Investigator A claims that his results are statistically significant at the 10% level
Investigator A claims that his results are statistically significant at the 10% level. Investigator B argues that significance should be announced only if the results are statistically significant at the 5% level. From this we can conclude that
options:
A)
it will be more difficult for investigator A to reject statistical null hypotheses if he always works at the 10% level compared with investigator B who works at the 5% level.
B)
if investigator A has significant results at the 10% level, they will also be significant at the 5% level.
C)
it will be less difficult for investigator A to reject statistical null hypotheses if he always works at the 10% level compared with investigator B who works at the 5% level.
D)
if investigator A has significant results at the 10% level, they will never be significant at the 5% level