You are a judge and are required to rule on two motions: A) Evidence is being offered into evidence without a complete paper chain of custody. A motion to suppress the evidence for lack of a proper chain of custody has been made by the defendant.
You are a judge and are required to rule on two motions: A) Evidence
is being offered into evidence without a complete paper chain of custody. A motion to suppress the evidence for lack of a proper chain of custody has been made by the defendant. What would consider in making your motion and how would you rule?
B) An expert DNA analyst is being offered to testify about an old case that the analyst did not conduct any personal analysis on. The analysis was conducted 5 years ago by a deceased analyst, the analyst being offered to testify had no interaction with this case other than looking at the file prior to testifying. A motion to suppress the expert testimony has been made by the defendant. What would you consider in making your motion and how would you rule? This case may help with you analysis: Wilson v. State – Absent serologist but serology report admitted into evidence
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Coupon Code "Newclient"
