AIRBNB: WHAT’S NEXT? PRIORITIZING OPPORTUNITIES IN SOUTHERN EUROPE

Airbnb: What’s Next?

Introduction

It was a sunny Sunday morning in late November 2014 when Jeroen Merchiers, general manager of Airbnb for Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe, was jogging along the beach in the Barcelona neighbourhood of La Barceloneta and reflecting about the future of his business.
Shortly before, Merchiers had been promoted from country manager of Airbnb for Spain and Portugal. He reflected on the region’s tremendous growth, how Barcelona had established itself quickly as one of Airbnb’s top five cities in the world based on the volume of annual who used the  company  (about  900,000  since  2008), and on the city’s bright prospects for the future.
Despite all the success, Merchiers had some concerns. How could Airbnb sustain its recent success? The company had been valued most recently at $13 billion. Now the company needed to prove its potential and demonstrate its capacity to grow further. Brian Chesky, CEO of Airbnb, was considering several growth options: dedicating more resources to expansion in Asia; targeting the premium hospitality segment and focusing on creating “better travel experiences”; and possibly developing vacation rental properties. As someone whose opinion the CEO valued highly, Merchiers needed to be prepared to discuss these options in terms of what was best for Airbnb in Southern Europe as well as worldwide.
Besides weighing the different strategies that would help Airbnb its growth,  Merchiers also needed to evaluate how to mitigate some key risks that had surfaced. Uber, a ride-sharing service platform founded in 2009, had been plagued by negative press coverage recently. As an example, Uber’s drivers, who by the company’s design operated as individuals, had begun grouping together in some cities to petition for higher wages. Given that Airbnb and Uber were both poster children for the “sharing economy,” Merchiers felt that it was important to think of how best to avoid or mitigate similar “unionization”  problems and how best to ensure that both hosts and guests would remain happy endorsers of the platform. What would be the right measures to achieve that goal?
Lastly, much like in other countries, Airbnb Spain had been accused recently of failing to comply with the state’s regulatory framework, given that hosts were not officially regulated lodging providers (and hence were not paying any hospitality tax). He needed to prepare for how Airbnb Spain should position itself regarding these legal discussions and determine possible outcomes. Could he afford to ignore the pressure generated by the press or does he need to take action – and, if so, what action should he take first? The company had reached agreements to collect city taxes in Portland, Oregon, and in its hometown of San Francisco, California. Several other European cities, such as Paris, were considering similar agreements.

Company Background

Airbnb had become an alternative solution for short-term home renters and providers worldwide. Since its inception in 2008, Airbnb had become the leading marketplace offering a variety of accommodation around the world (see Exhibits  1  and 2 for Airbnb’s early user growth rates.) By the end of 2014, it had more than 25 million guests and more than 900,000 listings in 34,000 cities and 190 countries – almost every nation in the world except for the likes of North Korea, Iran, Syria, Cuba and the Vatican City State.
Airbnb was a pioneer in incorporating the burgeoning trend of “collaborative consumption” into its  “peer-to-peer   accommodation   rental   business   model.”  This innovative business model, powered by Web 2.0 technologies, was disrupting the traditional hospitality business sector and economy, and it showed strong worldwide adoption and potential growth opportunity. Exhibit 3 gives insight into the economic impact of Airbnb on major cities in the world (Barcelona, Paris, Berlin, Amsterdam, New York and San Francisco). Furthermore, as an example, Exhibits 4 and 5 provide demographic data on Airbnb’s hosts and travellers for Barcelona.

Company History

Airbnb was founded by Brian Chesky, Joe Gebbia and Nathan Blecharczyk in August 2008 in San Francisco. It was one of the first peer-to-peer platforms for accommodation. Unable to afford rent in the fall of 2007, Chesky and Gebbia offered to rent part of their lofts as accommodation for strangers to subsidize their rent. Once they saw the potential business opportunity, they got Gebbia’s former housemate Blecharczyk to develop the website to be used as a platform for peer-to-peer property rental.
In early 2009 they received $20,000 in funding from an angel investor, Paul Graham, the cofounder of Y Combinator, followed by a further $600,000 in seed investment from venture capitalists. In November 2010 the three cofounders raised $7.2 million in Series A and, in July 2011, the company received a further $112 million in venture funding and was reportedly valued behind the scenes at $1.3 billion.1 As of October 2014, after two more rounds of financing, the valuation was set to be $13 billion, up from its private $10 billion valuations in March of the same year (see Exhibit 6), as it discussed an employee stock sale, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal. 2 As Chesky posted on Twitter in January 2014: “Marriott wants to add 30,000 rooms this year. We will add that in the next 2 weeks.”
Toward the end of 2014, Airbnb forecast 2015 revenues of $850 million (i.e., more than three times the 2013 reported revenues of $250 million) and operating losses of $150 million. The company forecast revenues of $10 billion by 2020. By comparison, Marriott, which managed more than 4,000 hotels, had $13.8 billion in revenue in 20143 and a gross income of $1.84 billion.

Business Model

Airbnb is a community marketplace where guests can book accommodation from a list of verified hosts. The company had traditionally identified itself as a technology platform that facilitated hospitality arrangements between hosts and guests. As such, it had been exempt from collecting tourist taxes, city taxes or personal income tax from hosts. Signing up to the website is free of charge, and it costs nothing to post a listing. This has reduced the barrier for hosts to enter the market. Upon finding the listing that they want, would-be guests need to sign up to the website, which then provides information for contacting the host directly as well as for providing payment information for an accommodation request.
When the host accepts the request, and the transaction is in place, Airbnb charges the guest a transaction fee of 6 to 12 and the host a fee of 3   . As the company is unlisted, there is no precise information on its revenue, but there have been a lot of forecasts and assumptions in the industry. The investment bank Piper Jaffray estimated the overall transaction volume of Airbnb to be approximately $4 billion for the year 2014.4
By offering free membership and free access to accommodation lists, Airbnb quickly gained traction. Users were free to browse as they pleased and were prompted to pay a service charge only when making a reservation, which let Airbnb maximize the number of potential transactions.
Despite the free listings, sharing one’s own home continued to be a daunting decision for many would-be hosts, as a home was typically a person’s most cherished asset. Therefore, instilling trust in the platform was paramount for Airbnb in order to get people to share their homes and to ensure guests had pleasant travel experiences. To that end, Airbnb focused its efforts on customer service and satisfaction. Airbnb used the revenue from transaction fees to implement systems such as improved customer verification, $1 million theft/damage insurance, authentic guest reviews and social media connections. All these efforts contributed to positive word of mouth, which played a key role in generating up to 80 of the guest traffic.
All of these factors, designed with the specific purpose of building trust on both sides of the platform, helped Airbnb create a scalable business model that has led to promising financial returns. Exhibit 7 provides an overview of the average spending of an Airbnb traveller, compared with that of a hotel-staying traveller, for Barcelona and other leading global destinations.

Online Hospitality Marketplace

The recession in  2012 growth prospects of Spain’s hotel and motel industry. However, more recently the industry turned around and showed a small but steady recovery. In the first 10 months of 2014, overnight stays increased by 3.1 compared with the same period the previous year.
The daily average invoiced amount per occupied room (average daily rate, or ADR) had been stable, going up slightly in 2012 to hit ¤70.50. The rate fell 3.6 to ¤67.90 in 2013 but later increased by 2.94 to reach ¤69.90. The daily average revenue per available room (RevPAR), which depends on the occupancy rate registered in hotel establishments, was also relatively stable until 2012 when there was a year-on-year fall of 0.8 to ¤38.60. However, RevPAR increased by 0.51 to reach
¤38.80 in 2013, followed by a substantial increase of 8.0 in 2014.5 Exhibit 8 shows the evolution of occupancy, ADR and RevPAR for Spain’s two most important city tourist destinations.
In Spain, the number of hotels increased, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of
1.5 between 2009 and 2013, to reach a total of 19,550 hotels in 2013 (see Exhibit 9). The industry’s volume is expected to rise to 20,400 hotels by the end of 2018, representing a CAGR of 0.9 for the period from 2013 to 2018. Barcelona, Airbnb’s fourth most important city in the world, followed a similar trend. (See Exhibits 10 and 11.)
In Spain, the leisure segment was the industry’s most lucrative in 2013, with total revenues of
$9.9 billion, equivalent to 89.4 of the industry’s overall value. The business segment contributed revenues of $1.2 billion in 2013, equating to 10.6 of the industry’s aggregate value.
Even with the recent evidence of recovery in the market, there were still concerns over the uncertainty of the industry’s future growth. The Spanish hotel and motel industry had total revenues of $11.1 billion in 2013 (see Exhibit 12), representing a compound annual rate of change (CARC) of -2.6 between 2009 and 2013. In comparison, the French and German industries had a CAGR of 2.7 and 5.4 respectively over the same period, with respective values of $27.2 billion and $25.8 billion in 2013.6

