China) 3.6
Modelo (Mexico) 2.7 Modelo (Mexico) 3.0
Coors (US) 2.0 Beijing Yanjing (China) 2.9
Asahi (Japan) 2.0 Molson Coors (US) 2.7
Kirin (J apan) 1.9 Kirin (Japan) 2.6

Source-. Euromonitor International, 2012
Three brewing companies
The European market contains many very different kinds of competitor: this section introduces the world’s largest brewer and two outliers.
Anheuser-Busch InBev (Belgium)
A-B InBev has roots going back to 1366, but has transformed itself in the last decade with a series of spectacular mergers. First, InBev was created in 2004 from the merger of Belgian InterBrew and Brazilian AmBev. As well as making it the second-largest brewing company in the world, this merger gave it a significant position in the Latin American soft drinks market. Then in 2008 InBev acquired the leading American brewer Anheuser-Busch for $52bn (£36.4bn),making the company indisputably the world leader. The company has 40% share of the US market, and in 2013 took over Mexico’s leading brewer, Modelo, famous for its global Corona brand. The company now has over 200 beer brands, led by such well-known international beers as Beck’s, Budweiser and Stella Artois. A-B InBev has the number one position in 19 national markets globally. However, in 2009 the company sold its Central and Eastern European beer operations to help raise funds to pay for the Anheuser-Busch acquisition. It also sold its minority stake in the second-largest Chinese brewery Tsingtao, though it has since acquired majority control of several Chinese regional breweries.
The company is frank about its strategy: to transform itself from the biggest brewing company in the world to the best. It aims to do this by building strong global brands and increasing efficiency. Efficiency gains will come from more central coordination of purchasing, including media and IT; from the optimisation of its inherited network of breweries; and from the sharing of best practice across sites internationally. A-B InBev is increasingly emphasising internally generated growth and improved margins from its existing business. Its declared intention is to be ‘The Best Beer Company in a Better World’.
Greene King (United Kingdom)
Established in 1799, Greene King is now the largest domes­tic British brewer, owner of famous brands such as Abbot, IPA and Old Speckled Hen. It has expanded through a series of acquisitions including Ruddles (1995), Morland (1999) and Hardys and Hansons (2006). Acquisition is typically followed by the closure of the acquired brewery, the ter­mination of minor brands and the transfer of major brand production to its main brewery in Bury St Edmunds. This strategy has led to critics calling the company ‘Greedy King’. IPA is the UK’s top cask ale, with over 20% of the on-trade market, and Old Speckled Hen is the top premium UK ale with more than one-eighth of the multiple retailer market. Greene King is unusual amongst contemporary breweries in operating many of its own pubs, having added to its original chain several acquisitions (notably Laurels with 432 pubs and Belhaven with 271). In 2007, it also bought the Loch Fyne restaurant chain and the company has invested in offering good casual eating in its pubs as well. Greene King now operates nearly 2000 pubs across the United Kingdom, with a particularly dominant position in its home region of East Anglia. Greene King explains its success formula in brewing thus: ‘The Brewing Company’s continued cut-performance is driven by a consistent, focused strategy: most importantly, we brew high quality beer from an efficient, single-site brewery; [and] we have a focused brand portfolio, minimising the complexity and cost of a multibrand strategy.’2
Tsingtao (China)
Tsingtao Brewery was founded in 1903 by German settlers in China. After state ownership under communism, Tsingtao was privatised in the early 1990s and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in 1993. In 2009, the Japanese Asahi Breweries held 19.9% of the shares, pur­chased from A-B InBev (which also sold the remainder of its original stake – 7% – to a Chinese private investor).
GLOBAL FORCES AND THE WESTERN EUROPEAN BREWING INDUSTRY
Tsingtao has 14% market share of its home market but has long had an export orientation, accounting for more than 50% of China’s beer exports. Tsingtao Beer was introduced to the USA in 1972 and is the Chinese brand-leader in the US market. A bottle of Tsingtao appeared in the 1982 science fiction film Blade Runner. Tsingtao set up its European office in 1992 and its beer is now sold in 62 countries. Tsingtao’s priority, for now, is adjacent Asian markets, with a new brewery announced in Thailand in 2012. However, it has described its ambition thus: ‘To promote the continuous growth of the sales volume and income to step forward (sic) the target of becoming an international great company’.

Questions for Report Writing:

  • An analysis of the organisation’s external environment highlighting, in particular, the major trends evident in the organisation’s environment, the opportunities and threats posed by these trends, and the implications of same for the future strategy of the organisation.
  • An analysis of the organisation’s internal strategic capability in terms, especially, of its ability to respond to the external opportunities and threats identified previously.
  • The group’s conclusions and recommendations for the future strategic direction of the organisation in the light of 1 and 2 above (highlighting the various strategy development options open to it).
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

The Global Politics of Human Rights: From Human Rights To Human Dignity?

The Global Politics of Human Rights: From Human Rights To Human Dignity?

Abstract

This review essay highlights the limitations and possibilities of a global human rights order based on an analysis of five recently published books about human rights. The main argument states that reform of the global human rights order requires not only a shift to a more emancipatory notion of human dignity but also an emphasis on global justice and material compensation within and between the Global North and Global South.
Human dignity, in this essay, embraces all types of human rights claims, ranging from political rights to socio-economic rights, among many others. The essay proposes a three-pronged reform of international human rights: (1) a shift from Western human rights to the more inclusive and pluralist notion of human dignity; (2) the promotion of global justice by rewriting the rules of global economic governance; and (3) mandatory political education on human rights and human dignity.