Customer Segments

In the collaborative economy, also known as the sharing or peer economy, owners “share” and rent out idle capacities they are not using, such as a house, apartment, car or bicycle, to a stranger through peer-to-peer platforms. One of the largest and fastest-growing poster child companies of the collaborative economy, Airbnb has a two-sided platform that creates value by enabling direct interaction between two primary customer groups: lodging guests and hosts.
Guests – Taking Catalonia, one of Spain’s most important travel destinations, as an example, 85 of Airbnb guests visiting there had a bachelor’s or master’s degree7 and 61 were visiting Barcelona for the first time.8 Guests using Airbnb could be segmented in  several ways. The most general hospitality customer segmentation splits guests by purpose of travel, such as business or leisure. With this categorization, Airbnb’s stronghold lies in the upper right quadrant of Exhibit, where guests typically travel for leisure either as solo or up to the size of a family.
In the case of Airbnb’s minority customer group of business travellers, the company recently teamed up with Concur Technologies Inc., a leading provider of corporate travel and expense management services, toward business trips.9 Nevertheless, Airbnb’s leading position was clearly in the leisure traveler category. With its commitment to providing guests with unique, local experiences (96 of guests travelling to Spain have indicated that they want to “live like locals”10), it was important to segment guests further by the type of experience sought. The type of trip experience could be divided by the type of destination (urban vs rural; within vs. outside main hotel districts) or by point of origin (international vs. regional vs local travelers).
Hosts – Airbnb hosts are diverse in age, and many are in the middle-income bracket. Some
75    of the hosts in Catalonia have annual incomes at or below the regional average of
¤26,411.11 Most Airbnb hosts rent out the home in which they live – their primary residence. For the hosts, the additional income generated from Airbnb rentals forms a modest but important source of income (on average ¤221 per month in Catalonia), with 53 of hosts in Catalonia citing that the income enabled them to stay in their homes.12
Interestingly, data collected for San Francisco, which is perhaps not typical of the cities where Airbnb operates, show that the top 10 hosts by the total number of listings, accounting for
5.2 of all lodgings listed in the city include property managers, hostels and even hotels.13    In terms of occupation, one-third of hosts in Catalonia were  classed  as  self-employed,  working as freelancers or entrepreneurs.14
Additionally, personality may play a factor in how willing a person will be to list their property on Airbnb. Individuals who enjoyed meeting new people were naturally better candidates to become Airbnb hosts.

Competitors

Market competition in peer-to-peer renting services had increased significantly in the previous few years. This fact defied the logic of marketplaces such as Airbnb becoming a “winner-take-all” type of market.  similar in the different companies, each firm had its own operating policy in order to remain competitive in the market. Some of the key competitors were the following:

Home Away

HomeAway is a vacation rental marketplace with more than a million vacation rental listings in 190 countries. The United States-based company is one of the market leaders with a strong brand portfolio in the industry. Founded in February 2005 and headquartered in Austin, Texas, the company went public in 2011. Travellers can search HomeAway.com for free to find a vacation rental and homeowners can pay to advertise their property.15 The group also owns global brands such as VacationsRentals.com, VRBO (a popular vacation rental site in the United States) and smaller ones such as Toprural.es in Spain, specialising in renting country homes.

Wimdu

Wimdu is a peer-to-peer property rental platform for both vacations and short-term rentals. Founded in Germany in 2011, Wimdu had 39 different domains in its respective languages and currencies as of 2014, and it had more than 300,000 properties in more than 100 countries.16
The concept of Wimdu has been depicted as a copycat of its very similar direct competitor, Airbnb. However, Wimdu has a unique approach to the market it shares with Airbnb, based on  the  Wimdu  policy  of  treating  “different  countries,  different  cultures,  in  different  ways.” Wimdu was the fastest-growing social accommodation website in Europe in 2012. While initially heavily based in Europe, it later expanded to different markets including China, the Philippines and the United States.

Booking.com

Booking.com is a booking website that started as a small start-up in Enschede in the Netherlands in 1996. Based in Amsterdam, it has been owned and operated since 2005 by the United States- based Priceline Group Inc., a provider of online travel and travel-related reservation and search services with revenues of $8.4 billion and a market capitalisation of close to $60 billion at the end of 2014. Through its online travel agent (OTA) services, the company connects consumers wishing to make travel reservations with providers of travel services across the world. The company’s brands include Booking.com, KAYAK, Agoda.com, Rentalcars.com and OpenTable.
Booking.com offers consumers online accommodation reservations, including hotels, bed-and-breakfasts, hostels, apartments, vacation rentals and other properties. It has claimed to have more than 700,000 properties globally under contract, to deal with more than 900,000 room night reservations per day, to have more than 60 million verified reviews and to operate in more than 40 languages. In 2013, Booking.com accounted for more than two-thirds of Priceline’s revenue.17 Booking.com does not charge customers a booking fee but charges accommodation partners a commission on bookings. Booking.com was Google’s most important advertiser in the world, representing approximately $1.5 billion in revenue for the search engine in 2014.18
Finally, another potential would-be competitor was Expedia, Inc., a United States-based parent company of several online travel brands including Expedia.com, Hotels.com, Hotwire.com, Trivago, Travelocity, CarRentals.com and TripAdvisor. Besides the above-listed competitors, several other smaller or niche competitors existed operating slightly different business models.

Value Proposition

Airbnb management believed that travelers chose its service, among other reasons, because it was the best-known site among peer-to-peer rental platforms and because, since its launch, it had built a reputation in the market for being trustworthy. Reviews by both guests and hosts were of the essence in building that trust, yet for hotels, it was estimated that only about 2  of all travelers wrote reviews. Nevertheless, high-quality services based on trust (such as double evaluation systems, the elimination of anonymous reviews, professional photography and 24-7 customer services) have helped Airbnb build a strong reputation in the industry and have led the company to stand out from its competitors.
Additionally, Airbnb’s first-mover advantage helped to build brand awareness and reliability throughout its service and product offerings. Airbnb created market needs for hosts and international travelers and has been receiving positive feedback and reviews from users. All these actions helped Airbnb to build a reputation in the market for being very reliable, which provides assurance to travelers when it comes to booking their trips.
Airbnb further facilitated the process of listing and booking a space by handling all financial transactions. Thus, payments are timely and secure. This adds extra security since a host is paid via Airbnb. A small processing fee is charged only when a place is booked. This was another major advantage of Airbnb compared with competitors such as HomeAway, one of the market leaders. That site puts guests in contact with owners or property managers. However, the transaction is not facilitated, and thus tenants and owners are responsible for processing their own payments.
Airbnb has a balanced and authentic review system that has been changed through the years, but which allows only those who have exchanged services to review one another. HomeAway, in contrast, does not facilitate the transaction, so it cannot determine the accuracy of reviews left by travelers.
Airbnb provides a variety of choices for the types of room (entire place, private or shared room) and prices (minimum to maximum). These various product offerings and the price range provide travelers with greater flexibility when planning trips, which creates value for different segments of travelers.

Industry Trends

The current landscape of the hospitality industry has been broadened with the flourishing peer-to-peer marketplaces within the sharing economy, which coexist with traditional accommodation such as hotels and hostels.
The sharing economy is a relatively new socio-economic model built around the sharing of human and physical resources. It includes the shared creation, production, distribution, trade and consumption of goods and services by different people and organizations.
According to Neelie Kroes, former European commissioner for the digital agenda,
“around producers doesn’t work anymore. They must have a voice, but if you design systems around producers, it means more rules and laws (that people say they don’t want) and those laws become quickly out of date, and privilege the groups that were the best political lobbyists when the law was written. That is old-fashioned compared to a system that helps all of us as consumers and encourages entrepreneurs. We need both those elements in our economy.  […] the disruptive force of technology is a good thing overall. It eliminates some jobs, and it changes others. But it improves most jobs, and it creates new ones as well.”19
The peer-to-peer marketplaces that appeared within the sharing economy have been accelerated, enabled by Web 2.0 technologies, which have allowed for the rise of a variation of the conventional peer-to-peer model. Here, individuals can interact with each other on a two-sided marketplace platform, which is maintained by a third party. The growth of these disintermediation platforms was not a phenomenon specific to the travel accommodation business. Other platforms – such as Wallapop (classified ads), BlaBlaCar (transportation), Trip4real (tours and activities), Kantox (foreign exchange) and Zoppa (lending and loans) – were also gaining considerable traction in diverse sectors of the economy.
Four different drivers contributed to shaping the evolution of this industry: political, economic, social and technology drivers.20
The political drivers were government operations, legal systems and taxation, as well as licensing and certification regulations. In Spain, these political drivers largely were the competence of each region separately, and there was no common political approach for dealing with emerging situations arising from the surge in the sharing economy.21,22
The social drivers included population density, the sustainability mindset, lifestyle trends among youth, as well as independent lifestyles. The growing population density and, especially, urban density favor the network effect of this new model. The sustainability mindset focuses on economic conservation and long-term thinking, encouraging meaningful interaction and trust. Among youth with limited resources, the “sharing mindset” has become common. Additionally, many Airbnb hosts find this new income source empowering to maintain their independent lifestyle.
Key economic drivers included an excess of idle inventory, the inaccessibility of luxury and the influx of venture capitalist funding. The first economic driver aligned with the social drivers, mentioned above, makes use of the idle capacity of the hosts’ homes, which can be shared and monetized. Access is more important than ownership, and those who could not afford a luxury home can now rent it. Regarding the third economic driver, venture capitalists had already invested more than $695 million in Airbnb by the middle of 2014 in five rounds of investment.23
The technology drivers were social networking technologies, mobile technologies and the payment systems. The social networking technologies provide three key features: first, social profiles and reputation tracking; second, social graphics that enable people to connect; and, third, the transfer of information between hosts and guests. Mobile technologies provide access to the people interacting, and this new marketplace requires payment systems to complete the transactions. This leads to on-demand and cost-effective services with a lower administrative overhead cost.
Airbnb’s value proposition in this new environment within the sharing economy model is to offer multiple lodging options, cost savings, locations off the tourist trail, new friends in new places, easy-to-use and personal profiles, and reviews. While Airbnb was the best-known example of this phenomenon, over four years at least 100  companies sprouted up to offer owners a tiny income stream out of dozens of types of physical assets, without needing to buy anything themselves. “The sharing economy is a real trend. I don’t think this is some small blip,” stated Joe Kraus, a general partner at Google Ventures.24

Online Marketing Strategies

Most of Airbnb’s growth can be attributed to its heavy investment in marketing and infrastructure. In the United States, Airbnb took off by implementing a digital marketing strategy involving two digital marketing giants: Craigslist and Google. Partnering with Google was a clear no-brainer, but Airbnb was clever to leverage Craigslist, a widely used classified advertisement website in the United States. Airbnb found that Craigslist was already being used as a platform for people to offer and look for short-term housing. In order to attract customers from Craigslist to Airbnb, it reverse-engineered Airbnb’s platform to fit
with Craigslist and made the two platforms compatible so that anyone listing on Airbnb could create a posting on Craigslist automatically.
Through a partnership with Google, Airbnb was able to not only expand its reach but also target audiences geographically. Airbnb’s strategy with Google went beyond traditional search engine marketing (SEM) as the Airbnb website was not optimized for transactions and direct conversations but rather to inspire trust, Airbnb resources to Google’s display advertising network, the Google Display Network, with compelling banner ad campaigns that included images from actual housing being offered. This allowed Airbnb to introduce its services as an entirely new way to travel the world, as an attempt to inspire a change in travel habits from searching (I want to go to X) to discovering (new travel destinations are uncovered).
In July 2014, Airbnb revealed a major rebranding campaign, including a brand new logo.  According to Brian Chesky, “This new branding changes the whole identity and expression of the company.” The new logo would also help the company move toward its target of making Airbnb as ubiquitous offline as it was online; in essence,  to make it a universal symbol for sharing that would pave the way for expanding its sharing economy service offering in the future, or ridesharing.  “day you’re walking down the street, and you see the Airbnb symbol in a window – you’ll know that it’s an Airbnb and a place that can be shared,” Chesky said.
As part of its rebranding, Airbnb also introduced a tool called Create, which allowed hosts and guests alike to access a basic Photoshop-style service to personalize the Airbnb logo. In the United States, Airbnb also partnered with Zazzle, an online retailer that allowed users to upload images to create their own merchandise. Hosts and guests were encouraged to create tangible items, such as mugs and apparel, with their uniquely personalized Airbnb logo, which they could subsequently share as mementos of their stay, thereby creating an experience worth remembering.
“Airbnb is one of the world’s largest story-doing platforms,” said Jonathan Mildenhall, chief marketing officer at  Airbnb.  was consistent with the use of content marketing, crowdsourcing user-generated content and focusing on storytelling as a key tool to connect with its users.

Economic Impact of the Sharing Economy

Various reports sponsored by peer-to-peer platforms and third parties showed that companies based on the sharing economy model have had a positive impact on and created social value for local economies. One example is Uber, a company in the transport industry based on the sharing economy model. Founded in 2009, the company provides a ride-sharing service that uses a smartphone application to arrange rides between riders and drivers. Uber has claimed that:

  • Some 20,000 jobs are created on the Uber platform every month.
  • The Uber platform generates $2.8 billion per year for the U.S. economy and is growing.
  • Uber’s presence in a city reduces impaired driving.
  • “In 2013,  the  convenience  and  efficiency  of  Uber’s  technology  created  as  many  as 25,000 additional rides in the city of Chicago than the transportation market would have  provided  without  Uber  –  these  are  incremental  rides –  that  otherwise wouldn’t have happened.”25

Airbnb also showed through its own research its economic impact on the main cities where it operates. For example, its reports concluded that ¤135 million in economic activity was created in 2013 in Barcelona, ¤185 million in Paris, ¤100 million in Berlin, $632 million in New York, and $469 million in San Francisco.26.

Course of Action

Airbnb was in an enviable position with continued growth and highly profitable business – on a global basis as well as on a regional basis. However, it faced two main challenges:

  • How could it maintain its high growth rates without sacrificing service levels and quality standards? In particular, with demand outstripping supply, how should the growing community (hosts and guests) be integrated into the existing model? And 2) how should Airbnb position itself with regard to regulatory concerns and the established hotel and hospitality lobby?

Further Growth

Having enjoyed enviable growth rates throughout the previous few years, Airbnb started looking into further opportunities for growth, as Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky explained:
“We want travelers to be able to book homes anywhere. Anywhere includes Asia. Asia’s a nascent market for us. Number two, we’re also looking at other use cases. Airbnb started as a way for travelers to find a budget way to vacation in a city. But now we’re starting to see people who aren’t on a budget. They want a much more high-end experience. And the third is that end of the  day, travelling to  Tokyo, travelling to Tokyo to stay in a home or a hotel. You’re traveling to Tokyo – if you’re on vacation – because you want to have an experience. And we’d love to do more to make that experience special and memorable.”27
Looking into these options, Jeroen Merchiers wondered whether Airbnb in Spain would be able to attract the right hosts to enter the high-end segment or to offer, in addition to a room, experiences such as city tours. Was Airbnb equipped with the right people and capabilities to expand into any of those new segments and, if so, how should it prioritize them? Integration of the Community
The sharing economy was the darling of the moment when Airbnb was launched, and several other business models based on the idea of sharing private assets or services with other people emerged at around the same time.
Uber and Airbnb, in particular, generated a lot of public attention due to their rapid growth rates, extremely high valuations, the disruptive character of their business models and the which they operated.  But there was two companies’ approach to gaining community acceptance. Uber was increasingly seen as untrustworthy due to its cutthroat handling of pricing, drivers (fees, phone commissions and platform deactivation), passengers, etc. 28, 29 For example, Uber experienced a strong unionization movement among its drivers, with calls for action directly against Uber, including a protest at the company’s headquarters in Santa Monica, Los Angeles (see Exhibit 14).
Airbnb aspired to become an unparalleled branded service experience. Looking to avoid a similar fate, Merchiers often thought about what measures Airbnb should take and what role it should play in the community, especially as more service providers (check-in services, cleaning services, hotel rooms, etc.) were being incorporated into the platform. Could similar problems affect Airbnb as well? What might the right mitigation strategies be? Or could these problems be solved before they emerged? For example, could Airbnb guide the behavior of would-be suppliers of services appropriately? Could it define and shape the culture on its platform?

Legal Concerns

According to the latest press coverage, there were contradictory opinions about the need to regulate the business models in peer-to-peer marketplaces, such as Airbnb and Uber. Airbnb’s internal market research on the hospitality industry in Spain suggested that the industry had grown since Airbnb’s inception, indicating a net positive impact. However, Juan Molas, the president of the Spanish Confederation of Hotels and Tourist Accommodation (CEHAT), argued  that,  “along  with  driving  down  rates,  proliferating  private  tourist  accommodations deprive the government of taxes, increase illegal employment, violate consumer rights concerning  security  and  quality,  and  can  harm  the  image  and  reputation  of  Spain’s  tourist destinations.”  30    Hotel lobbyists,   furthermore, on the amount of unregistered accommodation, which basically led to tax and health and safety issues, both mandatory requirements for hotels. These issues have been acknowledged publicly in some countries and, as a result, some countries have considered banning Airbnb in their markets.31
The main question concerning most Airbnb country managers was how Airbnb should react to this situation. Should Airbnb react at all? Or should it make attack the best defence and lobby against the traditional hospitality industry? The efforts of the hotel lobby had borne fruit in certain communities such as Madrid, where a city decree laid out restrictions on  Airbnb operations although the decree had not yet been enforced. However, Spain’s National Markets and Competition Commission (CNMC) objected to that ruling in July 2014 on the basis that it would restrict competition and adversely affect consumers.
Finally, tax issues key concern for Airbnb because a of government officials in cities believed that hosts regularly cheated on tax declarations. Both New York State and New York City imposed a number of taxes that might apply to Airbnb hosts, such as New  York City’s hotel room occupancy tax of 5.875. And yet, because hosts were not officially operating as hotels, they were not paying such taxes.32          To address such appease regulators, about behaving more like hotels by to city authorities.  cities across the United States and Europe, the company made it easier for host and guests to pay tourist and other administrative city taxes. For example, in Paris, Airbnb’s premier world destination with more than 50,000 listings, those charges would amount to
¤0.83 per person per night but, in Amsterdam, they would be 5 of the listing fees plus cleaning fees.