Keywords

Human rights, arms trade, intergovernmental organizations, European Union, United States, human dignity

Introduction

Amidst the recent resurgence of illiberal politics, how and under what set of conditions can we hope to reform the global human rights order? That overarching question inspires this essay, which reviews five recently published books that represent some of the finest scholarly works on the global politics of human rights norms. The principal analytical motivation of this review essay
relates to key limitations and possibilities for reform of the global human rights order. Notably, the five books under review were written by the historian Joe Renouard; the empirically-oriented political scientists Brian Greenhill, Jennifer Erickson and Katrin Kinzelbach; and the political theorist Benjamin Gregg.
Since the end of the Cold War, various human rights norms have gained traction – and not only in terms of their further codification in the international legal system and institutionalization in global governance. Indeed, these norms have appeared prominently as aspirational goals in many countries’ national constitutions and domestic legal frameworks.
In praxis, the number of countries, as well as the number of human rights treaties and conventions, have dramatically increased, despite the apparently deteriorating global human rights situation (Simmons, 2009; Tsutsui and HafnerBurton, 2005). The political science discipline, meanwhile, is divided on whether global or domestic factors primarily shape human rights outcomes over space and time (Regime, 2014a).
Philosophers and political theorists, on the other hand, primarily reflect upon new political utopias that would effectively realize human rights at the global level – and their creative thought experiments and philosophical reflections derive inspiration from a wide range of moral, normative, political and legal justifications (Bohman, 2010; Fraser, 1995; Regime, 2014b).

Path-breaking research on global human rights

This section is thematically divided into several parts. The first section starts with Benjamin Gregg’s reflections on a human rights utopia while succeeding subsections deal with the role of transnational and Western actors in global human rights promotion.

Conclusions: Rethinking global human rights

In sum, the five books under review provide us with some important insights about the contemporary state of the global human rights order. While Benjamin Gregg’s The Human Rights State highlights philosophical limitations in our contemporary understanding of human rights, the remaining four books underscore the dynamic interactions of transnational and local factors in shaping human rights outcomes, especially in the Global South.

Questions:

  1. Identify the major ethical/legal points of this article.
  2. Has the totality of the evidence regarding ethical/legal issues been considered?
  3. Are there any potential biases in the interpretation or discussion of the research?
  4. Does this article contribute to the ethical/legal debate?
  5. Do you agree or disagree with the position taken in this article – give your reasons.
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

Inform The Reader About The High Levels Of Diversity In Europe Generally: European History Assignment

University University College Dublin (UCD)
Subject European History

Introduction

Inform the reader about the high levels of diversity in Europe generally – provide a succinct overview of the entire continent. Provide the reader with a road-map of how you intend to focus on three countries and how overall these are more alike or more different, and why they make for interesting choices when undertaking this project.
Inform the reader about the high levels of diversity in Europe generally

Geography, Demographics, Language and Geostrategic Positions

Where is the country located? How big is its population? Breakdown of that population – gender, age, occupation, distribution, religion. What are the key physical features? Climate? Level of urbanization? Key urban centers? Languages?
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go
Insert images – Maps with correct references.

Socio-Economic Profiles

What are the core industries, services, sectors in different countries? Are there similarities? Reliance on foreign direct investment? Unemployment levels? Impact of recession? Average earnings? Terms and conditions (minimum wage, a living wage, etc.), Right to collective bargaining? Trade Unions and/or social partnership? Inequality in Poverty rates? Welfare systems?
Images of graphs could be helpful here, referenced correctly.
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go

Buy high-quality essays & assignment writing as per particular university, high school or college by Irish Writers

Get A Free Quote Chat Now

Education and Health

How are the education systems structured? E.G. Baccalaureate or Leaving Cert, how many years in secondary schools or second-level schools? Training? Apprenticeships? How high up OECD rankings? Major health issues? How is a system organized E.G. free at the point of entry?
Graphs here could be useful, referenced.
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go

Cultures – Traditional and Popular

Images of cultural traditions could be useful here, referenced.
What are the developments of this over time? What are the aspects of culture that are unique to each country? Are there any shared? Popular culture? Rules on the preservation of cultural heritage E.G. quotas on the representation of minorities, language benefits.
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go

Politics and Political Institutions

Images could be useful here, referenced.
How is a democracy organized E.G. two Houses of Parliament? Free press? Rights set out in Constitution? Electoral system (E.G. First past the post or PRSTV or List system?)
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go

Transport and Communication

Do all roads or networks radiate from a particular center? What is the main mode of transportation? How is public transport organized? Broadband access in schools and rural areas? New infrastructure planned?
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go

Environmental Context

Are there particular challenges faced in this country. E.G. flooding risks, unpredictable events, earthquakes, or other seismic activity? Pollution concerns?
Violations of international treaties or EU directives? Position of State at the Climate Change talks?
Graphs could be useful here, referenced.
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go

Life in these Countries

Graphs could be useful here, referenced.
What is the lived experience of citizens in these States? Cost of living? Access to housing? Quality of Life? Human Rights? Minority rights (how are ethnic minorities treated) Racism? Happiness index?
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go

Impact of the EU

What is the perceived and real impact of the EU of each State, including the non-member States (E.G. association agreements, the promise of membership, rejection of membership in referenda)? Differentiated membership of different aspects of the EU E.G. Finland is non-aligned so it is in Schengen (the free movement area) but not in any military alliance (e.g. NATO).
1. Ireland
2. Country Choice 2
3. Country Choice 3
Compare as you go

Conclusions

Having considered the differences and similarities between these countries, what can you conclude in terms of systems in each for managing challenges (e.g. heath, welfare, transport) cultural sensitivities or unique selling points, challenges for the future? Are these countries more similar than different? How? Why? With what consequence? Think of current issues: Brexit/ Global Pandemic/ Environment/ Migration, etc.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"