Vacation Rental Market in the Pyrenees

Since its inception in Spain, Airbnb’s focus had clearly been the development of stays in the that concentrated a tourism industry.  To expand Airbnb’s footprint in Spain, Merchiers had been considering the viability of a business plan to exploit the vacation rental property market outside cities. One of the most prominent vacation rental destinations for Spaniards was the Pyrenees. Specifically, Andorra and the five Catalan regions of Vall d’Aran, Cerdanya, Berguedà, Ripollès and Garrotxa made up the lion’s share of all the vacation rental properties in the Pyrenees. Those geographical areas had 115,000 residences available for rent, 70 of which were primary residences and the rest secondary residences (see Exhibit 15). A significant percentage of the primary residents, between 10 and 15, were vacant.
It was estimated that a significant percentage of vacation rental properties, and especially secondary residences, were not directly rented by owners but by professional or semiprofessional real estate businesses that managed multiple properties.
Andorra, with a population of fewer than 80,000 people, had steady demand for roughly seven million individual visitor nights a year, with roughly five million of those concentrated in hotels and the rest in apartment hotels, apartments, campsites, etc. Spanish citizens accounted for half of the visitors to Andorra, and French tourists made up another 40. The aforementioned Catalan areas had demand for an additional 1.5 million individual visitor nights per year with 700,000 in hotels and another 600,000 in campsites. Spanish tourists constituted roughly 80 of the highly seasonal demand (see Exhibit 16). Roughly 50 of the demand for Andorra was concentrated in the winter months, and approximately  50  of the demand for the Spanish Pyrenees was concentrated in the summer months.
A further consideration for Merchiers was the company’s would-be competitors since Airbnb would clearly not be the first one exploiting this market. For example, Booking.com had a list of more than 600 hotels in the Catalan Pyrenees and more than 150 in Andorra. Similarly, it had listings for nearly 200 other properties (campsites, apartments, houses and bungalows) at each of those locations. Villas.com (a vacation rental site owned by Booking.com) had over 500 listings in the Catalan Pyrenees and Andorra. Niumba, a Spanish site owned by TripAdvisor, had over 600 listings in the Spanish Pyrenees and approximately 100 in Andorra. Finally, HomeAway had a list of close to 800 in the Spanish  Pyrenees and 200  in Andorra. There were at least 10 other rental sites with properties listed in the Pyrenees, but with a significantly smaller presence.

The Way Forward

After Merchiers returned from his run on the beach and the sun was high in the sky, he knew it was time to make some decisions. He had a video conference with Airbnb headquarters coming up in a couple of days, and as the recently promoted general manager for Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe, he wanted to decide on a clear before handing over the Iberian peninsula to a new general manager. There is a saying that “you cannot kill an idea whose time has come.” And he felt that Airbnb’s time had come.
He took a pen and a piece of paper and started reviewing his options.
Place an order with us to get a customized paper similar to this or any related topic. NB: The assignment will be done from scratch and it will be 100% original.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

CITY@HOTEL: MARKETING MIX ASSIGNMENT ANSWERS ONLINE IN UK

Question 1 Introduction to services (799 words)

One of the underlying frameworks discussed in class is the service marketing mix. Discuss how each of the extended service marketing mix elements (process, people, and physical evidence) is implemented and executed by City@Hotels in general and how this could be differentiated for a typical B2C customer in the U.K. market. It is important to discuss how each of these elements contributes to satisfy the organisation’s customer.

Overview

The normal product marketing mix which contains 4P’s (Product, pricing, promotion and placement) is good for explaining the marketing mix for products. However, as services have been coming more and more in the picture it was seen that the 4P’s couldn’t justify the marketing as well as possible (Wilson et al., 2016).
Three elements were needed to actually explain the marketing of services since they could tell you about the experience around and about the service instead of just the product (Bhasin, 2018).

People

One of the essential elements of the service marketing mix is people. This consists of all the people involved in the City@Hotel: product or service, whether this is directly or indirectly.
The reason this P is important, is because without people the normal 4P’s wouldn’t result in a successful marketing mix (Acutt, 2017).
You can clearly see that people is an essential part of City@hotels, since they currently have 3100 employees, and want this to be increased by 7000 new employees by 2021 as part of their development strategy (which is an increase over 100%). When they get new employees, they train them by starting off with induction workshops in which they learn amongst others the core values: innovation, credibility and “you can”!City@Hotels keeps their employees involved and informed in/about the company by communication with them via the staffs’ intranet, the company’s magazine, the company’s website and via all the leaders (Altan, 2019). They also offer a special program for outstanding staff which is suitable to become a GM. Finally, the well-performing employees are rewarded by the Hotel.
City@Hotels also focusses on their partners. They have some exclusive partnerships with companies like specific T.A.s. They value these partnerships much, and as token of gratitude they anually hand out appreciation awards.
Regarding guests, they prioritize the guest satisfaction by offering a good product and service, having good interaction and communication with the guest and develop profitable relations (Altan, 2019). To provide the desired product and service they have developed policies and SOP’s. They work with detailed guest profiles in order to develop relationships and ensure guest satisfaction.

Process

The P of Process can be defined by: the systems and processes which can affect the service or the execution of it (Acutt, 2017). It is important to have a clear understanding on all of the processes in optimize them and eventually minimize the costs (Acutt, 2017).
The assignment states that processes are designed and managed to optimize stakeholder value (Altan, 2019).
One way they have done this is by focussing on obtaining the ISO9001:2000 certification for the BU’s systems, this means that they can consistently provide products and services that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements (ISO, 2000).
Some of the most recent process improvements relate to (Altan, 2019):
– improved check in processes
This is in order to reduce waiting times and therefore decrease waiting lines
– Recruitment is being centralized
Since this is getting centralized it will be saving recruitment and training costs
-Maximization of sales through process automation
The reservation systems are being automated which enables client information to be shared amongst all relevant stakeholders.
Part of the research to improve processes is outsourced to external companies because, there isn’t enough manning to fill and support an independent R&D department.
Furthermore, in 2006 a Health and Safety committee was created on Board and BU level which is managed by the GM in order to keep both employees and guests safe and healthy (Altan, 2019).

Physical evidence

The physical evidence is the environment in which the service is delivered and where the customer interacts with the firm.It’s also the facilities or communication of the service (Wilson et al., 2016).
Before the guest arrives at the hotel they (most-likely) have already encountered some of the physical evidence. Since they have heard or seen the hotel in one way or another, for instance via the website, brochure or press announcements.
When they enter the hotel, they will encounter all the physical evidence of the concept like the international plug system, XXL king-size bed, rain shower or the customer pads (used to control the rooms’ temperature and lighting) (Alton, 2018).
There are multiple ways in which they show that they care about the environment, like the low energy light bulbs and the use of recycled wash water in all BU’s (City@Hotels, 2018).

UK Market

Since the UK is a different country with a different culture, some of the aspects from City@Hotels may need to change in order to fit in the new society and adapt it to that lifestyle.
Due to the Brexit, the people part will probably undergo some bigger changes, the process part will most likely focus on adapting the processes to the new country and the physical evidence will not require dramatic changes.

Extended marketing mix Changes
People The current foresight is that the UK will leave the EU in 2019. However, the date isn’t certain due to multiple reasons (Hunt & Wheeler, 2019). This is important to know since City@Hotel wishes to expand to the UK by 2021 and consequently have to deal with the changes it involves.Data shows that 12.3% of employees in the UK’s hospitality sector are EU nationals compared to 72.7% who are British nationals. If it gets harder to work in the UK as an EU national the hospitality will face a challenge since these employees cover over 10% of the staff (KPMG, 2017).
 
Another thing which will probably result in less guests, is the loss of the freedom of movement of persons (Eisenberg, 2019). It will be harder to get in and out of the UK which means people will prefer to choose a destination which is easier to travel to.
Some of the key changes which City@Hotel should take into account regarding the different behaviour of their guests are:
stronger group travel, shorter lead time since they prefer last minutes, long 4-day weekends instead of a regular weekend, the possible increase/decrease of the Pound VS. the Euro and Dollar and the rise in domestic tourism (Diversified, 2017).
Processes Nowadays more and more is done via the internet. When the City@hotel brand wants to expand to the UK it is important that they are well aware of the things which can go wrong. In the previous years there has been an increase in booking frauds around the world, in which people pay for a room which turned out to be a scam from a fraud (ABTA, 2017). Reports have shown that especially in the UK the booking scams are dramatically increasing. Between 2016 and 2017 there has already been an increase of 20% (Mintel Academic, 2017). These numbers show that the booking process should be looked into to prevent bad commerce.
Physical Evidence When looking at the UK market, the physical evidence won’t be that different from other countries. Some of the only things which could be taken into account are things like the famous hot breakfast from England. But the things such as a good bed and free Wi-fi are still main requirements (Mintel Academic, 2015).

 

Question 2 Building customer relationships´ & Customer profiling (383 words)

Develop about 3 customer profiles, leaning on a multivariate segmentation approach, that are relevant for a hotel operating in the UK market. Does the value proposition of City@Hotels fit the requirements of these segments – why would these potential customers actually choose City@Hotels? Integrate concepts such as customer profitability segmentation,customer lifetime value and related degrees of customization.
The UK has a relatively good global connectivity since there are well over 100countries which are having direct air connections to them (Visitbritain, 2017). This information combined with the rapidly growing tourism market (as shown in the table) in the UK shows why it is important to focus on international guests (Coffey, 2017).
City@Hotels has segmented its customer by looking at trends. One of the trends they saw, was that a new type of traveller was emerging. A traveller who drinks Champagne, wears jeans and an expensive watch, uses public transport and looks towards costs and ecological issues (Altan, 2019). This group of travellers also think that it’s important to look at the worlds’ ecological issues. Also, since it’s the 21st century they want to stay connected to their friends, family and social media.
This group can be recognized as a wealthy, sustainable and relatively young group of customers (Altan, 2019).

It could be a smart idea to focus on the American visitors since they are the second to largest group of travellers going to the UK. Since these travellers keep showing a steady growth of visits and spending throughout the years (Visitbritain, 2017).
Since Americans tend to show a behaviour which is referred to as “list ticking” which basically mean that they go on a holiday to explore the hotspots and want to see all of them and when they come back they want to relax in the hotel and get ready for the next day (The Telegraph, 2018).
  Segment Business (Peter)
Age 25-34
 Household income 100,000-149,999
Residence US North east (urban areas)
Interests Exploring, socializing, having an image associated with the brand and feeling connected. He goes on a monthly business trip to create new business relations or refresh old ones.
I segmented the market into these variants since these (according to statistics) are the aspects of the guests that go on holiday from the US to the UK the most (Rafat, 2016).
Peter
To clarify this customer profile, I decided to create a persona of the ideal customer within this target group. The persona is from here on called Peter.
Peter is a 27-year-old male who is born and raised in New York. He has a company which makes him good money (130K annually). This company is green key certified and is also helping out locals. He has a girlfriend which helps and works for his company. When he is traveling for a meeting he likes to stay an extra day to explore s new city. Since time=money, he tries to plan his time efficient in order to visit all the hotspots as soon as possible. Whenever he sees the opportunity to socialize he takes it since he believes that you can always learn from others and a broad network is something he values. Additionally, he is “brand oriented”, which basically means that he looks and grades brands, if he likes something he will stick to it.
The reason Peter is an ideal persona is because he:
– is within the age range that prefers to go on holiday in the UK
– he cares about the environment
– has enough income to make it possible and interesting to have as a guest
– he is a “list ticker”
– he would most-likely enjoy the social spaces
– he values brands and is likely to stick to one he approved before
Looking at the lifetime value of Peter, we can see that this has much potential when he approves the brand. He will most-likely choose one of the City@Hotels as his preferred place to stay whenever he is on a business trip, or when he is on holiday with his wife. He also enjoys the fact that he feels part of the new group of international travellers.

 

Maria

A 55-year-old lady who lives in a poor populated area in a village. She is married and has children of the age of 20. She enjoys gardening, cycling and painting. This group of people is around 22% of the total population. Her hobbies are: Walking, cycling, puzzling, gardening and she likes pop-classics music. She goes on a long holiday 1.5 times a year, twice on a short holiday. she prefers to stay in a bungalow or villa. The only media she uses are old magazines, local newspapers and local news broadcasts.
When looking at her behaviour regarding holidays, she wants the price to be transparent, things to be clear, clean and easy. She does not like busy areas, illegal things and exuberant shopping. She is also not a fan of too much unnecessary luxury, and she also dislikes extremely colourful and/or busy pictures.
She values family tradition, safety, local and traditional regularity.
The Dutch have the UK at number 7 as their favourite holiday destination. And 5.6% of all visits in the UK comes from NL (Visitbritain, 2017).
The reason this market seemed interesting to segment was because over 80% is making a repeat trip within 10 years and 96% is extremely likely to visit Britain again (Visitbritain, 2017).
Their most popular activities were sightseeing of the hotspots and shopping (Visitbritain, 2017).
Dutch people are also know to enjoy socializing and connecting with others (Hollandexpatcetner, 2008).
These behavioural end psychographic characteristics are the reason they seem an interesting target group.

  Segment Leisure (Lotte)
Age 19-24
Income 15000-17,500
Residence The Netherlands
Interests Exploring, having fun, traveling, sightseeing, partying and connecting with others.The usually go on holliday twice a year, once with family and once with their partner/friends

 
I segmented the market by looking at which traveller is most likely to visit the UK from the NL, then continued looking at statistics of how much money these people make on average. Their interests are a combination of “generalized” interests from that age group and interests which are related to City@Hotels (Minimumloon, 2019) (Visitbritain, 2017).

Lotte
To clarify this customer profile, I decided to create a persona of the ideal customer within this target group. The persona is from here on called Lotte.
Lotte is a 22-year-old girl who has been born and raised within the Netherlands. She is writing her thesis which offers her much freedom in which she works most of the time. With this work she makes around 1400 euro a month. In her spare time, she enjoys going to the city centre with her friends. She loves shopping and sitting on the terrace. Whenever there are annual festivities she always likes to go there and make some pictures. She always plans a yearly trip with all her friends to visit a foreign city. During this holiday they enjoy shopping, visiting local places and going to a party. During these parties they usually end up meeting new people.
Looking at Lotte her lifetime value we see that she only has a yearly trip with her friends, however, since she is a social person with many connections she will keep the brand in mind and speak about it. Also, whenever she gets children she will be likely to visit the brand again. However, this time she will be in a different segment.

 

Customer lifetime value

Customer life time value is important because, the higher the number, the more money you make of a single customer. This is important since it costs a lot of money to attract a new customer opposed to keeping a customer. Also, a repeated customer will be more likely to spread positive word of mouth. If your CLV increases you know that you are making a better impression on your existing customers (and the other way around) (TheDailyEgg, 2018).

Peter (business)
Total Business nights                                      39,272,000
Total business visits                                        4,745,000
Total business spending                                                4,248,000,000
Average business spending per night is                 108euros
Total business travelers                                                4,181,000
average nights per visit                                 9.4
average visits per year                                   1.134
average spend per visit                                 895.26
895.26 Average purchase value
1.134 average purchase frequency
10 years is the average customer lifetime spanAverage customer Value:  1.134*895.26= 1016.02
Average customer lifetime value: 1016.02*10=10160.25
(Horsfield, 2018)

 

Lotte (Leisure)
Total leisure nights                                          4,220,000
Total leisure visits                                            859,569
Total leisure spending                                    411,856,128.20
Average leisure spending per night         97.59
Total leisure travellers                                   1,375,000
Average nights per visit                                 4.91
Average visits per year                                  1.6
Average spend per visit                                                480
480 Average purchase value
1.6 average purchase frequency
5 years is the average customer lifetime spanAverage customer Value:  1.6*480= 767.83
Average customer lifetime value: 767.83*5= 3839.13
(Visitbritain, 2017)

 

Customer profitability

Platinum Platinum customers are the upper tier of the customer base and includes people which are spending top dollar or usually buy many goods and/or services. They are heavy users and in most cases, trust your company enough to try new things.Once the persona called Peter has approved of the brand he will most likely turn into a platinum customer since he values the image and connection he has to the brand.
Gold Gold customers might visit your company as much as platinum users. However, they are more sensitive to prices and are a little more likely to shop at a competitor for a better deal. This tear is usually around the 21th to the 50th percentile in profitability.The persona called Lotte is likely to be a gold customer since she and her friends would enjoy keeping using the City@Hotels brand wherever they go, but they are sensitive to better deals.
Iron The Iron customers are even more price sensitive than gold customers, and less likely to be loyal. Usually businesses just accept this and accept the modest business they gain from them
Lead The Lead tear could be the primary reason to understand and evaluate the customer pyramid, in addition to the platinum customers. These guests usually cost more money than they generate. They are most-likely to do this by buying heavily discounted products or demanding a lot from your staff and sometimes even continuously returning and/or exchanging products they bought. It could be a good strategy to usher these people elsewhere as they can negate much of the profit.
This would probably relate to Maria since this hotel isn’t something she would like which will most-likely result in a bad experience which will cost money to compensate.
(Powell, 2016)

 
The Customer Pyramid

Question 3 Service innovation and design (798 words)

Work out Keller’s brand equity model for City Hotels. Describe each aspect of the model in detail and make sure all descriptions together make up a complete and coherent profile of the brand. Elaborate on and justify how the aspects of service design (interactive experience model and the 4 strategic tools of the physical environment) contribute to building a coherent and consistent brand for the case company.
Service innovation and design
Keller’s equity model is used to show the process of building a brand and what happens when you go through all the steps in the right order à Brand salience (identity), brand performance & imagery (meaning), consumer feelings & judgements (response) and finally brand resonance (relationships) (EURIB, 2009).The concept behind the brand equity model is to shape how customers think and feel about you and your product.

Brand Salience

The standard basis of your brand is trying to figure out and communicating what you are all about. Besides making sure that people are aware of your brand, you also need to be sure that they are getting the right message as well.
At this first level of the pyramid it is important to deliver the message what kind of brand you are and what you are trying to communicate.
This step is mostly about asking the question “who are you?” (Mindtools team, 2012). City@Hotels is striving to be unique with their core values which are: Innovation, credibility, technology and “you can!”. They are showing it with the features and facilities they offer. However, this is not experienced in their pricing since they want to offer affordable luxury to their customers (Altan, 2019).

Brand performance and Brand imagery

These two terms combined should give an answer to the question “what are you?” (Mindtools team, 2012).
Performance:
City@hotels typical guests want: a shower and a good bed since they spend most of their time exploring the city or within the social spaces of the hotel.
City@Hotels are meeting these needs by offering trendy rooms: with clean facilities, rainshower, XXL-kingsize bed and several lighting options. Throughout the rest of the hotel they offer the guests dining options free Wi-fi and social spaces in which they can socialize with others (Altan, 2018).
Imagery:
After meeting the tangible needs of the guests, it is also important to focus on the intangible needs. They do this by encouraging the social spaces to socialize with others. Next to the social spaces they also show a relaxing environment throughout the hotel. They should be communicating their trendy image to the outside world via things like social media.

Judgements and Feelings

This step is all about how the customers respond and think about the Brand City@Hotels.Each customer has unique needs and wants, upon these they will make judgements about this brand (Mindtools team, 2012).

Judgements

Quality: The judgements based upon the actual and perceived quality mostly involves the quality of the rooms, sanitary facilities, F&B and the quality of the service encounters. The quality will be most-likely be perceived as good since the hotel offers luxury which would usually be above their price range. Also, the ability of City@Hotels to deliver constant quality across all of their properties is something which gives a sign to the outside world about their standards of quality (Altan, 2019).
Superiority: by looking how guests judge you compared to the competition shows you where you are in the market. The competition in the UK market consists of: Comfort Inns, Ibis, Holiday Inn and Bastion (Altan, 2019).

Feelings

Since they aim for guests who like to explore the city and relax in the hotel, City@Hotels shows a “warm at-home-feeling which is in for socializing and fun”. They express the warm feeling with their comfortable and relaxed atmosphere which the guests feel throughout the entire hotel. The fact that it is a new city which is attractive to younger people makes it exciting and fun for people to explore the city. They can get to know new people in the social spaces, which again, creates a warm feeling of belonging.

Brand Resonance

When all the previous dimensions are aligned and clearly expressed by the company, and (in a good way) received/perceived by the customers the company becomes a “brand advocate” (Bhasin, 2018). However, this level means there is a huge social and psychological connection between the guest and the brand. This is why there are barely any companies which are successful in this part of the pyramid (Bhasin, 2018).
The way City@Hotels is working towards this goal is by giving their guests a feeling that they belong to a new group of international travellers. When they start to have a feeling of belonging they try to enhance this with their loyalty program called “City@Citizen.
Next to ensuring that they are having a strong feeling of belonging, they also ensure that they are giving personal recognition at the business unit level.
Since this step is important for showing how connected customers feel to the brand the encourage people to talk about them online. They do this via the service oriented social media presence they have created. This encourages people to talk about the brand, their stay and their expierences (Bhasin, 2018) (Altan, 2019).

Question 4 Link to E-marketing & website design (826 words)

use the ‘E-marketing mix’ (Kalyanam & McIntyre, 2002) to describe and explain how the company website should function as information source to attract more B2B clients through direct channels. Identify the type of business that is attractive to target for City@Hotels and develop arguments to support the choice of specific e-marketing elements to achieve the above mentioned aim. Explain how these website elements address customer expectations using the variables of the Customer Gap in the ServQual model (Parasuraman, Zeithaml & Berry, 1988)

Target market

During their start-up, City@Hotels has observed a new kind of traveller. “Today’s (business or leisure) traveller often travels in jeans and t-shirt, tends to wear an expensive watch, drinks Champagne or Cava and takes public transport as he considers driving in cities with his own car (or a company car) is not efficient in terms of time, cost or because of ecological issues. This type of traveller want a good bed and shower. Next to that, they spend most of their time in the city or in the social spaces in the hotel (Altan, 2019)”. They chose this as their target market and focus on these guests.

E-Marketing mix

The standard marketing mix is mostly developed for products which are purchased in shops. The rise of the information age with the internet has revolutionized the way we sell our products and services. Many consumers use the internet to do research and purchase products online, therefore, firms should create fitting strategies to attract and retain customers. The e-marketing mix is a refreshed marketing mix which should get you ready for the online market place (Tailor & Tailor, 2019).

B2B client

When looking at the B2B aspect of the hotel, they want to focus on “the new kind of traveller”.
The company called “Absolute digital media” consists of young entrepreneurs who are specialized in E-Marketing.
The company has won multiple awards like “UK southern business awards, European search awards and biddable UK awards”. They don’t wear suits but prefer jeans and a blouse. They are interested in social media and exploring new places. On a regular basis people from big companies travel to them to have consults and/or to help developing new ideas/strategies. They also have regular big meetings, however their office isn’t that big, this is why they are always on the look for a good place to talk and negotiate.
Absolute Digital Media seems like a perfect fit as a target market for City@Hotels. They can offer the guests that are visiting them a place to stay, but also offer their employees who go on a business trip a place in other countries where City@Hotels is situated. Since there are many people working together with absolute digital media,they will somehow have similar needs and interests like the company itself. This means that they will most-likely also be a great fit.
When they are targeted their “trendy” brand will start to feel associated with the City@Hotels brand and would want to keep working together. This can result in a cooperation regarding our specialties. We can provide accommodations for a somehow more interesting price, and they can help us to keep our electronic environment up to date (win-win).
The focus from the E-marketing mix should be on the e-place. Their website is the place in which people are recommended to go, therefore,this should show who they are, and why they are interesting for the “new traveller”. This e-place should also offer a good customer data base for guests who have joined the loyalty program in order to keep it transparent (Tailor & Tailor, 2019).

Customer Journey

When the Absolute Digital Media is targeted they will have heard about it and promote it internally since they have a close team.
The customer journey will be explained with the following story which is clarified by the table (Nijhuis, 2016).
The business will become aware of the brand via a direct marketing towards them and take it into consideration.
Since our online environment shows that we are attractive to “the new traveller” they will feel some sort of association. This will have them try out our brand and experience what it’s like. We will adapt them into our loyalty program in to retain them as a customer. This will most-likely spread awareness around all their offices. When the connection is made they are going to spread positive word of mouth and recommend us to their incoming customers and we will broaden our network via them.
Customer Journey

GAP model

When looking at the E-marketing mix the 1st gap seems like the gap which could lead to the biggest gap. This gap is about the service which is expected by the guests and about managements’ perceptions of consumers expectations (as can also be seen in the table) (Verint, 2013).
The reason this gap seems to be the biggest potential hazard is because of the following:
people nowadays make snap judgments. It only takes 1/10th of a second to form an opinion about a person or website. And it takes only a small 0.05 seconds to decide if you want to stay on a website or leave it (Laja, 2019).
Since this (probably) is the first contact moment in the customer journey, it is important that we send out the right first impression. It is important that we don’t send out the wrong message to the guests since this creates confusion. If this is done right the gap probably won’t occur.
Gap Model of Service Quality

Conclusion (127 words)

During this report we have had a look into the extended marketing mix, and how this would be different if City@Hotels would start operating in the UK. We then created some personas and had a look at their behaviours and profiles. We saw that some of them were more profitable than others. The brand equity model showed us how the brand and image of City@Hotels was built. We also had a look on how others see and experience our brand. In the final part of the report the E-Marketing mix was discussed, and it showed the B2B customer which would be interesting to get targeted by City@Hotels. We ended up with analysing the E-Marketing mix and how this could prevent gaps from occurring in the GAP model.

Reference list

ABTA (2017) 6.7 million lost to holiday booking fraud. [online] Available at: https://www.abta.com/news/ps67-million-lost-holiday-booking-fraud [accessed 09-04-2019]
Accut, M. (2017) The Marketing Mix Debunked. [online] Available at: https://marketingmix.co.uk/people/ [Accessed 02 April 2019]
Altan, M. (2019) City@Hotels Case Study, EHM2.MA-TR1-03 Marketing. [online] Breda University of Applied Sciences. Available at: cumlaude Learning [Accessed 02 April 2019]
Bhasin, H. (2018) Extended Marketing Mix. [online] Available at: https://www.marketing91.com/extended-marketing-mix/[Accessed 04April 2019]
Bhasin, H. (2018) Keller’s Brand equity Model – CBBE Model by Keller [online] Available at: https://www.marketing91.com/kellers-brand-equity-model/ [Accessed 09 April 2019]
Coffey, H. (2017) Brexit tourism BOOM: more Americans than EVER are visiting the UK while Brits shun the US [online] Available at: https://www.express.co.uk/travel/articles/783644/more-americans-visit-uk [Accessed 10 April 2019]
Diversified (2017) Domestic Tourism Industry Snapshot Survey 2017 [online] Available at: https://www.tourismshow.co.uk/domestic-tourism-industry-snapshot-survey-2017-results/ [Accessed 05 April 2019]
Eisnberg, A (2019) Business After Brexit: What Changes for UK Businesses? [online] Available at: https://business.trustedshops.co.uk/blog/brexit-damage-european-market/#changes [Accessed 05 April 2019]
EURIB (2019) Customer Based Brand Equity model van Keller [online] Available at: https://www.eurib.net/customer-based-brand-equity-model-van-keller/ [Accessed 08 April 2019]
Holland Expat Center (2008) Personal & Social needs for Dutch people [online] Available at: https://www.hollandexpatcenter.com/themes/personal—social-needs/network—social-clubs/ [accessed 12 April 2019]
Horsefield, G. (2018) Travel trends – overseas residents in the UK [online] Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/leisureandtourism/datasets/overseasresidentsvisitstotheuk [Accessed 11 April 2019]
Hunt, A. & Wheeler, B. (2019) Brexit: All you need to know about the UK leaving the EU [online] Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-32810887 [Accessed 06 April 2019]
ISO (2000) Quality management systems – Requirements. [online] Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/21823.html [Accessed 05 April 2019]
KPMG (2017) Labour Migration in the Hospitality Sector [online] Available at: http://www.bha.org.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/BHA-EU-migration-final-report-170518-public-vSTC.pdf [Accessed 05 April 2019]
Laja, P. (2019) First impressions matter: the importance of great visual design [online] Available at: https://conversionxl.com/blog/first-impressions-matter-the-importance-of-great-visual-design/ [Accessed 14 April 2019]
Mindtools Team (2012) Keller’s Brand Equity Model Building a Powerful Brand [online] Available at: https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/keller-brand-equity-model.htm [Accessed 09 April 2019]
Minimumloon (2019) Gemiddeld inkomen – info over inkomens en salarissen [online] Available at: https://www.gemiddeld-inkomen.nl/minimumloon/ [Accessed 11 April 2019]
Mintel Academic (2015) Hotel Franchising in Europe – October 2015 (Major Hotel Franchisors in Europe). [online] Available at: http://academic.mintel.com.proxy1.dom1.nhtv.nl/display/753286/?highlight#hit1 [accessed 09 April 2019]
Mintel Academic (2017) The European Leisure Travel Industry – Europe – June 2017 (Deceptive Booking Practices). [online] Available at: http://academic.mintel.com.proxy1.dom1.nhtv.nl/display/841311/?highlight#hit1[Accessed 09 April 2019]
Nijhuis, N. (2016) Customer journey with touchpoints English [online] Available at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Customer_journey_with_touchpoints_English.png [Accessed 14 April 2019]
Peltier, D. (2017) Travel habits of Americans: Gen Xers lead hotel-mobile Bookings among U.S. Travelers [online] Available at: https://skift.com/2017/09/06/travel-habits-of-americans-gen-xers-lead-hotel-mobile-bookings-among-u-s-travelers/ [Accessed 11 April 2019]
Powell, A. (2016) Provide Top-Notch Service: Pitfalls & Successes of Service Quality [online] Available at: https://slideplayer.com/slide/6904466/ [accessed 12 April 2019]
Rafat, A. (2016) Travel habits of Americans [online] Available at: https://skift.com/2016/08/25/travel-habits-of-americans-only-13-percent-traveled-abroad-for-holidays-in-last-year/ [Accessed 10 April 2019]
Tailor, P. & Tailor, S. (2019) E marketing mix [online] Available at: https://www.learnmarketing.net/emarketing.htm[Accessed 14 April 2019]
The Daily Egg (2018) The Importance of Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) and How to Calculate It [online] Available at: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/customer-lifetime-value/ [Accessed 12 April 2019]
The Telegraph (2018) The truth about how Americans travel [online] Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/north-america/united-states/articles/what-american-tourists-are-really-like/ [Accessed 10 April 2019]
Verint (2013) Service Quality Gap Model [online] Available at: https://community.verint.com/b/customer-engagement/posts/service-quality-gap-model [Accessed 14 April 2019]
Visitbritain (2017) 2017 Snapshot [online] Available at: https://www.visitbritain.org/2017-snapshot [Accessed 10 April 2019]
Wilson, A., Zeithami, V., Bitner, M. J., Gremler, D. (2016) Services Marketing: Integrated Customer Focus Across the Firm, 3rd ed. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

THL124 MARKETING AND BUSINESS FOR THE SERVICE SECTOR ASSESSMENT

Assessment Brief:
London Is A City Of Events And Festivals. Every Year, There Are A Huge Range Of Activities For The Visitors To See And Do Along The River Themes With Entertainment, Food And Drink To Enjoy. They Can Also Expect Fireworks, Live Music And Grand Parades.
TASK: 
In Your Role As A Marketing Manager For Your London Based Tourism Hospitality Event Organisation, You Have Ben Briefed By The Senior Management Team To Develop A Marketing Plan In Relation To One Of The Following Options:
A: Create A Marketing Plan For An Existing Tourism, Hospitality Or Events Product/Service To Increase Customer Engagement And Sales During Any Chosen Event In London In 2019.
B: Create A Marketing Plan For The Development Of A New Tourism, Hospitality Or Events Product/Service To Increase Customer Engagement And Sales During Any Chosen Event In London In 2019.
Module Leader: Leteechia Rungasamy
learning outcomes
Testing learning outcomes 1‐3 and contributing 50% of the final module mark.
Learning outcomes upon successful completion of this module, students will have demonstrated: ‐ :
Knowledge

  1. Knowledge of the fundamentals of marketing and its application to the tourism, hospitality and events sectors in its broadest
  2. Knowledge of business processes as a complex system of analysis, planning and implementation in tourism, hospitality and
  3. Knowledge of the role of the tourism, hospitality and events consumer within marketing and business

Skills:

  1. The ability to apply knowledge to the creation of a business and marketing plan for use in the tourism, hospitality and events sectors.

Assessment

This module has two assessments.
Assessment 1: Individual Project (50%) and Assessment 2: Examination (50%).
Assessment 1: Individual Written Project (50%)
For this assessment, you will produce individually a formal written project of approximately 2500 words excluding references and appendices. This assesses learning outcomes 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Please read carefully the following instructions:
Assessment 1 Brief:
Background
London is a city of events and festivals. Every year, there are a huge range of activities for the visitors to see and do along the river Thames with entertainment, food & drink to enjoy. They can also expect fireworks, live music and grand parades. Mayor of London (2019) states “these events offer something different, keeping the crowds entertained and ensuring that they remain as a cherished memory in their minds for many years to come.”
Task:
In your role as a Marketing Manager for your London based tourism/hospitality/event organisation, you have been briefed by the senior management team to develop a marketing plan in relation to ONE of the following options:
A: Create a marketing plan for an existing tourism, hospitality or events product/service to increase customer engagement and sales during any chosen Event in London in 2019.
B: Create a marketing plan for the development of a new tourism, hospitality or events product/service to increase customer engagement and sales during in any chosen Event in London in 2019.

Assessment 1 deadline: Individual Written Project ‐ TBC

Provisional marks and feedback are released within four working weeks of your submission.
Word count: 2500 words
It is  important to adhere to the prescribed  word  count limit to avoid  any penalties.
Your word count excludes table of title page, table of content, any appendices and reference
list/bibliography. The word count must be stated at the bottom of your title page. Please note falsifying the word count is classed as an academic misconduct.
Table 1 Applied Penalties for exceeding the word count.

Word limit Penalty Actual Word Count
Exceeds limit by up to 10% No penalty – tolerance band(see below) 3300
Exceeds limit by 10.1-20% -5% 3301 – 3600
Exceeds limit by 20.1-30% -10 % 3601 – 3900
Exceeds limit by 30.1-40% -15 % 3901 – 4200
Exceeds limit by 40.1-50% -20 % 4201 – 4500
Exceeds limit by more than 50% Mark of zero 4501+

For further information see AQH‐F14 Policy on Penalties for Exceeding the Prescribed Word
Limit for an assignment https://goo.gl/ckLmDZ.

Assessment 2:

Written Exam (50%)
Exam Date: (Exact date, place and time – TBC)
Testing learning outcomes 1‐3 and contributing 50% of the final module mark.

Assessment Criteria

Your seminar tutor on the basis of the following general criteria will assess the paper:

  • The university generic assessment criteria
  • Discretion – additional credit may be awarded to a student who tackles a difficult subject well.
  • The “Presentation” element of the Generic Assessment Criteria will be used to assess the report

Assessment Regulations

For further information regarding Assessment Regulations, extenuating circumstances or extensions and academic integrity, please refer to your Programme Handbook on the University of Sunderland in London information page on Canvas.

Reading List

Please access your reading list from the library website. To access it, please go to https://moduleresources.sunderland.ac.uk/ and search for your module.

Submission guidelines

There are currently two steps that you need to follow to ensure that you successfully submit your work for marking. Your submission links will become available approximately 3 weeks prior to your submission deadline, along with detailed instructions on how to submit your assignment, but in the meantime please feel free to also watch this Assignment Submission Instructions video.

Grading

You will be marked in accordance to the University of Sunderland assessment criteria attached below. The assessment criteria covers; Relevance, Knowledge, Analysis, Argument and Structure, Critical Evaluation, Presentation, Reference to Literature.

 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"

MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT QUESTION ON ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR

Assignment Tasks:

You are a Human Resource manager at a large Spanish bank as part of your job you are required to conduct annual performance appraisals for 30 employees at various levels in the bank, ranging from young trainees right through to experienced mid-tier managers. These performance appraisal interviews are important for the employees and the organisation: they are used to determine pay levels for the next year and also form the basis for major decisions about promotion, training, etc. From next year, however, the annual performance appraisal will take on an extra significance as the bank is thinking of adopting a “rank and yank” approach. This means that the top 20% of performers at each level across the organisation will each receive a performance bonus while the bottom 20% of performers at each level across the organization will be fired. So, from next year the stakes will be very high and, as part of this year’s performance appraisal you must give the employees clear and unambiguous advice about how they need to improve their performance in order to avoid being fired and perhaps even gain a bonus. Before their appraisal each employee is required to fill out a self-assessment questionnaire. The first question asks the employee, “How would you rate your overall performance in the previous year.” They can rate themselves from “Poor” to “Outstanding.”

Lea Restrepo

The first person you seen is Les Restrepo. She is a 23 year old Management trainee who has just completed her first year with the bank. At her interview 18 months ago (which you conducted) Lea Restrepo was confident she would graduate from the university with merit, although when she actually got her results in average. Still, she had impressed at the interview with her enthusiasm and knowledge of the banking system (her father had been a senior executive at another bank) so you decided to take a punt on her and offer her one of the coveted and highly competitive management training positions. Unfortunately for you and Lea Restrepo’s colleagues, this decision isn’t working out very well. Her performance has been, at best, average and she struggles with lots of things that other trainees are finding to be straightforward and she often blames others for her mistakes. Still, her enthusiasm is undiminished and she enters into each new task with great vigor (even if she usually ends up doing a poor job). In fact, it’s difficult to persuade Lea Restrepo not to volunteer for jobs that she is obviously (to others at least) unsuited for. In her self-assessment, she has rated his performance over the previous year as “Outstanding.”

Charles Nadal

The next person you see is Caries Nadal. He joined the bank as a 18 year old trainee and has slowly but surely made his way up to be a competent and reliable supervisor of a 10 person team of bank tellers. These are the “front line” customer service operatives who deal with the public all day. It can be a stressful and demanding job but it creates few obvious opportunities for the team members to exercise their autonomy. Still, Carles Nadal’s is one of the top performing teams in the bank and they report high levels of job satisfaction and morale. They all attribute this to his low-key but supportive management style. Despite this, Carles Nadal is extremely modest about his own skills and achievements. He is quite shy and introverted but seems to have a knack for getting the best out of others. At 35, Caries Nadal has been in the supervisor’s role for 5 years and you think he should really be thinking about applying for promotion, although it is unlikely he will ever do this without considerable prompting and support. He attributes all the team’s successes to its members and never takes any credit himself. In his self-assessment, he has rated her performance over the previous year as “Average.”

Questions:

Part A: An Analysis of Lea Restrepo and Caries Nadal’s Situation

  1. How would you explain Lea Restrepo and Caries Nadal’s behaviour in relation to their own performance and the performance of their colleagues?
  2. Bearing in mind your response to the previous question, suggest advice that you would give Caries Nadal so that he gets rated in the top 20% and receives a fair annual bonus? Conversely, what advice would you give Lea Restrepo so that she can avoid being “yanked” (i.e., being rated in the bottom 20% and fired) next year? In your answer be sure to discuss how both Lea Restrepo and Caries Nadal might improve their self-awareness about their own competence and how they might use this to work on improving their work performance.

Part B: A Personal Reflection
In any situation where our performance is being rated by others, most of us tend to overestimate our competence level in the particular skill being rated. In light of this insight, reflect on how you would respond in the future if, like Lea Restrepo, your success at university doesn’t meet your own expectations? Be sure to take into consideration key attitudinal and behavioural factors like your response to advice and criticism, your levels of motivation, your willingness to seek help, etc. Also, be sure to draw on additional appropriate material you find through your own research.
The word count is 5,000 words (+/- 10%) with indexed headings & subheadings in the following format:
– A Cover Page
– Table of Contents
– Introduction
– Body
– Conclusion Reference Section
# The Harvard Referencing System must be adopted with in-text citations.

Further Instructions for Assignment

  1. The general assessment criteria are: Substance, Originality of work, Presentation, Use of illustrations / examples, where appropriate.
  2. Independent research on the relevant topics is encouraged.
  3. Special consideration would be given to students who demonstrate an in-depth analysis of the questions.
  4. Candidates who simply regurgitate their answers from sources may risk getting a poor mark and may risk failing the paper outright if plagiarism is detected.
  5. Any similarities between individual assignments will result in a fail grade.
  6. The presentation format should be:
    • Top, Bottom margins : 1″
    • Left margins : 1.25″
    • Right margin : 0.8″
    • Header & Footer : 0.5″
    • Printing : Single Page A4 size
    • Vertical spacing : Double
    • Font type & size : Times Roman 12 pt
    • Binding : Comb
    • Page numbering : Page x of y (right justified in footer)
  7. Retain a copy of your assignment.
  8. You are required to submit a labelled soft copy of your assignment.

Legends for Term Used

Terms General Description of Work Presented
Excellent
  • Relevant issues consistently identified/discussed/analysed to a very high standard with very clear explanations/rationale/justification.
  • Very strong evidence of wider reading with relevant citations used providing very strong insights into the topic of discussion.
  • Critical analysis very well developed with strong identifications of pros and cons and the impact/implications of both to the issue at hand.
  • Very professionally and creatively presented quality of work that is very neat and tidy with very coherent flows of arguments.
Good/Strong/Clear
  • Relevant issues consistently identified/discussed/analysed to a high standard with clear explanations/rationale/justification.
  • Strong evidence of wider reading with relevant citations used providing strong insights into the topic of discussion.
  • Critical analysis well developed with good identifications of pros and cons and the impact/implications of both to the issue at hand.
  • Some professionalism and creativity shown in the quality of presentation with work that is neat and tidy with coherent flows of arguments.
Some / Fair / Somewhat
  • Relevant issues consistently identified / discussed / analyzed to a satisfactory standard with good explanations / rationale / justification. Some inconsistencies.
  • Some evidence of wider reading with relevant citations used providing good insights into the topic of discussion.
  • Critical analysis somewhat developed with some identifications of pros and cons and the impact/implications of both to the issue at hand.
  • Some professionalism and creativity shown in the quality of presentation with work that is somewhat neat and tidy with some coherent flows of arguments.
Poor / Little / Partial 
  • Relevant issues consistently identified / discussed / analyzed to an inconsistent standard with poor explanations / rationale/ justification. Many inconsistencies detected.
  • Little evidence of wider reading with relevant citations used providing little insights into the topic of discussion.
  • Critical analysis poorly developed with little or no identifications of pros and cons and the impact/implications of both to the issue at hand.
  • Little professionalism and creativity shown in the quality of presentation with work that is NOT neat and tidy with incoherent flows of arguments.
 
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"